Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The rise of democracy in England
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The rise of democracy in England
Q6: France had a more difficult time getting democracy than England because they had a more powerful monarchy. In England, a movement called the Chartist movement was made. This allowed men of all sorts of classes to have the chance to vote instead of just the high middle class and the upper class men. In 884, almost all of the men living in England had the opportunity to vote. During the Victorian Age of England, Queen Victoria was at the throne at the age of 18 years old. She played a less powerful role due to the monarchy that was expanding. The kings who watched over her had a great influence of monarchy, and the political power turned over to the Parliament. England was now runned by the prime minister and the cabinet. In France it took …show more content…
many years to establish a democracy. It first started with the Third Republic, but it was getting threatened by supporters of monarchy, aristocrats, and army leaders. These people wanted their country to be a monarchy or under military power. The Dreyfus affair was formed and became a scene for the rival forces. A role was also played as a conflict against Jews, also known as anti-Semitism was taken place. In France it was an argument between the people and what they wanted and didn’t want. Q7: Emmeline Pankhurst is describing, the only justification to end violence to end damage of property is for everyone to have the same rights and ability to act.
Pankhurst opened up an organization in 1903 called the Women's’ Social and Political Union (WSPU), it’s goal was to get attention to to other people about women’s rights. Although Emmeline and the members of her organization got arrested many times, it drew attention to other women to stand up and take charge. Finally, women gained the right to vote after World War I. In her statement, she says “have failed to secure justice” this means that not everyone has the same rights and they need to work on making everyone be equal, as far as, women and …show more content…
men. Q8: Anti-Semitism is a role played against Jews and Zionism is a movement to help Jews build their new homeland. Killing of the Jews was very severe in Eastern Europe. Russians allowed organized campaigns toward the Jews to hurt them. Many of the Jews were leaving Eastern Europe and coming over to the United States. Since they were getting beaten and killed, it encouraged some of them to work for a new homeland in Palestine. A movement called Zionism helped make this happen, many years later Israel was then established. Section 2 Q6: Britain's policy toward Canada was similar to its policy toward Ireland because in both of the nations they had two different forms or arguments about the people.
In Canada there was the Upper, English-speaking, and there was the Lower, French-speaking. Religion and cultural differences caused Canada to split into two different forms. In 1791, British Parliament tried to solve both problems by creating two new forms to Canada. In Ireland, the British rule took over two different styles. Some Irish people wanted independence for Ireland, but a greater amount wanted home rule. Like Canada, Ireland’s Protestants were afraid of being apart of a country ruled by Catholics. Both of these nations split due to religion, Catholic, and cultural
differences. Q7: The Great Famine was one of the worst famines in history. Irish peasants relied on potatoes as their main food source, but from 1845 to 1848 a plant fungus destroyed all of their potatoes. About 1 million people died out of 8 million due to starvation and disease. During these years, about 2 million fled out of Ireland and most went to the United States. Some also traveled to Britain, Canada, and Australia. In Ireland, the British made the Irish peasants pay their rent, but without any potatoes to sell they didn’t have any money to. Many of them lost their land and went into huge debt, while large landowners made money from higher food prices. Q8: Great Britain created both Upper and Lower Canada because of the people. Religious and cultural differences went around with the Catholic French-speaking and the Protestant English-speaking colonists. Both groups wanted the government to use their own affairs. The British Parliament tried to solve both issues by splitting up Canada into a Upper and Lower. Upper Canada was the English-speaking and Lower Canada had the French-speaking. Each of the provinces had its own elected body.
Absolutism was a period of tyranny in Europe during the 16th and 17th centuries because monarchs had complete power to do whatever they pleased. Since absolutism is a "monarchical form of government in which the monarch's powers are not limited by a constitution or by the law" essentially there are no boundaries for actions the monarch can and cannot take. The absolutists did not focus on the people under their rule, they ruled by fear and punishment, and believed they were equal to God.
