Alexander The Great Essay

1961 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Alexander the great leadership skills

Alexander the Great is the Greatest Throughout history, many great empires have risen up and gained extraordinary amounts of power. These empires gain power through the expansion and the conquest of land and expanding territory. However, in history, it is clear that not all great empires last. The Persian Empire is one of the great empires, which rise to power and then decline gradually over time. The Persian Empire fell due to a number of reasons such as bad leadership and poor military tactics; however, the drastic one of all was caused by one man, Alexander the Great. Alexander the Great was the king of Macedonia and the Greek army after his father Philip II died. His accomplishments at such a young age sets him apart from every other king …show more content…

He was able to take down the Persian Empire due to his determination, great leadership, and battle tactics in three decisive battles. The way he was able to do this only reflects on how much of an incredible king and military leader he was. In the Battle of Granicus River, he was able to show determination in defeating the Persian army by doing whatever it took to gain an advantage on the enemy, as well as, fight through whatever obstacles came his way. The Battle of Issus showed his great leadership by taking it upon himself to personally lead his army into battle and go after the king of Persia himself, knowing that he would be risking his own life in the process. Lastly, the Battle of Gaugamela proves that he is not only a great leader, but also a very intelligent one because of his quick thinking on the battlefield. It is difficult to be able to think and decisively plan everything in the face of pressure and Alexander did it with ease. He was able to come up with plans that would help lead his army to victory, showing each and every time that he was capable of accomplishing anything. Being able to take down the Persian Empire at such a young age is no easy feat, yet he was able to do this because of who he is. Someone cannot just be a great military leader by having a strong vast army. A great leader must be able to lead the vast army effectively and without hesitation. Alexander proved that he could lead the army handed to him by his father in every one of the battles he has fought, as well as showing in each one a different aspect as to why he was able to do so. All three of of these battles each showed a different, yet amazing aspect of Alexander the Great that proves as to why he is the greatest leader in history. His greatness in battle is the reason he got the nickname Alexander the

Show More
Related

  • Pros And Cons Of Alexander The Great

    117 Words  | 1 Pages

    Darius had an advantage over Alexander the Great, he had more troops, better resources, and he chose the battle field. Although Darius had the advantage he was not as smart as Alexander. Alexander had good communication with his troops; he planned according, in addition he was well organized before the battled. He did not stray away from his plan he stuck to it. Alexander troops were heavily armed they moved in formation, and they were shield with their long spears they stayed close together and moved in formation. In addition he did not have all his troops engaged in the battle at once he planned an awesome attack strategy that won him and his troops the war.

    Read More

  • How did Alexander the Great Accomplish his Military Feats at Such a Young Age?

    529 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the reasons for Alexander’s military success is because he was brought up by a great military leader. Alexander’s father was King Phillip II of Macedonia, a great military leader himself. When Alexander was a young man, around 16, his father realized his potential and pulled him out of school and put him out on the field to learn (McGill). He also got him a tutor, one of the best in all of history, Aristotle. Alexander’s young life will prove to be one of the largest reasons for his...

    Read More

  • Was Alexander The Great Really Great?

    943 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great is great because of his remarkable achievement which helped to create a long lasting legacy. Alexander started to build his empire in 334 BCE after taking the new role as the king. It only took eleven years to build an empire that was large and lasted several years. In addition, the empire Alexander created stretched over 2,200,000 square miles becoming bigger than the United States (Alexander’s Empire Doc. A) (Alexander’s Legacy Doc, E). This proves that Alexander the Great is great because although the process was eleven long years to make a strong empire, Alexander wasn’t willing to give up and

