A Modest Proposal Rhetorical Analysis

1025 Words3 Pages

“A Modest Proposal” is a perfect definition of juvenalian satire. The main focus in the story is to propose a simple way to remove the poor by creating a new dish they could create: babies. What Jonathan Swift proposes is, instead of seeing women with children at their skirts, the women sell their babies before the age of one as a source of food. With this method, Swift says that the poor will have a source of income that any woman can do, and the rich will have a brand new delicacy.

Swift’s proposal is obviously juvenalian in the way that it elicits a response of shock instead of humor. If someone does not understand that it is satire when it is first read, the person would feel shock and disgust as I did when I read it. I had forgotten …show more content…

By describing them as ‘Beggars of the female sex’, ‘breeders’, and referencing their birth-giving as a child breaking the ‘dam’, he is making them no more than cattle. Swift even states ‘Men would become as fond of their wives, during the time of their pregnancy, as they are now of their mares in foal, their cows in calf, or sow when they are ready to farrow…’(10). By using this phrase, he is making it strikingly clear that women are no more than cattle, something to create food.

Swift’s meaning to his writing, should you remove the satirical background, is to propose a way to end poverty. If taken from a distant point of view, it seems as if it could work, but I don’t believe that his point is to give an answer. Satire, to put it simply, does not need to explain a reasonable solution to a problem, but to point out the problem itself. By pointing out the problem, the public can find out an equal solution to and for all.

Juvenalian satire must cover a plethora of topics, even topics that are hard to cover because of a difficulty to describe or a difficulty to hear. Most satires tend to stray to Horatian because of this, as horatian is easier for people to see through and laugh at. Juvenalian is necessary, though, as it covers the topics that Horatian cannot …show more content…

Such things, such as domestic abuse, hard drug abuse, and rape are things that simply should not be brought up in satire. These are depressing subjects that the common people know and understand. Others, such as suicide, alcohol abuse, and racism are things that should be brought up. While they are not pleasant, they would shake people enough to realise they need to be spoken of.

Suicide, alcohol abuse, and racism are things that make people uncomfortable just as much as suggesting babies be used as a delicacy. Mentioning the words causes people to cringe and shy away, or simply change the topic. What the people do not seem to understand is that these things exist today in mass, and need to be spoken about, even in a satirical way. Though, it would be simple to go too far when speaking about these things.

Juvenalian satire is supposed to elicit a shocked reaction, or an angry reaction. Through this, it is easy to give it some leeway when it is discussing something controversial. While this is true, that does not mean juvenalian satire can insult the people afflicted by what it is showing. I believe that it is fine to point out their faults, but to openly criticize would cause the satire to lose its footing. People would simply shut it out as they do not like being

Open Document