Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The influence of Greek civilization
The influence of Greek civilization
The character of Alexander the Great
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The influence of Greek civilization
Great: an adjective that is frequently used to describe something as imposing, exceeding the traits of the ordinary, or being imperative enough for acknowledgement. A word that we see paired with various degrees of emphasis, from an individual’s opinion of an enjoyable activity, to an imposing natural or man-made structure; to the more severe, unfortunate incident (as well as a curiously favored sugar breakfast food). One may wonder how a rather versatile word like “great” should be applied to a noun to describe its respective attribute, such as the honorific of Alexander III of Macedonia. The young king was the son of the Macedonian king, Philip II, and the princess of Epirus, Olympias. During his rule between twenty and thirty-two years …show more content…
For example, the Battle of Thebes in 335 BCE. When Alexander acquired the throne and inherited his father’s heritage after his assassination in 336 BCE, some of the Greek territories that have been seized by the precedent empire, including the Illyrians and Thracians, saw the opportunity to revolt and attain their independence from authority. Fortunately, Alexander fleetingly traveled north and south, and reinstituted command and order upon the regions. Subsequently, as the new king continued to readjust control of the rebels, a campaign was coordinated along the cities of Thrace and Illyria, where the revolts were prominent. However, during the battles emerged a fallacious disclosure of the death of Alexander, slain during the midst of combat. Consequently, as the rumor dispersed among the country, another significant revolt arose from the city-state of Thebes (Alexander the Great Alexander of Macedon Biography; The sack of Thebes). Hearing of the news, he quickly marched to the exterior of the city, and according to one of Julian’s epitomes, a Latin historian, “. . . he directed the army towards Thebes intending to show the same mercy if he met with similar contrition. But the Thebans resorted to arms rather than entreaties or appeals, and so after their defeat they were subjected to all the terrible punishments associated with a humiliating capitulation” (The …show more content…
Even years after his ruling of the Macedonian empire, the arts and the development in knowledge flourished among the territories reigned by Alexander. From his death in 332 BCE to 31 BCE, a period, which the historians have labeled as the Hellenistic period, arose and spread Greek culture along eastern and western Asia, and the Mediterranean (Hellenistic Greece). Amongst the era, the established cities gained the prestige of a site of education and culture, as well as commerce. Particularly Alexandria of Egypt, the largest and most affluent city of the known world, and the home of the signal Library of Alexandria, arisen during the Hellenistic civilization. Founded by Alexander for the purpose as a center of trade and military outpost for the Macedonians (Hellenistic Greece; HELLENSIM IN THE ORIENT), it progressively expanded into a metropolis that restored the succession of Tyre, a Phoenician port city of the most considerable proficiency in commerce in the east Mediterranean (ALEXANDRIA; LIVIUS). Brilliant minds such as Aristarchus and Archimedes… New discoveries. Further insight of self and the world around them. Some of these lands influenced by the Greek stood with these cultures for years, and some still stand today… Despite that the kingdom was quickly broken, his work ultimately paved a better life to his people and their
Have you heard of Alexander the Great, the famous historical figure? There are many amazing stories about him explaining the courageous things he has accomplished. However, if you learn more about him and his accomplishments, you will soon realize the real person Alexander was. Alexander the Great, ruler of his empire, was in fact not great as his title states. The definition of great is a person who shows concern for others, has leadership and shows intelligence.
The son of Philip II, Alexander the Great, will become the conqueror of the western world. Alexander received the Macedonian empire when his father passed, he was only twenty at the time. As soon as he had the power of the Macedonian army, several lightning fast campaigns led them into the west and north. Next, he compelled the city-states that rebelled against the League of Corinth. This action demonstrated how Alexander punished disloyalty [Martin 244]. Alexander was able to keep his rule on the territories he conquered by rewarded the cities who recognized his powers and punished the individuals that betrayed his trust or ambitions. The power he possessed depended on his superior force and his unwillingly desire to use it [Martin 245]. The
Alexander the Great is hailed, by most historians, as “The Great Conqueror” of the world in the days of ancient Mesopotamia. “Alexander III of Macedon, better known as Alexander the Great, single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in little more than a decade. Alexander was born in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia in July 356 BCE. His parents were Philip II of Macedon and his wife Olympias. Philip was assassinated in 336 BCE and Alexander inherited a powerful yet volatile kingdom. He quickly dealt with his enemies at home and reasserted Macedonian power within Greece. He then set out to conquer the massive Persian Empire” (Web, BBC History). It is important to note, which will maybe explain his brutal actions, that Alexander was only twenty years old when he became the king of Macedonia. “When he was 13, Philip hired the Greek philosopher Aristotle to be Alexander’s personal tutor. During the next three years Aristotle gave Alexander training in rhetoric and literature and stimulated his interest in science, medicine, and philosophy, all of which became of importance in Alexander’s later life” (Web, Project of History of Macedonia). “In, 340, when Philip assembled a large Macedonian army and invaded Thrace, he left his 16 years old son with the power to rule Macedonia in his absence as regent, but as the Macedonian army advanced deep into Thrace, the Thracian tribe of Maedi bordering north-eastern Macedonia rebelled and posed a danger to the country. Alexander assembled an army, led it against the rebels, and with swift action defeated the Maedi, captured their stronghold, and renamed it after himself to Alexandropolis. Two years later in 338 BC, Philip gave his son a commanding post among the senior gener...
