Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Describe the conquests of Alexander the Great and analyze the legacy of his empire
Impact of Alexander the Great on the world
What impact did Alexander have on our world today
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
He is one of the greatest military tacticians, a charismatic leader who is no stranger to the art of manipulation, and an unstoppable force which conquered the majority of the known world. All this describes the man among men, Alexander the Great. He started as the simple King of Macedonia, but soon began conquering areas of renown such as, the lands of Asia Minor, Greece, and becomes the pharaoh Egypt as well as the King of Persia in a short time span. It is also said there were plans to circumnavigate Africa planned, but it was not carried out due to his early death at a young age. (Taking Sides 37) He was highly revered, even to the point that he was even worshiped as divinity by notable leaders such as Napoleon Bonaparte and Julius Caesar. …show more content…
(Taking Sides 23) Alexander’s wit in battle, his manipulation and social policy, as well as his charisma and ability to inspire loyalty were all factors which built his empire to the state of brilliance that put any being in awe to this day.
Alexander the Great was an unmatched General and Strategist. In a battle of the minds he would somewhat always prevail. There are even countries and empires which Alexander the Great has conquered and beat, where he did not lose a single battle or suffer a single defeat. Talk about flawless victory, battles in places such as Syria and Egypt were a mismatch for the infallible Alexander the Great. Like a chess master, Alexander the Great is capable of thinking several steps ahead of his opponents. At the battles of Gaugamela and Hydaspes, “He foresaw precisely the sequence of moves by his own units and the compulsion it would place on his enemies” Even when situations were unsure, Alexander the Great always seemed to know the right course of action …show more content…
to take regardless of the event. (Taking Sides 27) It was because of his brilliant and sound mind that he was able to achieve victory in even grim looking matchups. Armies which far exceeded his own army by even 4 or 5 times in numbers still faced a crushing defeat at his hands. When facing hardships including, lack of numbers, horrid terrain, and even freezing weather, he still found a way to walk the path of victory. Adolf Hitler, the man who single handedly brought Germany out of depression and conquered much of Europe with limited troops and supplies, in his conquest of Soviet Russia still fell prey to the harsh winters of Russia and was defeated. Alexander the Great’s styles and strategies are still taught to this day in Business and Military academies to give students the edge that they need in their own conquests. (Team Trek) More than military prowess is necessary in building an empire however; Alexander the Great was also skilled in manipulation and instating social policy. Alexander the Great’s empire consisted of many cultures and beliefs, to have these coexist in one empire, he had to pander to each and every one of them. With each area Alexander took over, he adopted part of their culture. He was also never too proud to bow down to their gods. In doing this he faced less resistance when annexing a nation into his own. He seemed to intend for his empire to become a melting pot, he instated policies to try and merge cultures. In 324 BCE, he hosted a mass wedding in Susa where he attempted to create a Macedonian-Persian Elite, 80 Companion Calvary members took 80 Persian Brides while 10000 noblemen took 10000 brides as well. Alexander also began adopting Persian clothing styles and practiced Persian derived activities such as meditation. He actually seemed to favor the Persians over the Macedonians and this caused a shaky relationship between Alexander The Great and the Macedonians. Alexander was incredible at manipulating others to do exactly what he wanted them to do. Skilled at imposing his will on others, one example of manipulation was stirring up support for the Persian War. His father King Phillip wanted to invade the lands of Persia first, however, he ended up being killed by unknown circumstances. Therefore, it was up to Alexander, his heir to take over the will of his father, he needed a way to get the people on his side and he attributes the death of his father to the Persians. He was able to manipulate the soldiers and citizens to back him for a seemingly impossible victory against the Persians. In another event, Alexander used his skills of manipulation against his own Macedonian soldiers in (324 BCE). These soldiers were worn and tired and thinking of ending their service, and their anger at Alexander for adopting “barbarian” customs did not help either. Alexander saw this and instated a policy saying that, any soldier who feels they are unfit for service may be discharged. The Macedonians saw this as an insult thinking that Alexander was trying to get rid of them in favor of the Persians and many decided to stay. This also led to the Opis Mutiny, where soldiers openly spoke out against him. This gets to the last of his policies, when efforts of non-violence don’t work, he would take out any who did not support or agree with him. Thirteen of the most troublemaking soldiers were arrested and soon executed; many did not dare to speak out against Alexander again. These policies were a very effective way to nip any problems in the bud. He was not only a well-respected as well as a feared ruler because of his brilliance, social policy and ruthlessness; he was also very charismatic and inspired the loyalty of his followers. Alexander the Great believed the he had come from the gods to be the reconciler of the universe. He believed that he was invincible and it fell upon him to unite the world under one ruler through the force of arms if necessary. (Taking Sides 29) This belief of invincibility and of divine will is what enabled him to be able to take to the front lines of battle fields. There were times he was the first over city walls and was never prepared to make his men do anything he wasn’t prepared to do himself. This “leading from the front” is the kind of motivational leadership that inspired his men to follow him and not lose heart. He also gives pre battle speeches which “inspire his men to even greater pinnacles of achievement.” (World of Alexander) This is an excerpt from a speech Alexander used to increase the morale of his men before a battle against King Porus.
