Immediately in A Heart Breaking Work Of A Staggering Genius, we see that Eggers is conflicted at the time of writing in how to deal with many of his relationships, especially those that he holds with Toph. Eggers is suddenly thrust into loco Parentis, leaving his relationship with Toph to be presented as vulnerable, but for the most part, safe and secure for both of them. We see that Eggers is conflicted throughout the memoir, he wants the best for Toph, but believe that he can only afford to provide for him the bare minerals. As a result of this we see Eggers trying to mould himself to the role of an encouraging parent by trying to disguise his messages to Toph through irony and sarcasm. "I'll never forget my brother, who tried so hard and suffered so long, lifted me over the heads of the throng to meet my destiny.” The adverbial phrase, “never forget my brother of the complex sentence’s main clause, “I’ll never forget my brother,” suggests Eggers reluctance to be parted from his closest remaining family member but with a …show more content…
finality that makes the reader wonder why Eggers reacted so wildly to the babysitter. The possessive adjective, “my,” links to the personal pronoun, “I’ll,” to create the impression that Eggers is extremely protective of Toph and treats him as almost a sacred possession which may be due to Eggers fears of losing another family member. Here, Eggers seems almost reluctant to use Tophs’ name and disassociates himself from the situation; the pronoun, “who,” gives a mood of uncaringness that suggests that in the future Eggers’ fears that Toph will move on to bigger things and leave him behind and thus when imaging Tophs’ future he avoids making the situation real for himself so he doesn’t lose another family member. Although meant to be mockingly, there seems to be a degree of truth to Eggers words. The loco parentis in the memoir allows it to mature into dealing with more sensitive topics such as coping with death, which is maybe what Eggers wrote for. Considering this it maybe that looking after Toph made Eggers mature enough to write about his experiences and so Toph really was the thing that allowed him to meet his, “destiny.” Eggers appears to be unsure of his boundaries in his and Tophs’ relationship and where to step in and intervene to help Toph, “warping of his fragile psyche.” The singular possessive pronoun, “his,” suggests that Eggers feels that Toph is being isolated as he doesn’t collect them both as one pairing as father and son but as two separate and equal entities. This also creates a polar contrast between Toph and Eggers and gives insight into where Eggers is the mature member in the duo as he doesn’t feel weakened by the deaths of their parents as he doesn’t use the plural possessive pronoun, “our.” The noun modifier “fragile psyche,” suggests that Eggers feels Toph needs extra help in dealing with the death of his parents as together with the isolated manner of just, “his,” represents maybe Eggers’ guilt at not being able to comfort Toph at the time of their death better. It could be possible that at the time of writing, “Fuck, Toph, I am so sorry,” Eggers was overwhelmed by how he should be as a parent compared to how he actually is. The only word in the parenthetical phrase, “Toph,” suggests that Toph is the only thing that truly matters to Eggers since his parents died, it also isolates Toph as if Eggers thinks that nobody else would be there for Toph should something happen to him. The parenthetical phrase also creates the impression that Eggers believes that it is just him and Toph against the world which intensifies a possible layer of Eggers guilt for the way he has tried to bring up Toph out of the way of anymore harm. This however does show that Eggers is a responsible parent as even when in hospital, Toph is his uttermost priority. We see Eggers trying to take a more paternal role through, “I’m gonna put you in bed.” The imperative sentence mood appears to be gentler than a command which could suggest that Eggers although knowing Toph was asleep, wanted some sign of consent to do this which could imply that Eggers doesn’t know where his boundaries are with Toph.
The imperative tone combined with the colloquialism, “gonna,” seems as if Eggers is more talking and reassuring himself rather than Toph. This could connote that Eggers knows this is what parents are supposed to do and is making a point of trying to do that for Toph so he doesn’t miss out on what kids with parents are treated like. However, the contrast between the two personal pronouns, “you,” and “I’m,” highlights a distance that Eggers is deliberately trying to keep between him and Toph which could imply that he doesn’t want to allow himself to become close to anyone after the death of his parents, not even
Toph. To conclude, at the time of writing Eggers presents his ideas of parenting in a highly precariously unsettled manner which reflects his emotions at having to care for a life that isn’t just his own anymore. Eggers appears to be terrified at the prospect of failure in his role as a parent and yet opportunistic at allowing Toph to have a better childhood than he himself did. This ultimately leads to Eggers portraying a relationship with very little structure or boundaries where neither is child and neither is the primary care-giver; as although it should be Eggers , Toph takes care of Eggers as he does for Toph.
