How Practitioners Can Use Academic Work in their Areas of Expertise Research is an essential component of many academic programs, from undergraduate to doctoral degrees. The widespread incorporation of research courses into numerous academic programs at all levels is testament to the essentiality of research skills and the subsequent benefits of becoming an effective researcher. It is true that if research was not a requirement and a critical part of higher education learning, there would be a high probability that majority of students would never undertake such scholarly projects either due to lack of opportunity or motivation. The primary reason why students are required to write research projects is to enable them to build the skills, …show more content…
There exist differences with regard to the utilization of critical thinking skills in trade and scholarly publications. In general, scholarly publications involve deep critical thinking while trade publications only entail surface/superficial critical thinking. This is because, while scholarly publications aim to foster a comprehensive understanding of ideas, trade publications only require one to recall basic information and facts. Also, there is greater personal interest in the topic of study when it comes to scholarly publications and individuals are curios and want more exploration while trade publications reduced interests in the topic. People read scholarly publications due to a personal push to maintain professional and personal reputation and skills and keep abreast of their fields while in trade publishing, people are drawn by marketing that has made them want to seek knowledge outside or beyond their work and professional fields (Horowitz, 2014). Besides, there is less technical terminology in trade than in scholarly …show more content…
Grounded theory is an innovative theory that facilitates the discovery of relevant theories from raw data and practitioners can ensure that they stay grounded in theory through methodological approaches such as consistent theoretical sampling and constant comparative analysis (Dunne, 2011). On the other hand, practitioners should also ensure that the stay current in practice. This can be attained through a variety of ways including becoming and effective consumer of research by effectively finding and keeping up with professional reading, reading new publications to stay at the forefront of industry issues, attending key industry gatherings such as professional meetings, workshops, and conferences so as to gain more knowledge and be familiar with issues and strands of though in the industry, and cultivating an appropriate and productive professional network to enhance information sharing and knowledge building.
The Role of Theories in Information Technology Research
Theories play an important role in information technology research. Theories are simply frameworks that are used for observation and understanding and which allows a researcher to establish the link between abstract and concrete items, theoretical and empirical variables, and
One being that the Scholar-Practitioner is located at the end of the continuum. This displays that the Scholar-Practitioner is the ideal level. McClintock states “Scholar Practitioners are committed to the well-being of clients and colleagues, to learning new ways of being effective, and to conceptualizing their work in relation to broader organizational, community, political, and cultural contexts.” From McClintock’s model, the Scholar-Practitioner is described as a scholar who has an intimate understanding of their specialty and are able to apply their knowledge in several ways. Capella’s Learning Model also differentiates the Scholar-Practitioner and describing them in that same fashion. The Capella’s Learning Model provides in depth examples of a Doctoral-Level (Scholar-Practitioner) assignment. In the assignment, terms such as extract and evaluate, demonstrate the higher level thinking required as a Scholar-Practitioner. Bloom’s Taxonomy also identifies terms such as evaluate and create as higher thinking processes. An expert, the Scholar-Practitioner, is able to put together information in innovative ways and think outside of the box, versus recalling information. Both the Capella Learning Model and McClintock’s Scholar-Practitioner Model support the idea of the Scholar-Practitioner being a researcher who is highly skilled and able to apply their knowledge in unique
A theoretical perspective or paradigm is a set of ideas that attempt to guide your thinking and explain viewpoints. Within the field of sociology, there are many paradigms. These include structural-functionalism, social conflict, feminism, symbolic interactionism, and postmodernism. As a female who appreciates a viewpoint outside of the standard male outlook, my favorite theoretical paradigm is feminist theory. Feminism is one of the most prominent areas in contemporary sociology.
