Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Industrial revolution changes in technology
Industrial revolution and its impact
Industrial revolution changes in technology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Industrial revolution changes in technology
Andrea Samayoa
Dr. Porter
Principles of Management
February 21, 2014
Management History and Trends
The Industrial Revolution was a major turning point in history promoting a different way of life worldwide. There was an increase in productivity and efficiency. Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations influenced the Industrial Revolution in which he discusses topics of division of labor, productivity, and the free market. Through this values portrayed in his book, many counties started to benefit from production and trade. These worldwide transactions occurring after the influence of the Wealth of Nations grew up to be an economic expansion. Thanks to the Industrial Revolution and the Wealth of Nations many markets, industries, and organizations now have a method of managing their products and employees. Following the economic ideals, management is now getting work done through others with efficiency. Thus, the contributions in history given by Adam Smith, Eli Whitney, Mary Parker Folley, and Johannes Gutenberg have influenced management today.
In the old views of economics, people were not interested in trading because they thought that through exchange they wouldn’t gain anything more valuable in return. Countries would then control this trading through taxes and protection. Smith then, showed why this method was irrational. “He argued that in a free exchange, both sides became better off” (Deeson). Free trade meant that both parties would benefit and thus, increase economic expansion in both ways. Through his morals and values he stated “A nation’s wealth is not the quantity of gold and silver in its vaults, but the total of its production and commerce” (Deeson). Through production, capitalism, and labor the industrial revolution shifted...
... middle of paper ...
... way. In a matter of days, I received e-mails from schools stating that they had received my transcripts and were ready to look over them. This trend of management is one of the most popular because of the rapidness and competence with which it is revolutionizing the world.
History has affected every part of our daily lives. In times of needs and desperation, a manager needs to remember the importance of integrative conflict resolution given by Folley. The efficiency of the work force that is active today in almost every organization thanks to Adam Smith’s division of labor, the faster production of goods and services provided by Whitney’s interchangeable parts, and the fast access of information provided through information management. This trend of management has developed a wealthier and more proactive world acknowledging the contributions by these vivid minds.
In the article White states, “Agriculture was the chief source of wealth during the third quarter of the eighteenth century. Commerce was second (principally the re-export of colonial tobacco, sugar, and Indian cotton) while manufacturing may have been in a temporary decline in terms of relative importance. Smith wrote before the mechanization of the cotton industry, the growth of the factory system, and the large accumulations of capital via the joint stock company.” A joint stock company is a company whose stock is owned jointly by the shareholders; capitalism. Trade tends to be the main importance of smith’s novel. On the
Smith is against mercantilism, which puts more government emphasis on exports than imports and typically puts high tariffs on imports. The goal of a nation, according to Smith, is to be wealthy, and that means to have plenty of affordable goods and services. To Smith, the best political order would be centered on the market. The goal would be to have a larger market so the citizens would be able to specialize more and increase production. It appears that Smith’s views on the type of political order are along the lines of what we consider capitalism today, and that Smith does not agree with the government involvement in citizen’s life. In this type of political order, the citizens profit from their product, and they also help others by hiring workers and paying rent on the property they are using. The success of the individual is determined by his or her wealth, and wealth is the amount of stuff an individual can buy with his or her money. To be a successful nation, all of the individuals have to be wealthy, and therefore the nation will be
In 1776, even as Adam Smith was championing the ideals of a free market economy, he recognized that the interests of national security far outweighed the principles of free trade. More then two centuries later, that sentiment proves to still be accurate and in use. Since the early 1900s, the United States has used this precept to defend its position on trade barriers to hostile nations, and through the majority of the century, that predominantly referred to the Soviet Union and its allies.
Smith’s text in his book seems to be characterized by fact-heavy tangents, tables and supplementary material that combine hard research with generalities, showing his commitment to give proof for what seem like never-ending observations about the natural way of economics. Smith’s Wealth of Nations Books I and II focus on the idea of the development of division of labor, and describe how each division adds to the fortune of a given society by creating large surpluses, which can be traded or exchanged amongst the members of Labor. The division of labor also fuels technological innovation, by giving a lot of focus to specific tasks, and allowing workers to brainstorm ways to make these tasks quicker or more efficient, increasing maximum output. This, again, adds to efficiency and increases surpluses so that the surplus items may be traded or re-invested somewhere else. Near the end of the case, technologies are likely to improve, foreshadowing them to become even greater efficient.
