H. G. Wells words of wisdom, “If you fell down yesterday, stand up today” can be seen throughout Ernest J. Gaines’ novel, A Gathering of Old Men. This novel takes place on a 1970’s Louisiana plantation where African-Americans are still suffering from the effects of slavery. Their dignity has been stripped away from them because of their color. After years of taking this abuse, the discriminated unite when an incident occurs in which the plantation’s boss, Beau Boutan, has been murdered by the hands of a black man. This incident would normally call for an execution but the old black men desire to gain their dignity and take a stand. They demonstrate that in spite of their tormented past, they still possess their bravery, power, and pride. …show more content…
This dramatic novel was written in a critical tone that employs the use of characterization, flashbacks, and symbolism to express the theme that there comes a time when one must stand up for themselves and take back their pride. Mathu is a character in the novel who does not flounder in up keeping his pride. From the very beginning, he never let anybody insult him due to his African-American heritage. He generally goes to bat for himself, even when confronting a white man, he never wavered even when he was imprisoned. Because of this disposition Mathu possesses, he is regarded and respected by everyone including some white men like Sherriff Mapes who “knowed Mathu had never backed down from anybody, either. Maybe that’s why he liked him. To him Mathu was a real man.” (Gaines 84). Mathu was like a boulder, the endeavors of others to make him submit were simply pebbles against his overwhelming pride and dignity. A character that Mathu undertook and inspired was Charlie. Charlie, in spite of his mellow character was a substantial man and was often criticized by his boss Beau Boutan with names like “Big Charlie” and “Nigger boy” (Gaines 187). After observing Mathu’s strong pride and refusal to let anyone step over that pride, Charlie eventually gained enough courage to stand up for himself. He killed Beau Boutan and fled, but he returned and was prepared to make up for his action. Gaines utilized this occasion in the novel to demonstrate that despite the fact that individuals may be offended and stripped of their dignity, they can gain enough courage to stand up for themselves. At the point when Charlie stood up for himself, and became a man in his eyes is also when he reached his death. By killing off Charlie, Gaines gives us the message that when one takes a stand they must be careful not to overdo it or there may be negative outcomes. Candy is another character in the novel. She is the proprietor of Marshall place and the one who organized the gathering after finding Beau Boutan dead in Mathu’s yard. By all accounts, Candy seems truly stressed over the general population in Marshall. She states, “No I won’t let them harm my people’ … ‘I will protect my people.”(Gaines 19). However as the story advances Gaines demonstrates that Candy’s thought process might not have been as well intentioned as she made them seem. She proves that she cares for only Mathu himself and not the others gathered in his yard when she rushes to Mathu’s side when he is called to be questioned and hit by Mapes. She had no show of feelings for the other men when they were hit by Mapes. Gaines shows Candy’s true nature again when Clatoo requests his need to converse with the men inside Mathu’s home, without Candy. She immediately threatens to kick out all men who follow Clatoo into Mathu’s house, making them leave Marshall Place the only home they have ever had. Gaines shows how oppressing people still existed in the minds of even those who appeared to be good-natured. At long last, Gaines created a complex character who encounters a change amid the story. Mapes is a character who when first arriving at the site of Beau Boutan’s death and the gathering of old men, acts as a Cajun during that time frame. His first reaction to the scene is savagery. He immediately becomes violent with the old men while attempting to gather information on what happened. Eventually he realizes that his violence is not producing results and begins allowing each man to tell their own story. Mapes’ unmistakable change appeared when Luke Will arrived at the scene with expectations of hanging Beau’s killer. Mapes tries to protect the men by saying “Go home, Luke Will” when Luke Will demands that Charlie be handed over to him (Gaines 195). At this point Luke Will begins a shootout between his team and the old men and Mapes surrenders all control of the circumstances to the old men and Charlie. By doing this Gaines demonstrates that the attitude of individuals can improve. He shows that Mapes began to trust the old men and Charlie and recognized them as respectable and trustable men. The old men’s attempt to stand up for themselves is what changed Mapes. Flashbacks are also employed in the novel.
