Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Quizlet on cultural diversity
Review of related literature about cultural diversity
Culture diversity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
How “diverse” is the world? The world today is a very diverse place, where many cultures coexist. There are many different religions, cultures, languages, and even customs of each region in the world. Today, these different cultures are integrating in the modern world, but it causes problems. One major example is that geographers, anthropologists, and historians to classify a region of the world based on a single cultural factor, such as religion. This classification system has been marked by debate and critique, as the system does not incorporate other cultural factors. Writers Ishmael Reed, in “America: The Multinational Society” Amartya Sen, in “A World Not Neatly Divided” and Hyuk-Rae Kim and Ingyu Oh, in “Migration and Multicultural Contention …show more content…
However, regions are often classified based on only one of these cultural factors and not all of them. Each of the articles covers a specific region of the world. In “A World Not Neatly Divided” India is the main focus for Sen’s argument, which criticizes the term “Hindu Civilization,” since India is home to many people who practice different religions. According to Sen, “For example, describing India as a ‘Hindu Civilization’ misses the fact that India has more Muslims than any other country except Indonesia and possibly Pakistan”(Sen 69). He also mentions the different religions that have established in India: “These include Hindus and Muslims, Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs, Parsees, Christians, (who have been in India since at least the fourth century, well before England’s conversion to Christianity), Jews (present since the fall of Jerusalem), and even atheists and agnostics” (Sen 69).
In both quotes, Sen concludes with, “Speaking of India as a Hindu civilization may be comforting to the Hindu fundamentalist, but it is an odd reading of India.” (Sen 69) His argument points out that a person who practices Hinduism may want to call India a ‘Hindu Civilization’ but it does not describe India
…show more content…
In “Migration and Multicultural Contention in East Asia” the main region discussed in the article is East Asia, particularly the countries of Taiwan, Korea, and Japan, which are very diverse countries. In the “Policies of Diversity” section, the article discusses the different cultures of each country. This was explained in the quote, “…Taiwan (Hoklo, Hakka, Waisheng ren and aborigines), Korea (Koreans, Manchurians, Chinese, and Japanese) and Japan (Japanese, Ainu, Koreans, and Chinese) have been multi-ethnic societies for centuries…” (Kim and Oh 1574). The three articles come to the conclusion that despite each article covering a region in a different area of the world, they share a common theme, which is that they are fed up with the negative stereotypes that are caused by the classification which uses one factor such as religion and want to be classified based on a system that includes other
The real definition of diversity includes different elements of the identity and culture of each person. Diversity involves cultural differences, such as origins, religious or political affiliation, race, and gender, and other more profound differences, such as experiences and personality. As Banks argues in her research, the real definition involves several elements of our identity (149). Therefore, the way in which we define and conceptualize diversity affects the way in which we interact with people of others culture, race, and affiliations.
The first understanding of India arrived in America through commercial and missionary activity. The finding of America itself was a mistake, as explorers were searching for a shorter route to India. At the time India was known for its great wealth, kingdoms and exotic mysteries (Charles Lippy & Peter Williams). Based on religious perspective India was thought to have an “ancient wisdom”, which rest upon a philosophy with the oldest religious scriptures. Prior to the twentieth century Americans knew little about Hinduism, therefore conceived it as inferior, pagan, and probably idolatrous (Charles Lippy & Peter Williams). Sadly this will not be the first of or last time America will have made quick and inaccurate decision on a diverse world religion. Even though Hinduism may have had difficulty establishing itself earlier in America, it has grown exponentially over the years.
However too much diversity in a country might affect the original cultures of a country for example in Canada, the immigrants coming from different countries have different culture. For example Muslims usually wear “Shalwar Kameez” but when they come in Canada they prefer to wear “pant shirt” because sometimes it’s a requirement of the work place and it would look odd if they wear their traditional dresses in Canada. So in this way it’s affecting the original culture. Moreover there is a possibility that Canadians might think that cultural diversity is affecting their culture too and they are losing their values which might create a bad impact on the society for example, people might see their children following the practices of other culture leaving their practices behind. Therefore parents possibly force their children to practice their own culture and might stop them from spending time with the people who belongs to different culture since they do not want their
Sen also states that religion isn’t the only thing that we can be identified by. I thought that was a great example of how diverse one place is, but has a reputation for not being diverse at all. I think this is the way a lot of places around the world are thought of , and in reality they are way more different than people can imagine. Sen writes “Consider Akbar and Aurangzeb, two Muslim emperors of the Mogul dynasty in India. Aurangzeb tried hard to convert Hindus into Muslims and instituted various policies in that direction, of which taxing the non-Muslims was only one example. In contrast, Akbar reveled in his multiethnic court and pluralist laws, and issued official proclamations insisting that no one ''should be interfered with on account of religion'' and that ''anyone is to be allowed to go over to a religion that pleases him.’’ This piece from Sen’s essay shows that even the rulers of the Muslim and Hindu areas realize that people cannot be judge by the religion they are and should be allowed to go upon their own business as they please to. People within certain societies are not seen as who they are but are perceived as something worse. Religious views don’t contribute negatively to any
Susan Page is an American journalist and the current Washington Bureau Chief for USA Today. In her online document “Divided we now Stand,” Page makes a convincing argument that the national government today fails at functioning because of its greatly divided views in its political parties. Because of these strong opposing views, no “common ground,” can be found for anyone to agree upon allowing for nothing to get done (Page). Page successfully explains her argument using plenty of statistics, clear cut diction, and finally Page’s point, that the current government is greatly divided, is easily identified with the use of continuous repetition of the statistics and diction she presents. Using these tricks Page is able to relate to most of her audience, allowing her to sell her position very well.
