Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Internet addiction and its effects
In person communication vs electronic
Internet addiction and its effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Internet addiction and its effects
Americans’ Overdependence on the Internet
Americans’ over-dependence on the internet is causing more harm than good. Technological advancement, coupled with our easy access to virtual life through computers, cell phones, iPods among others has introduced us into a new era of extreme livelihood and lifestyle; we have gradually expanded internet use to do most of our activities of daily living for us. This growing trend in internet obsession has led to increase in online sexual predators, social withdrawal, Internet fraud and health issues. This social stigma if left unchanged will lead to further deterioration in our emotional, physical and social wellbeing. This paper will take the position that our overly use of the Internet has caused more harm than good.
One researcher noted in his journal in 2001 that, “In recent years, there has been concern about the social impact of the Internet on several levels. One major worry was that use of the Internet would prompt people to withdraw from social engagement and become isolated, depressed, and alienated. A related fear was that Internet users might abandon contact with their local communities as they discovered how easy it is to go online to communicate with those in other parts of the world and get information from every point on the planet.” This prediction has partly if not in whole come to pass. With the average American spending roughly five and a half hours a day on social networking sites, (Nielson Mar. 19 2010) it’s become harder for people to make time for community associations. More people tend to derive more satisfaction from online acquaintances than face to face interactions. This growing phenomenon has worn our communal spirit to the barest mi...
... middle of paper ...
...ristotle once not, “we are social animals.” Even though I have friends that I communicate with on social networking sites from time to time, they are not reasons for me to detach from my family and friends who will be physically present to support me during hard times. Our local communities play a significant role in the nurturing process and it is very unfortunate that people don’t realize the threat Internet poses on our communal bonding.
So, what is the way forward? At this point, government censorship is extremely necessary to penetrate this social dilemma and initiate steps that can facilitate safe surfing. Even though the Internet has become indispensable in our lives, its excessive use has led to some serious detrimental effects on the society and it is about time we worked together as a nation to bring this stigma under control.
The internet is used today for many reasons. It is a platform for people to stay in touch with others, entertain themselves and complete work tasks. In the following articles, “Internet Addiction Left my Brother Homeless” by Winston Ross and “The Pointlessness of Unplugging” by Casey N. Cep, the internet is discussed very deeply, but in two varying lights. In the article by Cep the author is writing from personal experiences and research. In the article by Ross the author is writing merely from opinions.
Currently, there are numerous issues about a lot of man-made activities. One of the most controversial man made objects that people talk about is the Internet. The spectrum of available content is steadily increasing and some members of society are agreeing that some of the content is hazardous, as it is delivered in an explicit manner. This content is also not in agreement with some of societies morals. There are multiple research studies that show how the Internet negatively affects humans in society emotionally and socially, educationally, medically and morally.
Tears begin to fall down a child’s face. Her body goes into shock out of fear. Her mother warned her about watching inappropriate content, and there it was, right on her computer screen. This could not have happened though. All she was doing was casually browsing the internet before a pop-up appeared. Although it may seem hard to believe, the major cause of events such as this is the lack of censorship on the internet. Internet censorship relates to the removal of offensive, inappropriate, or controversial content published online. The current problem with the internet is that there are few restrictions on what can be published or viewed. Several sites on the internet only offer a warning about inappropriate content that can easily be bypassed by agreeing to the terms. Other websites provide access to private or military information. More dreadfully, however, are websites that use their explicit content as a promotion. These factors bring the conclusion that anybody of any given age can view and publish inappropriate or dangerous content. The current problems with the internet serve for clarification as to why the United States should create a nonpartisan assembly to censor the internet in order to protect its citizens from the mental, emotional, and physical harms the internet creates.
In her article “Friends Indeed?” Joel Garreau explains that for two decades, online social networks have been touted as one of the finest flowerings of our new era. But what is the strength of ties so weak as to barely exist? Who will lend you lunch money? Who’s got your back?” Technology has overtaken individuals by social media, allowing many people to communicate online rather than having face-to-face communication. Many “relationships” begin online, and end online. Although, true relationships are rarely created fast, it gradually grows and becomes stronger and stronger over the years. However, in our immediate society this is not the case. But the questions still remains, as Joel Garreau points out “Who would lend you lunch money?” in other words, who will help you physically not online. In our impatient society, technologies influenced the way individual communicate, and that often times leads to depression, loneliness and addictions.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., & Kiesler, S. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?. American Psychologist, 59. Retrieved April 1, 2014, from http://vb3lk7eb4t.scholar.serialssolutions.com/?sid=google&auinit=R&aulast=Kraut&atitle=Internet+paradox:+A+social+technology+that+reduces+social+involvement+and+psychological+well-being%3F&id=doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017&title=American+psychologist&volume=53&issue=9&date=1998&spage=1017&issn=0003-066X
The use of different social media platforms creates the illusion of human adaptation while in fact it has far reaching effects such as addiction (Bargh 582). The use of social media over an extended period may become addictive making people lose the sense of physical interaction thereby affecting their connection with their close ones and themselves. As indicated by Shapin (211), individuals in the older societies isolated themselves to find time to contemplate and grow while in the modern society, isolation may be as a result of self-love and the imaginary benefits people attach to online socialization. Psychology Today clearly indicates that the human nature has a characteristic of always seeking to be in a supportive structure in everyday life. Even though social media may have some effects on social change in an individual, it does not always lead to meaningful relationships (Engelberg 2). Social media’s virtual integration and lack of significant relations is a clear indicator of a deep underlying sense of
In the essay, “Isolated by the Internet” by Clifford Stoll, we read about the negative social impacts the Internet has on an individual. He supports his claim that “Internet use can have serious negative long-term social effects” with studies by two psychologists. They have come to realize that the social ties between people on the internet is not nearly as strong as the ties they develop in person. Face to face interaction is more effective than screen to screen interaction. The ties that people develop amongst others can also be dangerous. For example, some interaction on the internet can be lead to destructive situations; such as catfishing, cyber bulling, and credit card fraud. Loneliness and depression are another effect that the Internet
The invention of the internet has been one of the major advances of the modern world. It has allowed people from all over the globe to communicate with each other and ideas to be shared. In addition to this it is a free platform. Unlike television and radio it doesn’t cost anything to put your idea on the internet, making it a base of personal expression. This freedom coupled with the global access attracts around a billion users worldwide. Unfortunately, just as easily as the information is produced it is abused. The internet, although mostly used appropriately does harbour all manner of illegal activities. These range from phishing scams, trying to steal someone’s personal details, viruses, malicious code that attacks a person’s computer and websites that are morally questionable or illegal under Australian law. To combat this, the Rudd government has started action to impose an internet service provider level internet filter. An internet service provider is any company that provides internet services to its customers. Most notable of these is Telstra which is one of the top internet service providers in Australia. This filter will prevent a list of websites, the blacklist, from being accessed in Australia. In theory this is an excellent plan, but in reality, once implemented it will have little effect on preventing the illegal activity which occurs on the internet. The major arguments against the proposed filter are, cost of the filter, the ineffectiveness of the filter to stop illegal activity and the possibility of the blacklist expanding to block anti-government websites.