Few historical figures stand out in the same degree as that of Alexander the Great. He was a warrior by 16, a commander at age 18, and was crowned King of Macedon by the time he was 20 years old. He did things in his lifetime that others could only dream about. Alexander single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in just over a decade. There were many attributes that made Alexander “Great.” He was a brilliant strategist and an inspired leader; he led by example and was a conqueror at heart. In looking at his early childhood, accession to the throne, conquests, marriage, and death one can see why Alexander the Great is revered in historical contexts as one of the greatest figures of all time.
Alexander the great is known as one of the most ruthless and greatest leaders the world has ever seen. In less than ten years, Alexander conquered cities from Greece all the way to modern day India. Not only did he defeat and conquer cities throughout the known world, but Alexander would also leave his mark spreading and influencing Greek society wherever he went. His leadership and conquests united the East and the West as a whole like no one up to that point had done before. His impact on culture and society when meshing his Greek background with his conquered cities became something truly unique. In 323 B.C. when Alexander passed away, he not only left behind a vast thriving empire, but also a legacy that would be remembered throughout history.
Alexander the Great has been considered for centuries as a military genius and influenced conquerors such as Hannibal the Carthaginian, the Romans Pompey, Caesar and Napoleon. Although, he inherited a strong kingdom and an experienced army, Alexander was capable to display his leadership and military capabilities. In 338 B.C., his father, King Phillip II, gave Alexander a commanding post among the senior generals as the Ma...
The first reason that Alexandria has had such a lasting impact on today’s society was because it was such a large and grand city. In fact, it was the largest and richest city in the eastern region of the Roman Empire. In fact, it was one of
This investigation attempts to answer the question “What are the similarities and differences between the leadership traits of Darius I and Alexander?” This question is important because it went on to impact the leadership of other rulers and the way that the people under their rulings lived. The issues that will be addressed are in what ways they were successful, and what their biggest failure in their power was. This investigation will focus on the time period of 550-486 and 356-323 BCE, as this is the time period of Darius I and Alexander’s lives. The places investigated will include Greece, the Persian Empire, Macedonia, Syria, and Egypt because these are the central places of ruling for Darius I and Alexander. This will be accomplished through a thorough examination of what led to the fame and what led to the end of power for Alexander and Darius I by looking at biographies of both Darius I and Alexander’s lives, as well as books that are secondary sources.
Even if some tend to assume that Alexander truly was great, one cannot fully argue with the fact that Alexander had a huge ego, and he could barely maintain it himself. He was only twenty years old when he launched his invasion of the Persian Empire, and he could have had such a bright future that allowed him to deserve the title of great. Yet even Alexander’s army turned back after eight years of marching due to the fact that his ego could not wrap around the idea that all of these battles remained useless. Conquering so much land for personal pleasures just demonstrates how power hungry Alexander truly was. The city name Alexandria appears eleven times on the map of his empire. He was so conceited that he wanted people to know how much land
Alexander the Great (July 356BC – June 323BC) was King of the ancient Greek Kingdom of Macedon. By the age of thirty he had created one of the largest empires of the ancient world. He remained undefeated in battle and is considered one of history’s most successful Military commanders. Historians’ have offered theories which could explain Alexander’s motivation to conquer so much of the known world. Some suggest that Alexander was an idealistic visionary who sought to unite the world, whereas others argued that he was a fascist whose hunger for power drove him. The Ancient Greeks were driven by love of honour (philotimaea) and their desire for greatness. They were competitive, always striving to better one another.
The first matter to consider is what constitutes “greatness”. There are no set standards no checklist, to apply to a person, to determine it they are “great.” The simplest way that I could conceive to decide whether this title should apply to Alexander was to determine if he was, in some way, superior to the rulers that came before or after his reign. The most obvious place for me to start my consideration is with Alexander’s vast accomplishments as a conquerer.
Alexander II has been considered “a great historical figure without being a great man, that what he did was more important than what he was.” ( W.E Mosse) For 26 years, Czar Alexander II ruled russia. During his reign, he made his mark on history by stepping outside of the box and going to extreme measures to help his people. He has been labeled as the “Liberator of tsar” for the ending of serfdom. Czar Alexander II of Russia has made an impact on history because of his interesting background, fatal assassination, and the changes made after his assassination.
There are many leaders in the world, but a great ruler is passionate, honorable and one who can inspire even in the most hopeless circumstances. Alexander the Great was a great ruler. Alexander the Great was a ruler that was not only inspiring, but he was fearless, smart, bold and courageous. Alexander the Great inspired his soldiers to crave more. He has inspired people since the day he started ruling. What is inspirational about Alexander the Great is that he inspired his troops to the point that they did not question him when they were outnumbered three to one in a battle, they trusted him with their lives and were willing to die for him (Alexander the Great: man behind the legend).
Great has West Germanic roots and has been around since the days of Old English. The overall journey of great is about bigness: physical, then metaphorical. This movement is common for adjectives. Anne Curzan, Arthur F. Thurnau professor of English at the University of Michigan and regular contributor to the Lingua Franca blog, said in an e-mail that huge is making a similar shift: “Now you will hear, in informal usage, huge used to refer to something very important or really good in terms of its overall value — for example, ‘That win was huge!’ ” Over the centuries, great set that standard for that kind of
His next-in-command, General Ptolemy, took over Egypt after Alexander’s death. Ptolemy shared Alexander’s respect for knowledge and learning and was able to finish what Alexander started. Not only did he finish the library, he made Alexandria the capital of Egypt. Ptolemy and his descendants continued support of the library for almost 300 years. They spent their lifetimes collecting books.