Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is euthanasia ethical
Religion and euthanasia debate
Is euthanasia morally wrong
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is euthanasia ethical
In the world, 7.2 to 7.5 million people die from terminal illnesses each year (“We've Got Answers.”)Euthanasia, the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma, would end suffering. Euthanasia is illegal in most parts of the world but in the Netherlands it accounts for about one in 30 deaths. Even though many people find euthanasia unethical, it can be used to end the increase of medical bills after the patient passes, patients have the right to decide when they die, and it ends the suffering of the patient. Euthanasia cannot be justified because it is unethical and could become out of control. Many religions believe that euthanasia is immoral because it goes against God (BBC News). Even though it is the killing of another person, the patient that has undergone euthanasia either has a painful terminal illness or is in a coma they can never come out of therefore it is the right thing to do. If euthanasia becomes legal, many people believe that it will cause an effect called “The Slippery Slope” ("Euthanasia - ProCon.org.”). The “Slippery Slope” effect states that once euthanasia is legal, it will downward spiral until involuntary euthanasia is legal. The “Slippery Slope” effect is irrational because if euthanasia was made legal, there would be strict laws and regulations. The cost of hospice or palliative care only unnecessarily prolong life and even with insurance can become outrageous to the family of a loved one after they pass away. Hospice and palliative care are the caring of an individual at home or in a facility respectively, who are suffering from a terminal illness. Hospice care alone costs up to 95 dollars per day (“Find a Hospice”). Insurances like Medicare, M... ... middle of paper ... ...nasia - ProCon.org." ProConorg Headlines. N.p., 15 Oct. 2013. Web. 10 Dec. 2013. "Euthanasia Statistics." Statistic Brain RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Dec. 2013. Khan, Farooq, and George Tadros. "Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in Indian context: Sooner or later the need to ponder!" Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine Jan.-Mar. 2013: 101.Health Reference Center Academic. Web. 22 Nov. 2013. "Find a Hospice." Home. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Dec. 2013. "Human Euthanasia, The Debate: The Arguments for Both Sides." Examiner.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Dec. 2013. "Result Filters." National Center for Biotechnology Information. U.S. National Library of Medicine, n.d. Web. 12 Dec. 2013. "Right to Die."Right to Die Right to Die Comments.US LEGAL, n.d. Web. 06 Dec. 2013. "We've Got Answers." General Knowledge Questions and Answers – Kgb Answers. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Dec. 2013.
Nelson, H., Walker, M., Zackher, B., & Mitchell, J. (n.d.). Result Filters. National center for biotechnology information. Retrieved February 9, 2014, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?LinkName=pubmed_pubmed_pmh_cited&from_uid=15233153
"Result Filters." National Center for Biotechnology Information. U.S. National Library of Medicine, n.d. Web. 25 Apr. 2014.
In this essay, I will discuss whether euthanasia is morally permissible or not. Euthanasia is the intention of ending life due to inevitable pain and suffering. The word euthanasia comes from the Greek words “eu,” which means good, and “thanatosis, which means death. There are two types of euthanasia, active and passive. Active euthanasia is when medical professionals deliberately do something that causes the patient to die, such as giving lethal injections. Passive euthanasia is when a patient dies because the medical professionals do not do anything to keep them alive or they stop doing something that was keeping them alive. Some pros of euthanasia is the freedom to decide your destiny, ending the pain, and to die with dignity. Some cons
Bernards, Neal, Ed. (1989). Euthanasia: Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints Series, Series Eds. David L. Bender and Bruno Leone. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press.
Callahan, Daniel. "Physician -assisted Suicide Should Not be Legal." Suicide: Opposing Viewpoints. Biskup, Michael. ed. San Diego. Greenhaven Press, Inc.1992.
Cotton, Paul. "Medicine's Position Is Both Pivotal And Precarious In Assisted Suicide Debate." The Journal of the American Association 1 Feb. 1995: 363-64.
perspective on euthanasia. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(5), 306. Retrieved March 15, 2011, from Research Library.
