Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Feminism in the 1960s and 1970s essay
Essays by feminists
Essays by feminists
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The 1970’s were a time of protest and turmoil for equality, especially for women’s rights and feminism. Steps were being made though, women were hosting sit-ins and marches that were gaining ground. In 1971, Reed v Reed declared sexual discrimination as a violation of the 14th amendment, and Judy Brady wrote “I Want a Wife”. Judy Brady was able to exemplify and criticize women’s treatment and lack of value by writing with repetition, sarcasm, and reversal.
While opening her essay, Brady explains her situation as she was ironing one evening. She was reminiscing about a friend of hers who was fresh out of a divorce, who lost his child to his now ex-wife, and was looking for his next wife. Something suddenly occurred to her as a bizarre thought, she wants her own wife! She reverses the societal norm of a man and a woman, and uses that to catch her audience’s attention. Brady published her essay to a premier issue of
…show more content…
“Ms.”, a popular femistic magazine with thousands of woman readers. She wants to get her readers to stand up and realize that they too could use the same help a wife gives to her husband. Such a reversal exemplifies her real purpose of showing how much wives do and how deserving they are for some recognition. She uses a satirical reversal and difference from societal norm to catch her readers’ attention and prove her claim. Judy Brady moves from her reversal onto a barrage of repetition, repeating the phrase “I want”.
She conjures up the next six paragraphs all revolving around “I want”. By choosing to write her essay like this, it does a multitude of things. It shows her determination and steadfastness for proving her point. With every repetition of “I want” and “I want”, it proves to the reader again and again how much willpower she possesses. The repetition also creates sort of a snotty tone, making her sound like she is drawing her line in the sand and standing her ground. Above all, the recurrence of “I want” shows the magnitude of things women do for men that go unnoticed and underappreciated. She lists off an arsenal of things that go unnoticed, while even keeping them to broad topics like child support, physical needs, etc. This repetition inflates her idea that wives are not getting the proper recognition for all the tedious work they perform on a daily basis, while simultaneously making her audience notice some help they have considered or not considered
before. Judy Brady ends her essay with the iconic line “My God, who wouldn’t want a wife?” to bring out a feeling of sarcasm in her essay. This tone even exemplifies her feminist viewpoint, since many women of this time period were taught to follow directions, she speaks in a complete opposite manner to prove that she is going to do anything but follow norms and rules. This also gives her a personality that can’t usually be expressed throughout paper. Her personality causes readers to be drawn in to read her essay, and to especially understand her purpose of criticizing the lack of respect for wives. During the 1970’s were a time feminist warfare, Judy Brady wrote her essay “I want a Wife”. She wrote in such a way, incorporating strong hints of sarcasm, continuous repetition, and a stark reversal, that both catches the attention of her readers and pushes per motive. She wrote to criticize the treatment and lack of respect wives get for all the work they do for their husbands.
Edelman 's purpose in writing this essay is to show two sides: she wants to show the reader how her husband has abandoned her, but also cares to inform the perfect ideal of marriage that everyone grows up with is not completely achievable. Furthermore, Edelman wants the reader to feel sympathy for her situation and understand why it has taken such a toll on her life. She uses anecdotal evidence from her own life and how she handles the situations to get this point across. This choice impacts the article by creating a one sided slant because she never interviews her husband to find out how he is feeling about the situation. Edelman blames her husband for working more hours and not being around to help with the parenting, like they were supposed to be doing together. She explains how before her husband began working crazy hours, she too, was a working mother, but now the more and more hours he works, the more she needs to be present at home. Edelman says, “It began to make me spitting mad, the way the daily duties of parenting and home ownership started to rest entirely on me.” (53). She feels betrayed by her husband
...ng. She examines the issue of divorce and remarrying, using relationships as a tool for social climbing, she also examines the insecurities that arise when a man discovers that the definition he placed on the woman in his life isn’t as realistic as he would like to think. She subtly addresses the issue of man’s desire to own and define women they are in a relationship with, while trying to control any of her social interactions that could potentially threaten his sense of ownership.
Amy Cunningham, an editor and author from New York, wrote an article “Why Women Smile” to emphasize on how women are no longer smiling because it is a natural thing, but rather an everyday habit. Coupled with Cunningham’s supported reasons by using logos and ethos, she also uniquely brings in her personal experience by having ethos, making her argument more relatable. A long side with that, societies’ past and present impact on today’s world about women was also included as Cunningham put her own take into proving her point. Although this may be true, there were some fallacies found in her argument leading it to lack of fully portraying the audience.
Henry Adams, a famous historian, once said “Friends are born, not made.” Is this true? One curious woman, author Kate Dailey, wrote “Friends with Benefits: Do Facebook Friends Provide the Same Support as Those in Real Life?” published in 2009 in the Newsweek, and she argues that Facebook is able to provide and create “friends”. Dailey argues that while Facebook serves as a great alternative for real world’s social life, Facebook is not a replacement to the same support as those in actuality. Dailey starts building her credibility by incorporating personal stories and using reliable sources, quoting convincing facts and statistics, and successfully using emotional appeals; however, towards the end of the article, her attempt to summarize the other side of the debate ultimately undermines her platform.
