Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay history grade 12 Civil rights movements in
History easy The civil rights movement
History easy The civil rights movement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Through the Younger Family’s conflicts in A Raisin in the Sun, Lorraine Hansberry shows that segregation was still present in the 1950’s regardless of it being unconstitutional. African Americans had unequal opportunities in careers, housing, etc.
One effect of segregation was less opportunities. (What opportunities?) In the play, Walter is a limo chauffeur and Ruth is a maid. They had very few jobs available because of their race. Only having a little pool of career choices meant only having a little income. The 5 family members; grandma Lena, sister Berneatha, father Walter, mother Ruth and son Travis, all lived under one roof of a small apartment with a limited amount of living space. There are not enough bedrooms for the three generations
…show more content…
who share the apartment and they all share the hall bathroom with other families (Domina 20). Walter reveals his feeling of failure when he says “I got a boy who sleeps in the living room. . . and all I got to give him is stories about how rich white people are” (Hansberry 950). In Teron McGrew article "The History of Residential Segregation in the United States and Title VIII” he says Merzenbaum, one of the creators of the zoning standards declared the single family home to be the stamina of the country, the owner generally has the opportunity to have a little garden with a home that has fresh air and an abundance of light (23). Hansberry must have read this statement because in the play when Lena looks for in a house she wanted the exact same features, she wants a normal house without her race interfering with her opportunities. The Youngers dream of owning a standard home and being free from their rundown rental house comes true but not without a fight from zoning, covenants, and racial steering issues. Zoning, covenants, and racial steering were still occurring in Chicago regardless of laws in place banning them. Zoning resulted in communities which planned and orderly development provided a specific place for everything (McGrew 23). The Younger family lived in a crowed apartment complex that with research is assumed to be one of the low income homes for colored families. The article “Covenants without Courts: Enforcing Residential Segregation with Legally Unenforceable Agreements," by Richard Brooks stated that racial restrictive covenants were extensive in cities, like Chicago, where some estimates suggest that at one point they covered three-quarters of the city’s residential housing stock (360). The conventional view of covenants departs from an image of white homeowners in neighborhoods facing a threat of incursion by black buyers, who, initially, offer substantial premiums in order to gain entry into racially exclusive neighborhoods (B 360). Covenants, enforceable or not, were signals to black purchasers of the community’s resistance to their presence (Brooks 361). According to Myron Orfield, author of the article "Milliken, Meredith, and Metropolitan Segregation," racial steering occurs when housing providers direct prospective buyers to different areas according to their race (430). Lynn Domina, author of Understanding A Raisin in the Sun, argues that the Clybourne Park member, Linder, symbolizes the neighbors who are not accepting of the Youngers attempt at integration, because of their own prejudice (10). The role of violence, subsequent fair housing laws, suburbanization, and white flight are effects of zoning, covenants, and racial steering stress (Brooks 364). After World War II in the 1950’s there were laws and acts that documented unlawful and unconstitutional actions in regard to segregation and equal opportunities for African Americans.
The Equal Protection Clause and the Fair Housing Act made building a disproportionate share of low-income housing in poor and segregated or integrated but resegregated neighborhoods illegal (Orfield 429). While exclusionary zoning is a violation of the Fair Housing Act if it is discriminatory or has racially disparate impact it remained common in predominately white suburbs and intensified both racial and social stratification (Orfield 430). The Housing Act of 1949 was amended in 1954, thereby broadening the 1949 slum clearance and urban development program (McGrew 25). Under this program, provisions were made for families displayed by demolition (McGrew 25). The Federal Fair Housing Act (Title VIII of the Civil Rights of 1968 and 1988) may be the most racially viable solution to ameliorate residential segregation (McGrew 25). It was established to help diminish the isolation of the urban ghetto and to promote a more racially integrated society (McGrew). Title VIII prohibits the denial of housing on the basis of color or national origin (McGrew). One of the Act’s primary purpose is to end racial segregation (McGrew 25). In 1948, racially restrictive private covenants were declared unconstitutional by the Shelley vs. Kramer case according to Arthur Nelson, author of the article “Urban Containment and Residential Segregation: A Preliminary Investigation" (425). The law made the discrimination from the white residents of Clybourne incapable of doing anything but accepting the change or moving
away. Further research makes readers conclude that the Youngers integration of Clybourne Park would lead to success or white flight, whites fleeing from integrated suburbs and cities. Between 1950 and 1970, right after the time A Raisin in the Sun was set, the percentage of blacks more than doubled in most cities (Orfield 377). The Youngers and other Negro families started a revolution, because by the mid-fifties, the United States was home to a growing black bourgeois who had the means to purchase comfortable suburban housing on a greater scale than ever before (American Urban since WWII). Like millions of other post war Americans, The Younger Family sought to own modern homes in recognizably middle-class neighborhoods. The Younger’s fight for dignity and equality by being the first African American family to integrate Clybourne Park. They will face “discriminatory treatment” and also be “risking their lives” by the move to all white Clybourne Park (Domina 11). The treatment they receive is unconstitutional by the 1949 Act banning “covenants” and segregated neighborhoods, as well as, the 1968 Fair Housing Law providing equal availability of housing to both whites and blacks. Today, no one could reasonably argue that the United States has achieved a color blind society, but in 2016, African Americans hold equal rights in every aspect of life.
