Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics of magnet schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Characteristics of magnet schools
A Refining of Magnet Schools: The Segregated System
Magnet schools are designed to promote voluntary school desegregation and to enhance
educational quality through thematic teaching of uniform curriculum (www.magnet.edu). Partially funded by the federal government through grants and assistance programs, magnet schools essentially provide choice to parents and students across America to gain a more specialized education.
Intrinsically, magnet schools allow students from many different districts to unite in one school in hopes of creating a racially diverse learning environment. Despite the attempt made by the federal government to desegregate schools, Jonathon Kozol points out that, in fact, the magnet schools have even further isolated the poor urban student and that magnet schools have indeed failed to meet initial expectations as a desegregated environment. Yet desegregation is apparent in the areas of philosophy and purpose, admission and entrance to the schools, and curriculum.
The initial proposal of the magnet school as a means to create racial equity among schools has been unsuccessful despite its statement of philosophy and purpose. “By shifting focus toward academic interests…magnet schools are attempting to bring together students who have common interests regardless of race” (www.liberalparty.com). However, despite its attempts, the system of magnet schools has failed to overcome racial segregation. Kozol notes that “very poor children, excluded from this [magnet] system, says the Chicago Tribune, are ‘even more isolated’ as a consequence of the removal of the more successful students from their midst” (Kozol 59). According to Kozol and the
Tribune, the magnet system is further segregating the school systems by worsening the regular public schools in neighboring areas. What must not be forgotten are the existing schools that the less successful and less motivated students are left to attend, and the damaging effects that they face as a result of the magnet school system. In addition, in an evaluation of the Magnet Schools Assistance Program between 1989 and 1991, researchers “Steel and Eaton discovered that only half the schools met their
desegregation objectives” (www.eric.uoregon.edu). Another study providing evidence that
racial equity has failed to be realized through the use of magnet schools is in a recent statecommissioned evaluation of New York State’s magnet school program for 1993-94. The study “found that schools did not completely achieve their academic or desegregation goals” (New York State 1994- www.eric.urogen.edu). Legal critic Kimberly West has also concluded that “magnet schools are a ‘desegregation tool that backfired, are rife with racially segregated classes,’ and minority students are too often ‘treated as inferior by the very system that was designed to help them’” (www.
Another school in the same district is located “in a former roller-skating rink” with a “lack of windows” an a scarcity of textbooks and counselors. The ratio of children to counselors is 930 to one. For 1,300 children, of which “90 percent [are] black and Hispanic” and “10 percent are Asian, white, or Middle Eastern”, the school only has 26 computers. Another school in the district, its principal relates, “‘was built to hold one thousand students’” but has “‘1,550.’” This school is also shockingly nonwhite where “’29 percent '” of students are “‘black [and] 70 percent [are]
In the essay “Still Separate, Still Unequal” by Jonathan Kozol, the situation of racial segregation is refurbished with the author’s beliefs that minorities (i.e. African Americans or Hispanics) are being placed in poor conditions while the Caucasian majority is obtaining mi32 the funding. Given this, the author speaks out on a personal viewpoint, coupled with self-gathered statistics, to present a heartfelt argument that statistics give credibility to. Jonathan Kozol is asking for a change in this harmful isolation of students, which would incorporate more funding towards these underdeveloped schools. This calling is directed towards his audience of individuals who are interested in the topic of public education (seeing that this selection is from one of his many novels that focus on education) as well as an understanding of the “Brown v. Board of Education” (1954) case, which ties in to many aspects of the author’s essay. With the application of exemplum, statistics, and emotional appeals, Jonathan Kozol presents a well developed argument.
The essay “Still Separate, Still Unequal”, by Jonathan Kozol, discusses the reality of inner-city public school systems, and the isolation and segregation of inequality that students are subjected to; as a result, to receive an education. Throughout the essay, Kozol proves evidence of the inequality that African American and Hispanic children face in the current school systems.
America’s public school system started off very rough, but through the dedication of many hard-working Americans, it was starting to shape into a system that allowed all children, regardless of race, gender, religion, or nation of origin, to have an education.
The gap between the nation’s best and worst public schools continues to grow. Our country is based on freedom and equality for all, yet in practice and in the spectrum of education this is rarely the case. We do not even have to step further than our own city and its public school system, which many media outlets have labeled “dysfunctional” and “in shambles.” At the same time, Montgomery County, located just northwest of the District in suburban Maryland, stands as one of the top school systems in the country. Within each of these systems, there are schools that excel and there are schools that consistently measure below average. Money alone can not erase this gap. While increased spending may help, the real problem is often rooted in the complex issues of social, cultural, and economic differences. When combined with factors involving the school itself and the institution that supports it, we arrive at what has been widely known as the divide between the suburban and urban schools. Can anything actually be done to reverse this apparent trend of inequality or are the outside factors too powerful to change?
