Back in 2016, Donald Trump gave a speech to try to appeal to those who may or may not support him. He gives an in-depth speech to try to persuade the ones who are indecisive about their decision. The speech provides various rhetorics including logical and emotional appeals, repetition, and post hoc fallacy. These and many other rhetorics serve to attempt to give Trump more votes. In the opening remarks of Trump’s speech, he provides an introduction to what he will promise to change further on into his theoretical presidency. Within that introduction, he uses personal pronouns, such as “we” and “our”, to have the audience feel like they are included into his perspective. Following the use of personal pronouns, he goes to say, “ These are the facts”, providing information about the homicides and a number of illegal immigration that happened in the country. “Homicides last year increased by 17%... In the President’s hometown… more than 2,000 have been victims of shootings… Nearly 180,000 immigrants with criminal records, ordered deported from our country... “ This implements the logical appeal in the speech and lets the audience know to trust his authority. On top of this, Trump applies the propaganda technique of …show more content…
plain-folk to use as an emotional appeal, “... He ended the life of an innocent young girl named Sarah Root...But to this Administration, their amazing daughter was just one more American life that wasn’t worth protecting.” This emotional appeal may increase the effectiveness of the logical appeals because, alongside the trust in his authority, the audience’s perspective may be turned over. Moving further into the RNC speech, Trump begins to use much repetition. At first, he uses the word “rigged”, “That is because these interests have rigged… our system for their exclusive benefit.” “They know she will keep our rigged system in place,” In the second quote, he speaks of his opponent, Hillary Clinton, in a negative manner. The system is so “rigged to where the system takes advantage of those who will comply with their commands. “She is their puppet, and they will pull the strings.” This metaphor almosts repeats itself throughout the speech pointing out the various ways Trump’s opponent will do whatever it takes to appeal to the “rigged system” of the government. Trump goes on his repetition streak with the idea of “The Administration has failed America’s inner cities… failed them on education… failed them on jobs… failed them at every level.” The word “failed” is emphasized because he wants to convince the people of America that he can make the failures become a success. Deeper into the speech, Trump begins to try to convince his audience that he would be a better president than his opponent, Hillary Clinton.
Trump compares her mistakes and misfortunes to what he believes would be a better solution to what America needs. He leans into a post hoc fallacy when he states, “America has lost nearly one-third of its manufactury jobs since 1997, following the enactment of disastrous trade deals supported by Bill and Hillary Clinton,” Trump makes Clinton seem like a less appealing candidate by saying one disaster was caused by her and her husband. Then, Trump begins to repeat, “My opponent” to compare himself to her faults to create the illusion that he is more appealing to be president, “My opponent on the other
hand…” Finalizing the speech, he brings back the emotional appeal by thanking his family on his journey. He strived to turn people’s hearts around to make him a compassionate president. Trump also returns to the repetition saying the famous quote, “We will make America great again.” He also uses personal pronouns within the repetition to make the audience feel like they can help too. Trump uses this to his advantage since the emphasis on “we” will help when it comes to voting. To sum it up, Trump uses may rhetorics to appeal to his audience.
In the “George Bush’ Columbia” speech, George W. Bush used a variety of ways in order to make his mark and effectively assemble his dialog. One of the most prominent strategies Mr. Bush used was his sentence structure. He did a great job shaping his speech by initially addressing the problem at hand. He first stated what happened, who it happened to, and gave his condolences to the ones who didn’t make it, along with their families. Mr. Bush also seemed sincere throughout his speech as he made sure to mention each hero apart of the crew. Another technique George W. Bush displayed was the diction and tone he used while delivering the speech. From listening to the audio last week, I remember the passion behind Bush’s words and the sincerity
Many would argue that President Obama is one of the most effective speakers in the decade. With his amazing speeches, he captivates his audience with his emotion and official tone.
Rhetorical analysis assignment: President’s Address to the Nation. Since the 9/11 attacks, the Bush administration has been calling on all citizens and all nations to support his Middle East policy. Nonetheless, the U.S. has been involved in the Middle East struggle for more than half of the century, wars were waged and citizens were killed.
Bush opens his speech by acknowledging the events of September 11, and those that lost the lives of loved ones and to those that gave their life trying to save others in the buildings. He appeals to those that remain strong by saying that, “These acts of mass murder were intended to frighten our nation into chaos and retreat. But they have failed. Our country is strong.” His use of pathos helps Bush to calm and control the public in order to keep the country together. This
It all happened in an instant. One minute thousands of civilians were on their way to work when everything changed. President George Bush gave an iconic speech that was not only memorable but gave hope to the Americans that justice would be served to those associated with the terrorist group al-Qaida. George Bush’s speech rallied the Americans to fight back against the terrorists because he used rhetorical devices such as parallelism, analogies, and repetition.
