Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Altruism and selflessness
Altruism and selflessness
Altruism psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When pondering the meaning of life, participating in altruistic deeds is, in my opinion the most sensible way to carry out a meaningful life. Altruism is defined as helping others to lead a good life with out too much suffering. Altruism falls under the category of optimism, but is still a realistic belief. In order to prove altruism is the best argument for the meaning of life I will need to prove that it is a credible argument and also discredit the objections and show why they are incorrect. I will respond to various objections to the claim that carrying out altruistic deeds will lead to a meaningful life, including objections presented by Baggini. Baggini provides some of the main objections to altruism being the true meaning of life. The immediate threat presented to counter altruism is psychological egoism. Psychological egoism is a belief …show more content…
This problem claims that altruism is only intrinsically good, and it is only a means to an end. I disagree with this claim and I believe that altruism can be both intrinsically and extrinsically good. It is clear that altruism is intrinsically good as it can result in a better understanding of morals and beliefs for both the recipient of the help and the one that provided the assistance. Altruism can also be extrinsically good. Helping other people because they are suffering can produce results that are extrinsically good for both parties as well. For example, after you have assisted someone who is suffering the person who received the aid could potentially do something in the future that he or she would be unable to do without the previous assistance. This thing then could benefit the one who acted altruistically in the first place extrinsically. Baggini himself even said that altruism at least values the right thing, which is leading a full life. The same cannot be said for other common optimistic
... are given a broadly inclusive definition under Singer's argument, compose an in-ignorable chunk of the world economy. It is difficult to foresee how things would play out if the extreme altruism proposed by Singer became the norm. While the conclusion Singer produces appears to logically follow from his thought experiment, its appropriateness for actual application in the real world requires much greater justification. Nonetheless, if we hypothetically assume that the intended positive outcome will always be the result of our charity, Singer's argument still relies on several Utilitarian assumptions; namely that we consider the lives of strangers to be of equal value to the lives of our loved ones, and that we should regard the saving of a life as a greater good than marginal increases in the quality of life of a moderately healthy and financially secure individual.
The idea of self-sacrifice seems relatively common-sense to most of us: we forgo some current potential good in order to maximise either the good of someone we care about, or our own later good. Richard Brandt (1972) includes altruistic desires in his definition of self-interest: "if I really desire the happiness of my daughter, or the discomfiture of my department chairman ... then getting that desire satisfied ... counts as being an enhancement of my utility or welfare ... to an extent corresponding to how strongly I want that outcome." The key point here is that by this definition of self-interest, an altruistic act must have a number of conditions in order to be classed as self-sacrifice. Ove...
Khaled Hosseini’s The Kite Runner provides incredibly valuable insight into the intertwining concepts of identity and personal happiness, as does A Complicated Kindness by Miriam Toews. Undeniably, a healthy cognisance of personal identity is crucial to mental tranquility and happiness. Insecurity, for example is unilaterally viewed as an unsettling character flaw precisely because of the inherent implication of untrue personal identity. Accurately understanding one’s true personal identity is the backbone of happiness, as seen in The Kite Runner and A Complicated Kindness. Furthermore, it can be said that personal flaws, strengths and collectivist mentalities surrounding both Amir and Nomi’s characters ultimately contribute to their respective happiness or lack thereof, at the end of both stories.
Thomas Hobbes in Chapter 13 of Leviathan, and David Hume in Section 3 of An Enquiry Concerning the Princples of Morals, give views of human nature. Hobbes’ view captures survivalism as significant in our nature but cannot account for altruism. We cover Hobbes’ theory with a theory of Varied Levels of Survivalism, explaining a larger body of behavior with the foundation Hobbes gives. Hume gives a scenario which does not directly prove fruitful, but he does capture selfless behavior.
...l of human life. He shows that such a source is susceptible to both of his previous main arguments and feels that his only threat here is a viable theistic doctrine, so he brings no new sort of arguments to the table. However, his defense on this last point is also susceptible to the same weaknesses of his main arguments. It is even possible that he could be right that different people will have different moral responses to the same things yet still all subscribe to the same general goal of life; it is consistent that different means may reach the same end. If objective values were defeated above, it should now be considered whether a general goal of human life can be discerned in an objective manner. Regardless of whether we focus on a convergence of general values or an agreement on the goal of life, in this article Mackie runs roughshod over several open questions.
