Advertisement Worth The Paper

1411 Words3 Pages

During the technological boom of our current day and age, many argue that printed media is no longer worth the paper it is printed on - between the power of television internet advertising, ads in papers and magazines have become a decaying source, and as such, it is important that the issue be addressed appropriately for the urgent matter putting the jobs of many current and future graphic designers at risk. However, while works such as Stefan Hampel, Steven Heinrich, and Colin Campbell’s “Is an Advertisement Worth the Paper it’s Printed on?: The Impact of Premium Printing Advertising on Consumer Perception” prove to provide the proper rhetorical appeals to convey both the problems and solutions that graphic designers must face, other works …show more content…

While establishing oneself to be an authority is indeed a common and useful appeal to make, it can also backfire should the speaker be the only “authority” referenced throughout the entire work - the credibility of the argument at hand simply becomes questionable, as the reader is given no other indication as to the validity of the statements made other than being told that the speaker knows what they are talking about. Although most will ask for quality over quantity, both strategies in terms of sourcing have their own effects in writing. By referring to his own knowledge rather than others’, Sawyer’s opinionated piece has his own view exaggerated in a sense, showing that what he is writing about is unique to him and his own perspective, not a universal mindset for advertisers. Meanwhile, by focussing on sheer quantity of sources, one can achieve an opposite effect of making the argument at hand seem like a common belief that is agreed upon by the masses of a discourse community. In “Is an Advertisement Worth the Paper it’s Printed on?: The Impact of Premium Print Advertising on Consumer Perception,” not only to do authors …show more content…

In Sawyer’s article, he opens the texts first by explaining his experiment; “to update a presentation on print-advertising effectiveness, [he] needed to select about 20 ads to test their stopping power, branding ability and level of engagement--the three key elements that drive purchase consideration and, ultimately, sales.” To begin with, Sawyer chose 50 ads from 15 magazines, hoping to select prime examples of both good and bad advertising. However, he came across a vital issue while narrowing down those 50 ads down to 20 for the next step - almost every had he had selected had caught his eye because they were examples of bad advertising, with only 5% of all of the articles selected being deemed “good.” Sawyer then concludes the experiment by stating “Maybe I've become one of those old codgers who bemoan the lack of standards and whines that everything was better in the old days. But here is another possibility: Maybe print advertising today just isn't very good.” However, there is the issue of him being a scholar, or rather, the experiment is rather skewed, as his judgement of how the general marketing audience, and audience that varies from ad to ad, is all determined based off of his sole perspective, one that is much more elevated and analytical than the majority of people meant to see the ads. Instead of

Open Document