Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
International product life cycle by terpstra and sarathy
Critically analyse the significance of product life cycle
Critically analyse the significance of product life cycle
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Throughout history, a trend can be witnessed in the production of goods subject to international trade. Though the Heckscher–Ohlin (H-O) model is useful in predicting what a country is likely to produce, export, and import, it fails to explain how and why production of good is likely to switch from an exporting country to the importing country. Thus arose the Product Life Cycle (PLC) theory to address this pattern. In essence, the PLC theory states that production begins at the point of the product’s invention with the good being exported to foreign markets. Overtime, the production grows outward from the initial location and into foreign markets until the point that the role of exporter and importer is switched. Although exceptions exist …show more content…
Though foreign manufactures typically are not able to produce the good at a lower cost because of the economies of scale, foreign producers due have many advantages that they can utilize to compete in the foreign country’s home market. Already, the original manufacturers have researched, developed, tweaked, and mostly perfected the product; thus the foreign manufacturer is saved time and money, allowing them to proceed almost straight to production. The foreign manufacturers also has home-field advantage given that their prices do not need to accommodate for import tariffs and freight costs. While the foreign manufacturer is not necessarily able to export the good at a price that can compete with the original country’s price, foreign manufacturers are able to chip away at the original country’s exports. As more foreign firms appear and grow in different markets, the original country will start to see their export growth slipping until the point their market share begins to …show more content…
Mainly, there exist three scenarios in which the PLC model would deviate from the norm in international trade of the product. As already discussed, tariffs and transportation costs can have substantial effect on the growth of export/import markets. These types of trade barriers can be employed as a means to bolster international trade or as protectionist measures that discourage trade. Accordingly, high tariffs and high freight costs discourage trade while low tariffs and freight costs would encourage it. Countries that utilize protectionist measures typically see much more competition in their home markets early on. Similarly, the effect of scale economies largely affect how quickly foreign manufacturers are able to compete. In industries that lack strong gains from economies of scale, small production facilities are able to produce just as well as large production facilities; the advantage awarded to the original manufacturer’s country is negated, consequently leading foreign manufacturers to enter the market earlier and undercut prices, at home and abroad, sooner. Thus, products that are sooner able to compete on price routinely observe a significantly shortened cycle that may even skip some stages all together. Opposite to this shortening of the cycle stands high-income products, which are consistently subjected to an
The large initial capital investment needed for new entrants is another major barrier. The cost of machinery and manufacturing is expensive. It is hugely important and costly to have a global presence in manufacturing as it is extremely expensive to ship machinery to clients around the globe.
The U.S. industries have been outsourcing manufacturing for several decades now. U.S. companies thought they were reducing costs by outsourcing development, manufacturing, and process-engineering abilities. Consequently, U.S. corporations’ knowledge, skilled workers, and supply chain, which are the necessities to producing advanced products, have vanished. For example, almost all notebook computers, cell phones, and handheld devices, which were once created in the U.S., are now designed in Asia. When a major U.S. company outsource, it pressures their rivals to do the same thing. They also lose the expertise of process engineering, which would interact with manufacturing on a daily basis. Minor companies and skilled workers go to where the jobs and knowledge networks are no matter where they are geographically in the world. This decline of trade in the U.S. has caused a negative chain reaction to their suppliers of sophisticated materials, tools, production equipment, and components. U.S. industries do not have a way of coming up with new ideas for the next generation of high-tech products...
The cost advantages related to raw materials may be explained by better negotiated agreements with suppliers (perhaps due to the larger volumes of purchases – comp. Fig. 5) and possibly less shipping and distribution costs that stem from the fact that Samsung’s fab facilities are geographically collocated (while competitors’ facilities are spread world-wide). In terms of labour productivity only Chinese SMIC outperformed Samsung, but that came hardly unexpectedly: low labour costs in China had been and were to remain unbeatable for some time yet.
Magee, S. P. (1977). Multinational corporations, the industry technology cycle and development. Journal of World Trade, 11(4), 297-321.
American companies purposely make their goods in other countries such as India because their labor practices do not meet US standards and can easily be manipulated for maximum profit. By paying their employees extremely low wages, they are still able to manufacture their products. As a result they pull out more profit that does not have to be given back to their employees due to minimum wage laws not being in effect in these countries. In “Distributional Effects Of Globaliz...