The forties and fifties in the United States was a period dominated by racial segregation and racism. The declaration of independence clearly stated, “All men are created equal,” which should be the fundamental belief of every citizen. America is the land of equal opportunity for every citizen to succeed and prosper through determination, hard-work and initiative. However, black citizens soon found lack of truth in these statements. The Montgomery Bus Boycott and the murder of Emmett Till in 1955 rapidly captured national headlines of civil rights movement. In the book, Coming of Age in Mississippi, the author, Anne Moody describes her experiences, her thoughts, and the movements that formed her life. The events she went through prepared her to fight for the civil right.
The book, the Strange Career of Jim Crow is a wonderful piece of history. C. Vann Woodard crafts a book that explains the history of Jim Crow and segregation in simple terms. It is a book that presents more than just the facts and figures, it presents a clear and a very accurate portrayal of the rise and fall of Jim Crow and segregation. The book has become one of the most influential of its time earning the praise of great figures in Twentieth Century American History. It is a book that holds up to its weighty praise of being “the historical Bible of the civil rights movement.” The book is present in a light that is free from petty bias and that is shaped by a clear point of view that considers all facts equally. It is a book that will remain one of the best explanations of this time period.
In Melton A. McLaurin’s “Separate Pasts; Growing Up White in the Segregated South,” segregation is the obvious theme for the whole book. In the 1950s south, segregation was not uncommon and seen as normal. The 1950’s though, were on the verge of change. Change meaning the civil rights movement and the fight for the walls of segregation to be knocked down. However, McLaurin gives powerful insight to segregation in his hometown of Wade, North Carolina, where it “existed unchallenged and nearly unquestioned in the rural south” in the early 1950s. McLaurin portrays segregation as a normal way of life from a white viewpoint, which I believe he does effectively through memories of his childhood.
Younge, Gary. "America dreaming: the horrors of segregation bound the US civil rights movement together. Fifty years on from Martin Luther King's great speech, inequality persists--but in subtler ways." New Statesman [1996] 23 Aug. 2013: 20+. Student Resources in Context. Web. 28 Jan. 2014.
The book talks about how there was segregation just about everywhere you looked. In the 1930's the white people had their own restrooms along with their own water fountains and the lacks had their own school and blacks usually did not go to school. They were too busy working on the farm to go to school. The schools only had one room for all of the grades. The children usually walked to school in those days,because they didn't have school buses. They also had to bring their own lunch to school in lunch pails. Today children ride school buses to school. It would kill us if we had to walk to school.We are not use to that much exercise. Also today they serve us lunch in the cafeterias. Although it it is not that good at least they try. They have to work with the limited stuff the school board allows them to buy. Speaking of buses, the blacks would have to sit in the back of the bus and the whites sat in the front. Although,thanks to Rosa Parks, who on day refused to sit in the back of the bus, now blacks can sit wherever they want to sit. Today whites use the same restrooms and water fountains as blacks do. Blacks and whites also attend the same schools. Today schools have different classrooms for every grade.
Segregation is the act of setting someone apart from other people mainly between the different racial groups without there being a good reason. The African American’s had different privileges than the white people had. They had to do many of their daily activities separated from the white people. In A Lesson Before Dying there were many examples of segregation including that the African American’s had a different courthouse, jail, church, movie theater, Catholic and public school, department stores, bank, dentist, and doctor than the white people. The African American’s stayed downtown and the white people remained uptown. The white people also had nicer and newer building and attractions than the African American’s did. They had newer books and learning tools compared to the African American’s that had books that were falling apart and missing pages and limited amount of supplies for their students. The African American’s were treated as if they were lesser than the white people and they had to hold doors and let them go ahead of them to show that they knew that they were not equal to them and did not have the same rights or privileges as they did just because of their race. In A Narrative of the Life of Fredrick Douglass segregation is shown through both slavery and the free African American’s during this time. It showed that the African American’s were separated from the white people and not
In the book A Raisin in the Sun, the time period is set in 1955. A time in America where African Americans still dealt with a constant struggle between them and the rest of the country. It touches on subjects that were very sensitive especially at the time the work was released. Even though the setting of the book was in the north, Lorraine Hansberry seemed to want to show that things weren’t that much better in the north than they were in the south at that time. Segregation was still being implemented in the law system, and there was a missing sense of equality among everyone. It shows that Lorraine Hansberry took what was going on around her environment and portrayed those situations into her work. The three events listed include Rosa Parks
The segregation in South Carolina happens everywhere and every day. Indeed, racism is manifested through the media, the law, which legitimizes segregation, and the perceptions that white and black people have of each other. Because of the laws against colored people, Rosaleen, as a black woman, lives with constraints in her life. For example, she cannot live in a house with white people (Kidd, p.8), she cannot represent Lily at the charm school (Kidd, p.19), or even to travel with a car with white people (Kidd, p.76). The media is also influenced by racism, and constantly shows news about segregation such as the case of Martin Luther King, who is arrested because he wan...
