Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of the short story the necklace
The relationship between setting and character in the necklace
The necklace, essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of the short story the necklace
Selfishness in The Necklace by Maupassant
In Guy de Maupassant's, "The Necklace" all the characters in the story
exhibit similar behavior by showing that they think of themselves
rather than of others. A close look at the behavior of the characters
in "The Necklace" reveals more than a story about a spoiled selfish
woman, but what we see is a story about a whole society of selfish
people.
In "The Necklace" a woman named Mathilde lives a depressed life
because she does not live the life style that she desires. She "was
one of those pretty and charming women, born, as if by an error of
destiny into a family of clerks and copyists. She had no dowry, no
prospects, no way of getting known, courted, loved, married by a rich
and distinguished man. She finally settled for a marriage with a minor
clerk in the Ministry of Education (Maupassant 5)." She was a very
simple person, but she did not have the money to dress with very
expensive clothes. Her husband did not have the social status or job
to give her the types of things she wanted like expensive clothes and
jewelry. She felt depressed every time she would go over to her
friend, Mrs. Forrestier's, house because she had a very nice home and
wore expensive clothing with very impressive jewelry. Her husband gets
invited to a party, but Mrs. Loisel really doesn't want to go because
she has nothing good to wear. Mr. Loisel agrees to give her 400 francs
to buy a "pretty" dress, but even after that she feels skeptical of
going because she has nothing to wear with the new dress. Mr. Loisel
convinces her to borrow some jewelry from her friend and she would
return it after the party. She says ...
... middle of paper ...
...r
"modest, everyday wrap (Maupassant 8)." The group of women and men
were just as selfish as Mrs. Forrestier, the Chancellor, and Mr. and
Mrs. Loisel.
In conclusion, Guy de Maupassant's "The Necklace" does not only tell
the story of a spoiled selfish woman, it tells the story of a whole
society of selfish people. Besides Mathilde in the story, her husband,
Mrs. Forrestier, the Chancellor, and the groups of men and woman at
the party were all very selfish thinking about themselves and less
caring of others.
Works Cited
Maupassant, Guy de. "The Necklace" Literature: An Introduction to
Readingand Writing. 2nd ed. Ed. Edgar V. Roberts and Henry E. Jacobs.
New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2003. 5-12.
Directessays.com. "The Necklace." (2004). 09 Nov. 2004 <http://www.directessay.com/
viewpaper/46208.html>.
The similar controversial natures of Fury’s Kissing Doesn’t Kill and Manuel Ramos Otero’s “Nobility of Blood” suggest that perhaps their intended audiences may have shared characteristics as well. Because Kissing Doesn’t Kill is a piece of poster art, it was displayed out in the public, instead of a museum or convention like usual pieces of art. The poster was plastered in large sizes to the sides of public transportation buses, billboards, and even mass mailings. People of all kinds of backgrounds came across the artwork, whether they wanted to or not. However, since the point of activist artwork like this is to create social change, the effect of this artwork on its viewers is the main focus. To people who agreed with the statements on the
"Love in L.A.," written by Dagoberto Gilb, is a story full of irony and multiple themes. The story is set in Hollywood during the summer time. Written in third person objective, "Love in L.A." guides the reader along through the story as opposed to an omniscient point of view.
In Tobias Wolff’s 1985 short story “The Rich Brother,” we are introduced to two brothers. According to Wolf, you cannot even tell that they are brothers because of their physical differences, but as the story goes into more detail we can tell that they are different in every aspect. One of the major differences is that one is wealthy and the other is always in need of financial assistance. The older brother, Pete, is a successful real estate agent while his younger brother, Donald, works as a painter whenever he can. The two brothers are very different in their belief about what is valuable. Pete is a man that has worked hard and values what he has acquired. His brother Donald, on the other hand, values sharing whatever he has. Even if giving everything he has leaves him with nothing.
The Great Divorce by C.S. Lewis suggests that choices made on earth have a consequential effect towards our acceptance into heaven or our plummet into hell. In this book pride manifests itself in a hundred subtle ways as souls whine about perceived injustices or irrational motives. Thankfully, a few tourists do humble themselves, become transformed into marvelously real beings, and remain in heaven. But most don't, about which the great Scottish author George MacDonald, Lewis' heavenly guide, says, “They may not be rejecting the truth of heaven now. They may be reenacting the rejection they made while on earth”.
The Simple Gift by Steven Herrick explores the causes and challenges of homelessness in today's youth. It highlights the struggles that a victim of homelessness would go through, such as finding a place to sleep every night, and finding a source of food and money. The Simple Gift also showed some causes of homelessness, which were demonstrated in the book through out the story.
