Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How industrial capitalism affected the africa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Compare and Contrast African Kingdoms and The Industrial Revolution
The African Kingdoms of the Lozi and Zulu, people had rich and historic backgrounds, quite similar to the Industrial Revolution. These African Kingdoms, and the Industrial Revolution all had a well structured, civilization, and a similar outline, but eventually, had different outcomes. For example, all three civilizations shared the traits of having social classes, a centered religion, a written language, and a fairly stable economy, but lack similarities when it comes to monumental architecture, and the development of cities. These civilizations were able to be successful, due to their structure to uphold their society, in many different ways.
Sharing the same economic structure, the African tribes and the time period of the Industrial Revolution are all centered around capitalism. Due to the government not being in control of trade within its state or kingdom, a capitalist economy is formed. Therefore, natural resources can be used to create different goods and uphold specializations. Such as having an abundance of cotton later resulting in the textile mill. Both African kingdoms also perform similar situations. Zulu’s workers trade beadwork and complex sculptures and Lozi’s exchange grain, fish, and iron work.
…show more content…
Capitalism allows for free trade and the creation of social classes due to the success or inferiority of one's enterprise.
With this being exemplified by the African Kingdoms and the Industrial Revolution, their social classes are similar. As in history social classes are divided into rich and poor. As the Industrial Revolution was divided into a high class, middle class, and lower class. This also happened to the African Kingdoms such as Lozi was divided into royal, commoners, and slaves. Kingdom Zulu, social classes were divided into chiefs and slaves. As shown the similarities to one another, that led to their
civilization. The African Tribes were able to trade of their goods, was due to their economy having enough food for the people to do other jobs. As for the Zulu Kingdom there was a lack in the amount of food as it was not as much “extra” food, to lead to specialization. As these civilizations were able to create a specialization for their community, these African Kingdoms and Industrial Revolution was able to do other things, such as learning. Education for the Zulu Kingdom was not strong for their people to get right away. As the civilization grew, they began to have a efficient education. The civilization were also to develop a religion as specialization occurred. As these African Kingdoms, and the Industrial Revolution differ, but was similar. Zulu and Europeans during the time of the Industrial Revolution had belief in a God. The god for the Europeans was the christianity that has been around for centuries. As for the God in the Zulu Kingdom, who is known as Nkulunkulu. Nkulunkulu is thought to be above interacting in day-to-day human affairs. As for the Lozi they believed in a mark of aristocracy. The Lozi people would grow their fingernails in order to show that they did not do manual labor and were free citizens. The development of cities contrasts when evaluating the African kingdoms and the Industrial Revolution. In the division of the Lozi people, cities are constructed around the Zambezi river. The high and low tide seasons of this river dictate the food cycle of the Lozi kingdom. Thus, when river levels get high, the citizens move to higher ground for safety in turn, developing cities there. Zulu’s cities are mainly established by which areas have plentiful resources up for trade. During the Industrial Revolution, the abundance of farmers ended up kicking people off their land which caused them to go specialize. This urbanization lead to the modernization and development of populous cities. The differences in location also affect which natural resources a given area has. This plays a part on dictating what monumental architecture can be created. Because of its bounty of iron and carbon, Great Britain created a lot of steel artifacts and some of the first steel bridges. Being surrounded with wild life, Lozi people built a lot of monumental objects out of ivory. The Zulu created their housing architecture out of mainly mud and straw, goods that were ubiquitous to them. The Industrial Revolution was able to occur due to the large amount of food, that had occurred because of an Agricultural Revolution that led to specialization. Thus leading to the growth in the technological and economical fields benefiting the features of the capitalistic economy. Due to the similarities between the African Kingdoms and the Industrial Revolution, many foundational traits were shared such as - social classes and economic structure. Although opposing traits were discovered when looking at the development of cities, monumental artifacts, and religion. These cultures differ in many ways, but were all able to run semi successfully.
The African empires, kingdoms, and cities had many achievements before the arrival of the Europeans. Some of these achievements had influences many other places in the world. Three major achievements were the trading systems, their military forces and strengths of its people, and the wealth and success.
...e, unlike the surrounding nations which were powerful, rich empires, Africa consisted of small tribes and kingdoms. These kingdoms’ greatest exports would consist of gold, salt, and slaves, in exchange for the goods imported from the surrounding empires.
Prior to the arrival of European traders, the continent of Africa had developed sophisticated society as it demonstrated its ability to maintain advanced civilizations, withhold three major empires, and gain wealth through trade. Although European traders did advance organized society in Africa, it would be false to say that prior to their arrival Africa was underdeveloped.
In Africa, there were achievements in the empires or kingdoms and their cities before the Europeans arrived and took control. In the Kingdom (Empire) of Axum they developed a trade route. In the Kingdom of Ghana they had characteristics of powerful nations today. In the city of Timbuktu they had great morals and developed the center of Islamic Art. There are many other things that Africa achieved in.
