Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Revenge and its consequences
Revenge and its consequences
Revenge and its consequences
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Revenge and its consequences
They say vengeance will rupture the heart and haunt a man’s conscience. If there’s any truth to it, then with certainty it can be stated that that the path pf revenge is a truly unethical one.Just as there are two sides to everyone’s story, there are two sides to each person involved…one that that is exposed to the light of day and one that is kept in the dark.Within each human is the capacity for both good and evil.In revenge, as in life, every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Thus, the moral high ground that is absolved when one chooses to attack another man for the sake of dashed ego is when a man goes against all he ethically knows and destroys himself in all forms.In the end, the guilty will always fall and therefore the path …show more content…
of revenge is an unethical choice. As seen through the eyes of classical societies,such as the greek,Vengeance is the basis for all that is strength and dignity.Tragedy and scandal have a unique way of clarifying people’s priorities,such as the death of a dear friend of Achilles’ by Hector.The rage that drove Achilles to savagely destroy Hector can be seen as a prime example of revenge.Such rage is an example because Achilles is a all powerful soldier who cannot be killed,who looses respect of a dead man’s body and chooses to drag it around town on the back of a chariot.Such an action is disgraceful to the dead and the God Hades himself.Another example of revenge being used as a tactic to level the playing field are documents A and D.Document A describes Hammburi’s law and the statement of an eye for an eye.The use of one universal set of laws for all the of the diverse people is an example of setting up a natural selection of sorts.Loyalties forged in unease and mistrust are tenuous at best.
They are easily destroyed when held up to the unforgiving light of the truth,the punishment.In the desperation to ensure their own survival,people who lived under a lower income tax would commit crimes for they needed money to survive as they were deprived of much-knowing they would have to pay in the form of punishment.Thus,when the wrongdoer was caught,the victim would achieve a sense of revenge.But it was the inequality that raised question to the ethics of such vengeance because the punishments could vary from body
parts to taxes that any poverty-ridden man could not pay and therefore,the use of such a method would choose to further a man with nothing to ensure he would be placed in even more dire consequences.This would become a never ending cycle.Another document that displays the integration of vengeance into modern culture is Document D.Document D displays a girl carrying a head to parents in an act of revenge.It can be inferred that the girl killed an enemy and kept his head to show the man’s true defeat.The true meaning of this painting can only be taking from inferations of it and are therefore,not truly correct.However,it can be seen that such actions were seen as common and culturally accepted.This is important because it shows how society has grown toward being against such unethical actions.The integration of this piece into the culture is also significant due to the way the daughter carries the headband therefore shows that it did not matter who carried out the revenge,just that it must be carried out to withhold the dignity of a man(as assumed due to the articles of clothing and setting of the piece). But revenge carried out in such a fashion does not capture a truly significant emotion that all will carry if a wrong is committed,Guilt.Guilt is a truly powerful emotion. You can try to turn your back on it, but that’s when it will sneak up behind you and pierce you're soul with fear. Some people struggle to understand their part in their own guilt, unwilling or unable to justify the part they played in it. Others hide from their own guilt, silencing their conscience until there’s no conscience left at all.When the haunting of guilt lures you into the Past,you are condemned to live in a chaos of it.Such a powerful affliction is a weight you carry with you forever.For example,In the Lord of the flies.
While revenge may feel sweet at times, in most cases it is destructive to yourself and those around you. The article “Revenge:Will You Feel Better?” makes one contemplate this, and draws the question “is revenge really worth it?” Well, in the article, Karyn Hall suggests that “Revenge can be a strong urge, but you may not feel better if you act on it.” In fact, in a study performed by Kevin Carlsmith showed that “...the students that got revenge reported feeling worse than those who didn't…” With this, one may see that revenge is pointless, and in most cases leaves you feeling worse than the people you performed it
Evil exists naturally in the world, and there are many acts that are considered evil. As a result, evil is often a theme in literature. “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark” by William Shakespeare, and “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe each rely heavily on evil to portray a message. Out of all of the evil acts that exist, exacting revenge is the evilest act that a person can make, for a person’s rash decision to exact revenge will ruin their sense of morality. The characters of Hamlet and Laertes in “Hamlet” each commit terrible acts of revenge, as does Montresor in “The Cask of Amontillado.”
For the meek, vengeance pleasures the soul; however, it is only temporal. Like an addictive drug, revenge soothes anger and tension by sedating the mind with ephemeral comfort. Despite the initial relief, pain ensues and conditions seem worse than before. Mahatma Gandhi, the leader of the non-violence movement in India, stated once that “an eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind.” There is no such thing as a sweet revenge.
experiences with revenge what his actions caused. It shows that getting revenge is never the
... lack of need for it as his negative qualities seal his fate and the old sage shows the benefit of having faith and forgiving those who have betrayed them. Rather than focusing on getting revenge, one should strive to move forward with their life. All that revenge does is slow down the personal growth of an individual; the consequences far outweigh the benefits.
Many people percieve revenge to be something that falls under justice, as they are driven by emotions, while others consider getting the police involved as serving justice. Moreover, some people find revenge to be pleasing and satisfying, but to argue the point that just because something is more satisfying does not mean it is
Revenge is a fairly strong emotion; it’s wanting to retaliate towards those who wronged you. Revenge is such an uncontrollable form of retaliation that it can result in a destructive outcome or be carried out successfully. Although the results may vary, revenge sums up to one thing which is pain of some sort, affecting both parties or just one. Throughout history, we see many tales of revenge and redemption. Often revenge does leave the one carrying it out feeling victorious, but this can suddenly change as the process of karma generally begins in some tales.
