Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Four effects of cheating
Symbolism in the story of the necklace
Theme of greed in the necklace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Four effects of cheating
After Madame Forestier told her the necklace was fake she turned pale. “ What! It looks so real though!” Mathilda exclaimed. “I know. It was so beautiful for a fake piece of jewelry.” Mrs. Forestier said. “ I can’t believe that you payed 36,000 francs for that!” Mrs Forestier replied. “ Well since you didn’t even have a real one, and I payed for that with my hard earned money You should give it back to me!” Mathilda said angrily. “ Well you gave it to me, so it’s mine!” Mrs Forestier argued. “No, I payed for it and...and well... I deserve to have it because I worked so hard to pay for it!” Mathilda answered. “I’m going to go get my husband!”
Later that day, she came back with her husband. “Tell this lady how I...I mean we deserve that necklace.” She told her husband. “ Well we did work hard to pay for it, and maybe we can replace it with a fake like the one you had before?” He exclaimed. “ I completely disagree. I was lied to for ten years and you did give it to me.” Mrs. Forestier argued. “ You’re rich and can afford that and we couldn’t so we need it more.” Her husband replied. He felt anger set in and felt useless.
…show more content…
He began by asking her why she didn’t by a real necklace in the first place, while she snuck over to her purse at which she saw the box that the necklace was held in inside. She grabbed the necklace and ran as fast as she could until she was out of sight. Mrs. Forestier saw her running and tried to stop her, but she was already gone and she didn’t know where she went. Her husband ran after her, but by the time he found her she was in a taxi leaving him to find his own way out of the
Deceptiveness of appearances is highlighted in, “The Necklace,” by the necklace of Mathilde’s wealthy best friend, Madame Forestier. She allows, Mathilde to borrow it for the party. The fact that it comes from Madame Forestier’s jewelry box gives it the illusion of high value, when actually it is just costume jewelry. Mathilde would not have worn the necklace if she knew the diamonds were fake, because she believes she is deserving of more. Fake jewels suggest that even the wealthiest pretend to have more than they actually claim. Unfortunately, Mathilde loses the necklace, not realizing the necklace is fake. The fact that Madame Forestier, does not notice Mathilde has replaced the fake gems with real diamonds, suggests that true value is ultimately dependent on perception. In the movie Slumd...
“The Necklace” gives a strong representation of what the story is about. When Madame Loisel was looking for jewelry with Madame Forestier, “She came
The Necklace is a great example of how our desires can create tragedy rather than happiness. Madame Forestier would have rather been idolized for her wealth instead of buying items that grant her survival. She says,”It’s just that I have no evening dress and so I can’t go to the party.” which explains well how she had a finite amount of money and thought material wealth was more important than happiness. If she only knew before that she would spend the next decade working off her debt, she would have never asked for the necklace and she would have had a happy life. Furthermore, wealth isn’t the only thing that brings happiness to a life.
As the story opens, Matilda, a young middle-class wife who aspires to join the upper ranks of society, is finally invited to a high-society affair given by her husband's employer. Hoping to impress her guests and thus "fit in", she borrows a beautiful diamond necklace from her friend Madame Forestier. Unfortunately, during the course of the evening, the necklace is lost. Rather than confront her friend directly with the story of her carelessness, she and her husband scrape together every bit of money they can.
Her husband gets invited to a party, but Mrs. Loisel really doesn't want to go because she has nothing good to wear. Mr. Loisel agrees to give her 400 francs to buy a "pretty" dress, but even after that she feels skeptical of going because she has nothing to wear with the new dress. Mr. Loisel convinces her to borrow some jewelry from her friend and she would return it after the party. She says ... ... middle of paper ... ...
A common literary device, symbolism is used in this story. Symbolism is when something has a greater meaning within itself. For example, the necklace is considered a symbol in the story. When looking at necklaces at Madame Forestier she finds one that just jumps out at her. She believes it is everything she wants in life. This is symbolic because it was only a necklace it could not fulfill all of her dreams of a rich high-class life. “She wasn’t at all convinced “No… There’s nothing more humiliating than to look poor among a lot of rich woman”. This quote is said before borrowing the necklace, but it is the reason she borrows it from Madame. Furthermore, the necklace is not really going to change who she ...
