Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dbq 11 absolutism and democracy
Dbq 11 absolutism and democracy
Dbq 11 absolutism and democracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dbq 11 absolutism and democracy
Absolute monarchies were very dominant political systems during the age of absolutism. The aspect of an absolute monarchy that made it so successful was the complete control that each ruler was able to gain over the country. The dictionary definition of an absolute monarchy is when there is one ruler whom has total control without laws or a constitution to hold him back from giving any orders. This was a very helpful system for many of the rulers during the Age of Absolutism. During this time it was common for one person to be head of state however the rulers who took upon this political system were sometimes negatively affected. There were four main examples of rulers who affected their whole government negatively due to their absolute monarchy. These rulers were Louis XIV(the sun god), Peter the great the tsar of Russia, Charles I, and Philip II. These rulers were able to grow large empires through the ideas of a absolute monarchy. However, their empires were also weakened by absolutism because as enlightenment ideas came to the people they began to realize the unfairness going on. The people began to yearn for equality and started to revolt …show more content…
against the absolute monarchy that these rulers had established. Absolute monarchies were the governments way of wanting order and reform after the uprising and revolutions that people participated in with the hopes of equality. Religion caused many wars due to the controversy going on with equality and who had the right to rule.
The people did not know who should rightfully rule over them. Ideas of a Diving Ruler began to come about. Nobody knew exactly what route to take in order to find a good ruler. All the people knew was that in order to gain peace and order throughout the country that a new government should be established. They also knew that the idea of one person having absolute control over a control was never successful as well. The power always got to their heads and they became greedy which caused the country to weaken. There were many policies and strict reform that was taken place during the absolutism period that weakened the empires because people did not agree with some of the reforms and laws that the monarchy
instilled. The ruler by the name of Louis the XIV was the ruler of France from 1643 to 1715. Louis is known to be the definition of an absolute ruler. However instead of giving back to France and investing money into the starving people and the country he spent his money on lavish things to prove how much power he had and how wealthy he was. Louis built the palace of Versailles and this was not only a place were he can live this man built it as a symbol of his absolute control and power. With him being in control he can do whatever so he may please therefore in order to pay for wars and other things he started taken money out of peoples taxes however the nobility were taxes free and the peasantry had to pay taxes and this created a huge issue. The fact that people were starving and this man was abusing his power and quite frankly creating more problems than there ever was is a sign of his empire weakening due to his absolute rule. Louis the XIV was of the roman catholic faith and during his rule he made it a mission to destroy and burn down any signs of the protestant faith and completely wiping it out. By doing this he will create the widespread of the catholic church and be in absolute control. The protestants of course did not like this and there were many conflicts between the Roman catholic church and the protestant faith. Yes Louis XIV did lead great wars and did great for France for a period of time however he also created more problems due to his absolute control and power. Peter The Great lead many reforms during his reign in Russia many positive however there were negative aspects of his monarchy and absolute rule. One negative reform would be the paying of taxes which included the majority of taxes to be paid by the surfs and the peasants. These people were working hard and barely making money so money will be taken out of what they got paid and therefore making their situation more difficult than it already was. During Peters reign there were many wars since wars cost a lot of money the money would be taken from the peasants and surfs in order to pay for the wars. Peter the great was one of Russia's greatest rulers and shaped Russia into the country it is today however some of the reforms did weaken his empire. Peter the Great started to westernize Europe and bring it into a more modern phase however that upset a lot of people especially the upper-class and the Orthodox church. According to the book Peter the Great A biography "Shaving the beard, which increasingly became the fashion in the West among urban dwellers during the late seventeenth century attracted particular disapproval". The "old school" people in Russia or the traditional people within the society did not settle well with Peter the Great trying to westernize Europe. The orthodox church did not appreciate the reforms either because the Christian faith was being influenced and the Roman Catholic church was losing power. Peter even set an age restrictions regarding when men can join a monastery and when woman can be a nun. King Charles I was a monarch that
During the 16th and 17th centuries a new type of ruling emerged as a result of unorganized government called royal absolutism. This type of government was seen in many European countries including France and Russia where King Louis XIV and Peter the Great ruled respectively. Both had ways of ruling that were similar to each other and different to each other. Politically, economically and socially both Louis XIV and Peter the Great were similar to and different from how they ruled and what their reign resulted.
Differently, England failed at absolutism as a result of unstable, unpowerful, and differently minded kings and their failure at overpowering the nobles. France was able to gain more royal power than England, leaving them with complete control over their country, and left Europe without complete control. Learning how countries gained an absolute monarchy is important in the modern world because from this, people learned how to develop modern governments. Afterwards, countries started to decide whether it would be in their best interest for sovereigns to be under the law, rather than above the law. The old need for an absolute monarchy turned into a need for a government that was right for the
Monarchy was not at all a new institution in the 15th, 16th, or 17th centuries. It wasn’t even very different with respect to the goals that prevailed in each monarchy. However, the differences between the New and Absolute Monarchy come in the way of the methods, theories, and conditions prevalent throughout the different monarchical reigns.
Absolute monarchs ruled though the policy of absolutism. Absolutism declared that the king ruled though divine right with a legitimate claim to sole and uncontested authority (French State Building and Louis XIV). On this basis, Louis XIV of France and Suleiman I of the Ottoman Empire were both absolute monarchs. Each ruler believed that his power belonged to him and him alone due to divine right. They showed their absolute power by living lavishly, increased their power by waging wars, and kept their power by ensuring complete loyalty of their subjects.
