Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Flaws in todays grading system
Grading system literature
Flaws in todays grading system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Flaws in todays grading system
The Fairness of Academic Grading
The argument on the debate on whether or not the academic grading system is fair or not, isn’t something that is discussed too often. We have come to accept that the current grading system is the norm and that it is something that is unchangeable. To question the fairness of grading in this debate, isn’t on how it was adopted, but rather on how much of a student’s progress is up for interpretation. With varying opinions from Professors, it makes it difficult to set a standard of work across the board. The need for a grading system is understandable, even necessary to be able to mark the performance of students, especially in higher education. A student’s knowledge is pivotal in obtaining employment and becoming
…show more content…
What has been done to make sure that grades aren’t biased and can be measured to exactness universally? The answer is nothing. It would be impossible to be able to have the grading system down to an exact science. The question of academic measurement was being mulled around by Finkelstein back in 1913 when he wrote, “Variability in the marks given for the same subject and to the same pupils by different instructors is so great as frequently to work real injustice to the students… Nor may anyone seek refuge in the assertion that the marks of the students are of little real importance. The evidence is clear that marks constitute a very real and very strong inducement to work, that they are accepted as real and fairly exact measurements of ability or of performance. Moreover, they not infrequently are determiners of the student’s career.” (qtd. Durm 1993). There are too many variables that are put into play when it comes to a standardized grading system. This is because each college has their own political influence. This is based on the demographics of where the college is located, student attendance, and even religious association. There isn’t a way for the collegiate community to come together and standardize each subject for grading universally, especially when so much of it is subjective to the interpretation of both the student and professor. The …show more content…
The answer is no, not entirely. While college students will earn the same degree regardless of where they are located in the country, the information that they gained through earning that degree will be slightly varied. This is because of the social structure that is entangled with our education system. There are too many variables that come into play, depending on which instructor you have and which college you attend. While we all have been conditioned to accept the universal norm of the point scale grading system, that is used today, it really isn’t based on anything other than the interpretation of the instructor on what they feel about the student’s success. I wholeheartedly believe that everyone has access to a good quality education, no matter where they live or if they attend a Community College or a University. The strength of the student’s abilities lies within themselves and if they applied themselves or not, regardless of the GPA that they graduated
In her article, “The Case Against GRADES”, Alfie Kohn discusses the grading system and its faults. She opens her argument with information from an older psychological study that proves the negative impact of the current grading system, and she reinforces this with the proof that “no” research has contradicted this statement. Also, she gives many key reasons including: “Motivation”, “Achievement”, “Quantification”, and “Curriculum”. Kohn supports these topics with other reasearch for why the system is failing the students. She asserts that, “… the absence of grading is a necessary condition for promoting deep thinking and a desire to engage in it.” As support, she offers other solutions and then debunks them by proving that they would not solve
For one thing, weighting grades gives students and colleges the ability to examine a more accurate comparison of students from various schools with varying course schedule difficulties (Clinedinst). The thing is, these benefits mainly aid the gifted, college bound students in that it makes them stand out. This brings the opposition of weighted GPAs to argue that the actual weighting does not provide an equal playing field. J. Bravin argues in his book, The Executive Educator, that “The traditional reporting method, assigning grades of A, B, C, D, and F to student work, discourages college-bound students from electing to take classes that require rigorous effort… and leads to an inconsistent standard” (40). Since weighted GPAs lead to inequalities, educators around the country have protested traditional reporting methods, saying things similar to, “The only ones being penalized by not having weighted grades are our students” (Cognard
Colleges in America grade students academically for successful careers. For years students grades were calculate by an alphabetic/numeric grade scale. Today colleges are questioning whether grades should be determined by continuing to use a grade scale or switch to a pass/fail scale. Although, there were numerous of factors both positive and negative about a pass/fail system to take into consideration before making a decision. I feel that colleges in America should continue to use a grade scale to convey to students that grades have consequences, open doors to opportunity, and alleviates perturbation.
