Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial discrimination in the 1920s
Racial discrimination in the 1920s
Racial discrimination in the 1920s
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racial discrimination in the 1920s
The first collection of the textbook revolved around relating and interacting with other people, and is inspired by Barbara Jordan’s quote, “We, as human beings, must be willing to accept people who are different from ourselves.” All of these texts involve people not treating others the way they would like to be treated, essentially breaking the golden rule, whether it by discrimination, disagreement with opinions, and going by tradition even if you’re going to hurt someone in doing so. To begin with, in American Flag Stands for Tolerance, Ronald J. Allen talks about the release and dropping of charges of Gregory Lee Johnson, a man who burned an American flag during a government protest in 1984. The newspaper editorial supports the Supreme …show more content…
Court’s decision to let Johnson off, due to the fact that Johnson was protected under the First Amendment right to freedom of speech. However, what the text does not speak about is how Johnson was treated. The question is, should Johnson have been arrested at all? The police force on duty at the 1984 Republican National Convention restrained Johnson, kicking and screaming, as shown in the picture accompanying the text. They arrested, jailed, and fined Johnson because they disagreed with his opinion that burning the flag was necessary to the protest. He was different from the police officers in that he believed his actions were protected under the Constitution, they didn’t believe that, and intervened. Therefore, it makes sense that Gregory Lee Johnson was treated differently than the other protestors because the police didn’t agree with his beliefs and actions. Furthermore, Barbara Jordan’s quote applies quite a lot to the main plot of To Kill a Mockingbird.
In this story, a white lawyer in 1930s Alabama must defend an African-American man accused of raping a white woman. At first, the black man’s case doesn’t seem to stand a chance against the word of a white woman. However, as the trial goes on, it appears that Tom Robinson, the defendant, has solid evidence that he is innocent. But at the end of the trial, Tom Robinson is found guilty of a crime he did not commit, simply because of the fact that he is black. The blatant racial discrimination expressed by the jury is shocking, but unfortunately not at all unexpected. Every single trial that involved a white person against a black person in that time period was ruled in favor of the white person. It is obvious that even though the events of the novel are fictional, they are extremely realistic, and the quote by Barbara Jordan ties directly into the novel To Kill a …show more content…
Mockingbird. In addition, Barbara Jordan’s quote applies to the short story, The Lottery, in the sense that everybody in the village where the plot takes place conforms to a sadistic tradition even though someone is killed every year because of it.
On lottery day, everybody politely and cheerfully converses with one another, making jokes and laughing. But when it’s time for everyone to open the slip of paper they drew from the old box, things definitely take a dark turn. The head of household that draws the one paper with a black dot on it must make the other members of their family draw a slip. The family member that draws the second dotted slip is stoned to death as a sacrifice to help ensure a good harvest, whether that person is a toddler or an elderly man or woman. One of the sickest parts of the whole ordeal happened after Tessie Hutchinson drew the paper that sealed her fate: one of the villagers handed Tessie’s young son Davy a stone to throw at his own mother. The people that had been casually speaking with Tessie just minutes beforehand are now taking her life, solely because they believe it will make the fall harvest plentiful. There isn’t discrimination in this text as much as there is conformity. The people of the village are ready and willing to stone someone to death because tradition has told them that it was a good thing, so they follow through with it, even though they’re committing murder. Everybody has their traditions that other may find weird, but brutally killing
someone once a year is probably taking it a few steps too far. People that “win” the lottery may not be treated any differently than the next guy but on lottery day, all bets are off. Ultimately, Barbara Jordan’s quote, “We, as human beings, must be able to accept people who are different from ourselves,” applies to every text in Collection 1 in several ways. However, these applications stand out in American Flag Stands for Tolerance, To Kill a Mockingbird, and The Lottery the most. In the first text, Gregory Lee Johnson was treated differently than the other protestors because he did something the police didn't agree with. In the second text, a black man is convicted of committing a crime that he never did, simply because he was black. In the third text, an entire village suddenly turns and murders a woman who “won the lottery” so they can keep an old tradition alive. The authors of the three texts all seem to agree that people should not be treated differently than others simply because of their opinions, race, traditions, or anything at all. These texts that were part of Collection 1 can really teach people some things about how you should and should not interact with others.
The purpose of this essay is to compare three very similar cases, the Scottsboro Trials, Brown v. Mississippi, and the fictional trial of Tom Robinson in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird; and to prove why the defendant of the third trial never had a chance. Each took place in the rural South in the 1920’s and 30’s and involved the unfair conviction of young black males by all-white juries pressured by the threat of mob violence. Each lacked the evidence sufficient for conviction, most especially for the death penalty. Last, heroes emerged from each trial and made small but solid steps towards equal justice for all.
