Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Air canada industry
Airline oligopolistic competition
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 2011, Air Canada was Canada’s largest airline and the 15th largest commercial airline in the world, serving over 32 million customers annually with more than 170 destinations. Their mission was “connecting Canada and the world.” According to Air Canada’s Senior Vice-President of E-Commerce and Chief Information Officer, “We are in the customer service industry. In this line of business, the differentiators are service level, identification and innovation, but innovation is the key” (Karimi-Alaghehband and Rivard, 2014, p. 1). Air Canada was pursuing the dual strategic objectives of operational excellence and building customer loyalty through innovation.
This pursuit created unique challenges for Air Canada which primarily centered around operational efficiency issues, operating cost
…show more content…
controls and overall, difficulty competing with low cost carriers. Air Canada faced these challenges by focusing on maintaining balance between organizational, IT and changing business strategies. Their approach to achieving and maintaining this balance came through technology driven operational process improvements and innovations, the evolution of their IT governance model, changes in their sourcing strategy and the reorganizing and maturing of their IT organizational structure. During the 2010s, in support of carrying out their mission of connecting Canada and the world, Air Canada pursued an international growth business strategy by entering into partnerships with Lufthansa and United/Continental.
This proved successful in aiding their growth strategy. However, Air Canada still had to complete with strong, growing airlines in the domestic, US and International markets. While their vision was to build customer loyalty through passion and innovation, cost reduction was a critical issue. Fuel was the most significant cost to Air Canada, but with no control over fuel prices, they focused their cost reduction efforts on costs in all other areas of the business. Air Canada implemented the Cost Transformation Program (CTP) to change its cost structure and seeking cost reductions throughout the enterprise as a means of becoming more competitive with the low pricing structures of low cost carriers. The CTP focused on operational process improvements, supplier contract renegotiations and revenue optimization (Karimi-Alaghehband and Rivard, 2014, p. 2). These three3 focus areas required technology innovation and realignment of technology
support. Air Canada successfully leveraged technology to optimize its processes and greatly reduced operating costs in support of their competitive strategy. Air Canada embraced technology as a critical tool for innovation and they developed new technologies that other carriers use today, such as kiosks and electronic boarding passes. Further supporting operational cost reductions and innovation, Air Canada held a Federalism (or hybrid) IT governance. According to Pearlson and Saunders, Federalism is a structuring approach that distributes power, hardware, software, data and personnel between a central IS group and IS in business units (Pearlson and Saunders, 2013, p. 240). This approach was intended to harness the advantages of decentralized and centralized approaches, while mitigating the drawbacks of each. In 2001, 95% of Air Canada’s IT services were outsourced but a small, yet critical team was brought back in-house, or back-sourced. This team focused on the customer experience and was able to react more quickly to customer needs than if the area remained outsourced. As Pearlson and Saunders state, the reasons for backsourcing often mirror the reasons for outsourcing; to reduce cost and become more efficient (Pearlson and Saunders, 2013, p. 282). This was certainly the case for Air Canada in light of their business strategy evolution. In 2011, Air Canada had adopted a multi-vendor sourcing strategy and gave it’s IT Partner, IBM, integration authority. According to Karimi-Alaghehband and Rivard, IBM acted as the keeper and guardian of Air Canada’s corporate IT standards (2014, p. 4). Air Canada took a relational approach to managing their outsourced contracts. They believed that project success hinged on relationship building between business units and vendors, as well as amongst multiple vendors directly. This arrangement demonstrates a strategic network sourcing strategy for Air Canada. According to Pearlson and Saunders, a strategic network is a long term arrangement where client and vendor establish a web of close relationships aimed at providing products and services in a coordinated way. Through this strategic network, Air Canada could become more efficient than its competitors and be flexible enough to respond to its rapidly changing environment (Pearlson and Saunders, 2013, p. 283). Air Canada created an office of IT Sourcing to support the management of major supplier contracts. This included responsibility for vendor selection with the understanding that the appropriate vendor would be experienced with the airline industry and would not be learning their business on Air Canada’s account. This office was also responsible for onshore and offshore sourcing decisions based on the complexity of the service or change that was launching. The IT Sourcing office also developed, managed and enforced appropriate SLAs for each vendor and determined the appropriate governance structure for each. Over the years, Air Canada’s IT department went through multiple reorganizations of significant magnitude. By 2011, one IT representative was assigned to each of the three main branches of Customer Service, Commercials and Operations. This replaced the structure by which there was an IT representative for each department. This restructure eliminated the inherent lack of communication and coordination between departments and replaced it with three units that had separate responsibilities, but one common goal: to link the business side and IT.
The following value chain, which focuses on Spirit Airlines, is representative of most of the firms in the Ultra Low-Cost Airline industry. Spirit is the industry leader in many areas such as operational efficiencies/cost structure, aircraft fleet management, brand/network and growth. The firm, however, trails industry foes in areas such as customer service and operational reliability and recoverability. While most in this segment pursue the cost-leader competitive strategy, Spirit has demonstrated the most effective model to date – whether the model is the most sustainable remains to be seen.
One of the many influences that affect Qantas is the presence of globalisation, which has heavily affected the airline both positively and negatively. Globalisation is a process which refers to the increased integration between different countries and economies as well as the increased impact of international influences on all aspects of life and economic activity. Globalisation is responsible for the removal of many trade barriers and the increased level of competition that Qantas has been exposed to. The increased levels of competition has increased consumer sovereignty and forced Qantas to implement strategies to gain a competitive advantage in order to redirect consumers towards their business. Qantas has implemented a cost leadership strategy as a response to globalisation and the influence of cost based competition. One way that Qantas achieved this was by using Globalisation itself to the business’ advantage. Globalisation ha...