This source provided the unique perspective of what was thought to be the perfect household, with a man who worked and a wife who cooked and cleaned. However, it also showed how a woman could also do what a man can do, and in some cases they could do it even better. This work is appropriate to use in this essay because it shows how men talked down to their wives as if they were children. This work shows the gradual progression of woman equality and how a woman is able to make her own decisions without her husband’s input.
In the end, readers are unsure whether to laugh or cry at the union of Carol and Howard, two people most undoubtedly not in love. Detailed character developments of the confused young adults combined with the brisk, businesslike tone used to describe this disastrous marriage effectively highlight the gap between marrying for love and marrying for ?reason.? As a piece written in the 1950s, when women still belonged to their husbands? households and marriages remained arranged for class and money?s sake, Gallant?s short story excerpt successfully utilizes fictional characters to point out a bigger picture: no human being ought to repress his or her own desires for love in exchange for just an adequate home and a tolerable spouse. May everyone find their own wild passions instead of merely settling for the security and banality of that ?Other Paris.?
Society looks down on women when they don’t uphold to what they normally do. Furthermore, she talks about how men are not seen equally and there only social role is to work and come home and do nothing. In my opinion I realize that these social roles have changed for the better. Now both men and women are helping out with household work which I think would be less stress and work on women.
During the 1970’s, women were extremely mistreated and did not have many rights. There were very limited opportunities and women were restricted for doing certain things that men could. Throughout the United States women were not tried as equals compared to men. At the time, ladies could barely do anything if they did not have a husband, lesbian women did not have the freedom to express their sexual preference, abortions were illegal, females could only attend certain college and occupy certain jobs, and this list of inequalities can go on for days. According to the article some of these problems still exist today which is a major issue.
It is safe to say that the box next to the “boring, monotone, never-ending lecture” has been checked off more than once. Without the use of rhetorical strategies, the world would be left with nothing but boring, uniform literature. This would leave readers feeling the same way one does after a bad lecture. Rhetorical devices not only open one’s imagination but also allows a reader to dig deep into a piece and come out with a better understanding of the author’s intentions. Ursula K. Le Guin’s “The Wife’s Story” is about a family that is going through a tough spot. However, though diction, imagery, pathos, and foreshadowing Guin reveals a deep truth about this family that the reader does not see coming.
In the 1950’s, a woman’s life path was pretty clear cut, graduate from high school and find a good man while your ultimate goal is to start a family and maintain an orderly house. This is shown when Kingston says to the little girl “Some one has to marry you before you can become a housewife.” She says this as if becoming a housewife is a top priority for a woman. However presently, most women in America hold very respectable jobs and the role as housewife is slowly disappearing from American culture. Another example of modern day women showing strength is portrayed when the narrator’s mother goes on a cultural rampage and forces the narrator to go to the drug store and demand a piece of candy simply because the druggist missed the address of the house. This scene is shown in pages three, four, and five. By doing so the narrator comes off as poor and illogical.
Throughout the book, many of the wives note how they wish that they were able to pursue their goals and dreams, but were unable to due to the fact that they had responsibilities as a wife. I think that by putting themselves in a position where they could be viewed as undeserving upper class members who did not work, it not created a dependency to their husbands financially, it portrayed them as women incapable of supporting themselves or their desires in life. “Upper-class women, like other women, experience dissatisfaction with their role as wives–with its expected mode of accommodation, unequal voice in family decisions, and sole responsibility for home and family”
In Judy Brady’s, “I Want A Wife” (1971) sarcasm or a humorous tone is expressed on the topic of what makes a wife. Brady repetitively states, “I want a wife” and begins to list what makes “a wife.” Brady defines a wife as someone who takes care of the children, cleans and cooks, gives up her ti...
In her classic essay first published in Feminist magazine Ms., “I Want a Wife”, by Judy Brady declares the role of women in the 1970’s as viewed from a man’s point of view. It is explicit Brady is a Feminist even though she is reducing women to the role of a domestic slave because of her style of writing is satirical:
Society’s gender infrastructure has changed since the 1920’s and the nineteen amendment that allowed women the right to vote. Or so we thought, many of the gender expectations that were engraved into our early society still remain intact today. Women for many people still mean an immaterial, negligible, and frivolous part of our society. However, whatever the meaning of the word women one has, the same picture is always painted; that of a housewife, mother, and daughter. Women are expected to fallow the structural identity of living under her husband 's submissions. Threatening the social norm of what is accepted to be a woman in society can put in jeopardy the personal reputation of a woman, such treating her as a whore. But, what happens
In the year 1972 an author Judy Brady wrote the article, “Why I Want A Wife,” which appeared in Ms. Magazine. In this article Brady cleverly writes about herself as a wife wanting a wife to do all the jobs she would rather not do as a wife. As ludicrous as this sounds, she truly is really writesing a humorous satire that relates to the mood of many women in the 1970’s who felt unappreciated and dictated by men on unrealistic expectations and demands on what it means to be a woman, a mother, and a wife. Brady uses pathos throughout her article to emotionally connect with the reader and to create sympathy and uses humor to strengthen her objective of showing how women’s roles are dictated by men in society.