    Read More

  • Alexander: The Not So Great

    1861 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alexander the Great is hailed, by most historians, as “The Great Conqueror” of the world in the days of ancient Mesopotamia. “Alexander III of Macedon, better known as Alexander the Great, single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in little more than a decade. Alexander was born in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia in July 356 BCE. His parents were Philip II of Macedon and his wife Olympias. Philip was assassinated in 336 BCE and Alexander inherited a powerful yet volatile kingdom. He quickly dealt with his enemies at home and reasserted Macedonian power within Greece. He then set out to conquer the massive Persian Empire” (Web, BBC History). It is important to note, which will maybe explain his brutal actions, that Alexander was only twenty years old when he became the king of Macedonia. “When he was 13, Philip hired the Greek philosopher Aristotle to be Alexander’s personal tutor. During the next three years Aristotle gave Alexander training in rhetoric and literature and stimulated his interest in science, medicine, and philosophy, all of which became of importance in Alexander’s later life” (Web, Project of History of Macedonia). “In, 340, when Philip assembled a large Macedonian army and invaded Thrace, he left his 16 years old son with the power to rule Macedonia in his absence as regent, but as the Macedonian army advanced deep into Thrace, the Thracian tribe of Maedi bordering north-eastern Macedonia rebelled and posed a danger to the country. Alexander assembled an army, led it against the rebels, and with swift action defeated the Maedi, captured their stronghold, and renamed it after himself to Alexandropolis. Two years later in 338 BC, Philip gave his son a commanding post among the senior gener...

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great

    1624 Words  | 4 Pages

    Few historical figures stand out in the same degree as that of Alexander the Great. He was a warrior by 16, a commander at age 18, and was crowned King of Macedon by the time he was 20 years old. He did things in his lifetime that others could only dream about. Alexander single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in just over a decade. There were many attributes that made Alexander “Great.” He was a brilliant strategist and an inspired leader; he led by example and was a conqueror at heart. In looking at his early childhood, accession to the throne, conquests, marriage, and death one can see why Alexander the Great is revered in historical contexts as one of the greatest figures of all time.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great: The Invasion Of Persia

    1091 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander’s first major victory was at the Granicus River. In May of 334 BC, Alexander’s army met the Persians in battle and defeated them. Following this victory, Alexander continued his march into Persia, and many towns simply surrendered, including Sardis. After a siege at Halicarnassus which Alexander eventually won, he moved on to meet the Persians again at Issus in November of 333 BC, under the command of Darius III of Persia. The Persian army had an advantage in numbers over Alexander’s, more than 2 to 1; but Alexander, using his ability to anticipate his enemies’ plans and counter them, again soundly defeated the Persians. In the midst of the battle, Darius fled. The

    Read More

  • Of Alexander III Of Macedonia, Alexander The Great And Alexander The Conqueror

    822 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion, Alexander the Great lived up to his name and was a great leader. He had a willingness to fight from the front and respected his men. This allowed him to gain the love, trust, and respect of his men and to conquer the vast amount of land that was the Persian Empire. He created an empire that stretched from Greece to India and was responsible for freeing Egypt from Persian control. He was also responsible for building the symbol of the Hellenistic Age. No other man has been able to accomplish all that Alexander was able to in such a short amount of time. This is why Alexander is and always will be considered one of the greatest leaders of all time.

    Read More

  • The Battles Of The Battle Of Alexander The Great

    2705 Words  | 6 Pages

    These four battles and sieges, out of the twenty battles and sieges that Alexander took part in, were the most important to the expansion of his empire. Without these victories, Alexander would not have been able to expand his empire as much and his existing empire would constantly be threatened by the Persians and their allies. These four battles and sieges further proved the intelligence, cleverness, bravery, astuteness, and graciousness of Alexander, and thus earning him the name Alexander the Great.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great: Alexander The Great

    805 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander earned the title, “Great,” because of his “unparalleled success as a commander.” Despite being outnumbered on many occasions, Alexander fought hard, and never lost a battle. His knowledge and use of the battlefield gained him respect, and fortune for his army, and the region of Macedonia. He was constantly able to adapt to different terrains, and techniques, and always brought honor to his people.

    Read More

  • Alexander’s Vast Accomplishments as a Conquerer

    966 Words  | 2 Pages

    The first matter to consider is what constitutes “greatness”. There are no set standards no checklist, to apply to a person, to determine it they are “great.” The simplest way that I could conceive to decide whether this title should apply to Alexander was to determine if he was, in some way, superior to the rulers that came before or after his reign. The most obvious place for me to start my consideration is with Alexander’s vast accomplishments as a conquerer.