A Comparison of the Characteristics of the Absolutist Rule of Charles I of England and Louis XIV of France
According to the text book, an absolute monarch is a king or queen who has unlimited power and seeks to control all aspects of society (McDougall little, 1045). In more simple terms, it is a ruler who can do just about anything without having to get permission from anyone, or having to worry about the repercussions. This was a trend that started in the 1600’s by European leaders who were rich, and didn’t like to be told what to do. These conflicts arose with the States-General in France, or Parliament in England who had substantial control. The first countries to have absolute rulers were the traditionally strong countries, such as England, Spain, and of course Louis XIV’s France.
Absolutism is defined as a form of government where the monarch rules their land freely without legal opposition. In modern times, when democracy is the ideal, this form of government seems cruel and tyrannical; however, there was an era when it thrived in European politics. During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, absolute rule was justified by the concept of divine right and its improvements to the security and efficiency of a nation.
Absolutism describes a form of monarchical power that is unrestrained by all other institutions, such as churches, legislatures, or social elites. To achieve absolutism one must first promote oneself as being powerful and authoritative, then the individual must take control of anyone who might stand in the way of absolute power. The Palace of Versailles helped King Louis XIV fulfill both of those objectives. Versailles used propaganda by promoting Louis with its grandiosity and generous portraits that all exuded a sense of supremacy. Versailles also helped Louis take control of the nobility by providing enough space to keep them under his watchful eye. The Palace of Versailles supported absolutism during King Louis XIV’s reign through propaganda, and control of nobility.
Every system was corrupt, there was practically no right and wrong; no order, just rebellion. Several conflicting arguments can be made, but there is a definite decision to make in this situation.... ... middle of paper ... ... King Louis XVI tried to rule his country with an absolute monarchy, and the plan backfired substantially.
Absolute monarchy (Absolutism), it is a form of monarchy in which a single ruler has supreme authority and it is not restricted by any written laws or customs. An example of absolutism monarchy is French King Louis XIV, Russian Tsar Peter the Great, or English King Henry VIII. Democracy is a system of government by elected representatives or officials. Example of democracy is the United States. These type of government exist in the 17th and 18th century in Europe. So the question is, which type of government was considered the most effective in Europe? In my opinion, I believe that absolutism was the most effective in Europe.
Louis XIV (the fourteenth) was an absolute monarch. He was often called "the Sun King," and ruled over France. He devoted himself to helping France achieve economic, political, and cultural prominence. Many historians believe the phrase "absolute power corrupts absolutely" mirrors Louis' reign. Louis XIV revoked the Edict on Nantes, changing the economy of France in one motion. By creating the city of Versailles and being a major patron of the arts, Louis was very influential on French culture. He made France go almost bankrupt from his costly wars and failures. Louis was very corrupt in his power, and it shown in all he did to change France; he got what he wanted, when he wanted it.
In the seventeenth century there were different types of leaders in Europe. The classic monarchial rule was giving way to absolutist rule. Absolute kings claimed to be ruling directly from God, therefore having divine rule that could not be interfered with. In 1643 Louis XIV began his reign over France as an absolute king.
During the late 17th and early 18th century, many European nations such as France and Russia were absolute monarchies. Even countries such as England had kings who at least attempted to implement absolutism. Indeed the concept of absolutism, where the monarch is the unquestionably highest authority and absolute ruler of every element in the realm, is certainly appealing to any sovereign. However, this unrestricted power was abused, and by the end of the 18th century, absolutism was gone. Absolutism failed because the monarchs' mistreatment of the population caused the people to revolt against their rule and policies. There are many factors which caused this discontent. For one, there was a great loss of human lives. Louis XIV of France participated in four wars, while Peter of Russia ruthlessly executed anyone who stood against his will. Secondly, monarchs attempted to change religious beliefs. This was notable in England where rulers such as James II desired to convert the Anglican nation into Catholicism. Finally, the burden of taxation was more than the population could support. France was brought into huge foreign debt, English kings constantly attempted to raise money, and Peter of Russia increased taxes by 550 percent. These are some of the key reasons why absolutism failed in Europe.
...ck of money and the inability to pay off officials. Without money, an empire is unable to prosper. The rich stop paying taxes and the burden is placed upon the poor. Poor taxpayers become angered, and eventually spark revolts. Anger and inhumane acts contribute to the loss of ethics and valued traditions. The citizens of an empire begin to ignore the difference in good and bad. This will begin to cause chaos and corruption in an empire, resulting in a quick decline. Sometimes, like that mentioned in the Roman Empire, the Emperor is unable to control the amount of corruption and chaos occurring. Without an effective emperor to control such issues throughout an empire, the empire will begin to gradually weaken. The rise and fall of great empires result from many complex reasons such as moral decline and escapists, but the factors mentioned above are often inevitable.
This historical study will define the absolute monarchy as it was defied through the French government in the 17th century. The term ‘absolute” is defined I the monarchy through the absolute control over the people through the king and the royal family. All matters of civic, financial, and political governance was controlled through the king’s sole power as the monarchical ruler of the French people. In France, Louis XIII is an important example of the absolute monarchy, which controlled all facts of military and economic power through a single ruler. Udder Louis XIII’s reign, the consolidation of power away from the Edicts of Nantes to dominant local politics and sovereignty in Europe. These forms of absolute power define the role of the monarch in controlling the people without the influence of the nobility or a parliament in the decision making process. In essence, the various aspects of absolute monarchy will be defined win the example of , Louis XIII as the sole sovereign of his people during the 17th century.