“I could not have blamed you for being the first to lose heart if I, your commander, had not shared in your exhausting marches and your perilous campaigns; it would have been natural enough if you had done all the work merely for others to reap the reward. But it is not so. You and I, gentlemen, have shared the labour and shared the danger, and the rewards are for us all. The conquered territory belongs to you; from your ranks the governors of it are chosen; already the greater part of its treasure passes into your hands, and when all Asia is overrun, then indeed I will go further than the mere satisfaction of our ambitions: the utmost hopes of riches or power which each one of you cherishes will be far surpassed, and whoever wishes to return home will be allowed to go, either with me or without me. I will make those who stay the envy of those who return.” After hearing this speech, be sure that his men were prepared to jump into an active volcano if it were by his command. Before this speech the men were did not have the will to fight another battle after battle for years upon years. (Word Press) You are able to see elements of Alexander’s speeches even in modern ones like in the “I Have a Dream Speech” by Martin Luther King, or in the inaugural address of John F. Kennedy. (Team Trek) Alexander the Greats leadership abilities seem beyond
human. Alexander without a doubt lives up to his exalted historical reputation. He has earned the “Great” that comes after his name. Some may argue against this because of his quick tempered personality and recklessness, which caused him to do regrettable things such as endanger the lives of his soldiers trying to cross the desert (Taking Sides 31-32) or, run his friend Cleitus through with a spear during a drunken fit.(Taking Sides 28) However, this does not undermine all he has accomplished throughout his lifetime, he had achieved much more than any of his predecessors before him and the majority that came after him. Alexander the Great might just be the most successful and influential leader throughout all of history.
Alexander didn’t show any of these characteristics, therefore he doesn’t deserve the title of “great”. The first reason why Alexander lll wasn’t great is because he didn’t show concern for others. In document B it states “Porus’ elephants were now boxed in, and the damage inflicted by them fell on friend no less than foe, with men trampled under as the beast twisted and turned. In document E it states “Years that it took Alexander to build his empire-11 Years that Alexander’s empire held together after his death-10” Alexander the “great” doesn’t show any intelligence because he forgot to make a will with an heir for his empire leaving it confused and aggressive because no one knew who was going to rule.
In the countries who believed Alexander was the son of the devil or the devil himself, will say he is not ‘great’ but a demon who did evil. The countries who were on his side would say he was the greatest conqueror to live. He began as a Macedonian cavalry commander at eighteen, king of Macedonia at twenty, conqueror of Persia at twenty-six and explorer of India at thirty [Foner and Garraty]. The amount of large scale accomplishments he managed to finish in a span of six years is astonishing. Alexander’s tomb was the largest tourist attraction in the ancient world. The tomb was even visited by Julius Caesar, Pompey, Caligula, and Augustus. Alexander the Great’s accomplishments set a bar in which provided a standard that all other leaders would match their careers too. Many leaders after Alexander could not reach the standard left by him [Foner and
Lastly, Alexander was an incredibly poor sport when it came to his victories over other cities and/or countries. There are multitudes of people who think of Alexander the great as an outstanding leader and respectful
One of the reasons for Alexander’s military success is because he was brought up by a great military leader. Alexander’s father was King Phillip II of Macedonia, a great military leader himself. When Alexander was a young man, around 16, his father realized his potential and pulled him out of school and put him out on the field to learn (McGill). He also got him a tutor, one of the best in all of history, Aristotle. Alexander’s young life will prove to be one of the largest reasons for his...
“There is nothing impossible to him who will try” (Anonymous, Google). Alexander was not willing to give up in his lifetime. Nothing satisfied him. He always wanted to keep building his empire. Alexander the Great became a king at the young age of twenty. He was a strong leader who expanded his empire from Italy to India for eleven years with little rest. Alexander the Great was really great because Alexander made remarkable achievements while king of Greece, and he was very intelligent. Some may argue the achievements weren’t well earned, however these achievements lead to great successes.
Alexander was Great because of his leadership. When Alexander went into battle, he used lots of complicated strategies to win. Due to the teachings of Aristotle, he was a force to reckoned with. One example comes from Doc B.The battle was set in India, against a king named Porus. He had more than 30 elephants under his control. The one thing that separated them was a shallow river. The document tells us that he would “Take his cavalry to various positions along the river bank where he would create a clamor… This went on for quite a time until Porus no longer reacted” Alexander used great strategy to outsmart his enemy.