A lot of women from history have a great influence on our lives today. Two of these women were Emmeline Pankhurst and Rosa Parks. They both stood up for themselves and their cause no matter how hard it got for them. They faced numerous struggles along the way but that didn’t stop them, in fact, it made them even stronger. They both accomplished magnificent things during their lifetime and they are still remembered for those things. Although they are both similar in that they fought for what they believed in, they differ in terms of what they fought for and how they fought it.
By 1913, the suffragette movement had exceeded a decade. The growing desperation of the suffragettes is clear in their calls for the aid of working men, echoing Emmeline Pankhurst’s “Freedom or Death” speech in November 1913. This appears as a change of heart in the operation of the WSPU, which had decreed to exclude men from their organisation and broken with the Labour Party in the previous year.
The French pioneers arrived on the land of today’s Canada before the 17th century, in what they called New France. The English started to colonize North America in the 17th century, and it dominated the land by defeating the French after the French and Indian War, (McDougal Littell World Geography, page 156). Francophone’s population remains a minority in Northern America. The tension between the two ethnicities worsened, so the French asked for an independent nation. Canada and the Quebec province have been trying to reach a general conclusion by looking at the following three main aspects.
“Compare and contrast women’s suffrage movements of the late nineteenth and early centuries with the European feminist movements of the 1960’s and 1970’s.” Whereas the women’s suffrage movements focused mainly on overturning legal obstacles to equality, the feminist movements successfully addressed a broad range of other feminist issues. The first dealt primarily with voting rights and the latter dealt with inequalities such as equal pay and reproductive rights. Both movements made vast gains to the social and legal status of women.
"We ask justice, we ask equality, we ask that all the civil and political rights that belong to citizens of the United States, be guaranteed to us and our daughters forever ("Declaration” 18). This statement from the Declaration of Rights of the Women of the United States, compiled by the National Woman Suffrage Association, was read on July 4th, 1876 at Independence Square as an unexpected part of the nation’s centennial celebration. Originally, five women made a request for the document to be read at the official proceedings, but it was denied; however, the women decided to continue with their plan. At the celebration, they marched straight down the aisle to the podium where Susan B. Anthony delivered their Declaration to a “receptive crowd” (Rynder 15). The spirit evident in this event and statement completely captures the essence of the women’s revolution, not only in the United States, but in Europe as well. Feminism, according to the Oxford Dictionary, is the advocacy of women’s rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men (1). This idea of feminism was exemplified with the actions of the five women beginning more than 100 years ago; however, in today’s society, many would agree that women are shown nearly the same impartiality as with men. The women’s movements in Europe and the United States had political, economic, and social similarities and differences that led to this revolution.
Before the French Revolution that occurred during the late 18th century, France was considered one of the most advanced and opulent countries in Europe. It was in the center of the Enlightenment era, a period of time from the 1600s to the 1800s that is considered today as one of the most significant intellectual movements in history by encouraging a new view of life. The age sparked hundreds of important thinkers such as Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Locke, Thomas Paine, and Adam Smith. The Enlightenment was the fuel that sparked a worldwide desire to reshape and reconsider the ways that countries were governed. Limited monarchies, direct democracies, limited democracies, and absolute monarchies, among others, were many forms of government that were disputed by these thinkers. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, one the many significant Enlightenment thinkers, believed in a direct democracy, a system in which a country is governed by many, and where no one person has a considerable amount of power. This idea that citizens should receive independence and a voice would later stimulate the French and result in what is now k...
The need for women’s rights began back in colonial America where women were referred to as “inferior beings”. This era, though it is not particularly noted for it’s feminist movements, did hold such people as Margaret Brent, who was a wealthy holder of land in Maryland and was a strong, but unsuccessful voice in securing a place for women in the legislature of the colony. It was also a period where Quakers, and many other individuals, such as famous American patriot, Thomas Paine supported the rights of women, but at the time it was not enough to make a significant difference and it wasn’t until the 19th century that women would get the real chance to make a difference.