Anyone can be diagnosed with a terminal illness. It doesn’t matter how healthy you are, who you are, or what you do. Some terminal illnesses you can prevent by avoiding unhealthy habits, eating healthily, exercising regularly and keeping up with vaccinations. However some terminally ill people cannot be helped, their diseases cannot be cured and the only thing possible to help them, besides providing pain relieving medication, is to make them as comfortable as possible while enduring their condition. Many times the pharmaceuticals do not provide the desired pain escape, and cause patients to seek immediate relief in methods such as euthanasia. Euthanasia is the practice of deliberately ending a life in order to alleviate pain and suffering, but is deemed controversial because many various religions believe that their creators are the only ones that should decide when their life’s journey should reach its end. Euthanasia is performed by medical doctors or physicians and is the administration of a fatal dose of a suitable drug to the patient on his or her express request. Although the majority of American states oppose euthanasia, the practice would result in more good as opposed to harm. The patient who is receiving the euthanizing medication would be able to proactively choose their pursuit of happiness, alleviate themselves from all of the built up pain and suffering, relieve the burden they may feel they are upon their family, and die with dignity, which is the most ethical option for vegetative state and terminally ill patients. Euthanasia should remain an alternative to living a slow and painful life for those who are terminally ill, in a vegetative state or would like to end their life with dignity. In addition, t...
Euthanasia has been a controversial topic in the United States for many years now. Euthanasia is the practice of intentionally ending ones life, to relive them from any more pain or suffering. Euthanasia can also be known as mercy killing or mercy death. There are many different viewpoints on whether euthanasia is right or wrong. Those who are for euthanasia believes it is a way to relive extreme pain and suffering and it is a right of freedom of choice to do what one wants to their body. Those who are against euthanasia believe euthanasia devalues human life, goes against religion, and it can cause a slippery slope effect. Euthanasia is a topic that is viewed in different ways in the eyes of different people it is either viewed as a persons
... greater pain and anguish for longer periods of time than my father did, I believe euthanasia is the only compassionate form of relief we can provide. I believe it is morally important to allow an individual to die with respect for his or her dignity, while respecting his or her autonomy. Because of these reasons, euthanasia is morally justified when administered under strict controls.
Focus on the Family Issue Analysts. “Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide.” Focus on the Family. 2008. Focus on the Family. Web. 20 Feb. 2014.
... Association. 1998. “Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide.” Canadian Medical Association Board of Directors. Retrieved from http://www.cma.ca/index.php/ci_id/3214/la_id/1.htm on October 16th, 2010.
My opponents and their followers “see it as a term of murder, killing those who are sick, infirm, or disabled, young and old alike, with or without their permission.” (Urofsky 22). They could even say that by allowing euthanasia, we could possibly be encouraging people that it is ok to end your own life when you see fit; inadvertently telling people it is okay to commit suicide. My opponent also believes that euthanasia should not be allowed as it allows doctors to play God with the lives of people who are ill.
Euthanasia has been an ongoing debate for many years. Everyone has an opinion on why euthanasia should or should not be allowed but, it is as simple as having the choice to die with dignity. If a patient wishes to end his or her life before a disease takes away their quality of life, then the patient should have the option of euthanasia. Although, American society considers euthanasia to be morally wrong euthanasia should be considered respecting a loved one’s wishes. To understand euthanasia, it is important to know the rights humans have at the end of life, that there are acts of passive euthanasia already in practice, and the beneficial aspects.
...r of Rights and Freedoms states that, “Everybody has the right to life, liberty, and the security of person.” By allowing euthanasia we are defying those basic rights to life. A persons right to life is now a persons right to die. One study shows that the majority of depressed elderly patients wanted to be euthanized, but no longer wanted to die after they got treatment. Euthanasia will provide death with dignity. A person should die knowing they are loved and their doctor did everything they could to keep them comfortable through the pain. Palliative care is the best for patients that want to die with dignity.