A Modest Proposal Rhetorical Analysis

927 Words2 Pages

The major goal of writing a work of satire is to subversively expose social ills through exaggerations. The satirist holds a social and moral responsibility to inspire resistance, and that responsibility is to draw attention to failings of the government and often the people. Generally, people learn through absurdities. It is the absurdities that are memorable, because they offer a new perspective on issue that would otherwise not be given second thought. Swift’s A Modest Proposal highlights how absurd language can be an effective educational and revolutionary tool as it speaks to the audience both emotionally and intellectually. The mind may be tricked by the absurdities, but the emotions of the reader created a sort of disequilibrium. The …show more content…

The criticism that seems to be targeting the poor, is actually drawing attention the poor and inhumane treatment of the impoverished. Swift further articulates this mass maltreatment by using numerical diction in discussing his economic plan to cure the nation of poverty. Theorist Robert Phiddian argues that use of polytonality of the voices of Swift himself and swift as an economist works because these voices “center the text securely outside the reader” (Phiddian 608). The observation of poverty from an outside position helps to offer a perspective indifference which mirrors thos Individuals are typically are not open to criticize themselves so this text offers and alternative perspective of criticism is disguise as an absurd proposal for social …show more content…

For instance, Swift argues that one of the benefits of his economic plan is, “that it will prevent those voluntary abortions, and those horrid practices of women murdering their bastard children” (Swift 2). Here reading the passage literally it becomes apparent that reproductive rights for women was not favored in the society. Swift prevents abortions as nuance in the same way that he presents the begging children as pests to societies. The use of the word” horrid”, and the need to prevent the birth of bastard children. Highlights the attitudes held by those in 1720 England about female reproductive rights. The women are presented as “Murders to children”. Through this use of language

Open Document