In John McCain’s essay “Veterans Day: Never forget their duty” he talks about his friend ,Mike, who was in the same prison camp as he was in and showed the pride that he and his fellow prisoners had for their flag. The American Flag is the most iconic symbol of America and to express pride for The American Flag is to show pride in America itself. On page 7 paragraph 8 “Every afternoon, before we had a bowl of soup, we would hang MIke’s shirt on the wall of our cell and say the Pledge of Allegiance. I know that saying the Pledge of Allegiance may not seem the most important or meaningful part of our day now, but I can assure you that for those men in that stark prison cell, it was, indeed, the most important and meaningful event of our day”. John McCain shares with us that the most important part of their day was to say the Pledge of Allegiance.
On March 25 1931 a group of nine boys were charged with raping two girls aboard a train traveling from Paint Rock Alabama across the state’s border. The trial of these boys had become collectively known as the Scottsboro case. Several years later Harper Lee wrote her famous novel To Kill a Mockingbird. In this story a young male Tom Robinson is charged with raping a white female. It is by understanding the parallel between Tom Robinson’s case in To Kill a Mockingbird and the Scottsboro case that can be understood that a fair trial was unlikely and that because of Tom Robinson’s race he was presumed guilty before his trial.
Gaines’ novel is centered on a massive injustice, which is a young man who is falsely convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death by electrocution. When Jefferson was brought into a trial for the murders of the three white men in the bar, most of the jury quickly assumed that he was guilty due to his skin color, because, at that time, the assumption of innocence does not
Screaming, yelling, and screeching emerge from Tessi Hutchinson, but the town remains hushed as they continue to cast their stones. Reasonably Tessi appears as the victim, but the definite victim is the town. This town, populated by rational people, stones an innocent woman because of a lottery. To make matters worse, no one in the town fathoms why they exterminate a guiltless citizen every June. The town’s inexplicable behavior derives from following an ancient, ludicrous tradition. With the omission of one man, no one in the community comprehends the tradition. In the case of “The Lottery,” the town slays an irreproachable victim each year because of a ritual. Shirley Jackson exposes the dangers of aimlessly following a tradition in “The Lottery.” Jackson not only questions the problem, but through thorough evaluation she an deciphers the problem as well.
One's identity is a very valuable part of their life, it affects the Day to day treatment others give them which can lead to how the individual feels emotionally. Atticus, defending Tom Robinson, who is an african american man from the plaintiff of the case, Mayella Ewell, who is a caucasian woman, accusing that Tom raped her is supposivly a lob sided case. During the great depression, any court session that contained a person of color against a caucasian would always contain the “white” individual winning the case. The cause of the bias outcome comes from the lawyer of the african american does not try to defend or the jury goes against the person of color simply because their black, this shows the effect of racism to anyone’s identity in the courtroom for a case simply because of race. Atticus, deciding to take Tom Robinson’s case seriously sacrifices his identity as the noble man he is, to being called many names for this action, such as “nigger lover”. He is questioned by
Tom Robinson, the African American, was a man of innocence who was accused of rape, a crime that he did not commit. If the jury had realized that they were treating Tom unequally and unfairly the verdict and outcome of the trial would be utterly different. In the trials of Tom Robinson and OJ Simpson, the amendment of the bill of rights seemed to be only considered for OJ. These two trials demonstrate how race, social status, and money have an effect on the current law system of the United
One of the major events in Harper Lee’s award-winning novel To Kill a Mockingbird is Tom Robinson’s trial. It is based on the Scottsboro Case that took place in 1931 in Alabama, in which several black men were accused of raping two white women. Both the Scottsboro Boys and Tom Robinson are unfairly judged, however, because of prejudice against colored people. The racial discrimination makes whites’ testimony more believable even when it contradicts itself. The same happens in To Kill a Mockingbird. As we delve deeper into the case and get increasingly closer to the truth, it is quite suprising to see that Mayella Ewell is the true villain rather than a victim. She shall and must bear full responsibility for her actions because she makes the decision to tempt Tom Robinson, gives false testimony in court that directly leads to Tom’s death, and has been well aware of the consequences of her behaviors.
