Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays over the amistad
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Amistad is about a mutiny in 1839 aboard a slave ship, La Amistad, which eventually comes to port in New England. The West Africans who have commandeered the ship are taken into custody and the plot revolves around who "owns" them or if, indeed, they should be freed. This sets up the main event of the film, a courtroom drama about rights and origins, with the required flashbacks to the voyage and the gruesome conditions aboard the ship. The problem with this approach is that we learn less about the real conditions of slavery and instead focus on the more sanitized conditions surrounding the courtroom. In addition, we get a film which is largely about the efforts of the whites battling the case and much less about the struggles of the Africans themselves.
There are too many strands in the film which lead to no-where. At one point Cinque makes an interesting point of international law that might help the case. While the legal minds are inspired by his insight and initiative, the idea is quickly dismissed as unworkable and he plays almost no role in designing the case which might lead to his freedom. The events on the slave ship are even more scattered. Cinque is involved in a brief eye-contact relationship with a young woman but there is no development to give it emotional power. The women's ensuing death is as shocking as it is unexpected and while it works as a good visual, her undeveloped role as a real person results in the loss of any deeper meaning. Furthermore, the Amistad case is portrayed as a spark that helped ignite the Civil War, but the movie does not go into greater detail. It simply flashes ahead and shows that the Civil War had begun.
Also, the fact that few strong personal bonds develop between the principal characters to give the story the emotional force that it needs hurts the dramatic level of the film. There is an obvious connection between the Africans' leader, Cinque, and the young lawyer working for his release. However, the strength of this budding relationship is unconvincing. Moreover, it is seriously disrupted when control of the defense team is taken over by the aging ex-president, John Quincy Adams.
Furthermore, the movie lacked depth in the Supreme Courtroom. In Washington, only one side of the case is presented: that of the Amistad captives.
...es such as Georgia to deny blacks their civil rights as well as federal protection. Wexler reveals the shameful standards of the investigation which was simply a cover up from beginning to end. There is also some feeling with regards to the racism and hatred of the white townspeople who almost thought that the blacks actually deserved their terrible fate.
The main characters in the film include Sebastian and Costa, who happen to be lifelong friends. Sebastian is a compulsive visionary who strives to direct controversial a film about one of history’s most influential figures, Christopher Columbus. He is determined to escalate the “myth” that western civilization's arrival in the Americas was a force for good. Instead, his story is about what Columbus set in motion; the hunt for gold, captivity of, and penal violence to those Indians who fought back. His story is counteracted by the radical priests Bartolome de las Casas and Antonio de Montesinos, the first people to ra...
There are three things in the article that is very compelling to me as a reader, the living conditions of the slaves in the ships, the rape the women faced, and the punishment styles the rebellious slaves had to endure. What they endured was almost like hell on earth, it was almost genocide, but without the intention of genocide.
Amistad, fact or fiction, that is the question at hand. As trying to find out what in the movie Amistad, and trying to figure out what had actually happened. The Amistad was a slave ship that had got slaves from Cuba. Some of the slaves that had got on that ship, were brought to Cuba by the Tecora, and one of those slaves being Joseph Cinque.
First we will look at fate. The definition of fate is a force or power that predetermines events or an inevitable events predestined by force. I believe that Oedipus’ fate in life was sealed for him to be exiled and alone in the end before he was even born. His father, Laius was told that he “was fated to die by the hand of his son to be born to him…as for the son – three days after his birth … Laius had him cast away on the pathless mountains”. Laius’ descendants were cursed because of his actions to another. Laius did not believe he had a son or living child to carry out this telling. So he went about his life without worry believing that the one child he had brought into this world was gone. Oedipus was this unknown child that did not know he was that child either. He believed he was that of another. Forces were at work without any control.
I have watched the “Amistad” directed by Steven Spielberg, written by David Franzoni, presented by Morgan Freeman, Nigel Hawthorne, Anthony Hopkins, Djimon Hounsou, Mathew McConaughey, David Paymer, Pete Postlethwaite, and Stellan Skarsgard. It was rented from Hollywood Video to complete the assignment.
While Oedipus may have tried everything he thought he could do to avoid his fate, it seems like the more he fought against his fate the faster these prophecies were revealed as true. It makes the reader wonder, had the character not known his/her fate ahead of time would it still have occurred? Fate vs. Freewill can be used to develop an engaging and interactive plot that allows the reader to develop their own interpretations. This archetype is used in a wide variety of stories and was deeply embedded in ancient culture. Many believed that upon birth your destiny was decided by the fates. After the day your fate is written you can get no more or no less out of life than is fated to you. The effect this had on civilization was massive as many believed freewill ultimately did not matter because you were fated to make those choices and live through those given
Sophocles explores the role of fate in his reputable play, Oedipus the King, as an unseen power that controls the lives of the characters. He depicts fate as a force against free will. Although some may disagree, saying that one chooses their own fate or that one’s fate is only determined by the choices they make, it is hard to argue over something we have very little or zero control over, that being, fate. In the story, Jocasta and Laius, a queen and King from ancient Greece, found out they were going to have a son. But they did not know from the moment Jocasta became pregnant, fate had already decided what was to happen to him. Before he was even born, Oedipus was destined to kill his father and marry his own mother. Despite his parent’s attempt to kill him as a baby and Oedipus himself running from his fate, the result remained unchanged. Fate used everybody and made them all play a part in the tragedy. Even without the actions of Oedipus’ parents, Tiresias, and the gods, Oedipus still would have killed his father and married his mother. Although the blame from the tragedy of Oedipus could fall on many different people, ultimately fate is at fa...