A movie, “The Other Sister,” is about two mentally challenged people name Carla Tate and Daniel. Carla Tate, a 24-year old woman, return to San Francisco from a sheltered boarding school after long years. After rejoining with her overprotective mother Elizabeth, a gentle and thoughtful father Radley, and two young and older sisters, Carla announces that she wants to attend a local school called Bay Area Polytech, a normal vocational school. Nevertheless of her mother Elizabeth’s disapproval, Radley supports her to pursue her dream. On the first day, Carla meets a boy named Danny and helps him when someone calls him “retarded.” They both get close to each other and fall in love quickly. Carla envied Danny for living on his own, so
Lying on the Couch by Irvin Yalom is about the therapeutic relationships and sometimes unprofessional relationships that can form. The primary focus is on Dr. Ernest Lash, whom works out of an office in a more privileged area of San Francisco under the supervision of Dr. Marshal Streider, a highly ambitious therapist who aims to be the president of the American Psychiatric Association, but is secretly pre-occupied by greed which ends up getting him into some trouble. Dr. Lash seems to truly enjoy his work and take pride in it. This novel opens up with Dr. Lash meeting with his one client Justin, whom after 5 years and many sessions has finally decided to leave his unhappy marriage. Justin then decides he no longer needs the help of Ernest
While reading the book Lying on the Couch by Irvin D. Yalom one would come to realize that there are ethical and legal issues that get in the way of numerous counseling sessions. The novel focuses on the struggles that any therapist can come across while working with their clients. Although with this storyline the boundaries and legal issues may have been taken to the extreme, it strongly depicts what could happen if one would choose to make unethical decisions. One must also have a sense of the true meaning of the counseling sessions
“Geronimo: an American legend” is a story of an apache warrior who fought against the United States in order to preserve his peoples culture. The film starts off, ironically, with the first surrender of Geronimo. His people are sent to a reservation called turkey creek. On this reservation they were expected to become farmers that would produce mostly corn. However the apache where not harvesting enough to sustain their community and had to rely on government checks.
It is undeniable that human struggle is relative. It is relative to one’s background, life experiences, and strength- and at some point everyone is faced with an obstacle that they feel incapable of overcoming. In Surviving Hell written by Leo Thorsness, the author is captured after a mid-flight ejection in the Vietnam War. He spent years undergoing torture and solitary confinement, not knowing if he would make it out alive. Physically shattered, his spirits remained strong. Several events take place throughout the novel that ultimately kept Leo afloat. The significance of the church service, walking home, and Mike’s flag lies outside of their surface meaning, but in the mental battles won that propelled Leo and the other soldiers to do more
Turning point occurs when an exclusive Manhattan prep school recruits Jamal for his basketball talent and academic achievement, and he seeks Forrester’s help in dealing with the new environment. Jamal gradually becomes committed not only to his own writing, but to cracking Forrester’s shell.” (p2) Jamal and Forrester are not your usual pair of friends; a 16-year-old basketball player and an extraordinary writer are not two people you usually see together often. Not only do they get closer, they also start to realize what the other needs. They are both extremely different from each other, so they are going to overcome their situations by showing courage in opposite ways.
Many people think that reading more can help them to think and develop before writing something. Others might think that they don’t need to read and or write that it can really help them to brainstorm things a lot quicker and to develop their own ideas immediately (right away). The author’s purpose of Stephen King’s essay, Reading to Write, is to understand the concepts, strategies and understandings of how to always read first and then start something. The importance of this essay is to understand and comprehend our reading and writing skills by brainstorming our ideas and thoughts a lot quicker. In other words, we must always try to read first before we can brainstorm some ideas and to think before we write something. There are many reasons why I chose Stephen King’s essay, Reading to Write, by many ways that reading can help you to comprehend, writing, can help you to evaluate and summarize things after reading a passage, if you read, it can help you to write things better and as you read, it can help you to think and evaluate of what to write about.
In this essay I will be exploring and contrasting the relationships of two characters. These characters are Stephen Wraysford of Sebastian Faulks' romantic yet graphically violent novel "Birdsong" and Victor Mancini of anarchic social commentator Chuck Palahniuk's "Choke." "Birdsong" darts between the early 1900s and the 1970s, although Stephen does not appear in the latter dates, and his story is accounted by his granddaughter Elizabeth. "Choke" is a contemporary novel, based in America in the late 20th/early 21st century. In both novels, there are strong messages about relationships, and how they can contribute to the development of a person. While both books may share similar messages, there are massive differences. The main point of contrast is the difference between lust and love.