Zora Neale Hurston’s The Gilded Six-Bits is a beautifully written short story about marriage and forgiveness. This story tugs at the heartstrings, as Hurston paints each scene with vivid imagination. The characters, their surroundings, and their behaviors are visually and emotionally illustrated.
The main characters Mrs. Loisel in "The Necklace" and the grandmother in "A Good Man is Hard to Find" are very similar because both these characters refused to admit to a mistake that they had made. They both had the same motivation prior to the mistake and they also had the same reason as to why they wanted to keep quiet about it. Although Mrs. Lisle's and the grandmother's penalties were different, it is still fair to compare the two because either way, dead or alive, both their lives were ruined.
Women will do almost anything for love, to be loved, or to keep love. That is their mission. When women become jealous, however, the love they want to hold onto disappears, becomes selfishness, and one does not know if it is love anymore. In the short story “The Lady, or the Tiger?” written by Frank R. Stockton, a semi barbaric princess motions which door her lover, the accused man, must open to either receive punishment or a reward. The punishment is to be devoured by a fierce tiger and the reward is to be married to a lovely damsel of the court. This semi barbaric princess loves the man and chooses which door the man deserves to open. Like many women in love, this princess would not dare to let another woman take her lover away from her. Instead, jealousy takes over and the door that opens will emerge a tiger because she will go berserk to see her man happy with another woman, and will prefer to have him eaten by a tiger and await the princess herself on a heavenly earth.
Vanity and pride are two factors that have always been affecting our society, and been a driving force for people’s decisions and actions. So when we set the scene in nineteenth century France, what is the result? When Mathilde complained about her lack of a nice dress and her husband asked for her limit, she hesitated to make sure she would have a nice dress for the ball without being rejected. “She reflected several seconds, making her calculations and wondering also what sum she could ask without drawing on herself an immediate refusal and a frightened exclamation from the economical clerk” (de Maupassant 23). Mathilde is willing to put their finances and physical well-being in jeopardy at the hands of her prideful desires. After realizing
Other details in the story also have a similar bearing on Mathilde’s character. For example, the story presents little detail about the party scene beyond the statement that Mathilde is a great “success” (7)—a judgment that shows her ability to shine if given the chance. After she and Loisel accept the fact that the necklace cannot be found, Maupassant includes details about the Parisian streets, about the visits to loan sharks, and about the jewelry shop in order to bring out Mathilde’s sense of honesty and pride as she “heroically” prepares to live her new life of poverty. Thus, in “The Necklace,” Maupassant uses setting to highlight Mathilde’s maladjustment, her needless misfortune, her loss of youth and beauty, and finally her growth as a responsible human being.
As I dart through "the desert" in the last game of the day, with only
Although, because he is seen as an enemy of humans, it causes him to be scared of how people will treat him. This relates to the topic, because when humans go out and hunt predators, they do so without seeing whether or not the dragon is worthy of life. Dragon, believes that because he is so kind, he will be spared the cruel justice of humans. It is because of the selfish decisions of humans, that innocent beings get hunted.
Guy de Maupassant is a realist whose claim to fame is the style in which he conveys political and socioeconomic themes in his literary publications. He achieves his writing style by putting small unfortunate life events under a spotlight. His literary performance is described in his biography from Cambridge, the writer says “He exposes with piercing clarity the small tragedies and pathetic incidents of everyday life, taking a clear-sighted though pessimistic view of humanity” (Halsey, par. 1). Guy de Maupassant’s story The Necklace is a great representation of the style he uses. In The Necklace the main character Mathilde Loisel a beautiful but impoverished woman married to a clerk is in conflict with her lack of wealth and desire to acquire
The moral of Guy de Maupassant’s story “The Necklace” seems to be suggested by the line, “What would have happened if Mathilde had not lost the necklace?” If Mathilde had not lost the necklace, or in fact, even asked to borrow the necklace, she and Mr. Loisel would not of been in debt ten long years. Because Mathilde had to borrow the necklace to make herself and others like her better her and Mr. Loisel’s economic situation had become worse than it already was. I think that the moral of the story is that people need to be happy with what they have and not be so greedy.
It took ten years for Mathilde and her husband to pay off the debt of buying a new necklace. Those ten years were not spent with the luxuries she experienced so many years ago at the party, nor were they filled with the simple things she once owned and despised. She came to know “the horrible existence of the needy. She bore her part, however, with sudden heroism.” When passing her rich friend again in the street, she was barely recognizable. Who she was the day she ran into her friend was not who she was the night she wore that necklace.