Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Disafvantages of free education
Advantages and disadvantages of free university education
Benefits of free tuition for college
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Disafvantages of free education
As an increasing number of students continue to seek higher education, there has been debate about tuition increases and the amount of debt students face. One suggestion for resolving this issue is to grant students free tuition at public colleges and universities. Although it may initially seem impractical, there are ways the government would not incur the entire cost. Either the nation grants free tuition for deserving students at public universities or some of these students will continue to miss out on a college education because of the financial burden. Deserving students cannot continue to be denied a college education, so there should be free tuition at public universities for students. One benefit of offering free tuition to students …show more content…
However, colleges would see more applications, but that does not necessarily mean there would be more college degrees earned. The colleges and universities with free tuition programs can accept the same number of people as they did before while seeing an increased number of applications. If colleges see an increased number of applicants, then they can be more selective and pick the best students, and these students do not have to worry about financing their education. If these colleges are more selective and students do not have to worry about financing their education, then the colleges will accept better students and not necessarily have an increased number of graduates. So, if colleges see an increased number of applicants, they will accept better students and not necessarily have an increased number of …show more content…
Since the government is already in debt, many argue that this plan is not a good enough reason for more government spending. Many plans for making tuition free at public colleges would not force the government to pay the entire way for all students. Students who can afford some or all of tuition could still be responsible to pay for some of the cost. If the government had to pay for the entire cost of tuition for all students, it would signal that colleges are no longer giving out merit based scholarships. However, colleges would continue to give out these scholarships, so the government would not have to pay the entire cost of tuition for all students. Additionally, the cost of room, board, textbooks, and other miscellaneous objects would still most likely fall the student. So, although the price may initially seem to be a burden to the government, the price tag is not as big as it may
Some of these industries include plumbing and health care. Therefore by charging for tuition at universities we are able to create funding on lower vocational jobs, were still without degrees they are significant to our country. Aside from job spending, this will also increase taxes. According to Forbes, an advisor network, Mike Patton has gathered that the public debt per taxpayer in 2004 was $72,051, and in 2017 the projected debt will rise to $161,022. Furthermore the spending of tuition will raise taxes and prevent the advancement of skills in vocational jobs. Secondly this will cause a dramatic increase in graduates, were this sounds astounding, 50% of the graduates will work for jobs that do not require a degree. Although others may argue that those who turn away from degrees will turn to vocational jobs which are also important to the economy, some may refute that the spending of their tuition was worthless and only adds to the debt crisis. This takes away not only the value of opportunity to become a doctor, or a scientist, but inflates the misuse of tuition spending. Finally free tuition will alter the value and quality of education. According to
While most people want college to be free, the U.S. should not make tuition free for all citizens. There are a number of reasons like taxing families who already have it hard, quality in education, rationing, and if people see that they do not have to pay it may lower the value in which they won 't take school seriously. Tuition free college is impossible because at the end of the day someone will have to pay for all those students attending. For example, “In college I was invested, I was paying,” The former student said, “Once it entails a cost, it’s not easy to just say, Oh, let’s not go to class today. You’re just hurting yourself” (qtd, in Make College Affordable, but Not Free). Student who barely made it
Because of this, graduation numbers might drop, or the people who do graduate may not be as well prepared for the workforce. Yes, there are still entry requirements that limit the amount of students allowed into the school, but much of the drive for the students comes from the fact that they are paying a lot of money to be there. Also, giving away college education would almost certainly do the opposite of what people want it to do, which is give more money to students from richer families than from poorer ones. It isn’t that they want to necessarily take money from the richer families, but they want to give poorer families more opportunities to get money. “Without a dramatic overhaul of how we understand student benefits, making college more or entirely free would most likely boost the wealth of college attendees without securing any important egalitarian gains.”