Robin Cochrane Mrs. Schroder AP Literature and Composition 3 January 2018 The Awakening 1999 Prompt In one’s lifetime, he or she may face an internal struggle. Perhaps the struggle lies in a difficult choice between right and wrong. Perhaps it lies in a decision between want and need.
What elements are needed to create a good short story? As John Dufrense quoted "A good story has a visionary quality, a personal voice, a signature gesture(1969). The elements used should be used so strongly that it pulls you in; forcing you to connect to the people in the story. Not every story is written well enough to be capable of doing this. This also creates a connection with the reader; leaving some type of effect or impacting the reader along with the characters’ lives. Although there are many elements in writing but one of the greatest things of writing is the ability to make the reader empathize with the characters. This goes beyond than just a connection with the characters; when the reader is able to apprehend with the characters he or she is truly relating and reaching out to them. The author has accomplished something truly special when the reader has the ability to feel the agony that a character is feeling.
The Compound is about a boy Eli and his family, and their life inside of a fallout shelter also known as The Compound. Eli first entered the compound when he was nine before a nuclear attack plunged the world into another age of darkness. Eli has now been in the compound for six years. In that time, his mother Clea had three children, and is pregnant with a fourth, known by the family as “the supplements”, the supplements are Eli’s father’s, Rex, plan for food incase their meat supply runs low. Eli doesn't like seeing them because he doesn't want to grow attached to them. Eventually Rex shows Eli his laboratory where Eli discovers his dad is attempting to clone humans to maintain a continuous food source in the oncoming years and this disgusts Eli. Clea eventually talks Eli into meeting the children where he develops a deep bond with them. Eli then finds out that there is working internet around his father's laboratory. Eli accesses the internet to find out that his twin brother Eddy, who we are told didn't make it to the compound in time, is still alive, and that there was no nuclear attack. Eddy warns Eli about their father having a history of being insane and warns him of the dangers to come. Eddy promises to find Eli. Learning this Eli confronts his father to find that the lies are indeed true. Eli socks his dad in the jaw and knocks him out cold. Before his father is taken to the infirmary he reveals how to unlock the hatch at the top of the compound. Eli and his sisters discover the code on a piece of paper written in invisible ink
As Theodore Roosevelt once said, “…there is no effort without error and shortcoming;” and having read Brené Brown’s The Gifts of Imperfection and Daring Greatly, I wholeheartedly agree with that statement, and Brown’s decision to include it in her book. I chose to read Daring Greatly because I love Brown’s witty remarks and humor, also because it seemed like a book I might actually take something away from, and I was not wrong. I have never been the type of person to read self-help books, but Brown has made me a firm believer through both The Gifts of Imperfection and Daring Greatly, and I do not think you can truly reflect on one without also reflecting on the other. Through chapter after chapter of personal testimony, dedicated research,
In this book, Julie Barenson is a young widow, whose husband Jim died earlier from cancer. Her husband left her two unexpected gifts. The first was a Great Dane puppy name Singer (this gift was delivered the first Christmas after his passing) and the other gift was his promise that he would always be watching over her. About four years after his passing, Julie is twenty-nine years old and is too young to have given up on love just yet. She may be ready to risk caring for someone again but she just can't figure out who that person is yet. She starts dating Richard Franklin, a sophisticated, handsome engineer who treats Julie like a queen. The other person she has an option to date is Mike Harris, the down-to-earth guy who was her husband's best friend.
“I am nothing special, of this I am sure. I am a common man with common thoughts and I've led a common life. There are no monuments dedicated to me and my name will soon be forgotten, but I've loved another with all my heart and soul and to me, this has always been enough.” That is a quote from The Notebook, a famous book written by Nicholas Sparks in 1996. This quotation inspires people to have faith that love is the only thing in the world that they need. They need not have prosperity or fame. They simply need an individual to love with all their hearts for all eternity. The world is a place where love seems to somehow find its way through in the most difficult of times. Nicholas Sparks is a dedicated author, father, husband, and donor who sees that clearly and demonstrates that in his novels. To understand the genuine significance of Nicholas Sparks and his novels, one must know his background, the truth about what the critics think about his novels and his influence on today’s society.
In “Frustration”, Isaac Asimov selectively uses literary devices to uncover some of his own observations of society. The story is narrated through the perspective of Gelb and Peter, who discuss the matters of Old Man Hargrove and his desire to convert all the people with opposing ideologies into believing his own policies and morals through weaponry. Although the story is set in the distant future, the self-righteousness of the characters can be related to people in the present. Asimov addresses the fact that an egotistical person’s ability to think reasonably may be limited, resulting in his frustration when others, who do not share the same outlook on human civilization, reject his opinions. However, while such a character trait can be associated