Destined to marry his mother and murder his father, Oedipus was partly guided by fate. This prophecy, as warned by the Oracle of Apollo at Delphi, was absolute and would inevitably come to pass. As for free will, Oedipus’ actions, temper, impulsive nature and pride (hubris) as well as his erroneous judgment (hamartia) all contributed to his eventual downfall.
As predicted from the Oracle, Oedipus fate will be to kill his own father and marry his mother, he discovers that he has already fulfilled his fate by his insistent in knowing the truth. Oedipus is given a series of choice in discovering his identity or leaving it to up to fate throughout the play. His egotistical and persistent nature lead him to thoughtlessly make the incorrect decisions, consequently, it is Oedipus’s burden that the tragedy is revealed, not the responsibility of fate. In the mean well Oedipus and those close to him consider “fate” the main reason of Oedipus downfall. To the audience it shows something totally different, Oedipus is ultimately responsible for his tragedy. Possibly the most evident reason Oedipus is accountable is that by the end of the play Oedipus has taken responsibility for his actions. Oedipus states, "Now loathed by the gods, son of the mother I defiled coupling in my fathers bed, spawning lives in the loins that spawned my wretched life. What grief can crown this grief? It's mine alone, my destiny-I am Oedipus!" (Sophocles 1492). Oedipus obviously sta...
These four dramas did not operate in isolation, of course, but understanding the dynamics of each paints a more complete picture of how the trade was able to flourish for almost 400 years and how it finally was able to be stopped. Rediker's thesis spoke about the four dramas that were played out on the ships by “the ship captain, the motley crew, the multi-ethnic enslaved, and towards the end of the period, middle-class abolitionists” (6). These smaller stories within one set setting is what makes this book and its intent so brilliant. We hear tragic incidents such as “they died from starvation” or “they got separated from their family” and that’s it; that’s where most people stop at. Rediker forces the reader to acknowledge the depth in these
One event that directly led Oedipus to his fate was at the crossroads where Oedipus killed his biological father unknowingly. If Oedipus has acted wiser when King Laius struck him to move out of the road, Oedipus may have successfully avoided his fate. Oedipus also could have avoided marrying his mother, if he never went to Thebes or defeated the Sphinx by answering the Sphinx’s riddle correctly. Oedipus did have the ability to refuse to take the place of King Laius, he also had the ability to discontinue his investigation of King Laius’ death, however in his own free will Oedipus choose to continue his investigation by dig deeper to the root of his existence. While Oedipus’ personality ensures his fate to become reality, Jocasta and Laius also assisted Oedipus ' destiny to become reality. If Laius never struck Oedipus to move out of the road, King Laius may have returned safely to his queen and avoided his fate of being killed by his own son, and for Jocasta, she could have simply refused to marry someone half her age. After discovering his identity, Oedipus didn’t blame anyone for his misfortune not his parents, the servant that saved him as a baby or even the Oracle but himself. He chose to accept the consequences of his action, as he
Oedipus was born with an unfortunate fate, which ultimately lead to his downfall. Despite his destiny, Oedipus attempts to change his fate, which is shown in the first act:
Job Redesign, which affects companies and workers more positively than negatively, composes of Job Rotation, Job Enlargement, Job Enrichment, Flextime, Job Sharing, and Telecommuting. rganizing these components well, companies can get multiple benefits, such as increasing employees’ motivation and satisfaction, reducing absenteeism and turnover costs, and expanding productivities. The textbook Organization Behavior says that Job Rotation, is that “The periodic shifting of an employee from one task to another”(215). Consequently, employees can escape from boredom and also increases motivation. Job Enlargement defines that “Increasing the number and variety of tasks that an individual performances result in jobs with more diversity”(217). For example, housekeepers in some small hotels manage various tasks, like cleaning bathroom, making beds, and preparing meals. These works helps to increase their responsibility and duties. Job Enrichment is that “…increasing the degree to which the worker controls the planning, execution, and evaluation of his or her work”(217). Flextime is flexible work hours. Employees can schedule their work hours, in which they are more productive. In addition, it has some degree of freedom that they can freely come to work and leave. Job sharing is that “An agreement that allows two or more individuals to spilt [their work hours]”(219). It allows workers to have good balances between works and family responsibilities. As a result, employees can satisfy their work and life. Furthermore, their satisfactions increase companies’ productivity. Telecommuting allows employees to work at home at least two days a week through a computer (219). It gives employees flexibility and also it affects toward companies in a good way, like decreasing office-space costs.
In Oedipus Rex, fate is something that unavoidably befalls two characters. The gods decide Oedipus and Jocasta’s fate even before they know it. Trying to avoid destiny is pointless because no matter what, it will catch up to you where ever you are. It is often thought that you can change your destiny, but in reality our fate was put into action the day we were born.