Furthermore, the lifestyle both women want ends up in disaster however, one ends in death while the other in hard labor. In "The Necklace", the wife ends up losing her friend’s expensive necklace which causes her to work hard to earn enough money to pay of a new one. Due to all the work she loses her beauty. In contrast, whereas in "The Jewels" the constant attendance of the opera house during the winter causes her to die of inflammation which resulted a deep sorrow towards the husband. Both wife’s lived life differently. Both tries to find the best way to fulfill their desire for the good
The use of Irony is seen in both short stories representing the constriction in marriage. In “The Necklace” Madame Losiel receives a spectacular invitation to a prestigious gala which her husband went to great ends to get. Loisel had this desire to live a lifestyle that was way beyond her means. After purchasing a beautiful gown worth 400 franks Mathilde Loisel came to the realization that she had no jewelry to go along with the dress. Her husband suggested “You will wear some natural flowers” and she replied “ No; there is nothing more humiliating than to look poor among a lot of rich women” (Maupassant 2). Mathilde Loisel than went to her wealthy friend Mme.Forester to borrow a diamond necklace that was not affordable to replace if anything
Hence the situational irony had taken place. First the original necklace was fake and all that pain of ten years could have been avoided. Secondly, Mathilde’s character had a turn around as in the beginning she was greedy but after the tragic events She is more self sufficient and does work to make money. And most importantly Mathilde did not divorce on Mousier and supported him and help herself pay up the debt. Ture characteristic of a person is not shown when he has everything but rather when he has
A common literary device, symbolism is used in this story. Symbolism is when something has a greater meaning within itself. The example of this in the story is the necklace. When looking at necklaces at Madame Forestier she finds one that just jumps out at her. She believes it is everything she wants in life. This is symbolic because it was only a necklace it could not fulfill all of her dreams of a rich high-class life. “She wasn’t at all convinced “No… There’s nothing more humiliating than to look poor among a lot of rich woman”. This quote is said before borrowing the necklace, but it is the reason she borrows it from Madame. The necklace is not really going to change who she is in reality. The necklace ...
Around the world, values are expressed differently. Some people think that life is about the little things that make them happy. Others feel the opposite way and that expenses are the way to live. In Guy de Maupassant’s short story, “The Necklace”, he develops a character, Madame Loisel, who illustrates her different style of assessments. Madame Loisel, a beautiful woman, lives in a wonderful home with all the necessary supplies needed to live. However, she is very unhappy with her life. She feels she deserves a much more expensive and materialistic life than what she has. After pitying herself for not being the richest of her friends, she goes out and borrows a beautiful necklace from an ally. But as she misplaces the closest thing she has to the life she dreams of and not telling her friend about the mishap, she could have set herself aside from ten years of work. Through many literary devices, de Maupassant sends a message to value less substance articles so life can be spent wisely.
The Necklace also displays distinctive realism in the use of socioeconomic influences which are essential to the plot. The major conflict in the story would be absent and the theme would not be obtainable without Mathilde Loisel’s insecurity about her own socioeconomic reputation. An example of Loisel’s self-deprivation nature is presented when she realizes she does not have a necklace, she says “I shall look absolutely no one. I would almost rather not go to the party” (Maupassant, sec. 3). Another example of the self-conflict caused by social pressure is Loisel’s immediate attempt to replace the necklace and her reluctance to speak to her friend Madame Forestier about the necklace for ten whole years. If she were not conflicted by societal pressures she might have avoided the whole situation altogether. The Necklace establishes a realistic difference in value between the necklaces and proposed clothing. Her husband proposes flowers which were valued 10 franks so in any case if she had chosen the flowers there would have been an insignificant economic loss. Her decision not to tell her friend about the necklace ends up costing her seven times the worth of the original. The roses symbolize the simpler things in life to the theme of the story. Mathilde Loisel’s withered appearance at the end
As I did research on how others interpreted the story, the same conclusion would pop up. The necklace was used as a symbol of higher class of wealth. We use symbolic items to try and fit into societies belief of “fancy”. The deeper meaning is within the true value of the necklace. It is a fake just as she is! She is trying to be something she is not and ends up losing the necklace which holds a false value as well. This is why a person should not take everything as it
In the story “The Necklace’s”, by Guy de Maupassant, there are some dramatic and situational ironies through out the story. The first irony is that Monsieur came home with a large envelope to surprise his wife, in the envelope it wrote “The Minister of Education and Madame Ramponneau request the pleasure of the company of Monsieur and Madame Loisel at the Ministry on the of Monday, January the 18th.” (Maupassant, G. d. 1952); this invitation caused his wife to a physical distress because she did not have any luxury jewelry or fancy dress for the party. Another irony in the story is that Madame Loisel dissatisfied with her position in society and discomforted in life, “She suffered endlessly.” (Maupassant, G, d.); and there were the two reasons
As put by Jason Pierce, “Whereas before [Madame Loisel had the necklace] she was filled with grief, regret, despair, and misery, but with Madame Forestier’s jewels on her neck she is elegant, graceful, and smiling, and quite above herself with happiness” (2). Although everything Maupassant (and therefore Pierce) mentions about her without the necklace is negative and with the necklace is positive, there is something to notice. Although Madame Loisel can control whether she is “happy or miserable,” she cannot control whether she is “graceful and elegant.” Her gracefulness and elegance are merely an implication of the fact that she has nice clothes, and nice necklace and people want to dance with her. It can be argued, however, that because, she has achieved her greatest dreams for her whole life, at least for one night, she has an aura of confidence and is happy and therefore looks graceful and elegant.