First and foremost, Trade Schools, Colleges and Universities states, “After all, more and more of today's jobs are knowledge-based or require advanced technical skills. So a better-educated workforce would help fill many of the skills gaps that prevent America's economy from growing faster.” If more people attended college then there would be more jobs to fill in America’s economy. There have been droughts in America’s economy, but with free college tuition, droughts would decrease. It would not be fair that someone who could be successful at the job would not be granted the ability to get the job because they don’t have a piece of paper with a signature on it compared to someone who does average or mediocre at the job and had the opportunity to go to college. Making college free also comes with consequences. So graduation numbers might drop, or the people who do graduate might not be as well prepared for the workforce. Also, with more people choosing to attend public colleges because of their tuition-free status, many schools might have to create wait lists or expand the ones they already have. State budgets could become strained, which might lead to cuts and decreased access to the programs that students want to take. Here is the weakness, although it benefits many students, the nation's existing
First, free college can encourage students to go to college to get a degree which leads to a high paying career. It can fulfill those students that are having a hard time financially, and fewer students will be in debt. Second, with free college, colleges will be more likely to help students that need the guidance to stay on track and get a diploma. Clayton and Bailey mention, "If we want to significantly improve educational outcomes, we need to make college more affordable so more students can enroll, and make the reforms needed to en-sure community college students can succeed in their courses, complete their program, and grad-uate within reasonable amount of time" (Clayton and Bailey). Finally, free college can help the U.S. catch up to the rest of the countries with higher education. For example, it can help the United States surpass Russia, where more than half of adults have a diploma. Frohlich explains, “More Than 53% of Russian adults between the ages of 25 and 64 had some form of higher edu-cation in 2012, more than in any other country reviewed by OECD” (Frohlich). Although free college is an attractive idea, it will leave the United States in a bigger debt which will be hard to recover from and more students will be unmotivated to
As Bernie Sanders, a presidential candidate for the 2016 presidential elections, claims he can make college free, the subject of tuition for secondary schooling has become a “hot” topic. The New York Times, on January 20th, released a “Room for Debate” titled “Should College be Free?” where many journalists such as Andrew P. Kelly and Sara Goldrick-Rab voiced their opinions on college tuition. “Just one-third of students from the bottom income quartile, who started at a community college in 2003 finished with a degree or certificate by 2009,” wrote Kelly, showing that the poorer find it hard to finish college with a degree. He believed that indigent students would likely not graduate with a degree due to college cost and because they are not motivated enough to get through six years of college. Although it is unpractical to create an educational system where college is absolutely free, creating organizations dedicated to encouraging the needy to get through
When hearing the words “free” and “college” in the same sentence, that is exciting to anyone who is interested in not paying those thousands of dollars for their pursued education. However, when it comes to Obama’s free community college idea, for the first two years, many people skip over the many factors that go into this issue. Some may agree with President Obama’s plan fighting for a fair chance for all student to get a degree and not go into debt receiving an education, and others argue that community college already being inexpensive will only make the system difficult to work with. While making community college free for everyone is considerate, the students with low incomes already get the aid they need without this program and the
The idea of freedom and equal opportunity that America was built on has sadly been lost and replaced with a system of quality education only being accessible by the wealthy. In-state college tuition should be free for all students meeting admission requirements, allowing students from the full spectrum of economic backgrounds to have the same opportunity to receive the same education. The incidence of poverty in the U.S. is directly linked to educational level. When a college degree is earned, income levels rise (College Board). The best use of federal government anti-poverty funds is not another welfare or assistance program; it is to make college education affordable for everyone.
There is no doubt that college is expensive, price tags for some universities go over a quarter of a million for just a bachelors degree! (That’s if you graduate in four too). The extravagant price for college is no doubt crazy. Trying to better yourself and your future shouldn’t cost $250,000 plus. If public universities were to be free a plethora of problems could be solved instantly. According to Forbes the National student loan debt has surpassed 1.2 trillion dollars (Denhart )! This number is growing exponentially as more students enroll in to college. Why question then whether college should be free? Well, this number is the total amount of student loan debt from all students that have exited college. Some of these students are freshly graduated while some are aged with the wisdom trying to pay their loans back. If public universities were to be free and funded by our federal government, our government would pay this amount within ten years. Relatively a short amount of time considering that the student loan debt is an accumulation debt from students that have graduated more than ten year ago, also this also greatly increase with the following years as well.