Intelligence has begun to define individuals globally, but the goal of the minimum grading system is fairness and equality. Fair share grading is when all students in the class take an intended exam, but the class average score of the test is given to every student. Each student will receive the same grade even if one did better or worse than the average score. That being said it could reduce dropout rates, test anxiety, and competition between students. On the other hand, students could be affected negatively because it could lead to false self-value and unfairness to those students who study harder in order to earn higher grades. The debate continues about whether students should be separated by intelligence or be given equal grades in order
The article written by Michael Thomsen addresses the issue: should we as a society continue using a standardized grading system. Thomsen includes many reasons supporting his ultimate conclusion that we should not continue with any system of standardized grades. However, the reasons he uses to support his conclusion are affected by significant ambiguity which weakens the overall argument.
The author was a freshman at Princeton University when this article was written. He seems to have enough drive and determination in order to embrace grade deflation compared to his peers, who complained and disagreed with the grading system, which is what started this essay.
I have always valued school and enlarging my intelligence; I receive a sense of pride from earning a decent grade on a paper or on a particular assignment. Alfie Kohn wrote an essay titled “From Degrading to De-grading”; in it he suggests a different view on the current education system. Even though students expect marks and even seem dependent on them, grading should spur on a love of studying not deter it. Grades tend to reduce a student’s inclination for stimulating tasks, and lessen students’ interest in erudition.
In today’s society we feel the need to be graded in order to learn. The topic of the grading system has sparked three essays, by three different authors, about the pros and cons of the grading system. First, Jerry Farber, professor at University of California at San Diego, wrote A Young Person’s Guide to the Grading System (333). Next is Steven Vogel, professor at Denison University, who wrote Grades and Money (337). The last two authors in this compilation are Stephen Goode and Timothy W. Maier. They both are journalists for Insight on the News. While each of these authors have their own point of view on the grading system, all three essays talk about how being graded affects learning.
Now a day, grade inflation has become widely discussed phenomena among educationists. Grade inflation is known as the rise in higher grades of students without an equal rise in their achievements. It is a process where grades are improving in the examination systems with the passage of time which are not resulting in an improved level of learning. This trend is ruining the standards of education and producing a large pool of unskilled educated people.They possess grades which represent them highly skilled and genius students (O’Grady, Quinn, 3).
One of the issues, which Boyer points out , is that teachers and students have different expectations from college education. She says that the teachers are mainly concerned about students’ comprehension of the material, their attendance and attention while students’ hopes are to get good grades and to be well prepared for exams. It seems that the system of grading pushes students to not care too much about what is being taught from an understanding perspective, but only promotes more concern about grades instead. Some students don't really pay attention unless the instructor mentions an exam or something that will be graded. Furthermore, be...
By nature, most students are brought up in an academic environment motivated to get A’s and B’s on their report cards. Those grades sometimes don’t thoroughly report how much a student has learned or gained knowledge in each topic. Some instructors throw in factors totally unrelated to learning, when the main objective of academic institutions is to learn. In order to clearly demonstrate how much a student has learned in the classroom, schools should change their current grading system and teach students how to learn.
The public high schools began a grading system as a way of telling an individual how they were performing. There was no interest by the public in reporting the school’s progress at teaching. Teachers, in an effort to recognize outstanding performers, looked for a way of rewarding hard-working students for their efforts The grading structure changed from superior and excellent to A’s and B’s. This placed much of the burden of recognizing academic talent on the high schools.
I’ve always been taught that no matter the task ahead, if you put your mind to reaching your goal then you shall succeed. The question whether the grading scale should be more rigorous or stay the same as it is now, is quite a difficult question. I personally believe that only some of the grading system should be changed, this reason being because of immense pressure put on college students in attempt to complete all their assignments. College is not a large social party, it’s a place that you come and learn. Making friends in college is great but that’s not what it’s entirely about. You cannot expect to go into a job setting and get accoladed for performing poorly; your boss will not tolerate this behavior and most likely you would eventually
There isn’t one student in this world that is perfectly alike to another when comparing their mentality. Every student has their own differences, their own strengths and weaknesses, which makes them unique in their own way. With this being said, students do not need to be a part of a system that uses standardized tests that treat all of the students the exact same. A student’s possibilities of future success should not be limited down depending upon a standardized test’s score.
There are some advantages for having standardized tests, we can see how our schools compare with each other and we can see where what we need to work on. There are some researchers that believe that teachers over time can have different thoughts on a paper if given in different perspectives. With these tests, they are either right or wrong answers. “grades and test scores are far less likely to be generalizable than any standardized tests”