Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages of litigation vs alternative resolution disputes
Alternative dispute resolution advantage and disadvantage
Difference between mediation and negotiations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Arbitration is a form of dispute resolution where a binding decision is issued by a neutral person usually selected by the parties involved. Arbitration has some advantages over litigation and can be more efficient, less time-consuming, and more cost-effective. These are some of the primary reasons why businesses may choose to include arbitration clauses in their agreements. Arbitration is different from other types of dispute resolutions as the arbitrator is selected by the parties. Unlike mediation and conciliation the arbitrator not only resolves the dispute but also makes a binding decision. Arbitration disputes usually arise from a variety of business deals such as merger and acquisition, financial services, construction and infrastructure, …show more content…
Disadvantages of arbitration can be that it is not appropriate in all situations. Situations where immediate relief is needed from the court. For example a landlord would not want to insert an arbitration provision in a lease because in the event of needing to evict a tenant. In which case an arbitrator does not have the power to do arbitration. The technical nature of arbitration may end up leading to delays and uncertain results. Arbitrator power is also subject to limitations as they can not order pre-emptive injunctions. These can be only granted by the state courts.. The fees for an arbitrator can be quite significant unlike court fees which may be lower. Arbitrators are paid hourly and administrative fees will need to be paid to the arbitration organization. If it is a large arbitration there may be a need to have more than one arbitrator on a panel and pay hourly. All of the arbitrators, the arbitration organization, and the arbitrator's generally require the total amount of money upfront before going to the final arbitration hearing. The party that is aggrieved may need to advance all of the fees including the fees for the other party. The other party may not be willing to put up any fees because they may not want to go to arbitration. While it is possible to receive an award of the fees for arbitration if there is such a provision in the contract it may be difficult to collect those fees after the arbitration. Discovery is generally limited in arbitration. If there is no proof in advance it may be very difficult to obtain it through the arbitration process.. Confidentiality may also be lost in the finality of the arbitration award. Arbitration confidentiality may also cause a lack of transparency which may cause the process to be subject to bias. While many arbitrators are very good there are some cases in which the losing side will sometimes feel that an experienced
Sue contracts with Tom to deliver a quantity of computers to Sue’s Computer Store. They disagree over the amount, the delivery date, the price, and the quality. Sue files a suit against Tom in a state court. Their state requires that their dispute be submitted to mediation or nonbinding arbitration. If the dispute is not resolved, or if either party disagrees with the decision of the mediator or arbitrator, will a court hear the case? Explain. (See Alternative Dispute Resolution.)
2.) According to Judge Joseph Colquitt (2001: 706), “[t]o date, those who would abolish plea bargaining have been largely unsuccessful. In fact, some would argue that the battle against plea bargaining has been lost.” If you agree that the battle against plea bargaining has been lost, what steps would you take to ensure the fairness and constitutionality of plea bargaining practices in light of its inevitability, and if you disagree, then what steps would you take either to limit or eliminate plea bargaining?
After the Declaration of Independence, U.S. became a nation but didn 't have a government to guide the nation. People, the early settlers, suffered by the excessive power of the Monarch so they wanted to incorporate the ideas of ordered government, limited government, and the representative government. Based on these ideas the Article of Confederation was created. Although it was too weak and inadequate to manage all of the states. As the weakness became palpable, the nation required stronger government system and that 's when the Constitution was created as it saved the nation from the crisis. One thing that made the creation of the Constitution possible was the Great Compromise, which was
Texas politics is an interesting ecosystem of power, rules and regulations. Of course, in typical Texas fashion, most of the politics we engage in we do our own way. From governors who stay in office for a decade to our extremely diverse demographics, Texas is extremely unique. This uniqueness of course comes with its critics, benefits, and downsides. This is particularly true with the Texas Court system compared to both the federal courts and many other states.
The United States Constitution is a set of amendments that are made specifically for the rights of the people. Three freedoms that the government should uphold in order to ensure that the soldiers that died in the civil war did not die in vain are the freedom of peaceful assembly, freedom of petitioning the government, and an impartial jury. Freedom of peaceful assembly is defined as the right to hold public meetings or parade without the government interfering. It's important to uphold this freedom so the people of our country can peacefully stand for the things they believe in. This allows them to express their ideas and opinions with people who have the same views as them and want to bring awareness to it.