Homer's two central heroes, Odysseus and Achilles, are in many ways differing manifestations of the same themes. While Achilles' character is almost utterly consistent in his rage, pride, and near divinity, Odysseus' character is difficult to pin down to a single moral; though perhaps more human than Achilles, he remains more difficult to understand. Nevertheless, both heroes are defined not by their appearances, nor by the impressions they leave upon the minds of those around them, nor even so much by the words they speak, but almost entirely by their actions. Action is what drives the plot of both the Iliad and the Odyssey, and action is what holds the characters together. In this respect, the theme of humanity is revealed in both Odysseus and Achilles: man is a combination of his will, his actions, and his relationship to the divine. This blend allows Homer to divulge all that is human in his characters, and all that is a vehicle for the idyllic aspects of ancient Greek society. Accordingly, the apparent inconsistencies in the characterization of Odysseus can be accounted for by his spiritual distance from the god-like Achilles; Achilles is more coherent because he is the son of a god. This is not to say that Achilles is not at times petty or unimaginative, but that his standards of action are merely more continuous through time. Nevertheless, both of Homer's heroes embody important and admirable facets of ancient Greek culture, though they fracture in the ways they are represented.
Norms of Revenge. 4. Blackwell Publisher, 1990. 862. eBook. . Bar-elli, G. and Heyd, D. (1986), Can revenge be just or otherwise justified?.
In his classic work "Poetics" Aristotle provided a model of the tragic hero. According to Aristotle, the tragic hero is more admirable than the average person. This results in the tragic hero being admired by the audience. For the audience to accept a tragic ending as just, it is crucial that the tragic hero be responsible for their undoing. At the same time though, they must remain admired and respected. This is achieved by the tragic hero having a fatal flaw that leads to their undoing. One of literature's examples of the tragic hero is Achilles from Homer's The Iliad. However, Achilles is different from the classic tragic hero in one major way - his story does not end tragically. Unlike the usual tragic hero, Achilles is able to change, reverse his downfall, and actually prove himself as a true hero.
The Iliad, the Greek epic documented by Homer that describes the battles and events of the ten year siege on Troy by the Greek army. Both Trojans and Greeks had their fair share of heroes and warriors, but none could match the skill and strength of the swift runner, Achilles. Achilles had the attributes of a perfect warrior with his god-like speed and combat abilities. However, even though he was Greek’s greatest warrior, he still possessed several flaws that made him fit the role of the Tragic Hero impeccably. Defined by Aristotle, a Tragic Hero is someone who possesses a high status of nobility and greatness, but must have imperfections so that mere mortals cannot relate to the hero. Lastly, the Tragic Hero’s downfall must be partially their own fault through personal choice rather than by an evil act, while also appearing to be not entirely deserved of their unfortunate fate. Achilles is a true Tragic Hero because he withholds all of these traits. Achilles proves to be a good man that puts his loved ones first, reveals his tragic flaws of pride and anger, shows dynamic qualities as a character when his flaws are challenged, and has a moment of clarity at the end of his rage. Achilles truly exemplifies the qualities of a Tragic Hero.
As George Eliot once said, “It is a narrow mind which cannot look at a subject from various points of view.” Whether viewing a piece of artwork or another person, there are often many points of view to evaluate in order to find the true core of the subject. In great works of literature, authors often create complex and dynamic characters to add depth and meaning into the story. In the Iliad, Homer beautifully depicts the multifaceted character of Achilles as an epic hero. As readers look closely at Achilles, he reveals different sides of himself as the epic poem develops. Representing the struggle between his dominant, selfish, and Dionysian nature as an epic hero and his hidden empathetic Apollonian core, Achilles reveals the mythos of the Iliad which states that war degrades mankind into objects and only the pursuit of Apollonian regard for others renews their humanity.
Vengeance is a dangerous temptation to fall under. People often are very easily lured into taking vengeance upon another individual. The cause of this is that some people often think to take justice into there own hands when it is not there duty. This is how people can become trapped and obsessed with taking vengeance upon someone else and how it can change a persons motives to evil ones, motives that are far from justice. To counter the poison of vengeance, people must act in forgiveness rather than hate and anger towards another. When showing forgiveness for others, you will also be shown forgiveness.
In their book Homicide, evolutionary psychologists Margo Wilson and Martin Daly identify one such conflict between human nature and the contemporary cultural order. They argue that humans have an innate concept of justice which is based on the idea of personal revenge. According to this concept of justice, it is legitimate and even praise-worthy for people to whom a wrong has been done to avenge the wrong-doing themselves.
Revenge occurs everywhere in the present and some still seek revenge for past wrong doings. Because of the desire to fulfil the need for revenge, it can lead to an even bigger problem and can globally affect everyone. It can be difficult to determine when revenge can be justified but in my perspective, revenge can’t ever be justified since it can hurt and include other people that were caught in the problem. The two stories demonstrated that the idea of seeking revenge can consume your life and is very serious. It is best for us to let go of a grudge instead of making the other person suffer as much as you did as it is the mature decision. Revenge can be dangerous and immoral and people will go to any limit to seek revenge.