    Read More

  • Who Is Responsible For Alexander's Downfall

    880 Words  | 2 Pages

    The first of these reasons was caused by the unloyalty of Alexander’s men. The Macedonians along with several other leaders doubted Alexander and did not carry out several of his plans following his death. Also, Alexander’s several devastating faults of his disregard to his friends and enemies. Finally, Alexander’s strength as a ruler and excellent military strategy resolved in the downfall of his great empire. Alexander’s military success displayed his ingenious strategies, along with his spontaneous thinking. All of this ensued the collapse of Alexander the Great’s magnificent empire after his

    Read More

  • The Great Strategies And Challenges Of Alexander The Great

    1405 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great, also known as Alexander the third, was the son of Philp the second and was the King of Macedon. His reign was from 336–323 BC and he was an undefeated military commander. During his reign, he spent majority of the time on a military campaign going east into Asia, creating one of the largest empires known. Not only was he king of Macedon, he was also Pharaoh of Egypt, King of Persia, and King of Asia., showing his incredible feats as King. He was capable commander and a successful king, which was shown in many of his battles. The battles of Granicus, Issus, and Gaugamela were all key battles in his defeat of the Persian and their King, Darius. These battles all showed Alexanders incredible ability in battle and skill for

    Read More

  • Does Alexander The Great Deserve His Title

    1820 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alexander the Great deserved his title because he extended his massive empire, also naming many cities after himself. Alexander the Great had conquered so much land that he was able to name more than 70 cities after himself and one after his horse. Alexander commemorated his conquests by founding dozens of cities (usually built up around previous military forts) which he named Alexandria. I feel that if you are able to name 70 cities after you, your truly great. Also, Alexander was a great conqueror, in 13 short years he amassed the largest empire in the entire ancient world — an empire that covered 3,000 miles. And he did this without the benefit of modern technology and weaponry. Alexander had created the biggest empire ever, even today. He did so without guns. He used spears, shields and arrows to conquer 3,000 miles. He also did this on foot and horse over just 13 years. Even today it would be hard to conquer that much land in 13 years. This is truly an amazing accomplishment. After three grueling years of warfare and three decisive battles, Alexander smashed the Persian armies at the Tigris River and conquered the mighty Persian Empire, including the legendary city of Babylon. The Persian army was the best army at the time, they had been the army to beat. Alexander slowly but surely had

    Read More

  • Was Alexander The Great Really Great?

    595 Words  | 2 Pages

    Greatness can be defined in many ways. Some scholars today define it by a particular person’s ability to better other human beings lives while others would define it by the magnitude of their personal achievements. No matter how greatness is defined Alexander fulfills both definitions. Alexander the Great truly earned his title both by performing seemingly impossible military feats and his ability to bring about economic prosperity to everyone is his great empire. He was able to build the greatest empire that the world has ever seen. Although he lived a short life, he lived one full of seemingly impossible accomplishments. Alexander is truly great because he exemplifies all of the qualities of an outstanding general and person, and throughout

    Read More

  • History´s Greatest Military Captains

    1173 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander's legendary feats and his ability to grasp the strategic and tactical situation are absolutely worth studying for all military leaders in learning the art of war. What he was able to accomplish before he was thirty-three years old is nothing short of a Herculean effort, very much similar to his own hero, Achilles, from Homer's Iliad. Alexander had founded some 70 cities, many bearing his name, both as strongholds and cultural and trade centers, thereby spreading Greek ideals and knowledge eastward as far as China. When Rome gained control of the Hellenistic world after 190 B.C.E., Greek culture rapidly infused that of Rome, and together they formed the basis of modern western culture. Alexander deployed the new technologies and equipment to perfection. He almost always scouted his enemies and their terrain before moving against them to avoid getting caught by surprise or at a disadvantage. Alexander also put himself at the center of each skirmish, where he could do the most damage and assume the most risk. His armies moved swiftly, sometimes suddenly appearing in places he was thought unable to reach, and with their reputation for ferocity they often were able to demoralize or scare opposing armies into scattering ...

    Read More

More about Alexander The Great Essay

Open Document