Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Similes and metaphors
Ambrose bierce easy
Peyton farquhar character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Similes and metaphors
“An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” by Ambrose Bierce is a short story. The story begins with a man from the confederate states named Peyton Farquhar. It is broken down in three parts: Part one being about Peyton preparing to get executed on the bridge. Part two is about how Farquhar is a successful planter and wanted to help the confederates. He met with a soldier to talk about what he could do to help the south. It turns out the soldier was from the north. The last part takes place back in the present with Farquhar preparing to get hung. He imagines himself breaking free of the ropes and jumping in the water below while soldiers fired their guns at him. He escaped but quickly woke up to the reality of his dead body hanging from Owl Creek …show more content…
Bridge. The central idea of this story is that reality and illusion are sometimes hard to tell apart. The main character of this story is Peyton Farquhar. Farquhar is a “well-to-do planter” that wants to help the confederates (Bierce 862). He was also “slave owner” and a politician. “He was naturally an original secessionist and ardently devoted to the Southern cause.” He was unable to join the confederate army due to “circumstances of an imperious nature” and wants to show his worth to the cause (Bierce 862). This desire to serve in anyway possible makes him an easy target for the union spy. This ultimately leads to his execution. The supporting character is Farquhar’s wife. She is the stereotypical female and she is only really mentioned in Farquhar’s imagined state. She is simply referred to as “the lady” and is “too happy to serve” (Bierce 863). She is really just a comfort for Farquhar in his illusion as opposed to his reality of death. The conflict in this story is reality vs. illusion. Farquhar was deemed not worthy enough to serve the confederate states army and he feels he must prove his worth by helping the confederates. His conflict with reality happened when the story makes you think that he has escaped. His escape provides him with a comfort in an illusion rather than the reality of “his body, with a broken neck,” swinging from Owl Creek bridge (Bierce 866). Another example of this illusion is the union spy that gives the illusion of being a confederate solider. The conflict ultimately was resolved with the noose taking his life. The conflict relates to the central idea that the reality of life will always win in a fight with a self-made illusion. The point of view in this story was omniscient.
This type of point of view was evident when the man’s thoughts were expressed “He closed his eyes in order to fix his last thoughts upon his wife and children.”(Bierce 863). Bierce made it obvious that omniscient was the point of view being used because he told the reader about the thoughts and feelings of the main character, Peyton Farquhar. This type of point of view is powerful in the use of this story because this story was about his illusion seeming like a reality. The narration affected the story by showing readers the blurred line between Farquhar’s illusion against his …show more content…
reality. The setting of this short story is the warm, farmland of the confederate states. The time period of this story is somewhere around the time of the civil war during the 1860’s. The setting is very important in this story because it describes Farquhar’s allegiance to the south and why he is ultimately killed. Bierce goes into creates the setting by immediately saying “A man stood upon a railroad bridge in northern Alabama, looking down into the swift water twenty feet below.” (Bierce 864). The setting affects the story because the setting shows (and specifically the bridge) shows the connection between two different things. The bridge isn’t on either side of the river but in the middle. The setting supports the central idea because the bridge is the centerpiece of the connection between illusion and reality. Ambrose Bierce is a literary master when he writes his stories, especially this story of “An Occurrence on Owl Creek Bridge”.
The two that were used quite frequently were personification and similes. We see personification used when Bierce writes that “the railroad ran straight away into a forest for a hundred yards, then, curving, was lost to view” (Bierce 861). This gave the effect that the railroad continued for a long time after the bridge. The second language device used was simile. This seen when Bierce Writes that, “The water roared in his ears like the voice of Niagara” (Bierce 865). Ambrose is trying to describe how loud the water is by comparing it to one of the largest waterfalls in the world. The sound is almost deafening at this
river. The author has quite an extensive personal history that influences his writing in this story. Ambrose Bierce “enlisted at age 19 as a private in the 9th Indiana Volunteer Infantry on April 19, 1861.” (Berg 1). This is seen in this story because both the setting and the plot revolve around the civil war. Ambrose Bierce was also a strong abolitionist that made his opposition to slavery open. “As a youth, Bierce became an ardent Abolitionist, working for an antislavery newspaper in northern Indiana.” (Nash 73). Ambrose Bierce shows this in his story since the person being hung is a slave owner.
