Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Competition and predation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Competition and predation
Introduction
Competitive interactions between species have long been a topic of interest to ecologists (Goldberg & Barton 1992). They are especially interested in how competitive interactions influence the structure of natural communities and their abilities to evolve competitive abilities (Goldberg & Barton 1992).
Competition is often responsible for the natural distribution of species, as one species will move away from an area where another species with similar requirements occur, since there is a clash in the resources they use (Connell 1961, Tilman 1987).
Other factors that influence the distribution of species and interspecific competition are weather, predation, intraspecific competition, disturbances and the characteristics of the competing species themselves (Connell 1983). The aim of this study was to see how the characteristics of competing species affect the outcomes of competitive interaction. What happens when values for initial abundance and alpha values are increased?
Methods and materials
A model was built in Vensim to represent two imaginary interacting populations. To incorporate the effects of the one species on the other, the following Lotka-Volterra (Begon et al. 2009) equations were used:
Effect of species 2 on species 1: dN1/dt= r1N1 ((K1- [N1+α12N2])/N1)
Effect of species 1 on species 2: dN2/dt= r2N2 ((K2- [N2+α21N1])/N1)
Where N is the number of individuals in the population, K is the carrying capacity, α12 is the effect of species 2 on species 1, α21 is the effect of species 1 on species 2 and r is the rate of intrinsic increase (Begon et al. 2009).
The initial values used for the parameters were: r1= r2=0,1 ; N1=N2= 50 ; K1=K2= 100 ; α12= 0,5 ; α21= 0
To see whether these results are accurate, a ...
... middle of paper ...
...nterspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology, 42(4), 710-723.
Connell, J. H. 1983. On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. American Naturalist, 122(5), 661-696.
Goldberg, D. E., & Barton, A. M. 1992. Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: a review of field experiments with plants. American naturalist, 771-801.
Tilman, D. 1987. The importance of the mechanisms of interspecific competition. American naturalist, 769-774.
Yee, D. A., & Skiff, J. F. 2014. Interspecific Competition of a New Invasive Mosquito, Culex coronator, and Two Container Mosquitoes, Aedes albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae), Across Different Detritus Environments. Journal of Medical Entomology, 51(1), 89-96.
Yes my prediction was correct this is because the Semibalanus barnacle species overgrew and killed off the Chthamalus barnacle species becoming less abundant. The Semibalanus barnacles that were transplanted became more abundant.
Abstract: The house cricket, Acheta domesticus, was used to test whether food and potential mates drive aggressive behavior. Male crickets were randomly selected in pairs and place into a cage to observe aggressive behaviors in the presence of no food, food, and female. The cage provided a confine area for the crickets to fight one another while the variables of food and female were used in attempts of increasing aggressive interactions between the male crickets. There was no significance found through this experiment due to a lack of data. It was discovered that the experiment would have to be done at a larger scale to be able to see any significance in the two variables.
Mills, Scott L., Daniel F. Doak, and Michael E. Soule. "The Keystone-species Concept in Ecology and Conservation." BioScience 43.4 (1993): 219-25. Apr. 1993. Web. 30 Oct. 2011.
In conducting my research, I observed activity on a rocky shore off the coast of Washington in the Northwest United States (workbook). This environment inhabits 10 species in shallow water nearly on top of each other. Each species helps form a complicated ecosystem where species protect, consume, and compete for space with other species. Out of the 10 species there are three producers, three sessile consumers (otherwise known as filter feeders), and four mobile consumers- one of which is an invasive species. In this environment the producers are Nori Seaweed (Porphyra), Black Pine (Neorhodomela), and Coral Weed (Corallina). Producers make their own food through sunlight, so only have predators and competition for space. Coral Weed is the strongest
Soule, Michael E et al. “Ecological Effectiveness: Conservation Goals for Interactive Species.” Conservation Biology 17.5 (2003) : 1238-1250.
A different scenario takes place when an alien species is transported to a new area. Although direct competition with similar species is still a problem, the new kid in the block may have no natural pests and diseases. Thus, large stands of monocultures can occur. It is generally accepted that one plant species will support 10 species of animals. If one species takes over 99% of a given habitat dozens if not hundreds of species are lost from that area and some populations are stressed enough that extinction is possible.
For a species to survive and flourish within a given environment, it not only needs to replace itself but also all the other species around it exclusively. Hence, if one species completely replaces another species, the result is a single dominant species, a monoculture (source 2). According to Gause’s law, every species in a given environment occupies different niches for survival. Therefore, two separate species competing for similar resources cannot fundamentally coexist (source Gause). This is known as the competitive exclusion principle. When comparing animal niche’s to that of different autotrophic plants, one can rather easily differentiate adequate ecological niches for the animal species merely based on food-requirements (P.J. Grubb). On the contrary, many autotrophic plants contradict the competitive exclusion principle by sharing similar ecological niches such as sunlight, carbon dioxide, water, and alike mineral nutrients (p.j. grubb).
Some individuals have developed different traits to help them in the process of intra-sexual competition. The organisms with more distinctive traits have greater reproductive success. More genes of those traits are then ‘selected’ and are passed onto the offspring of the organisms. Throughout time variability in these traits becomes
...lts in an increasing population of non-native species, which in turn might oppose a threat in the years to come to the number of the native specie populations of the islands. Zimmerman et al. described that the islands’ “forests seem to be balancing between two opposing factors”, meaning that the native and the non-native plants are competing for space in their common ecosystem (1).
Coevolution may be defined as an evolutionary change in a trait of the individuals in one population in response to a trait of the individuals of a second population, followed by an evolutionary response by the second population to the change in the first (Janzel, 1980). Plant animal coevolution is a very broad topic with many different areas and examples therefore this essay will be focused on the evidence of coevolution between grasses and herbivores. Key questions explored will be how is coevolution studied,
On the second level, the introduced species starts to reproduce faster than other native species around it. It also out-competes native species for resources
Competition and predation are two key factors that affect the stability of an ecosystem, such as a lake. There are three theories on the affects of competition. Competition may lead to competitive exclusion, stable coexistence, or niche differentiation. It has been shown that in marine environments, species are strong competitors for both light and nutrients and thus competition leads only to competitive exclusion (Passarge et al. 2006). The competitive exclusion principle states that if two species compete for the same resource in the same location, then one of those species will go extinct because one species will be the better competitor (Jenson 2010). Another factor in ecosystem diversity is predation. The predator and prey relationship is a complicated one. Populations go through cycles of high abundance and low abundance. Many data seem to indicate that predators are able to reduce prey populations in density-dependent situations (Freeman 2008). One example of this is the study of the snowshoe hair and the lynx. This study proved that the hair populations and the lynx...
A pair of equal sized birds of prey might overhunt an area and compete for food. However the Ecological theory shows validity in the idea that a territory is not overhunted because a small male will eat small prey while the large female hunts larger prey. However, it does not adequately explain why it is the female who would eat the larger prey or the bigger portion and be the bigger mate. It also does not explain why some species have smaller RSD than others such as the Screech Owl for
All the phenomena above indicates that biodiversity, in other word, the variety of species, is the basis of those interactions among forest ecosystem. Any absence of one species in that huge ecosystem will result in negative effects on other related species. Meanwhile, any absence of the interactions among species will cause the dysfunction of forests and lead to deterioration of forests.
Interactions between organisms are called a biological interaction. Within these interactions, there are positive but also negative interactions that can be beneficial to some, harmful to the other and even neutral for the organism. The interaction between organisms can be break down to three big categories and amongst those categories, it can be break down to small subcategories.