Global competition- As more companies are coming into this airline market so there can be a threat to Air Canada from these
Another internal challenge for Southwest Airlines is the conflicting management style and business operation with AirTran. On top of that, the external challenges such as the increase of competitions and gas prices are some of issues f...
The Airline Industry is a fascinating market. It has been one of the few industries to reach astounding milestones. For example, over 200 airlines have gone out of business since deregulation occurred in 1978. Currently, more than 50% of the airlines in the industry are operating under Chapter 11 regulations. Since 9/11, four of the six large carriers have filed for and are currently under bankruptcy court protection. Since 9/11 the industry has lost over $30 billion dollars, and this loss continues to increase. Despite the fact that the airline industry is in a state of despair, JetBlue has become the golden example, a glimpse of what the industry could be.
Having a low cost of operations is one of the contributing factors to Southwest Airlines’ financial success. Such low cost model of the corporation is brought about by an effective strategy. Southwest uses only one type of aircraft – the fuel-efficient Boeing 737. This tactic keeps training and maintenance costs down. Moreover, the no-frills approach to customer service contributed to the low cost of operations for Southwest.
JetBlue's mission is "to bring humanity back to air travel". Its low-cost strategy is second-to-none, not even to Southwest. Utilizing Southwest as a model and benchmark early in Neeleman's career in the industry, he's managed to copy the Southwest model and expand upon it with his ability to find more innovative ways to cut costs along the organization's value-chain, while utilizing technology to increase productivity and further add to operational efficiencies. JetBlue's value chain demonstrates its ability to successfully compete in several key areas relative to the bases of competition within the industry and creates processes that focus on reducing costs, for the specific purpose of continuously creating value for its customers, i.e. fare pricing, customer service, routes served, flight schedules, types of aircraft, safety record and reputation, in-flight entertainment systems and frequent flyer programs.
In a dysfunctional time for the airline industry, most airlines, especially major carriers, are adapting the concept of "doing less with more." One low-cost carrier, JetBlue, is changing the domestic aviation landscape in this regard and is defying the odds. Here is a company that has examined each marketing mix elements carefully, has adapted them to its customer’s needs, and is succeeding because of this approach.
In the airline industry, Southwest Airlines is considered a true innovator. By shaking up the rules of flying and improving upon inefficient industry norms, Southwest has quickly grown by leaps and bounds. From the very start, Southwest Airlines' goals were to make a profit, achieve job security for every employee, and make flying affordable for more people (Southwest,2007). Southwest has not strayed from these goals. It does not buy huge aircrafts, fly international routes or try to go head to head with the major carriers; and thanks to a great planning, Southwest airlines has become the most successful airline company in the U.S., if not the world.
Northwest Airlines is one of the pioneers in the airline transportation industry and is ranked at the fourth largest air carrier in the United States today. The success of the carrier depends on the quality and reliability of the service at a reasonable price. Close competitors force Northwest to innovate their services by increasing efficiency. This essay will try to examine different perspectives in the services needed to successfully complete the company’s objectives. The analysis will explain historical and financial perspectives that may give a better understanding of the current market trend of the organization.
The airline industry has long attempted to segment the air travel market in order to effectively target its constituents. The classic airline model consists of First Class, Business Class and Economy, and the demographics that make up the classes have both similarities and differences to the other classes. For instance, there may be similarities between business class travellers on a particular flight, but they will not all be travelling for the same reason. An almost-universal characteristic of air travel is that customers do not fly for the sake of flying; the destination is the important element and the travel is a by-product, a means-to-an-end that involves the necessity of an aircraft that gets the customer from point A to point B. Because the reasons can differ greatly in the motivations for a customer wanting to fly, it can be difficult to divide the market into discrete segments, that is, there is always going to be overlap in the preferences and characteristics of any given segment. With that in mind, the commonalities that are shared between the clientele that make up the respective classes can easily withstand analysis.
Airline and travel industry profitability has been strapped by a series of events starting with a recession in business travel after the dotcom bust, followed by 9/11, the SARS epidemic, the Iraq wars, rising aviation turbine fuel prices, and the challenge from low-cost carriers. (Narayan Pandit, 2005) The fallout from rising fuel prices has been so extreme that any efficiency gains that airlines attempted to make could not make up for structural problems where labor costs remained high and low cost competition had continued to drive down yields or average fares at leading hub airports. In the last decade, US airlines alone had a yearly average of net losses of $9.1 billion (Coombs, 2011).
This concept was challenged by Southwest Airlines by marketing itself as a cost leader. Their entire growth curve in the industry has been attributed to its cost effective strategies which has made it more efficient and successful than traditional airlines.
Customer experience directly influences the sustainability of Asiana Airlines. Any business solely depends on customers to thrive. The customer service quality is paramount in Asiana airlines. The airline ensures that the customers are satisfied with service delivery in various ways. For instance, the introduction of Netflix streaming for a passenger aboard is a great step towards the sustainability of the airline. The initiative is important for the passengers because they are kept busy while aboard. According to Reader & Ridout (2013), the airline’s KLM technology will enhance the airline’s sustainability. As traveler centered advancements proceed swiftly, there are constantly
Improvements that have been made since 1972 are foremost improvements to the product of "traveling": better in-flight entertainment, an upgrade to ground services, more flight destinations through the "Star Alliance" network and improved seats and space on board. There are however improvements in other areas than product improvements: 2 kinds of loyalty programs have been introduced, premium passengers' preferences are filed and the complaint management has been improved over the years. The differentiation of types of passengers and the expectation that they will fly SIA again, retaining clients through complaint management and loyalty programs all suggest a move into a customer intimacy value strategy. As service and CRM become more and more integrated at SIA, customer intimacy is strategically embedded in the organization.