Alexander The Great: Hero Or Villain?

526 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Brief biography alexander the great

After reading the source of “Alexander the Great”, I believe the source material does praise him. Alexander the greats whole motive was to spread Hellenism, the spread of green ideas and traditions throughout the Western Mediterranean and near east. According to the source material provided he ended up accomplishing just that throughout all his conquests. Alexander the great had a very strong personality which caused all the successor kings to revered to Alexander as their founder, and all minted coins had his image. Alexander was so successful as a leader that the results of his actions caused the green culture to evolve and mix with other cultures.
Alexanders vast empire did not last because although he fathered a successor, that child was not born when Alexander died. All Alexander was interested in was his rapid military conquests. His empire was a prize for the taking due to the murder of Roxanna who was a threat by the generals. The war lasted for decades and tore Alexanders empire apart. Some historians have criticized the reason as to why Alexander’s empire did not last. However, …show more content…

As a hero, for example, many historians consider him the greatest military leader of all time, frequently learned about the cultures he conquered, founded more than 20 cities (many named Alexandria), helped to preserve Greek culture posthumously with the spread of the culture to these areas which rose in wealth, and the first major victory against Theban troops equals victory for Philip and claims all of Greece. As a villain, for example, he neglected his own kingdom, local leaders in his place abuse power and ignored peoples’ needs, believed he could accomplish great things and an empire beyond what his father created, demanded and received the utmost allegiance and obedience from his advisors, but often brutal towards them, and he neglected to designate a legitimate heir thus his vast empire crumbles after his

Show More
Related

  • Alexander The Great Dbq

    735 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many small government officials took pieces of land, changing the laws and affecting the citizens in big ways. Ten years later, the empire fell apart, leaving people with many burdens. Alexander left his empire after he died in a big mess, hoping someone could help him. This was unsmart because even though death might not be expected, it is always important to create a will with as much at stake as there was in Alexander’s situation. In summary, Alexander was not smart because he wasn’t able to think ahead to help his empire stay strong.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Alexander The Great

    117 Words  | 1 Pages

    Darius had an advantage over Alexander the Great, he had more troops, better resources, and he chose the battle field. Although Darius had the advantage he was not as smart as Alexander. Alexander had good communication with his troops; he planned according, in addition he was well organized before the battled. He did not stray away from his plan he stuck to it. Alexander troops were heavily armed they moved in formation, and they were shield with their long spears they stayed close together and moved in formation. In addition he did not have all his troops engaged in the battle at once he planned an awesome attack strategy that won him and his troops the war.

    Read More

  • Was Alexander The Great Selfish

    1711 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the countries who believed Alexander was the son of the devil or the devil himself, will say he is not ‘great’ but a demon who did evil. The countries who were on his side would say he was the greatest conqueror to live. He began as a Macedonian cavalry commander at eighteen, king of Macedonia at twenty, conqueror of Persia at twenty-six and explorer of India at thirty [Foner and Garraty]. The amount of large scale accomplishments he managed to finish in a span of six years is astonishing. Alexander’s tomb was the largest tourist attraction in the ancient world. The tomb was even visited by Julius Caesar, Pompey, Caligula, and Augustus. Alexander the Great’s accomplishments set a bar in which provided a standard that all other leaders would match their careers too. Many leaders after Alexander could not reach the standard left by him [Foner and

    Read More

  • Why Alexander The Great Is A Villain

    910 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great:An Analysis Thesis:Alexander the Great is a villain because Alexander the Great murdered and tortured people for no reason,he also took over cities against their own will. Alexander the Great is a villain because Alexander the Great murdered and tortured many people. This man came to civilizations and Alexander the Great took them under his rule,if one did not follow one were tortured. He also killed people just as a warning that Alexander the Great actually wasn't dead. According to Alexander the not so great Paragraph 3 page 2 “Persians also condemn him for the widespread destruction Alexander the Great is thought to have encouraged to cultural and religious sites throughout the empire.”

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Hero Or Villain Essay

    549 Words  | 2 Pages

    Lastly, Alexander was an incredibly poor sport when it came to his victories over other cities and/or countries. There are multitudes of people who think of Alexander the great as an outstanding leader and respectful

    Read More

  • Was Alexander The Great Really Great?

    943 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great is great because of his remarkable achievement which helped to create a long lasting legacy. Alexander started to build his empire in 334 BCE after taking the new role as the king. It only took eleven years to build an empire that was large and lasted several years. In addition, the empire Alexander created stretched over 2,200,000 square miles becoming bigger than the United States (Alexander’s Empire Doc. A) (Alexander’s Legacy Doc, E). This proves that Alexander the Great is great because although the process was eleven long years to make a strong empire, Alexander wasn’t willing to give up and

    Read More

  • Alexander of Macedon, A Historical Biography

    962 Words  | 2 Pages

    The author’s thesis argues that Alexander became who he was based on the society he grew up in. Green describes Alexander’s surroundings as “loud, clamorous professional soldiers, who rode or drank or fought or fornicated” (pg. 40). These were the male examples that he had in his life and his father was no different. He was also surrounded by the planning and strategy of war, treachery and conspiracies. His mother Olympia’s which is so popularly known for poisoning young Alexander’s mind against Philip, the author believes is nothing more but a psychological myth. Alexander and Olympia’s did not turn against Philip till 338 BC, when Alexander...