Steel, L. & Levine, R. (1994) Educational Innovation in Multiracial Contexts: The Growth of Magnet Schools in American Education. Palo Alto, California: American Institutes for Research.
For decades now, there have been educational problems in the inner city schools in the United States. The schools inability to teach some students relates to the poor conditions in the public schools. Some of the conditions are the lack of funds that give students with the proper supplies, inexperienced teachers, inadequate resources, low testing scores and the crime-infested neighborhoods. These conditions have been an issue for centuries, but there is nothing being done about it. Yet, state and local governments focus on other priorities, including schools with better academics. It is fair to say that some schools need more attention than other does. However, when schools have no academic problems then the attention should be focused elsewhere, particularly in the inner city schools.
The first question raised of Gertrude’s actions is why she so hastily married her brother in law? Some speculate that she perhaps had an affair with Claudius before the death of the late king Hamlet. However, it can be seen that Gertrude, oblivious to the fact that Claudius murdered her late husband, decided to marry him so that she doesn’t lose her position of power in the royal family. How do we see that she didn’t conspire against her late husband? We see as the audience that Gertrude is innocent to this crime is when the ghost of the late king Hamlet confronts his son and reveals the culprit of his own murder. The ghost king tells prince Hamlet this of his uncle Claudius:
We first realize in Act I, Scene 2 that poor judgment is her major character flaw. As the mother of a grieving son, Gertrude should have been more sensitive to Hamlet's feelings. Instead, less than two months after King Hamlet's death, Gertrude remarries Claudius, her dead husband's own brother. Gertrude should have realized how humiliated Hamlet would feel as a result, because at that time it was considered incestuous for a widow to marry her husband's brother. There is also jealousy on the part of a son, who feels that his mother should be giving him more attention during the mourning period. Gertrude is not in touch with her own son's feelings to see why he is angry. Hamlet expresses this outrage during his first soliloquy:
Once a school system drops their efforts to integrate schools, the schools in low-income neighborhood are left to suffer; not to mention that segregation in schools leads, not only to the neglect of schools, but the neglect of students as well. Resegregation quite literally divides the public schools into two groups “the good schools”, that are well funded, and “the bad schools”, that receive a fraction of the benefits-- more often than not the groups are alternatively labeled as “the white schools” and “the black schools” (and/or hispanic). Opportunities for the neglected students diminish significantly without certain career specific qualifications that quality education can provide-- they can’t rise above the forces that are keeping them in their situation.
It can also be assumed that another reason Gertrude married Claudius so hastily after the death of her first husband is that she wanted to keep her status as queen. Originally Hamlet was supposed to step up as king since his father died. If that would have taken place, whoever Hamlet marries would be the new queen, presumably Ophelia. Gertrude could have very well married Claudius for greed. She could have very well married Claudius to keep her position as queen. Furthermore, the line “Ay, that incestuous, that adulterate beast…” in Act One Scene Five insinuates that Gertrude had been the lover of Claudius even before Hamlet’s father died. An adulterous act can only be committed by definition when a person has a lover, and have sex with another. If they had gotten together after the late king’s passing it would not be considered adulterous. Gertrude’s selfishness is illuminated with that very scene, because she was only thinking about herself and her own desires when getting involved with Claudius. The late king’s expression of betrayal towards Gertrude aide Hamlet create a dreadful plan of action to confront his mother for her wrong doings. Thus, proving that Gertrude’s selfish ways helped to lead the dreadful events of the
*** Macronutrients Certain elements in the soil are required by plants in relatively large quantities; these are called macronutrients. Some of these are major components of nucleic acids, proteins, and phospholipids, all of which are plentiful in plants. Among the macronutrients, nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) are particularly important because they often act as limiting nutrients, meaning their availability limits plant growth. If N, P, and/or K are added in appropriate quantities to soil as fertilizer, plant growth usually increases. This observation explains why the leading ingredients in virtually every commercial fertilizer are N, P, and K. Freeman 5th***. Both organic and inorganic fertilizers provide plants with the nutrients needed to grow healthy and strong. However, each contains different ingredients and supplies these nutrients in different ways. Organic fertilizers work over time to create a healthy growing environment, while inorganic fertilizers provide rapid nutrition. (REFERENCE/rephrase)
The community is people who buy what farmers produce. Farmers are forced to grow crops at a fast rate as they supply supermarkets every 2 or 3 weeks with fresh goods. People don’t buy goods that are bruised or damaged as it’s seen as “bad quality”.
In the play Hamlet, Gertrude is very complex. She is a wife, mother, widow and queen and is vital to the action of the play. She lies to herself about the consequences of her actions of marrying her dead husband’s brother. Gertrude changes throughout the play and her relationships with other characters help develop the plot. Gertrude is, more so than any other character in the play, the antithesis of her son, Hamlet. (Introduction p 1)
Organic farming produces nutrient rich, fertile soil which nourishes the plants. Keeping chemicals off the land protects water quality and wild life.