...g the aristocrats, the middle class being the businessmen and the lower class being mostly the poor farmers. Also the colonies had a very distinct system of the social class, starting with the aristocrats, lesser professional men, farmers, hired hands, indentured servants, jailbird and slaves. These slaves had no equality with the whites and whites often feared their rebellion. The slaves were the closest to Europe's lower classes. But compared with contemporary Europe America of the 1700's was a place of equality and opportunity except for slavery.
If you have ever read the book 1984 by George Orwell, then an interesting topic may have crossed your mind. The way the classes of people break down can be quite similar, and very different at times. In the United States, we have classes like the lower class, the working class, and the middle class. In 1984, there were such classes as the Proles, the Outer Party, and the Inner Party. The way the classes are broken down in 1984 reminds me a little bit of my old history class. When I studied medieval times and the classes back then were broken down into the nobles, the bourgeois, and the serfs.
Society as a whole, has an interest in categorizing people and groups. Some of these categories are made of people from different social classes. Certain people are similar in the way they live and the amount of money they make so they become categorized together as a certain group. During the Industrial Revolution Karl Marx provided the idea of the proletariat and the bourgeoisie as different social classes. The bourgeoisie being the owners and the rulers and the proletariat being made of the workers and the laborers. From this idea of different social classes, there
It is insignificant, for example, that no new social class came to power through the door of the American Revolution. Degler says, “ The men who engineered the revolt were largely members of the colonial ruling class. Peyton Randolph and Patrick Henry were well-to-do members of the Virginia Assembly; Washington, reputed to be the richest man in America, was an officer in the Virginia militia.” (Degler 125) This is showing how the social classes stayed the same and didn’t change because all the wealthy and popular people stayed wealthy and
Society has categorized individuals depending on their financial status and their income; also known as social class. There are three original social classes in America, upper, middle, and lower class. The classes may sometimes be further divided into upper- upper, lower-upper, upper-middle and lower middle; with the working and lower classes at the bottom; working poor and underclass.
Stratification systems, categorized people by class, gender, ethnicity, wealth/income. When people are categorized, start looking at different systems within the social system or social mobility. “The four main systems of stratification have been slavery, caste, estate, and class. Each of these systems allows greater or less flexibility in terms of social mobility. Social mobility is the ability to move up or down within a social stratification hierarchy” (Larkin, 2015). Slavery is a social status began with social norms allowing people to own others. The slaves had no wealth or power while under this social status. Caste systems are all aspects of social status are assigned at births and held forever,
It is only recently that more reliable studies have brought to light much information about great civilizations that developed in Africa while Europe was in the period often referred as the Dark Ages. The earliest of these mature civilizations were in West Africa. In a vast region south of the Sahara, Africans organized kingdoms which in time became great empires. This region is called the Sudan (a word meaning "land of the Blacks" in Arabic) The Sudan was important in the early history of Black Africa because the Africans first practiced agriculture in this region, and thus became the first people south of the Sahara to fashion and use iron tools and weapons. They were also among the first people in Africa to organize viable political systems. The Sudanic Blacks had learn to domesticate crops long before the coming of Christianity, and their grain production furnished food for an expanding population.
Like many civilizations, “Social theory in the year 1000 divided the community into those who worked (the peasants, traders, and craftsmen), those who fought and administered justice (the kings and lords), and those who prayed.” In Rome there were two social classes, the patricians and the plebeians. The patricians were the ruling class of Rome and were very wealthy. The plebeians were common people who had no input in the government. In Ancient Greece, both Sparta and Athens had a similar class system, which contained the ruling class and those who worked. The class system has not wavered throughout history and is still very present today.
For years, since the start of the Agricultural Revolution the gap between the rich and poor was slowly escalating, but because of social structures and stratifications that gap has dramatically increased exponentially in just a short period of time. The emergence of social classes in early Mesopotamia around 3500 to 500 B.C.E.: kings, nobles, commoners, and slaves, influenced the Empires in the period 600 B.C.E. to 600 C.E. to use the same concept. For instance, the Persian Empires had free classes but
The unbalanced relationship between Africa’s resources and European and American financial interest can first be analyzed from 1600 to 1860 leading up to the emancipation proclamation. This era was characterized by Africans giving up their human capital, or human resources in the form of slaves to European’s to trade over to the Americas to support the plantation economy. This was the largest loss of humans for Africa as they sent millions through the slave trade. Many Europeans, such as the Dutch West Indian Company and the Royal African Company, made an enormous amount of money running the slave trade while African’s got little to nothing in return. American’s profited by having free labor for a one time fixed payment to acquire the slaves. This fueled the plantation economy in which Americans deepened their pockets leading up to the civil war. Overall, this relationship heavily favored the westerners and caused Africa to lose a great deal of human resources.
The Europeans saw Africa as being a great place to obtain all types of resources from labor to natural materials. Items such as cotton, coal, rubber, copper, tin, gold, and other metals were considered very valuable and readily available in Africa (Nardo). The industrial revolution had already become a strong influence on the countries that attended the Conference. They had spent the past...