    Read More

  • Alexander: The Not So Great

    1861 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alexander the Great is hailed, by most historians, as “The Great Conqueror” of the world in the days of ancient Mesopotamia. “Alexander III of Macedon, better known as Alexander the Great, single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in little more than a decade. Alexander was born in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia in July 356 BCE. His parents were Philip II of Macedon and his wife Olympias. Philip was assassinated in 336 BCE and Alexander inherited a powerful yet volatile kingdom. He quickly dealt with his enemies at home and reasserted Macedonian power within Greece. He then set out to conquer the massive Persian Empire” (Web, BBC History). It is important to note, which will maybe explain his brutal actions, that Alexander was only twenty years old when he became the king of Macedonia. “When he was 13, Philip hired the Greek philosopher Aristotle to be Alexander’s personal tutor. During the next three years Aristotle gave Alexander training in rhetoric and literature and stimulated his interest in science, medicine, and philosophy, all of which became of importance in Alexander’s later life” (Web, Project of History of Macedonia). “In, 340, when Philip assembled a large Macedonian army and invaded Thrace, he left his 16 years old son with the power to rule Macedonia in his absence as regent, but as the Macedonian army advanced deep into Thrace, the Thracian tribe of Maedi bordering north-eastern Macedonia rebelled and posed a danger to the country. Alexander assembled an army, led it against the rebels, and with swift action defeated the Maedi, captured their stronghold, and renamed it after himself to Alexandropolis. Two years later in 338 BC, Philip gave his son a commanding post among the senior gener...

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great

    1624 Words  | 4 Pages

    Few historical figures stand out in the same degree as that of Alexander the Great. He was a warrior by 16, a commander at age 18, and was crowned King of Macedon by the time he was 20 years old. He did things in his lifetime that others could only dream about. Alexander single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in just over a decade. There were many attributes that made Alexander “Great.” He was a brilliant strategist and an inspired leader; he led by example and was a conqueror at heart. In looking at his early childhood, accession to the throne, conquests, marriage, and death one can see why Alexander the Great is revered in historical contexts as one of the greatest figures of all time.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Influence

    1197 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander the great is known as one of the most ruthless and greatest leaders the world has ever seen. In less than ten years, Alexander conquered cities from Greece all the way to modern day India. Not only did he defeat and conquer cities throughout the known world, but Alexander would also leave his mark spreading and influencing Greek society wherever he went. His leadership and conquests united the East and the West as a whole like no one up to that point had done before. His impact on culture and society when meshing his Greek background with his conquered cities became something truly unique. In 323 B.C. when Alexander passed away, he not only left behind a vast thriving empire, but also a legacy that would be remembered throughout history.

    Read More

  • Alexander the Great

    1349 Words  | 3 Pages

    Borza, Eugene N. "Alexander the Great: History and Cultural Politics." Journal of the Historical Society 7.4 (2007): 411-442. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 17 May 2011.

    Read More

  • Alexander’s Vast Accomplishments as a Conquerer

    966 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...here are few people in history that can claim the military prowess, uncanny political maneuvering, and the overall lasting effect of the dissemination of a particular culture such as Alexander. Alexander’s exploits led to the spread of the Greek culture throughout Asia and Africa. They even went so far as to impact the Romans who dominated Hellenistic Egypt. He left in his wake and expansion of territory and commerce, with expanded trading ports and the exportation of the Greek political system. Christianity emerged with the Hellenization of the Jews and spread throughout Hellenized gentile communities. It seems impossible to catalogue every impact of Alexander’s empire. In the end, I have to conclude that Alexander does ‘fully deserve’ the title of “the Great.”

    Read More

  • Who Is Alexander The Great A Villain

    600 Words  | 2 Pages

    First, Alexander the Great is a villain because he caused the destruction of his own empire. Throughout his reign as king, he was constantly asked to name a successor to take over the empire if something happened to him, but Alexander always refused. Alexander needed to name a successor to keep his empire going, but he “both refused to provide one, and killed off any man who could be seen as one…” (The John Maxwell Company). Alexander was so determined to stay in control of his empire that he killed any man who he thought could be seen as his successor. He cared more about himself and his power than his empire and it’s success. When

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great: Leadership, Courage, Intelligence, Or Discipline

    344 Words  | 1 Pages

    What do you think makes someone great? Is it leadership, courage, intelligence, or discipline? Whatever makes someone great, that is what Alexander the Great is. The Greeks were weak after the Peloponnesian War, and King Philip II of Macedonia saw this as an opportunity to take over. He conquered Greece and then was about to move onto Persia, when he was assassinated in 336 B.C., leaving his son, Alexander the Great, to be king. Alexander went on to finish what his father had started. He quickly took over Persia and then pushed eastward into Central Asia. He returned to Persia and blended Greek and Persian cultures. A couple of years later, he became very ill and died. In order to be great, you must have leadership, courage, and remarkable

    Read More

  • Herodotus's Impact On Greek Life

    875 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander was the son of King Philip II of Macedon, ‘‘whose accomplishments laid a firm foundation for Alexander’s later success”. Following his father’s death, Alexander claimed the title of king at only the age of eighteen. He then went on to build his empire and become one of the greatest conquerors the world had ever seen. Some of his most notable conquests were those of Egypt and Persia, which later became two of the three divisions of Alexander’s empire, along with Macedonia. At the age of just 33, Alexander died of unknown causes, having never lost a battle.

    Read More

More about Alexander The Great: Hero Or Villain?

Open Document