...ge parts of India, becoming the predominant faith for much of the population. (Allen 399)
One would expect that social equality would just be the norm in society today. Unfortunately, that is not the case. Three similar stories of how inequality and the hard reality of how America’s society and workforce is ran shows a bigger picture of the problems American’s have trying to make an honest living in today’s world. When someone thinks about the American dream, is this the way they pictured it? Is this what was envisioned for American’s when thinking about what the future held? The three authors in these articles don’t believe so, and they are pretty sure American’s didn’t either. Bob Herbert in his article “Hiding from Reality” probably makes the most honest and correct statement, “We’re in denial about the extent of the rot in the system, and the effort that would be required to turn things around” (564).
Religion, “part of the human experience that has to do with a god or gods, a higher power, or the ultimate values of life” (Cason & Tillman 6-7), is one of the most controversial and interesting subjects for humanity. It has been around for as long as anyone can recall and they have difference and similarities in their founders, beliefs, and history. Religion has served to give some sort of a meaning to life and everything around it. In modern society, some religions have grown and expanded significantly. These larger religions have been classified as world religions. In addition, these world religions have been split into two categories known as Eastern and Western religion.
In the October 10, 2011 issue of Time, there is a feature called “The Great American Divide” that reports on money: who has it, who is spending it on what, and how as a country Americans feel about it. This feature also reports something troubling, how the gap between rich and poor is once again growing wide (Sachs, 2011). Shifts in spending, shifts in money control, and a struggle with how to deal with the great money crisis America and Europe face are all discussed in this feature. This feature pulls together how GDP, unemployment rates, consumer consumption, and pricing affect this era of volatility and the shrinking middle class (Foroohar, 2011). This feature also reflects on inflation, economic growth, political stability in emerging markets and taxes play in as well. The answer to solving this imbalance of wealth and the struggling economy may be found by government action, but will it be too late?
This essay will outline the claim that consumption creates new social divisions. The definition of consumption refers to the acquisition, use and disposal of goods and services (Hetherington, 2009, p13). This is where the term ‘social division’ refers to a number of social differences (module glossary, 2013). This essay will establish the connection between consumption and creation of new social divisions within the UKand will look at social scientists Thorstein Veblen (1899) concept of ‘conspicuous consumption’, Zygmunt Bauman’s (1988) concept of ‘the seduced and the repressed’ and supermarket’s effect on consumer society, by applying Dennis Wrong (1997) ‘zero-sum game’ and ‘positive-sum game’.
Diversity and inclusion should also apply to humans; by bringing people together who are different, it can create a whole that is enhanced by the uniqueness of each individual. What are the dimensions of cultural diversity? In this week’s readings, the subject of dimensions of cultural diversity were covered comprehensively in both books. Understanding and Managing Diversity presented a nicely laid out illustration. Primary Dimensions Secondary Dimensions Age Geographic Location Gender Military & Work Experience.
India is the center of a very serious problem in the world today. It’s a very diverse place with people from many different religious backgrounds, who speak many different languages and come from many different regions. They are also separated economically. Two of the country’s religious sects, Muslims and Hindus, have been in conflict for hundreds of years. Their feelings of mistrust and hatred for each other are embedded in all those years and will not leave easily. What’s most disturbing is that there seems to be no plan for reconciliation available. There are numerous reasons for this conflict.
India sits in the middle of the scale and can be considered both individualistic and collective. There is great need for belonging to a bigger social framework. In Indian culture family is highly stressed. They strive to increase and preserve their family’s riches, by working hard in order to maintain the family’s dignity and insure the longevity of their offspring.. On the other hand the individualistic aspects of Indian culture are influenced by the major religion in India, which is Hinduism. Hindus believe in reincarnation where past lives are seen as affecting and determining the present life, as a result of this individuals are responsible for how they live their lives and how that will impact their next lives. Since aspects of both individualism and collectivism are present, India scores intermediately in this dimension. (Cultural tools, n.d.)
In a world that diversity is found in everything that controls our living as humans in one
The world as a whole is becoming more diverse. There is diversity in schools and in the workplace. People should understand that diversity is what makes the world go around. If all people had the same characteristics then the world would be a very boring place. Even though all human beings are the same in some ways, we are still culturally different. Cultural diversity lets us appreciate our differences. Different cultural groups have varying beliefs, customs, values, and a wide variety of characteristics that make them special. Cultural influences make people see the world differently and cultural diversity should be appreciated.