Alexander the Great is hailed, by most historians, as “The Great Conqueror” of the world in the days of ancient Mesopotamia. “Alexander III of Macedon, better known as Alexander the Great, single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in little more than a decade. Alexander was born in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia in July 356 BCE. His parents were Philip II of Macedon and his wife Olympias. Philip was assassinated in 336 BCE and Alexander inherited a powerful yet volatile kingdom. He quickly dealt with his enemies at home and reasserted Macedonian power within Greece. He then set out to conquer the massive Persian Empire” (Web, BBC History). It is important to note, which will maybe explain his brutal actions, that Alexander was only twenty years old when he became the king of Macedonia. “When he was 13, Philip hired the Greek philosopher Aristotle to be Alexander’s personal tutor. During the next three years Aristotle gave Alexander training in rhetoric and literature and stimulated his interest in science, medicine, and philosophy, all of which became of importance in Alexander’s later life” (Web, Project of History of Macedonia). “In, 340, when Philip assembled a large Macedonian army and invaded Thrace, he left his 16 years old son with the power to rule Macedonia in his absence as regent, but as the Macedonian army advanced deep into Thrace, the Thracian tribe of Maedi bordering north-eastern Macedonia rebelled and posed a danger to the country. Alexander assembled an army, led it against the rebels, and with swift action defeated the Maedi, captured their stronghold, and renamed it after himself to Alexandropolis. Two years later in 338 BC, Philip gave his son a commanding post among the senior gener...
Few historical figures stand out in the same degree as that of Alexander the Great. He was a warrior by 16, a commander at age 18, and was crowned King of Macedon by the time he was 20 years old. He did things in his lifetime that others could only dream about. Alexander single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in just over a decade. There were many attributes that made Alexander “Great.” He was a brilliant strategist and an inspired leader; he led by example and was a conqueror at heart. In looking at his early childhood, accession to the throne, conquests, marriage, and death one can see why Alexander the Great is revered in historical contexts as one of the greatest figures of all time.
...f the conquered territories to remain relatively unchanged, Alexander was able to subdue potential unrest before it occurred. However, Alexander’s rule was not without discord though. Many Machiavellian actions for the good of the empire were seen as unsavory to a select few. While this created some distrust, Alexander’s power and governing expertise were enough to overcome these adversities. Because of the characteristics mentioned above, Alexander the Great is as close to a true Machiavellian ruler as humanly possible.
Alexander the Great (July 356BC – June 323BC) was King of the ancient Greek Kingdom of Macedon. By the age of thirty he had created one of the largest empires of the ancient world. He remained undefeated in battle and is considered one of history’s most successful Military commanders. Historians’ have offered theories which could explain Alexander’s motivation to conquer so much of the known world. Some suggest that Alexander was an idealistic visionary who sought to unite the world, whereas others argued that he was a fascist whose hunger for power drove him. The Ancient Greeks were driven by love of honour (philotimaea) and their desire for greatness. They were competitive, always striving to better one another.
The first matter to consider is what constitutes “greatness”. There are no set standards no checklist, to apply to a person, to determine it they are “great.” The simplest way that I could conceive to decide whether this title should apply to Alexander was to determine if he was, in some way, superior to the rulers that came before or after his reign. The most obvious place for me to start my consideration is with Alexander’s vast accomplishments as a conquerer.
Alexander the 3rd of Macedon (Alexander the Great). Son the king Phillips the 2nd. Alexander was a man who thought himself to be a god, famously known for never losing a battle. A king Idolized by many throughout history and for millennial his name still alive as a result of his greatness. The Macedonia king was Born in the classical Greek period, in 356 B.C.E and his death marked the end of that same time period in 323 B.C.E. Alexander created the largest empire in the ancient world and lastly he was indeed what every conqueror would’ve ever wanted to be, a military genius, a warrior, a Pharaoh, a king, a real legend. The legacy of Alexander represents the real idealism of true greatness which can split into different parts. There is a fascinating
Alexander the Great was a noble leader, he made his soldiers a large priority. On the return march after 13 years, ships are sent to send men home and Alexander
There are many leaders in the world, but a great ruler is passionate, honorable and one who can inspire even in the most hopeless circumstances. Alexander the Great was a great ruler. Alexander the Great was a ruler that was not only inspiring, but he was fearless, smart, bold and courageous. Alexander the Great inspired his soldiers to crave more. He has inspired people since the day he started ruling. What is inspirational about Alexander the Great is that he inspired his troops to the point that they did not question him when they were outnumbered three to one in a battle, they trusted him with their lives and were willing to die for him (Alexander the Great: man behind the legend).
In conclusion, I believe Alexander is one of the best political leader and the best general in the history. He managed to conquer and govern a huge territory with his wisdom. He didn’t win wars with soldiers, he won with strategy. Without a question, he was the most successful leader in the history. He knew how t rule and how to make people obedient and it is the main reason that he was very influential. These qualities made him live forever in stories, epics, and