The point of view is considered to be omniscient third person narrative, meaning that the narrator, in this case Preston, knows everything about what will happen at future points in the book, but decides not to let the reader know it all just yet. The novel is told as if a grandfather is sharing his childhood memories to his grandchildren, where he himself knows all how it will end, but his young listeners do not.
Using Omniscient narration Braddon allows us to delve into the mind of the protagonist without actually being in his perspective. This literary device is displayed when the narrator said “But he is a genius and a metaphysician—grief, true grief, is not for one such as he.” Which gave a deeper look into the protagonists mind and him trying to convince himself that he “he was no worse off than he was yesterday.” and showed him struggling with the loss and attempting to tell himself he was well. (Braddon 140)This device was further utilized when the narrator continually stated “he has forgotten” when directed at thoughts of his cousin, which the repetition of it displays his false lack of recollection of her. (Braddon 141) The
Ambrose Bierce wrote "The Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" during the turn of the nineteenth to twentieth century. During this time period the two writing styles of romanticism, and realism were coming together. This melding of styles was a result of the romantic period of writing and art coming to an end, just at realism was beginning to gain popularity. "The Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" is a perfect example of this transition of styles as it combines elements of both romanticism and realism to create a story that can be far-fetched while still believable at times.
Ambrose Bierce chose to write this story in third person limited omniscient point of view to help the reader understand the story from the main character’s mind, Peyton Farquar. During the story you only see what happens through Peyton’s eyes. Therefore, you do not realize that most of the narrative reflects Peyton’s imagination. Choosing this type of view also lets the author focus more on the emotions and thoughts of the main character. The author does not let the reader see into the eyes of the men hanging him, but after reading the story one will understand that their point of view was not needed and would have actually taken away from the story if done so. His creative way of inventing this story would not have affected me and many other readers if written any other way.
The story would have been a lot shorter without these thoughts and had a lot less meaning. It would have been shallow. It was really hard to “show” the thoughts and feelings of the characters through actions. Even if the thoughts and feelings of the characters could be shown through actions, it would have made the characters more distant from the reader. Because of all these things, third person limited omniscient, with a free indirect style, was the most effective way to write
In Shirley Jackson’s short story The Lottery, the people of a small American town struggle to hold onto a gruesome tradition, one which has greatly affected the moral values of the society. In writing this story, Jackson is commenting on tradition; how, when taken to extremes, it can hinder society. THis horrible tradition of stoning people to death is a normal event from the perspective of the townspeople; one which is practised by the whole town. Early on in the story, the narrator states that the lottery “was conducted - as were the square dances, the teen club, the Halloween program - by Mr. Summer…” (Jackson 1). As evidenced by this quote, the lottery was just another event comparable to other events that society deems normal. In other words:
“The Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge,” by Ambrose Bierce tells the story of a man being executed. As the man dies he imagines his escape. Facing death, the man wants nothing more ten to go home to his family. During his journey home, the man comes to appreciate life. Perhaps he sees how he should have lived, only as a dying man could. When faced with death he truly begins to realize what he has lost. This story might show us how death can enlighten us about life.