Example, I am a practitioner-scholar at Capella University acquiring the required knowledge and skills that are essential for the field of clinical psychology specialization in forensic psychology. Whereas, the scholar-practitioners are experiential scholars who are aspiring toward or already hold a doctoral degree, the scholar-practitioner connects academia and experience amalgamating both research and theory McClintock
In science, a theory will refer to an explanation of an important feature of the world supported by testing and facts that have been gathered over time. It’s there scientific theories that allow scientists to make predictions about untested and unobserved concurrences in the world. The American Association for the Advancement of Science has this explanation of what a theory means to those in the science field, and it is as follows, “A scientific theory is a well substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts......Such fact supported theories are not guesses but reliable accounts of the real
First of all, through this assignment, I have learned that a theory is an interrelated set of concepts and propositions, organized into deductive systems that explain relationships among different aspects. It is an overall explanation of the person in environment configuration, and helps explain why a problem is occurring. It will also provide a social worker with a set of ideas that will help the social worker get a better understanding of the problem. In addition, there are many different theories, and perspectives that are used in the social work field to empower people and to promote a positive society for all. This particular case is associated with bio-psychosocial approach
Rereading America: Cultural Contexts for Critical Thinking and Writing written by; Gary Colombo, Robert Cullen, and Bonnie Lisle, Eighth Edition, published April, 2007 by Bedford/St. Martin’s, is a textbook about writing and critical thinking. In the first chapter of Rereading America: Cultural Contexts for Critical Thinking and Writing, “Thinking Critically, Challenging Cultural Myths”, the Authors begin by setting a relatable scene of what it’s like for a college student. How a new found independence can be overwhelming, especially with regards to critical thinking, showing that what we have learned, needs to be re-evaluated and that an open mind in essential. "What Is Critical Thinking" In this section of the chapter the editors explain what it means to be a critical thinker. They explain that critical thinking is not just studying dates and facts, but rather taking those facts and examining them. The editors then proceed by explaining how having an open mind, and taking others' perspectives into account when formulating our own opinions on what the author is trying to say to us is important. A critical thinker takes all aspects into account and reflects on personal experience as well. The editors also point out that different cultural experiences bring different opinions. They suggest that we need to become active learners, continuously questioning the meaning behind everything, testing not only the theories of others but also our own experiences and analyzing the text rather than going for the obvious. They show that thinking outside the box is the epitome of critical thinking. Basically, we need to step outside our comfort zones and what we have always been taught. The editors also suggest that we need to re-evaluate our per...
There are many definitions to theory. According to Akers (2009) “theories are tentative answers to the commonly asked questions about events and behavior” (Akers, (2009, p. 1). Theory is a set of interconnect statements that explain how two or more things are related in two casual fashions, based upon a confirmed hypotheses and established multiple times by disconnected groups of researchers.
There are many definitions to theory. According to Akers, “theories are tentative answers to the commonly asked questions about events and behavior.” Theory is a set of interconnected statements that explain how two or more things are related, based upon a confirmed hypotheses and established multiple times by disconnected groups of researchers.
Theory: A general statement about some parts of the world that fit together and how they work; an explanation of how two or more facts are related
12.) Theory - is a system of ideas to explain how a certain situation or event might have came about.
The research is guided by a theoretical framework called the Grounded Theory Approach. The Grounded Theory Approach (GT), first described by Glaser and Strauss in 1967, is an inductively formatted, general method of research that is aimed towards theory development through the data collection process and constant comparative analysis of that data. Cohen and Crabtree, 2006). The concept relies contingently upon the data the study presents and is characterized by the proposed theory being perfectly depicted by the data accumulated. Cohen and Crabtree, 2006).
While it is possible to generate formal theory directly from data (Glaser and Strauss 1967; Strauss 1987), it is better to start with a substantive grounded theory of which a formal theory can be developed (Glaser and Strauss 1967). Both the substantive and formal theory can inform each other on the development of a formal theory. On moving substantive grounded theory to formal theory, Glaser and Strauss (1967) suggests using someone else’s formal theory as an important starting strategy. Through discussion of substantive theory with formal theory, findings from other substantive areas are constantly compared in a generation of a grounded formal theory. A substantive grounded theory is a one area theory developed for a substantive/empirical area while a grounded formal theory is a ‘multi-area’ theory developed for a formal/conceptual area (Glaser and Strauss 1967; Strauss 1987). A formal theory cannot fit or work well when written from only one area (Glaser and Strauss 1967). Therefore, a discussion of substantive grounded theory with a formal theory incorporates other substantive areas to make a formal theory adequate. The best building materials for grounded formal theory are the findings of other substantive theories (Glaser and Strauss 1967). Moreover, avoidance of prevalent mode of formal theory will be achieved as Strauss (1987) noted:
A theory is an announcement of how and why forms work. Theories are a vital part of the system used to arrange particular social wonders inside the social sciences. Inside sociology, theories endeavor to clarify why gatherings of individuals play out specific activities and how societies capacity or change unquestionably. It's essential for social sciences to take after hypothetical points of view as a system for comprehension marvels, for example, the ways individual’s structure bunches. Without theories, we'd simply have a colossal rundown of individual propensities, or choices individuals make, or sorts of individuals, yet we wouldn't have any method for arranging the field. Theories help us see general topics crosswise over numerous particular
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine.
To understand or create a theory, one must first have scientific support. The best way to comprise such support is research. Counseling theories give an extensive basis of data from research which has relevant correlation to active psychotherapists and counseling practitioners.