President Trump’s inaugural address was a speech many have called short, brutish, but effective. While being shorter than the average inaugural address, falling nine-hundred and two words behind President Obama’s second inaugural address, it took only those one-thousand four-hundred and thirty-three words to reach out in an attempt to unite the divided American people. Trump’s speech effectively offers a new vision of our government, by connecting to people emotionally and logically, however lacking many facts and playing more off his credibility, many people questions his point in saying “empty talk is over.”
Bush’s method of topic by topic argument along with many emotional appeals was a rather effective way of winning the audience’s support. By appealing to the emotions of the audience Bush was able to give the audience issues they could relate to as well as issues they would feel strongly about. With an emotionally involved audience Bush was able to gather a great number of supporters of his party, just as he intended in his original purpose. The further reference to the character of the people involved in the issues really paid off by drawing the crowd closer to the people working for them. With the topical structure and the appeals used, the speech was a very effective tool in gaining support for the Republican Party from the northern Arizonan audience.
Every 20th of January, the United States undergoes the passing of power from one president, to another. On this specific election, Donald J. Trump was elected as president. He has received much criticism from opposition, but much praise from his supporters. Although a very controversial person, Trump gave a great speech that was based on uniting the people as one. Trump used multiple rhetorical strategies such as repetition, pauses in speech, and listing are just a few of them. Adding hints of populism, his speech was one that touched many citizens. While very controversial, Trump’s inauguration speech was one that was based on the people, not the elite, about bringing back what made America great, and uniting everyone as one.
President Obama’s Inaugural Speech: Rhetorical Analysis. Barrack Obama’s inauguration speech successfully accomplished his goal by using rhetoric to ensure our nation that we will be in safe hands. The speech is similar to ideas obtained from the founding documents and Martin Luther King’s speech to establish ‘our’ goal to get together and take some action on the problems our country is now facing. As President Barack Obama starts his speech, he keeps himself from using ‘me’, ‘myself’, and ‘I’ and replacing it with ‘we’, ‘us’, and ‘together’ to achieve his ethos.
“The beauty of me is that I am very rich” according to Donald Trump. His ignorance has lead him to do things that he shouldn’t being doing or has done. In the past few months he has been racist man that would insult people that are from a different race. When Trump started running for president he would insult and bully everybody in general not knowing the people’s stories. He made people seem like they are poor and have nothing to live for, Trump’s inability to see past his greed. He wants to separate the United States and wants people to think he is the best of the best; Trump should not be President.
On January 20, 2009, President Obama was officially inaugurated and sworn in as the forty-fourth president of the United States of America. The tradition of being inaugurated requires the president to give a speech about the goals they want to reach during their presidency. The president must make a speech that appeals to the audience while being professional. Rhetoric is a useful strategy to utilize in speech making. Obama uses rhetoric to achieve presenting his message of creating hope and change together in America while fixing the economic and social challenges and issues left behind from the previous president. Barack Obama uses syntax, the rhetorical triangle, and diction to portray his message.
This created much disbelief and shock across the grid. To summarize his entire presidential campaign in one word, it would simply be “different”. It is worth noting that Trump has taken an extreme approach against what is normally expected, and that resulted in one of the most divided political stances up to date. “David Robinson, who performed a statistical analysis of the President-elect's Twitter account in August, said Mr. Trump's tendency to tweet like an "entertainer" meant he was able to garner the “interest" of the American people, which in turn boosted his chances of election success”(Independent.co.uk 1). His appeal to emotion has personally benefited himself to the point where he remained a key subject of interest throughout the entire election. Whether or not he was favored, he was the most focused on topic for widespread
President Obama’s Address to the nation was presented on January 5, 2016. His speech was shown on all of the major network stations. The main goal of his speech was to get the point across to the nation about the increasing problem of gun use. His speech really focused on the issue of gun control and if it would benefit the country. Overall, the biggest idea of his Address was that gun control is a large issue in the United States. The way to prevent deaths caused by firearms can be prevented in other ways than taking peoples guns away. The examples brought up in this Address really stood out to me. The use of personal, national, and global examples really made his speech stronger on the topic of effectiveness.
The adults need to pick a president”. You get the impression that Trump is a spoiled brat, who won’t admit defeat “This is the kind of childish person who, when losing, flips over the board and yells insults at his family,…”. At the same time, he is also portrayed as bigot, who is both sexist and racist. In the essay, we hear about three times Trump was sexist, because he objectified women and a 12 year old child, which is sort of pedophilic. He admits that he would want to date his daughter, if she wasn’t his daughter “This is the same man who marveled on television about his daughter Ivanka’s “very nice figure” and mused, “I’ve said that if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps, I would be dating her”” . Relating to this, Blow questioned Trumps audacity to call out Hillary Clinton’s husband past, when Trump himself has so many skeletons in his closet “That man is lecturing someone
"We’ve seen our discourse degraded by casual cruelty. At times it can seem like the forces pulling us apart are stronger than the forces binding us together. The argument turns too easily into animosity, disagreement escalates into dehumanization,” Bush continued."