Advantages And Disadvantages Of Deontology

A deontologist is an individual who focuses the righteousness of an action being something that is right or doing something wrong. Deontology focuses mainly on the actions themselves, not the outcome, emotional aspect, nor the consequences of the action. Demonology is also known as duty-based ethics, and utilitarianism is also know us utility-based ethics. The two topics are similar but they also have a difference separate the two. While utility-based ethics emphasizes on the end result, and what the right decision is based on making a person happy in the end. Utilitarianist tend to explore what is good and identify the correct actions as the ones that make someone happy. Deontologists tend to skip over what the consequences would be as an end result. They take an approach by exploring the characteristics of the action, even though

A person could conclude from the information spoken of, that utilitarianism includes individuals who are consequentialists, and deontology include individuals who are nonconsequentialists. Meaning, consequentialists decide the rightness and wrongness of something by what the consequences entail. A nonconsequentialist perspective would be one as viewing the actions to be right or wrong based on the properties essential to that action, not any of the consequences. Deontology like any other ethical theory has strengths and weaknesses. A strength of deontology is the element that, in most circumstances, keeps individuals consistent. It does so in a way that a deontologist has certain duties and they are more than likely to perform them in the same way each time. Another strength according to Team Deadlock is the idea of supererogatory. Supererogatory indicated an act that is good but not morally required to be done (Team Deadlock) As an example, if an individual is stressed to the maximum and is ready to commit suicide but tells his best friend he would not do it under the circumstance that he helped him find a job and get his life on