Importance Accurate Information and Proper Citation Professor, Ole Bjorn Rekdal of Bergen University College, in his article, “Academic urban legends”, discusses the importance of proper citation to keep information accurate. Rekdal’s hope is to show how sloppy, improper citation is causing bits and pieces of information to be lost. Moreover, this causes an interpreted piece of knowledge to sometime be reused as incorrect information. Rekdal tells a fact many of us to believe true with cited evidence of its falsehood to try and persuade his academic writers of how important proper citation is. However, according to reporting intern, Charlie Tyson, in his web article, “How rumors spread via sloppy citation practices”, compares what Rekdal has …show more content…
Sune Larsson in the Journal of Internal Medicine, “The myth from the 1930s that spinach is a rich source of iron was due to misleading information in the original publication: a malpositioned decimal point gave a 10-fold overestimate of iron content” (Hamblin, 1981, cited in Larsson 1995; 448-449) (Rekdal 639). Therefore, by giving us this information that most people thought was truth Rekdal creates a connection with a large portion of his readers. Additionally it gives him write credibility that gains trust. Furthermore, he goes on to tell us that this myth that spinach is a good source of iron has gone and remained false information for more than 30 year because of inaccurate information (Rekdal 639). Rekdal goes even further to insist on checking references that are secondary sources by once again relation to his reader by describing it like the “whisper game”. Similarly using a secondary source is like when a rumor is spread and you lose pieces of information along the way (Rekdal 641). For instance, I have a dog, by the time it get around a table full of people, I have a dog who wears pink bows. Rekdal says it is the same for citing academic sources. Vidal information is lost along the way causing false information. Furthermore; to prevent lost information Rekdal talk throughout his entire article the importance of giving everyone the credit that is deserved, so that the reader can trace the thought back to the original person. Overall he shows the importance of have easily information is misconstrue and everyone has the right to be able to go and check for accurate information, thru proper
Secondary sources of literature are primarily written by journalists and does not report an original finding, but rather relies on an original source to provide information that can be used as background material. To use it correctly, one must first distinguish it from primary sources and understand that secondary sources alone cannot sufficiently and
The most successful approaches to the public’s acceptance of scientific information are the cues from political leaders, persuasive syntax, the use of narratives, and research into a scientific source’s
There are certain criteria that must be fulfilled in order for a nonfiction book to be successful. The two criteria that we should judge all argumentative nonfiction by are well written anecdotes that capture the reader’s attention and well explained factual data that proves the author’s point. The book Lies My Teacher Told Me by James W. Loewen contains both of these criteria and as such is a successful nonfiction book. Loewen’s purpose in writing Lies My Teacher Told Me is to correct the inaccuracies in textbooks and to help students learn the truth about history. He uses anecdotes that provide insight about history and data that easily proves his point about inaccuracies in textbooks to achieve his goal of helping students gain knowledge.
In her research, Dr. Clune uses multiple types of sources, both primary and secondary. Dr. Clune’s basis of her argument stemmed from the discovery of missing
For example, if the author provides statistics to prove their case, it's important to check the date, location, etc., of when this data was collected. Just because authors may have an eyewitness, survey, or results from a scientific study, doesn't mean that their data is reliable. Their info may be subjective and therefore, not trustworthy. Moreover, some writings can include broad generalizations, assumptions, and omission of facts. This can mislead you into believing something that is not true which is why you should make your own inferences whilst reading. When making an inference, figure out the author's purpose, take note to the details, address the facts they give, inspect their usage of words, and back your inference with
After all, learning citation properly is far more than learning a set of rules, a style, the correct placement of commas and capital letters. Learning citation is first and foremost learning how a discipline creates and disseminates knowledge. It is subtle, takes many years to master, and is the mark of a professional.
...s passage he references “scientists” as the information source, but does not cite any specific people or research.
Who discovered America? The common answer to this question would most likely be Christopher Columbus. However, many explorers and adventurers came to America before Columbus. Viking Leif Ericsson was one of these explorers. Ericsson visited, and may have even discovered, the land that became America on one of his many adventures away from his native Greenland. The life, discoveries, and legacy of Leif Erikson are an important piece of history that not many are familiar with.
Graff, Gerald, Cathy Birkenstein, and Russel K. Durst. "They Say/I Say": The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing: With Readings. Vol. 2e. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2012. Print.
Herbert, Bob. “Hiding From Reality.” They Say I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. Graff, Gerald. Birkenstein, Cathy. New York. London: 2012. 566.
What other information might the author use? Has the author remembered to acknowledge the opposition? To repeat myself: the sources are insufficient. Look for magazines, journal articles, and scholarly books. Run subject searches on InfoTrac.
There are cases in the history of scientific inquiry that are marred by instances of fraud. Robert Bell's The Impure Science offers several case studies in questionable scientific activity; Bernard Rollin touches on a few more cases in the final chapter of Science and Ethics, and the chapter "Deceit in History" offers an account of possible fraud by some of science's largest historical figures. What is strange about these accounts is that the integrity of the scientific discipline remains unaffected despite these instances of fraud. The central question of this brief analysis is to ask if science can sufficiently control its internal fraud. Science's self-policing techniques are peer review for research proposals, referee system for the review of manuscripts, and the ability to replicate scientific results (Rollin ).
If one source makes a claim, it’s important to speak with another source that can verify or refute the said claim. However, the number of sourc...
In contrast, the presenter also stated very clear definition for the scientific misconduct. To all be aware of intentionally mentioned fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. The main topic of this webinar
We are seeking scientific evidence and hardcore facts. In order for the information we are consuming to be accurate, is necessary for the source of information to be reliable and relevant. This information must also be verifiable. For example, websites such as Wikipedia may not be the best source to obtain your data considering any individual is given the opportunity to adjust and edit the information displayed. In this case, the only precise way to verify information is to trace that information back to the primary evidence and source.