In my opinion there is no singular primary adversarial relationship between the plaintiff and the defendants within the Judicial System. The American Court System works much like the tectonic plates hidden deep inside the earth, there is constant pressure from all sides to stay in balance. It is a very precarious act where they must ensure the rights of the accused are not infringed upon while actively seeking justice for victims. They must pick and choose who gets prosecuted and who walks free. Many factors go into those decisions some are obvious other are never known due to deals that have been made with immunity. Overall there is a vast degree of suspicion held between the individual from all side of the spectrum. The process in which
Whether a judge should be elected or appointed has been a topic for discussion since the creation of a judicial system. Depending on what side of the decision one may be on, there are some challenges that arise from each side. If a judge is elected, will he be judicious in his decision based on the law or based on his constituents? If the judge is appointed, will he be subject to the authority that appointed him, thereby slanting his decision to keep favor of the executive or legislator that appointed him? Mandatory retirement is also a question that brings about challenges. How old is too old? When does a judge become ineffective based on their age?
The ADR process that is used in a particular situation depends on the circumstances of that case. According to the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court, New York County, the principal forms of ADR are the following: 1) Mediation- A process in which a Neutral attempts to facilitate a settlement of a dispute by conferring informally with the parties, jointly and in separate “caucuses,” and focusing upon practical concerns and needs as well as the merit of each side’s position; 2) Neutral Evaluation- A process in which an expert Neutral receives a presentation about the merits from each side and attempts to evaluate the presentations and predict how a court would decide the matter; 3) Arbitration- A process in which the parties present evidence to a neutral or panel of Neutrals, who then issues a decision determining the merits of the case. An arbitration may be binding or advisory, depending upon the agreement of the parties. If binding, the decision of the arbitrator (s) ends the case, subject only to circumscribed review pursuant to Article 75 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules.
ADR holds an extensive, easily influenced and diverging choice of processes for finding solutions to disputes which are personified by structured negotiation and consensus. It is regarded that arbitration is a familiar ADR technique, however, it is more of an official adjudicative and adversary technique initially a confidential litigation process which has more commonality to litigation than the more original consensual processes which symbolise ADR. As simplified by Angyal (Alternative Dispute Resolution, 1987, p. 11). "The key difference between ADR and those traditional techniques of litigation and arbitration is that ADR techniques are used to produce a resolution to dispute through a negotiated agreement while litigation and arbitration are processes by which a result is imposed on the parties. " We can say that many issues arise with terms.
Judicial review in the United States had controversial origins because of the manner that it was established. However, it has become an important part of the system of government in our country. I believe it to be an important part of the balance between the different branches of government. Since judges have served as arbitrators between conflicting people since the beginnings of society, the task of arbitrating between conflicting laws naturally fell to the courts as society became more advanced.
When entrepreneurs plan their business future they will consider how they can increase their business size or profit in a short period. Entrepreneurs may consider growing their business or company by using a merger or an acquisition. These methods can be a speed up tool and a short cut to enlarge their business. (Burns, 2011) Also they can reduce competition, make it easier for entrepreneurs to think about the market and product development and risk reduction. Furthermore, some lesser – known companies can improve their firm’s image and market power by using merger and acquisition with larger firms. However, there may be risks associated with merger and acquisition related to lack of finance and time. (Burns, 2011) This essay will discuss more deeply the advantages and disadvantages of using mergers and acquisitions, showing how it can affect firms and market with the case study.
An arbitrator’s function is usually to interpret the collective bargaining agreement between the parties, not to apply his or her standards of what is right in a given situation. The courts have sought to compel labour and management to a peaceful resolution of grievances through arbitration. The Supreme Court has given support to the arbitration process in a series of decisions, and judicial deferral to arbitration has become a basic tenet of national labour policy. Bibliography Byars, L. L. (1997). The.
This decision is called an award. When an arbitrator is appointed to arbitrate over the dispute, he will ask the parties to retell their sides of the dispute.
Both forms of ADR have several common characteristics. However, one must consider that a neutral side in both procedures fulfils distinct from one another duties. Mediators do not have the objective to make decision, whereas arbitrators determine an outcome of the case. Upon the termination of the procedure, an arbiter renders a binding award that cannot be later avoided by disputants. During mediation, parties are not contingent upon the third side and enjoy freedom of actions needed for dispute resolution. In contrast, in case of failure to reach an agreement, parties are not legally bound for actions afterwards. By considering the true qualities of arbitration and mediation taken individually, legislation and scientists suggest that in single arbitration, arbitrators may use mediators’ functions to promote amicable settlement and functions of both arbitrators and mediators have incongruous
Gies, T. P., & Bagley, A. W. (2013). Mandatory arbitration of employment disputes: What's new and what's next?. Employee Relations Law Journal, 39(3), 22-33.