People perpetrate seemingly selfless acts almost daily. You see it all over the news; the man who saved that woman from a burning building, the mother who sacrificed herself to protect her children from the bomb blast. But how benevolent are these actions? Are these so-called “heroes” really sacrificing themselves to help others? Until recently, it was the common belief that altruism, or selfless and unconditional kindness, was limited primarily to the human race. However, within the last century, the works of several scientists, most prominently George Price, have provided substantial evidence concluding that altruism is nothing more than a survival technique, one that can be calculated with a simple equation.
Have you ever done a true good deed? If so, think was it really a truly good thing that you have done for someone else? In “The Good Deed” by Marion Dane Bauer demonstrates that a good deed is only a true good deed when it is done with the right intentions. “The Good Deed” is about a girl named Heather who is in the girl scouts, and in order to get a badge they had to do a good deed, and she had gotten Miss. Benson to do a good deed for.
The descriptive claim made by Psychological Egoists is that humans, by nature, are motivated only by self-interest. Any act, no matter how altruistic it may seem on the outside is actually only a disguise for a selfish desire such as recognition, avoiding guilt, reward or sense of personal ‘goodness’ or morality. For example, Mother Teresa is just using the poor for her own long-term spiritual gain. Being a universal claim, it could falter with a single counterexample. And being that I believe this claim to be bunk I will tell you why!
Altruism regards the individual life as something one may be required to sacrifice for the sake of
Effective Altruism is a combination of philosophy and social movement that involved moral values to improving the global, for example, poverty, death of disease and starvation. The values of effective altruism consist open-mindedness, critical thinking, and global empathy. Which means, doing things that bring largest positive influence, applying evidence and aim to identify the effective ways, and valued all lives. In Singer’s speech, he said that "Effective Altruism is combined with head and heart. Define how necessary it is and doing in a right direction. Singers also gave examples of a two-year-old girl who has hit by two truck and preventable disease--Malaria." (TED, 2013) Like, “the ripple effect” (TED,
• Once more, the ordinary science’ proves itself as the master of classification, inventing and defining the various categories of Egoism. Per example, psychological egoism, which defines doctrine that an individual is always motivated by self-interest, then rational egoism which unquestionably advocates acting in self-interest. Ethical egoism as diametrically opposite of ethical altruism which obliges a moral agent to assist the other first, even if sacrifices own interest. Also, ethical egoism differs from both rational and psychological egoism in ‘defending’ doctrine which considers all actions with contributive beneficial effects for an acting individual
For someone who believes in psychological egoism, i t is difficult to find an action that would be acknowledged as purely altruistic. In practice, altruism, is the performance of duties to others with no view to any sort of personal...
In Barry H. Corey’s book, Love Kindness, the underestimated, devalued virtue of kindness is explored. Kindness is a powerful, gentle strength that is often underestimated and devalued. Living a life of kindness is not for the meek or the prideful for this is a humbling, bold, and whimsical way of being. Love and kindness are difficult to separate because kindness is a result of love in its most authentic state. Love and kindness are the keys to moments of vulnerability. In that moment of authentic love and kindness barriers are demolished and people are reached in their brokenness.
Before a case can be made for the causes of altruism, altruism itself must first be defined. Most leading psychologists agree that the definition of altruism is “a motivational state with the ultimate goal of increasing another’s welfare.” (Batson, 1981). The only way for a person to be truly altruistic is if their intent is to help the community before themselves. However, the only thing humans can see is the actions themselves, and so, selfish intent may seem the same as altruistic intent. Alas, the only way that altruism can be judged is if the intent is obvious. Through that, we must conclude that only certain intents can be defined as altruistic, and as intent stemming from nature benefits the group while other intent benefits yourself, only actions caused by nature are truly altruistic.
“When a society starts depending on people overseas to hand over their hard earned money their society does not grow. “