Tom Robinson is at the stand being questioned by Mr. Gilmer. Dill starts to feel sick because of how Mr. Gilmer is treating Tom. The narrator explains, “Well, Dill,after all he is just a negro” (Lee 266).This piece of evidence shows that prejudice is used as an antagonist in the novel by giving an unfair trial to Tom Robinson. The quote states “he is just a negro,” which shows that the trial is unfair just because of the towns racial views on people of color. The jury is all white and the case is black versus white. The jury is very biased towards the case. The prosecuting lawyers and defending lawyer are giving their closing statements. Atticus ends with a powerful speech that prove Tom is innocent and his views on race. The jury thinks over all the evidence for a long time and come to a verdict. The author of To Kill A Mockingbird quotes, “Guilty...Guilty...Guilty...Guilty…” (Lee 282). This quote shows the jury is very prejudice. There is more than enough evidence to prove Tom did not rape Mayella and that Bob Ewell beat her. Even though there is enough evidence to proves Tom’s innocence the jury’s verdict is guilty just because of their hate and their prejudice towards African Americans. Ultimately, prejudice is being used as an antagonist is very thoroughly shown throughout the entirety of the
The Scottsboro Trial and the trial of Tom Robinson are almost identical in the forms of bias shown and the accusers that were persecuted. The bias is obvious and is shown throughout both cases, which took place in the same time period. Common parallels are seen through the time period that both trials have taken place in and those who were persecuted and why they were persecuted in the first place. The thought of "All blacks were liars, and all blacks are wrongdoers," was a major part of all of these trails. A white person's word was automatically the truth when it was held up to the credibility of someone whom was black. Both trials were perfect examples of how the people of Alabama were above the law and could do whatever they wanted to the black people and get away with it. In both trials lynch mobs were formed to threaten the black people who were accused. Judge Hornton tried many times to move the case to a different place so that a fair trial could take place and not be interrupted by the racist people. Finally was granted to move the case even though the lynch mobs threatened to kill everyone who was involved in the case if it were to be moved. In this essay the bias and racism in both trials are going to be clarified and compared to each other.
In Harper Lee’s fictional novel To Kill A Mockingbird, an African American field hand is falsely accused of raping a white women. Set in the 1930’s in the small town of Monroeville Alabama, Addicus Finch an even handed white attorney tries to shed a light on the injustice of this innocent black man’s conviction. Atticus feels that the justice system should be color blind, and he defends Tom as an innocent man, not a man of color.
The town's citizens are eager, gathering in the town square in order to take part in the yearly lottery. With the story focused around one particular family, the Hutchinsons, who are so anxious to get it all over with until they find that one of their members is to participate in the lottery's closing festivities, Tessie. Of course, unlike your typical lotteries, this is not one that you would want to win. The one chosen from the lottery is to undertake a cruel and unusual death by stoning at the hands of their fellow townsmen for the sake that it may bring a fruitful crop for the coming harvest season. Ironically, many of the towns people have suggested that the lottery be put to an end, but most find the idea unheard of being that they have lived in it's practice for most of their lives.
The townspeople seem to have mixed emotions about the lottery; they fear it yet on a very barbaric level they enjoy it. By standing "away from the pile of stones," and keeping their distance from the black box, the villagers show their fear of the lottery (Jackson 863). However, once they find out who is going to be stoned, Tessie Hutchinson, they seem to actually enjoy the stoning. One villager picks up a stone so big she can barely carry it; someone even gives Tessie’s youngest son a few pebbles to throw at his mother. Their overall attitude about the stoning is summed up by the phrase "and then they were...
In an agriculture-dominant village, the lottery is practiced as the annual tradition. The “fortunate” lottery winner will be stoned to death by the town after a few rounds of drawing lots. Such flabbergasted ritual is seen as a norm in that village and the villagers even feel excited over this cruel occasion due to the mob psychology of people. The villagers abandon their rationale in demonstrating violence towards the innocent “winner”. When Tessie draws the winner piece, everyone in the village straight up turns on her with stones and pebbles including Mrs. Delacroix, her
These characters are not cognizant of the idea that what they are enacting every year is basically murder. They show this ignorance through a very pedestrian exchange between Mrs. Hutchinson and Mrs. Delacroix, “Clean forgot what day it was… thought my old man was out back stacking wood,” Mrs. Hutchinson went on, “and then I looked out the window…and came a-running” (141-42). This short conversation has the essence of an ordinary, every-day chit-chat between two women but in reality Hutchinson forgets that the lottery is about to start. Since the villagers do not know any different, they react to the lottery this way because they have no idea what it is to live without this ritual. Sadly, this society’s way of thinking is a fetter to them. Villagers who realize how despicable the practice really is are the ones chosen to be stoned, “It isn’t fair, it isn’t right,”Mrs. Hutchinson screamed and then they were upon her” (146). This a reaction that is purely human and is written into the story to show how surmountable it is to break the meaning of the tradition in one person. Then the villagers who have not been chosen in the lottery have no knowledge of what it feels to see your imminent death in the form of rocks. In addition, Jackson chooses the events in her to prove a point about