At the time of the African-American Civil Rights movement, segregation was abundant in all aspects of life. Separation, it seemed, was the new motto for all of America. But change was coming. In order to create a nation of true equality, segregation had to be eradicated throughout all of America. Although most people tend to think that it was only well-known, and popular figureheads such as Martin Luther King Junior or Rosa Parks, who were the sole launchers of the African-American Civil Rights movement, it is the rights and responsibilities involved in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision which have most greatly impacted the world we live in today, based upon how desegregation and busing plans have affected our public school systems and way of life, as well as the lives of countless African-Americans around America. The Brown v. Board of Education decision offered African-Americans a path away from common stereotypes and racism, by empowering many of the people of the United States to take action against conformity and discrimination throughout the movement.
In the early 1900s, “restrictive covenants” more specifically racially restrictive covenants were legally enforceable agreements that prohibited landowners from leasing or selling property to minority groups, at that time namely African Americans. The practice of the covenants, private, racially restrictive covenants, originated as a reaction to a court ruling in 1917 “which declared municipally mandated racial zoning unconstitutional . . . leaving the door open for private agreements, such as restrictive covenants, to continue to perpetuate residential segregation” (Boston, n.d.). It was more of a symbolic act than attacking the “discriminatory nature” (Schaefer, 2012, p. 184) of the restrictive covenants, when the Supreme Court found in the 1948 case of Shelley v Kraemer that racially restrictive covenants were unconstitutional. In this particular case, a white couple, the Kraemers lived in a neighborhood in Missouri that was governed by a restrictive covenant. When a black couple moved into their neighborhood, the Kraemers went to the court asking that the covenant be enforced. In a unanimous decision, it was decided, “state courts could not constitutionally prevent the sale of real property to blacks even if that property is covered by a racially restrictive covenant. Standing alone, racially restrictive covenants violate no rights. However, their enforcement by state court injunctions constitutes state action in violation of the 14th Amendment” (Shelley v. Kraemer, 1948). Even though the Supreme Court ruled that the covenants were unenforceable, it was not until 1968 when the Fair Housing Act was passed that it become illegal (Latshaw, 2010). Even though today it is illegal, it might appear that we still have an unspoken...
Lorraine Hansberry herself clarified it when she spoke about the play. She states, “We cannot…very well succumb to monetary values and know the survival of certain aspects of man which must remain if we are loom larger than other creatures on the planet….Our people fight daily and magnificently for a more comfortable material base for their lives; they sacrifice for clean homes, decent foods, and personal and group dignity”. (Lester 417). Hansberry used Walter Lee to stand for that exact representation. Many African American men in the 1950’s and the 1960’s suffered pride and personal crisis issues because of the incapability to support and provide his family with the minimum of their basic needs. Walter Lee incriminated himself and his family for what he sees as his personal failure. (Lester 417). During the meeting with Mr. Linder the family, with the exclusion of Mama and Travis, stated that they was not interested in the offer of selling the house back to the welcoming committee of the neighborhood. This showed that the family stood firm for their moral values (dignity) that they share as a collective unit. Then something switch; Walter recklessly invested the family insurance money on a shaky liquor business startup. Feeling that all hope is lost and that his way of changing the family way of life is out of reach, he despairingly call Mr. Linder and
Although slavery has ended, segregation still has a lasting effect on American society. There are still African-Americans being mistreated in parts of the country, some people cannot get jobs and in recent time some people will not sell land to blacks. The mistreatment of African-American occurs in both stories. In Uncle Tom’s Cabin ...
This is known as de jure segregation which essentially states that the segregation was implemented by public policy and law instead of private discrimination practices held by individuals (Rothstein). Thus, “racial segregation in housing was not merely a project of southerners in the former slaveholding confederacy [but instead] it was a nation-wide project of the federal government in the twentieth century, designed and implemented by its most liberal leaders” (Rothstein). With this nation-wide project, numerous racially explicit laws and government practices were combined in order to develop a system of urban ghettos where African Americans were designated to live (Rothstein). Moreover, highlighting that while privately held discrimination did play some role on the residential segregation of African Americans, the government primarily played a crucial part in reinforcing the racially explicit laws that inevitably led to racial discrimination in
Once a school system drops their efforts to integrate schools, the schools in low-income neighborhood are left to suffer; not to mention that segregation in schools leads, not only to the neglect of schools, but the neglect of students as well. Resegregation quite literally divides the public schools into two groups “the good schools”, that are well funded, and “the bad schools”, that receive a fraction of the benefits-- more often than not the groups are alternatively labeled as “the white schools” and “the black schools” (and/or hispanic). Opportunities for the neglected students diminish significantly without certain career specific qualifications that quality education can provide-- they can’t rise above the forces that are keeping them in their situation.
It is not simply a story about a few maids and white ladies in Jackson, Mississippi; instead, it shows the ever-present divide between African Americans and whites. In the 1950’s, however, many people are beginning to share their beliefs that segregation should no longer exist, but it will take a long time before integration is common in the U.S. “Wasn't that the point of the book? For women to realize, We are just two people. Not that much separates us. Not nearly as much as I'd thought” (Stockett