Various electronics are frequently used to go on pointless websites, such as Twitter and Facebook, which ruin society’s social abilities. More and more people use social media on the internet as a communication source. This does not apply merely to kids and teens, but adults as well. Using these sorts of websites as a way of communicating causes many individuals’ social skills to decrease. A plethora of children and teens would rather stay inside and interact with their friends through the internet than go hang out with them. Before technology people were not afraid to go up to a random person and talk to them. Now many friendships form through the internet and these friendships are not genuine. When these “friends” meet in person, they find nothing to talk about. For example, I remember after watching Perks of being a Wallflower, a movie taking place in the early nineties, my friends and I discussed how all the characters communicated in person and during hanging out they played games and talked. Now...
Internet is a powerful tool that allows users to collaborate and interact with others all over the world conveniently and relatively safely. It has allowed education and trade to be accessed easily and quickly, but all these benefits do not come without very taxing costs. This is especially true when dealing with the likes of the Internet. Countries in the European Union and Asia have realized this and have taken action against the threat of net neutrality to protect their citizens, even at the cost of online privacy. Internet censorship is required to protect us from our opinions and vices. Every country should adopt Internet censorship and regulation since it improves society by reducing pornography, racism/prejudice, and online identity theft.
Since its availability to consumers in the 90’s the internet has forever changed the way one can communicate with others. With improvements in technology and an increase of emerging countries the accessibility of the internet will only increase with time. Such a possibility is fraught with problems, problems that were later brought to light by the September 11 attacks. With widespread internet usage the means to do harm increases and for some that vulnerability warrants the censoring of internet material that will aid criminals/terrorists. Internet censorship is not a viable option for any government to partake in. In censoring the internet the government infringes on their citizen’s basic human rights, it would become a costly endeavour, and it’s a lost cause.
Social media is used by many people, young and old around the world as a way to communicate. Our lives have become so busy that it is difficult to maintain family and social relationships. “They use social networking sites including Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc. On these sites users create profiles, communicate with friends and strangers, do research and share thoughts, photos, music, links and more” (Social Networking). With the use of social media you can be friends with all sorts of people without actually seeing or knowing them. “In many ways, social communities are the virtual equivalent of meeting at the general store or at church socials to exchange news and get updated on friends and families” (Cosmato).
Technology has more negative effects on today’s society than positive. Due to technology in the past few decades Canine Shock Collars have been increasingly popular. Students in school pay more attention to texting than they do their classes. Violent addictive video games have made their way into American homes. Parents encourage their children to not text as much, but them to face the problem of constant communication. The Internet gives the students easier ways to cheat in school, and reinforces laziness. Internet Porn gives every bored male a chance to look at the seediest film in the comfort of his own home. Technology has taken the innocence and mystery away from the American family.
People who are constantly using their phones and gadgets to access social media are losing their human instinct to interconnect with the outside world. Almeida states, “The universal concern over social standings put many unnecessary distortions on interactions and outings.” Mostly everyone in this generation uses technology since it is an everlasting advancing civilization, in technology that is; furthermore, it is making our civilization rely more on technology rather than relying on others or own well-being. Almeida says, “Again, almost nobody, myself included, is exempt from this group that uses social media.” The populace of the world uses technology and these so-called friendships people have online are not really friendships. People are communicating, but are not really gaining an acquaintance because no one knows who that person really is behind the mask. Almeida also states, “seldom exist in actuality.” Due to hyper-connectivity, the human civilization that highly revolved around communication and acquaintances, are no longer forming friendships the way previous generations have done. Despite that most of society is all akin somehow through the nodes of the social media, not all are considered friends since the people may not even know each other; in fact, many might not even know who they themselves really
This online article was useful for my research because it showed how over use of technology impact on people. This article also gives background information on internet addiction and internet dependence. The source is one of the best sources used in my research due to the fact that it had some of the basic information about the harmful effect of becoming so much dependent on technology.