The short story starts by creating curiosity with the revelation that a man will be hung in the owl creek bridge. At that moment the reader does not know the reasons for which the man will be sentenced. In the second section, the name of the man who will be hanged is mentioned, the motives for his crime and how he was captured. The final section illustrates the struggle Peyton Farquhar was facing and the events that went through your mind at that moment. He imagined/dream that he escape and peaceful return to their home. But the reality is another and his life ends in darkness and silence. (Bierce 201-209)
The usage of first person point of view traps the reader within the mind of a character who is closed off and narrow-minded for the duration of the story in such a way that it “tell 's nothing, but shows everything (Messer)” at the same time. In this way, the reader goes through the series of realizations with the narrator which convey the message of blindness in correlation with true sight and a spiritual awakening. For instance, the narrator can only feel pity for Robert’s wife, Beulah, because he was never able to see her. He imagined that Robert 's wife “could, if she wanted, wear green eye-shadow around one eye, a straight pin in her nostril, yellow slacks, and purple shoes” (Mays). However, none of this really matted to Robert, and the narrator finds it utterly pathetic. Yet, the narrator never really understands the fact that he does not really know his own wife, regardless of the fact that he can physically see her. Additionally, within the first paragraph, Carver uses demonstratives and possessives to draw the reader close to the Narrator of the story while also constructing a psychological distance between the narrator and other characters in the story (Peterson). In this paragraph, Carver uses the demonstrative “this” as a word to indicate distance, metaphorically, between the narrator and Robert (Peterson). In particular the sentence, “This blind man, an old friend of my wife 's, he was on his way to spend the night (Mays 33)” demonstrates the use of this as a specific person while showing the distance and dislike the narrator has of Robert. As a result, the narrators prejudice is presented to the reader in a way that shows his blindness as
O’Connor uses the limited omniscient point of view in the story so that the reader learns more about each character and family as they go along, as opposed to knowing everything from the beginning. It also brings and emphasis to Mrs. May so to focus on the way she sees the world. This way the reader gets a more biased look at everything because the story is told from her point of view and Mrs. May attempts to make herself out to be a good woman who is simply wronged by everyone else. The reader better gets to know her character this way, along with the other characters, but in Mrs. May’s more biased view of them. For example, Mrs. May refers to the Greenleaf’s as dirty and is always referring to how they “murder the king’s English”. From this point of view the reader also gets an understanding of Mrs. May’s way of thinking. In Mrs. May’s mind, the world in which she lives operates in cause and effect situations. She believes that if she acts like a respectable woman, than good things should happen to her. Alternately, those who act like “trash” will get what she thinks they deserve. For exam...
The story takes place on a railroad bridge that goes over a river in Northern Alabama. There is a man that is being executed by Federal Soldiers.They bound his hands
An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge by Ambrose Bierce is a mysterious short story about a man named Peyton Farquhar and his last few moments in his life. The story tells of the protagonist being hanged from a bridge and his thoughts before the deed is done. He wants to escape those that captured him and embrace with his family. The story is broken up into different parts that give a better background on why the character is on the bridge and how he makes his escape. As he escapes, the reader gets a sense that they should cheer for this man who has avoided death. Looking closer into the story, the reader can see how the effective uses of symbols and themes piece together in the story.
With distorted views of blindness, it creates a narrow minded way of thinking that limits his ability to see the picture as a whole and in a way makes the narrator blind. This can be seen when the narrator mentions that “my idea of blindness came from the movies” (Carver 1), showing the fact that there was only a singular window that the man perceived his ideas through. An important part to note was that it was the only source that the narrator relied upon for this knowledge, and contributed to the development of the stereotype against the blind man in his home. Later in the text, a similar statement can be seen regarding his ignorance. When struggling to comprehend a blind life, the narrator expressed his disbelief in the difference found between him and the blind man, saying that “it was beyond my understanding”, further supporting his lack of insight on things outside his sphere of knowledge.
The writer uses third-person limited omniscient point of view to tell the story. The author can read through Elizabeth Bates’s mind and perc...
By using the third person omniscient point of view, the narrator is able to render the characters with information related both from direct description and from the other character's revelations. This way, the description remains unbiased, but at the same time coherent with how the various characters see it. For example, after the narrator tells us that "He was an only child, eleven years old. She was a widow. She was determined to be neither possessive nor lacking in devotion.", we are able to understand why the boy is so emotionally attached to his mother and, at the beginning, unwilling to ask her for permission to go to his beach and, later in the story, unwilling to let her know about his adventure through the tunnel. This also explains why the mother let him go without questions, even if she was very worried about him.