Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religion and movie sociology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The People of Hadleyville and Big Whiskey The people of Hadleyville and those of Big Whiskey are compared and contrasted in the following essay and the main issue of civilization between these two towns is brought out. The town people of Hadleyville are connected with crime as shown by the character of Frank Miller who is regarded as a criminal. He is a gang leader and he was committed to be hanged. As a result, he vows to revenge to the town marshal Will Kane. On the other hand, the townspeople of Big Whiskey are regarded as calm and quiet who lead their lives normally without being involved into crime (Foster 94). Another characteristic of the people of Hadleyville is that they are revengeful just as Frank Miller had vowed to revenge against Will …show more content…
The fight that erupts leads to the death of Frank. The people of Hadleyville are termed as cowards and frightened as they leave Will to confront Frank alone instead, they encourage him to leave the town to avoid him. Nevertheless, they are having strong beliefs towards God as depicted by mentioning of the many churches in the town. While Christianity and observation of good morals is observed in the town of Hadleyville, the people of Big Whiskey exercise some immorality as shown by the mentioning of prostitution in this town (Foster 94). Determination and brevity is shown by some of the people of Hadleyville for example Will Kane who refuses to leave in fear of Frank who has been pardoned his mistake. Will maintains his position that he will stay in the town despite being told by many people to leave the town (Foster 94). Will Kane is the protagonist in the film. He represents the brave and righteous person who is willing to stand against transgression; he stands for the United States during the cold war while the townspeople represent the United Nations as the communism who is afraid to fight for righteousness (Foster
Horsmanden’s journal provides a wealth of information about eighteenth century New York if one is willing to analyze it critically and ignore the bias present in it. If one does this they catch fascinating glimpses of a divided world, one where people are partitioned by race, economic status, homeland and religion. A world filled with fear and suspicion caused by the tension inherent within such societal division. The same tensions that either gave rise to a massive conspiracy to destroy the town of New York or gave credence to a nightmare constructed by the minds of the people and fed by individuals’ self-serving nature. Regardless, eighteenth century New York was a troubled place and Horsmanden’s Journal of the Proceedings gives us a partial but valuable insight to the lives and interactions of colonial New York’s peoples.
The detailed account of the killers’ childhoods makes the reader sympathize with the Clutter family’s killers Smith and Hickock. Should they reserve the death penalty? Did Truman Capote take a stand on the death penalty? By giving the reader a detailed account of Perry Smith’s and Dick Hickock’s childhood, Capote sets up the reader for a nurture vs. nature debate on the death penalty. The question then becomes, do the effects (if any) caused by environment in childhood make for a trained killer or a natural born one?
In the novella of The Crucible by Arthur Miller vengeance is walking Salem in causing several conflicts throughout the Salem village. Many of the conflicts are due with getting back at one another with the need for revenge. “We are what we always were in Salem, but now the little crazy children are jangling keys of the kingdom, and common vengeance writes the law!” (Miller 81). This quote is trying to prove the point the proctor has a very good understanding of what is happening in how the little girls are rebelling and acting out. They are accusing several women of being witches. “Why, Abigail Williams charge her” (Miller 77). The quote is trying to show how many of the girls are calling out the wives in the Salem village.
Kathleen Norris uses small town society to illustrate a much larger phenomenon that occurs in America: The obstruction of truth in the name of progress and patriotism. Norris makes an example of a small Dakota town, the old families ingrained in local society who act as somewhat of a censorship committee, silently fixing the past's blunders and bad dreams so not to discourage themselves or the younger generation:
In the book In Cold Blood the people of Holcomb and other friends of the Clutter family are deeply affected by the murders. The people in the town perceive the Clutters as the family “least likely” in the world to be killed. Rejecting the idea that the killers were strangers, many of them become suspicious of everyone and anxious about their own safety in the company of their neighbors. According to Truman Capote, the author, it is the first time the community of this part of Kansas have had to undergo the “unique experience of distrusting each other” (page 88).
In Red Harvest, in both his description of both “Poisonville” and it’s inhabitants, Hammett uses contradicting language, and often iconic reoccurring imagery to express the deterioration of American morals with the growth of underground crime, judicial politics, and the emergence of the femme fatal. The characters in the novel, including the operative himself are willing to lie, cheat, and kill in cold blood for their own personal gain. Although infidelity, greed, and self-preservation are expected from characters involved with the murders and inner crime ring; the story becomes more complicated when characters like the operative, and chief of police begin to get their hands dirty. Bringing the age-old crime ad punishment theme to a higher tier where the reader is unable to make an impulsive decision on who is a “bad guy”, and who is a “good guy”.