The pivotal second chapter of Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, "Of the Principle which gives occasion to the Division of Labour," opens with the oft-cited claim that the foundation of modern political economy is the human "propensity to truck, barter, and exchange one thing for another."1 This formulation plays both an analytical and normative role. It offers an anthropological microfoundation for Smith's understanding of how modern commercial societies function as social organizations, which, in turn, provide a venue for the expression and operation of these human proclivities. Together with the equally famous concept of the invisible hand, this sentence defines the central axis of a new science of political economy designed to come to terms with the emergence of a novel object of investigation: economic production and exchange as a distinct, separate, independent sphere of human action. Moreover, it is this domain, the source of wealth, which had become the main organizational principle of modern societies, displacing the once-ascendant positions of theology, morality, and political philosophy.
Wren. (2005). The History of Management Thought (5th ed.). Danvers, MA: Wiley & Sons. (Original work published 1976)
The division of labour described by Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations is a product of individual self-interest. This is representative of Smith’s methodological individualist interpretations of human nature. Adam Smith deduces that the division of labour is beneficial to the individual, as it is in one’s own interest to work less whilst still engaging in tasks that are to their own specialities. Highly specialized work is beneficial for nations to grow economically whilst allowing individuals to further pursue their own rational self-interest. To further explain the concepts that Smith proposes I will first explain what rational self-interest in regards to human nature and how the division of labour emerges from self-interest. Secondly, I
His influential theory enabled industry to move away from "rule of thumb" management and be more efficient and prosperous. The modern systems of manufacturing and management would not be the examples of efficiency that they are today, without his work. Frederick Taylor was instrumental in bringing industry out of the dark ages by beginning to revolutionize the way work was approached. Taylor was able to increase wages, productivity and reduce per piece costs at the same time. His work was eventually adopted in a wide array of applications. Taylor's ideas had a significant influence on the industrial life of all modernized countries. His work was an extension of human work and technology. His principles of scientific management were conceived to be free of value judgment.
Frederick Taylor and Henri Fayol are both considered classical contributors to management theory. Both were developing and expression their viewpoints at similar time period with the aim of “raising standard of management in industry” (Brodie,1967, p7) in a period were very few publications and theories on management. While both theories were developed with the same influencing factors such as war, social struggles and industrial revolution (Urwick. 1951, p7) each developed quite different management theories. Frederick Taylor is considered the Father of Scientific management and he developed scientific principles of management, focusing on the individual,...
The founding father of scientific management theory is Fredrick Winslow Taylor. He was an American mechanical engineer and an inventor. Modern management theorist Edward Deming credited Taylor for his contributions while Joseph Juran criticized his work for extracting more work from workers. However a careful reading of Taylor’s work will disclose that he placed workers interest as high as the employer’s in his studies. Before the principles of management are discussed it is very important to understand the causes which led Taylor to derive the four principles of management. The three causes are as follows:
Adam smith argues that the amount of labor used in production of a commodity determines its exchange value in a primitive society; however, this changes in an advanced society where the exchange value now includes the profit for the owner of capital.
Dr. George Crowley’s publication, “Adam Smith: Managerial Insights from the Father of Economics,” reaffirms the belief that Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations continues to remain influential in modern management practices. By allowing economies to be fluid, Dr. Crowley argues societies are better off when businesses and consumers are free to pursue the opportunities in the free market without boundaries or restrictive government interference. Contemporary businesses are more complex and globally intertwined than they were at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. Fundamentally managers face similar challenges as their eighteenth century counterparts, but there are more dynamics taking place in the twenty-first century economy. Academic scholars continue to debate over Adam Smith’s theories, but as Dr. Crowley correctly establishes, Smith’s economic principles provide a blue print in today’s managerial decisions.
Free trade was first observed by Adam smith in 1776. “These artificial constraints to free trade are detrimental to a society” (Adam Smith). Until his book was published so many people had different skeptic about free trade. As a result of Adam Smith's book titled Wealth of Nations, free trade achieved an intellectual and rational status supreme to any other principle in the field of economics.
Our first pioneer was Henry Fayol. Fayol was one of the pioneers who were accountable for constructing the modern management theory. Before Fayol created his principle his company who was currently was facing difficulty and with the experiences he had and the principles he created he was able to turn the mining company around. “Henri Fayol 's "14 Principles of Management" have been a significant influence on modern management theory. His practical lists of principles helped early 20th century managers learn how to organize and interact with their employees in a productive way” (Henry Fayol Principles of
The evolution of management though the decades can be divided into two major sections. One of the sections is the classical approach. Under the classical approach efficiency and productivity became a critical concern of the managers at the turn of the 20th century. One of the approaches from the classical time period were systematic management which placed more emphasis on internal operations because managers were concerned with meeting the growth in demand brought on by the Industrial revolution. As a result managers became more concerned with physical things than towards the people therefore systematic management failed to lead to production efficiency. This became apparent to an engineer named Frederick Taylor who was the father of Scientific Management. Scientific Management was identified by four principles for which management should develop the best way to do a job, determine the optimum work pace, train people to do the job properly, and reward successful performance by using an incentive pay system. Scientifi...