To understand what caused the discord on Canadian soil, we must first explore the political and cultural situation in Ireland. The Irish struggled under the oppression of absentee English landowners. It could easily be assumed that the English absentee landholders had an absolutist and almost monarchic control over their Irish “employees”. Furthermore, the Irish were seen by the English, as marginal members of the peasantry. During the 17th century, Oliver Cromwell said that “I am persuaded that this is a righteous judgment of God upon these barbarous wretches (...)”1, while his troops killed almost 3500 Irish people. That message could easily show the bitterness of the relation between both populations. Cromwell hated the Irish and sent his army, to pressure Irish populations into obeisance. He also separated children from their families, hoping that such a move would result in a population decrease. A famine also erupted in the Emerald Isle, in 1849, which caused a massive exodus. In his book The Irish in Canada, David A. Wilson said, when talking about the Famine, that it was “a s...
Although they were fighting for a worthy cause, many did not agree with these women’s radical views. These conservative thinkers caused a great road-block on the way to enfranchisement. Most of them were men, who were set in their thoughts about women’s roles, who couldn’t understand why a woman would deserve to vote, let alone want to vote. But there were also many women who were not concerned with their fundamental right to vote. Because some women were indifferent in regards to suffrage, they set back those who were working towards the greater good of the nation. However, the suffragettes were able to overcome these obstacles by altering their tactics, while still maintaining their objective.
Through the history, women have always fought for their rights creating a new space for their participation as citizens. After the First World War during the 1920s and 1930s new histories of women suffragettes have been written. During that period of time some activist groups were created, for instance, the Edwardian women’s suffrage movement that created in women a ‘Suffragette Spirit’ with the same goals and purposes even with the same militant procedures such as radical feminism that involved hunger strike and forcible feeding. This argument have become controversial due to different points of view in recent years. Another samples are the formation of the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU), a group led by Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst under an autocratic system; Women’s Freedom League (WFL), a self-proclaimed militant organization and National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies (NUWSS). These groups were formed in Britain giving way to creation of some texts that explain the actions of the feminist groups and were the basis to achieve the right of suffragettes. Furthermore, the author of this article talks about a second narrative published in 1914 by Constance Lytton that explain about her own experiences in a militant period and personal sacrifice in an attempt to vote. Finally, her experience of militancy had become the archetype of suffrage militancy. In addition, she became in a feminist and kept touch with important members of the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU). According to Lytton (cited in Mayhall, 1995: 326) She said that whilst she felt sympathy towards men, children and even animals – those that she said were ‘down-trodden’ – she had completely ‘been blind to the particular sufferings ...
Even though the women worked hard as Poor Law Guardians, they did it only because they had no other option available to them. She believed that in order for there to be no more suffering for the women of this time, they all needed to band together to fight back against the injustice they continuously faced. For Emmeline, she wanted to change the laws that made men so entitled even in a situation in which the men and women should have been viewed as equal. Despite her efforts to get these laws changed, nothing was accomplished in the hands of a man, and she felt it best for women to have these laws changed
Absolute monarchy or absolutism meant that the sovereign power or ultimate authority in the state rested in the hands of a king who claimed to rule by divine right. But what did sovereignty mean? Late sixteenth century political theorists believed that sovereign power consisted of the authority to make laws, tax, administer justice, control the state's administrative system, and determine foreign policy. These powers made a ruler sovereign.
The division between Northern and Southern Ireland dates back to the 16th century. A succession of English monarchs had used the planting of Protestant English and Scottish people on lands seized from Irish Catholics as a way of increasing loyalty to the British Crown. This is an example of how the British treated the people of Ireland unfairly.
Throughout the centuries women have demonstrated their passion to be heard, accepted by society, and have freedom of rights. An intellectual example took place in May of 1869, when Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton formed the National Woman Suffrage Association.The centered goal of the organization was achieved voting rights for women. It represented millions of women and w...