Accidental Errors

1285 Words3 Pages

So many researches were done on human factors in spreadsheets. At the most basic level, human error research in many domains has measured the frequency of errors and error detection rates. In this report I have covered many of the human factors and mitigating approaches for them. ACCIDENTAL ERRORS:- Accidental errors are nothing but slips and mistakes occurred by carelessness, the typing errors are the best example. Even though regularly occurring, there is always a big chance corrected and highlighted quickly by the person who is making the error. Few people, anyway, will go untraced and may lead to wrong values in remaining other cells. It will be vital to mention that almost all of the errors explained under this type/ category will also be done knowingly or suddenly occurred with intent which is malicious. By observing very closely/ examining different kinds of accidental errors, this can be discovered that they will be again classified into couple of various groups. They will be errors committed by the developer and errors committed by the end user. DEVELOPER-COMMIITED ERRORS:- The above kind of errors is the errors committed by the developer who is working on the spreadsheet design. These kinds of errors are normally seen in the working section present in the model. They are classified into three different types namely alteration, omission and deletion. 1. Omissions are nothing but the things that are accidentally left remaining in the model/ design by the developer. Human factors studies have proved that on the fission types of errors especially are harmful, as they have less detection rates/ speed. It can be assumed a key factor/ variable is deleted from the spreadsheet design and therefore, a crucial relationship is q... ... middle of paper ... ...ong for every single question. Overconfidence started decrease after a series of actions. In a different study [Arkes, et al., 1987], subjects started losing their overconfidence after given response after 5 deceptive and difficult problems.Additionally, we are according to Kasper's [1996] an overview on DSS research which casually providing information is not good enough. Almost all overconfidence studies have been working on individuals. Anyway, Company bosses rely much upon one-to-one meetings. From which, we know if groups or individuals are critically overconfident. Inspired of focusing on most overconfident research conducted on individuals, there is a proof that overconfidence also happens in the group settings [Ono & Davis, 1988; Sniezek & Henry, 1989; Plous, 1995].Human Err, SSR: 2003.Reducing Overconfidence in Spreadsheet Development Dr. Raymond R. Panko.

Open Document