A Good Man Is Hard To Find

1028 Words3 Pages

I personally believe that “A Good Man is Hard to Find” by Flannery O’Connor is the best piece of fiction that we have read this semester. In my mind's eye, it is an exemplary piece of fiction by every standard. I hold this story above the others without a second thought, so much so that when I think of great fiction I cannot think of any other story. When you asked us to write about what we thought made good fiction in class, my thoughts drew several parallels with this story.

Firstly, I strongly believe in stories that allow the reader to decide they merit and morality of the characters involved. I believe the reader should be able to “play god” and judge the living and the dead in a story. When a piece of fiction makes the reader the judge …show more content…

I personally prefer time flowing in a story as it in reality. I believe it makes points come across smoother and it helps the reader fully understand the network of events taking place in the story’s universe. While I have already expressed my opinion on leaving stories moral undertones up to the reader, I do not believe plot should be handled the same. I believe that time jumps can help suspenseful rising action, a powerful climax, or a spicy resolution greatly. That said, It’s the writer’s job to write the story. When readers interpret chronology things have the potential of being misunderstood, which in my opinion, takes away from the original point of the story. The tell the story the writer intended. “A Good Man is Hard to Find’ does a wonderful job of piling on suspense and terror while clearly presenting its plot. In the story there are flashbacks but they are contained to one character's mind or one character’s pre-murderous warm-up speech. By only one character experiencing the event out of time it, at least to me, seems to transport the reader into the mind of the character. This avoids the story’s universe being thrown back 20 years and then to the present. Possibly I view this different than others, but I believe chronology is like a plane in flight. Chronology starts, gets going, then levels off and sets into a steady course. There might be a little turbulence along the way, but nothing major. When the story is ready to stop the “plane” can land. As for time jumps, it’s probably not a good idea to land the plane mid-flight. My analogy is also most likely a testament to why I also hate

Open Document