He gives many reasons against the tuition-free college proposal. The proposal requires higher expenditure for government and it is not guaranteed that it will improve the educational system and be beneficial for students at community college. Furthermore, community colleges should figure out the solution to solve the growing dropout rates problem instead of trying to add more students to fill their classrooms. For working-class students, the Pell Grant program of federal government already provides two years of free community college for them, and it might also benefit middle-class students. He concludes that the most important thing is figuring out how to use tax money sensibly to help students attend post-secondary school. This article provides current and valuable information for anyone who is concerned with free tuition college
No matter what age or where people are in their life, they would be able to go back to school to start or finish their higher education and fulfill what they have always wanted to do. An article “Why Free College is Necessary” Tressie McMillan Cottom presents the need for free college in the U.S. According to Cottom, “Why aren’t more people going to college? One obvious answer would be cost, especially the cost of tuition” (Cottom/115). Cottom states that basically the main reason why many people are not going to college is because of cost, plain and simple. The job opportunities people would be able to acquire would grow immensely for them, instead of being stuck at a certain job making ends meet. I have come across old friends that never considered going to college after high school because they simply could not afford to go college or even pay for a book. Tuition free colleges nationwide would help many people struggling with their jobs, bills etc. and give them motivation to want to do something better in their life by extending their education, creating new career
Calling a college education “free” is a contradiction because nothing in life is truly free. Someone will be responsible for paying for this education, even if it is not the person receiving it. To support this flood of hopeful college students, the American Government will have to heavily tax the working and upper classes. Taxes will have to be inflated to compensate for the price of college, and in some cases, may become outrageously high. If the upper class becomes constantly taxed, what keeps them from dropping down a class? What keeps the middle class from becoming the lower class? In an extreme situation, if the middle and upper classes were constantly taxed, there risks a problem of creating a bigger class divide. Maybe the plan to pay for college education starts out with only the rich being taxed. In America, there are roughly 324 million people. This number increases every eight seconds, so there is a constant increase of citizens. Imagine if half of that number decides to go to college. College education is free for them, but their tuition is paid for by the upper class. Now, average college tuition runs for about $9,410 for State Universities, and around $32,405 for out of state students. This amount of money, per student, is paid for by the upper class’s taxes. Taxes are raised higher and higher to pay for all these students until they cannot be raised any further. The upper
For most young Americans, college has always been preached to them as being a vital part to their success in the adult world; but as they reach this educative rite of passage many find they must take out inflated loans, work part time jobs, or even become dissuaded entirely due to the exorbitant costs of higher education. We must forsake this current antiquated system in favor of government subsidized tuition. Therefore, college education must be free because of its benefit to the economy, creation of equal opportunity, and the resolution of the student loan crisis.
Nelson Mandela once said “Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”. President Obama made a proposal during his State of the union address to promise two years of tuition free community college. While this may sound too good to be true Obama has added a few conditions such as, students will have to attend school half or full time, make some type of progress towards degree plan, and also have at least 2.5 grade point average. Although, president Obama’s proposal is a great way to give a student a better future, some naysayers believe students have enough help from the government with financial aid and will also drain our economy. Despite, Americans views towards the president’s proposal, congress should support his idea because it can help better the life’s of students qualify for a well-paying and stable career and also help students who struggle paying college tuition.
This has sparked the debate as to whether higher education ought to be offered free of charge or not, with many rallying for the former. In order to level the playground for all Americans and offer equal opportunities in life; higher education should be offered free of charge to all. This paper seeks to make a convincing argument regarding the importance and need of having free higher education. At the same time, this essay seeks to cite some of the opinions of those of a contrary opinion, giving them a different viewpoint. In the end, this essay will weigh the benefits of free higher education against the drawbacks and probably, convince everyone that the benefits are enough to guarantee free higher education.