In some ways, the creation of the regional trading blocs is interpreted as obstacles to global trade and exchange of the international advantages. For example, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) that includes the U.S., Canada, and Mexico is a regional trade agreement between these countries, which implies lower barrier and trade restrictions. The U.S. imports textiles and other goods from Mexico at a lower price than the local market, which is due to cheap labor and reduced tariffs. However, other Asian countries have a reputation of being the haven of cheap production such as China, which is even cheaper than Mexico. In this scenario, we notice that regional blocs could limit the opportunities that international trade could offer. Equally, the European Union is another example of regional blocs that gathers most of the European countries, such as, France, Germany, Italy and others. The European countries have special agreements in which each country could trade with one another at a lower tariffs and reduced restrictions. As a result, this could causes isolation from using the opportunities offered from the other regions of the world such as production cost, cheap labor, technology transfer, and production quality. Regional blocs reshape the world in terms of economic entities and geographic locations, which is contrary to the concept of global free trade adopted by the World
"A buildings environmental impact extends from global factors, such as ozone depletion, to the quality of the environment inside the property. These impacts arise from decisions made at all stages of the buildings life, including materials manufacture, site selection, design, construction, occupation and ultimately demolition."
Industry discontinuities—sharp changes in legal, political, economic, associated technological conditions that shift the basis for competition at intervals an trade
Firstly, what should be noted here is that international trade has been providing different benefits for firms as they may expand in different new markets and raise productivity by adopting different approaches. Given that nowadays marketplace is more dynamic and characterized by an interdependent economy, the volume of international trade has grown substantially in recent years, reducing the barriers to international trade. However, after experiencing the economic crisis that took its toll in 2008 many countries adopted a different approach in terms of trade barriers by introducing higher tariffs in order to protect domestic firms from foreign competition (Hill). Secondly, in order to better understand the implications of the political arguments for trade it is essential to highlight the main instruments of trade policy (See appendix 1).
The failure of Heckscher-Ohlin Model leads to the build-up of new theories to explain occurrences in international trade. The Product Life Cycle theory built up by Raymond Vernon is one of them. The theory describes the life span of a product from initiation, appearing in market to finally removing from the market.
With the advent of the Internet, decreased shipping costs, and the removal of trade barriers, the world market has shrunk in such a way that everyone can be a player. While many businesses thrive solely on serving a small local area, a globalized company has the benefits of increased customer markets, gross production, and brand awareness. Take for example Coca-Cola; this multi-national corporation offers products in countries all over the world, operates in over 200 of those countries with the help of its franchisees, and is the most well-known beverage companies. It is interesting to note however, that as positive as globalization may seem, there are many negative ramifications and a large population of detractors to this movement. While increased product availability is good for profits, if a local market is inundated with imported products, locally grown or manufactured items may be squeezed out, to the detriment of the local economy. Although it is cost effective to have your product produced in another country with low wages, you are essentially taking away jobs from the people of your own country, negatively impacting your national economy. However, if you manufacture your products in a country with higher wages, you must increase your products’ prices which may be harmful to your profits. While maximizing your companies profits is always of great importance, it is essential that you weigh the pros and cons of globalization and its effects on not only your company, but the areas in which you wish to spread.
...stinguish that a qualitatively new type of worldwide trade was developing. The illustration in United stated since the late of 1980 showed that “has less productive portions moved offshore which lead to a decrease in employment while maintaining higher value-added parts. Consequently, all the productivity has risen, while the tradable sector has increased employment” (Spence and Hlatshwayo,2011).
With the globalization of a product, a company might benefit in many ways. First, by sifting its production or services overseas, the company can reduce its overall production costs due to availability of low-cost labor. Second, working collectively with other companies overseas allows companies to access technical knowledge or resources that are either unavailable or are too expensive at home.
There has been a shift in the economic policies of nations, especially developing nations from ‘policy regulation’ to ‘market orientation’ exposing their industrial units to greater competition, globalisation has elevated market competition and there have been many technological developments in numerous areas, which have had important implications for the small scale units (Bhavani, 2002).
Currently in the global environment, there is a strong sense of competition that must be achieved through better performance, almost all firms are competing in international markets due to the reduction in barriers for capital and tariffs. With the new changes in both communication and technology, the consequences faced are that production processes are no longer within national boundaries but spread across (Debrah & Smith, 2002).