A Journalist Levittown Summary

1049 Words3 Pages

The 20th century heralded the installation of mass production, the media and consumerism as the foundation of the modern American identity. Advancements in prefabrication and scientific methods of industrialized construction helped cultivate the newly established middle class and made buying a home affordable. Eric Larrabee discusses in the essay, A Journalist Describes Levittown, how Bill Levitt’s construction company used the modernized production techniques perfected by Henry Ford to mass produce millions of new homes that would form the urban sprawl. In contrast, the Great Depression demonstrated that with the innovation of industrial farming came growing pains, causing many Americans to struggle to survive the period of economic hardship. …show more content…

Oscar Ameringer describes the conditions he witnessed during this period of hardship, stating “while I was in Oregon the Portland Oregonian bemoaned the fact that thousands of ewes were killed by the sheep raisers because they did not bring enough in the market to pay the freight on them.” After years of economic reconstructing the broken industrial system, innovators of their industries helped to repair and scientifically refine mass production. The GI bill allowed soldiers returning from World War II the ability to buy a home and many construction companies started creating massive residential communities. Eric Larrabee discussed the revolutionary prefabrication techniques used by the construction company Levitt and Sons. According to Larrabee “Bill Levitt is becoming a kind of bellwether of the building trades, and he believes that he is setting patterns which the others must eventually adopt.” The state-of-the-art construction methods utilized at Levittown were replicated across the country, …show more content…

Soap print-advertisements instructed the consumer how to maintain a healthy appearance, and more specifically defined women's perception of outer beauty. As a result, the woman became the pioneers of household consumerism and manufactures began asking for their ideas to create the best possible product. According to home economist Christine Fredrick, “scientific advance is working in America in far more closer cooperation with housewives than in any part of the world”. At first, this method of research improved the home and paid off for both the producer and consumer, but in time women themselves would become the product of the media’s model of the nuclear family. The end of World War II and the return of the soldiers displaced many working women, urging them to return back to the home and contribute to the baby boom. The Time Magazine article about homemaker Marjorie Sutton illustrates the revival of conventional notions of feminine domesticity. According to the article,”But Marge Sutton thinks of herself primarily as a housewife and, having stepped from high school into marriage, has made a career of running her home briskly and well”. Ultimately, women of the era were manipulated by advertisers to improve their products, and in return were forced to replace their identity to fulfill the expectations of the

Open Document