Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay about Sherlock Holmes
Literary analysis of sherlock holmes
Essay about Sherlock Holmes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay about Sherlock Holmes
Coursework-The Speckled Band How does Conan Doyle present Dr. Grimesby
Roylott as a typical Victorian Villain.
Having now read this book I feel I am now able to complete this essay
about Roylott. The main constituents of a typical classic murder
mystery invariably consist of a body, a motive, a weapon, a suspect,
an alibi and a detective. Conan Doyle’s,The Speckled Band
demonstrates all those typical characteristics.
I am now going to briefly summarise the story and identify each of the
ingredients of the murder mystery, The Speckled Band, to help the
reader understand the elements of the story. I will then analyse how
Conan Doyle presents Dr. Roylett as a typical Victorian villain.
The story begins with Holmes and Watson in conversation. They are
reminiscing about their past cases over the last eight years and talk
about the mysterious death of a Miss Julia Stoner. This case
commences when Holmes wakes Watson up very early in the morning. This
is because they have a client, a young lady, Helen Stoner. She is
about to be married and is scared because her sister, Julia was due to
be married and just before her marriage day, she died. It was an awful
shock to all the family. The coroner said she was unable to find any
satisfactory cause of death but Helen thought Julia had died of fear
and nervous shock. Consequently Helen Stoner sought the help of
Holmes. Helen then tells us a little bit about the history of her
family. Helen and Julia are twins who have lost their mother and are
living with their stepfather Dr Grimesby Roylott. Roylott stopped
working when the twin’s mother died. We then hear about the night
when Julia Stoner died. We know that Roylott had retired to his room
early but had not gone...
... middle of paper ...
...1824. He was heavily in debt, guilty of
attempted bribery, fraud, forgery and overly fond of the ladies and of
gambling on the horses is beyond doubt! He was only tried for one
murder although he was found guilty of the murders by poison of his
wife and his brother. He was then found guilty of the murder of John
Parsons Cook in the ‘Talbot Arms’ in Rugeley. They tried to get him
to admit it but he wouldn’t. For this murder he was publicly executed
in saw it. He was nicknamed, “The Prince of Poisoners.”
In conclusion I say that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s fictional villain
Dr Grimesby Roylott is a lot like these two Victorian villains. Both
the real murderers were doctors, just like Roylott. The way they kill
is fairly similar as well, although Roylott was more clever and may
have escaped detection if it had not been for that super sleuth ,
Sherlock Holmes.
...nd enjoyable. The one thing that did bug me was that Youngs does not directly tie his thesis directly to the end of the book. It would have been helpful for the reader to be able to confirm Youngs’s intention for writing the book, but since he fails to re-introduce his argument in the end, it left me questioning that intention.
When reading this book I began to think of how I grew up and how I am a
The ending of the novel was inspiring. The author suggests the reader to look into great novels, and even supplies a list of novels a personally suggests. He ended with a very ...
One thing I realized after I read the book is that I’ve been in a 'better
end. This essay will further show how both stories shared similar endings, while at the same time
making life unbearable. Reading this novel gave me a great sense of hope for human kind, as we have been able to keep
...e preceding reasons, all college students should read the book. The book will captivate the educated mind, and most importantly, will cause that mind to think and to question why things happen as they do.
In my essay I have chosen the essay “ black men and public space” by Brent Staples, and “ on seeing England for the first time” by Jamaica Kincaid . In Staples essay he shows us what does it mean to be a black man who walks in the night, living between people “ white people” who sees a criminal or a “mugger” when they look at him , because of the color of his skin that makes him stranger . And Kincaid explains how she felt as a stranger in her home town as well as in England when she went there . And both of Staples and Kincaid share the feeling of the fear, different types of fear ,as they both been through racism from people around them in different ways , in one hand Kincaid had the fear of losing her identity , and her culture identity and thus losing herself , while Staples had the fear of facing others fears of him, and both never did any harm to white people but they been suffering from white people and under they control and under their judgement .
All in all, this is a great book that I’ve ever read in my life. It really inspires me. I do agree with Spike Lee that this book had change the way I thought and it changed the way I acted. Besides, it has given me the courage that I didn’t know I had inside me. I’ve learned a lot from the book. Once again, thank you sir for giving this kind of assignment
Booth, Alison, and Kelly J. Mays. The Norton Introduction to Literature. New York: W.W. Norton, 2010. Print.
...more involved with the reading in this course, I understand the political undertones, religious themes, and the cultural awareness that I need in order to fully comprehend the meaning the authors convey. I believe it will be a challenge, but I will have a new perspective as well as new expectations as I continue reading literary masterpieces.
...ater appreciate and learn several lessons from its theme and historical content. Overall, the novel is valued by many writers and will continue to be inspirational to all throughout the many generations to come.
I thoroughly enjoyed this novel and believe it to be one of the best books I have ever read. It was extremely well written and challenging for me to understand at times. It conveys that dark side of human ambition very well, and it has given me much to think about.
Overall, this was a great book because I finished it in two days. It was filled with suspense, action, valuable themes, and it made me feel a wide variety of emotions. The book explored the value of family, the corruption of government, and the fundamental question of “Should one follow the order if it’s immoral to one?”
...eight years on a desert island. We learn that what really keeps us down is our human self absorption and that we have to rise above this terrible selfishness. We learn that finding the self is acknowledging our frailty and working, in spite of it, towards making our spiritual side strong. If I realize what is important in life, I know I have learnt from Crusoe's experiences and will never have to cry "Oh had there been but one ....