“And even when we were no longer hungry, there was still no one who thought of revenge.” p. 109
Arthur Miller expresses the concept of oppression being present in every society through the characters of The Crucible. "It is still impossible for man to organize his social life without repressions." As discussed, personal motives, disputes and misuses of power, as well as distorted religious beliefs are the roots of the maltreatment in Salem. Miller’s statement and message is valid and applicable in every society, and for every
...ene illustrates. Through the process of developing Brady's character, Kramer questions whether it is possible for religion to exist in politics. Brady can't balance the two, as his ultimate collapse illustrates. Kramer also points out the detrimental, oppressive affect that a small town can have on the truth. The narrow mindedness of the town enabled Brady to take control and prevent any alternative point of view to be considered. Is it possible for a small town to equally consider both sides of an argument? Brady appears to the town as a very strong self-assured man who believes in his ideas. At the climax of the film, Drummond places Brady on the stand, and questions his ideas. This serves as a major theme for the film and as a result it becomes necessary to have a strong development of Brady's character, so that the viewer can better understand his fall.
exchanging greetings and bits of gossips. This scenario illustrates the inhabitants as friendly and kind to each other. However, the setting is also ironic, for it highlights the hypocrisy, brutality, and perhaps inherent evil of human nature of this town after centuries of supposed civilization.
The article discusses the need for these early Chicago saloons as a neighborhood commune for those men who labor long hours only to come home to poverty and despair of a desolate household. Melendy focuses on the mental, physiological, and moral nature of these workingmen. He points out that this saloon culture allows it’s patrons to develop these traits by interacting with their peers—others facing the same despair. These establishments are described as the “workingman’s school. He is both scholar and teacher” (Melendy pg. 78). Patrons gather at the bar, around tables and in the next room amongst games of pool, cards, and darts to discuss political and social problems, sporting news, and other neighborhood gossip. Here men, native and immigrant, exchange opinions and views of patriotism, brotherhood, and lessons in civil government. Melendy describes this atmosphere as cosmopolitan, and articulates that these businesses advertise this issue in their names. For example one of the downtown saloons was entitled “Everybody’s Exchange.” The saloon’s customers experienced a buffet of nationalities upon which was not so for those of poverty in previous decades. Saloons also served as disguises of corruption as Melendy illustrates by declaring “...
In Frethorne's letter home to his parents, he draws a revealing picture of the deteriorating relations between the English settlers and the Indians that is consistent with the history of Jamestown in the period between the two attacks on the colony by the Powhatan chief Openchancanough. Both attacks were in retaliation for specific incidents of murder and depredation on the part of the English, but were responses, more generally, to English expansion into native lands and the resulting erosion of native life ways. The writer's candor about his own experience is compelling. He used vivid details to describe his discontent, deprivation, and discomfort. The small specifics of daily life (quantities and kinds of food, items of clothing, catalogs of implements) and the data of survival and death (lists of deceased colonists, trade and barter statistics, numerical estimates of enemy Indians and their military strength, itemized accounts of provisions, and rations...
Charles was a greedy man. He was cold hearted and never philanthropic. This "Scrooge" was the CEO of a multi-million dollar stock company in New York City. Charles often told his employees that honesty is the key to success and that he would not tolerate liars. When approached by a potential client himself, he told the client that he would be sure to consult with him before making any major decisions. As soon he left the room, however, he transferred all of the man's stock to a different holder without asking the man's permission. As long as the outcome benefited him, dishonesty was acceptable. This man's hypocrisy parallels Arthur Miller's novel about the Salem witch trials. In The Crucible, the theme of hypocrisy plagues the pages and the three characters that exemplify this theme the most are Danforth, Paris, and Mary Warren.
“From the metropolis of Philadelphia, or rather from Norris Town to understanding the road passes over a reddish, and shelly, or slaty kind of property, throughout a very wide and mountainous countryside, acceptably well educated by the farmers. The farmhouses are good quality, and their Barns above poorness. The entire Road certainly from Philadelphia to Reading goes over undulating and busted grounds--but very pleasing despite.”
She creates these characters that are in a state of hubris (overbearing pride and a sense of invincibility towards fate) and therefore are ripe for catastrophe. She puts them in a moment of crisis in which their self-confidence is destroyed or they reevaluate their past lives. This method is emphasized through the main characters Joy and Grandmother; they both tried to use religion against their assailant as a means of escaping their doom. Joy who is an atheist begged the Bible salesman to return the wooden leg insisting that “you’re a Christian...you’re just like all of them…you’re a perfect Christian!” (Good Country 9), and Grandmother in her final moments begged the Misfit to pray and that he was fine people (A Good 384). These epiphanies involves the characters recognition that their “attackers” actions are a result of their hypocritical attitudes and hollow actions. They offer only lip service to spiritual concepts and then go back to their lives filled with materialistic gratification, not really concerned about the people that they affect. So the men refuse these gestures and their hypocrisy because the damage is already done and really they hold little worth to