The main role of flashbacks is to show the hardships and discrimination the African-Americans faced in that time. We are shown these flashbacks when Mapes the Sherriff questions the old men who are all claiming to have kill … ‘The way they beat him. They beat him till they beat him crazy…” (Gaines 80). Gaines introduced this flashback to show the brutality that blacks endured during the years following slavery. Not even a child was spared. Another flashback was by Johnny Paul, who remembered back to a time when they all lived together as a community until Beau Boutan and his tractor came and plowed it all up. Johnny Paul was referring to this time when he confused Mapes by saying “But you still don’t see. Yes sir, what you see is the weeds, but you don’t see what we don’t see.”(Gaines 89). Johnny Paul was referring to how the weeds and dilapidated houses replaced what was once a place of happiness, and brotherhood among the black families who lived there. Gaines uses this flashback to show what was taken from the African-Americans in the novel. It is the reason they must stand up for themselves. Another of the old men, Tucker goes into a flashback and remembers a time when his brother Silas and two mules, beat a white man and a tractor in a race. “…and because he didn’t lose like a nigger is supposed to lose, they beat him” (Gaines 97). This flashback portrays the obvious distinction between whites and blacks …show more content…
during that time period. African-Americans were thought to be less of people than the Cajuns therefore the white man and his friends said Silas had cheated, and they beat him to death with canes. Tucker was scared and didn’t stand up for his brother and wants to take a stand now. Gaines uses this flashback to show the results of the old men being walked over by the Cajuns, and doing nothing about it. Gabe also reminisces about his unfortunate past. He recalls the Cajuns sentencing his sixteen year old son to the electric chair, “on the word of a poor white trash” (Gaines 101). He remembers the indifference the Cajuns displayed in killing his son, watching his death, and then leaving as though “they was leaving a card game”(Gaines 102). This flashback again shows how the cruelty of Cajuns didn’t spare any age. It also shows how little the word of a black man counted over that of a white. Gabe could do nothing but beg when his son was sent to the electric chair. Gaines ties this back to the importance of the men standing up to their tormentors. It is as if the events could have been avoided if they had stood up to their oppressors. Symbolism is also used in the novel by Gaines to express the theme.
The tractor is a constant symbol that repeatedly came up throughout the novel. The tractor is what began to drive the African-Americans on the plantation out of work and away from their homes. It is also the tool that the Cajun, Felix Boutan rode when he was beat by Silas and the mules. Beau Boutan was riding the tractor when he went after Charlie. The tractor symbolizes one of the main tortures of the African-American community in Marshall. It not only drove them out of work and their homes but it also led to their dearth, especially in the case of Silas and Charlie. Gaines used the tractor as a motivator to the old men. It gave them more reason to take a stand. The shotguns that the old men carried also were symbols in the novel. The empty shells symbolized the weakness and ineffectiveness of the old men. They offered no resistance and let the Cajuns walk all over them. Their lives were as useless as the shotguns with empty shells that they held in their hands. However, when the time came to fight, the old men were ready for war. They decided to stand up for themselves and gain back their dignity. They went from useless old men to men who could make a difference. They had fully loaded shells, power, and pride which affected Luke Will, who “looked worried, real worried” when he realized their conviction (Gaines
205). Ernest J Gaines expressed the theme that there comes a time when one must stand up for him or herself throughout his novel with the use of characterization, flashbacks, and symbolism. Dignity was expressed through the characters Mathu who always stood up for himself, Charlie who learned to, and Candy and Mapes who were characters that were a motivator to the old men standing up for themselves. Gaines used flashbacks to better portray the importance of the African-Americans in the area standing up for themselves, and he used symbolism to show one of the major torments of the people, and the change the old men went through. By standing up for themselves, the old men not only displayed their power and pride, but also seized hold of their dignity and future for themselves and their generations to come.
Between the years of 1954 to 1968, racism was at its peak in the South. This occurred even though the blacks were no longer slaves as of 1865 when slavery was abolished. The blacks were treated very poorly and they were still considered unequal to whites. Hiram, the main character of this novel, is a 9 year old boy who is clueless about racism. He is moved from the South to the North, away from his favorite grandfather. He wishes to go back to Mississippi and to be with his grandfather again. He never understood why his father, Harlan, wouldn't let him go. Hiram, who moved from Mississippi to Arizona, is in for a rude awakening when he is visiting his Grandfather in Greenwood, Mississippi at 16 years old. In the novel Mississippi Trial 1955, there were many complicated relationships among Hiram, Harlan, and Grandpa Hillburn. These relationships were complicated because of racism at
Four black sharecroppers (Roger Malcom, Dorothy Malcom, George Dorsey and Mae Murray Dorsey) are brutally murdered by a group of white people. The murders attracted national attention, but the community was not willing to get involved. The community was not fazed by these brutal murders but, by the fact that this incident got national attention. They were even more astounded that the rest of the nation even cared. In this book Laura Wexler shows just how deep racism goes. After reading the book I discovered that Fire in a Canebrake has three major themes involving racism. The first is that racism obstructs progression. The second is history repeats itself. The last theme is that racism can obscure the truth. This lynching, in particular, marks a turning point in the history of race relations and the governments’ involvement in civil rights. In the end this case still remains unsolved. No concept of the
...ism and segregation, it is what will keep any society form reaching is maximum potential. But fear was not evident in those who challenged the issue, Betty Jo, Street, Jerry, and Miss Carrie. They challenged the issue in different ways, whether it was by just simply living or it was a calculated attempt to change the perspective of a individual. McLurin illustrated the views of the reality that was segregation in the South, in the town of Wade, and how it was a sort of status quo for the town. The memories of his childhood and young adulthood, the people he encountered, those individuals each held a key in how they impacted the thoughts that the young McLurin had about this issue, and maybe helping unlock a way to challenge the issue and make the future generation aware of the dark stain on society, allowing for more growth and maximum potential in the coming years.
In Maycomb and Alexandria, the whites in the community do not treat the blacks respectfully. When Coach Boone first arrives into town from North Carolina the white residents responds to the sight of a black man saying, "Why aren't outside with all your little friends hollering," as well as, "are those people the movers?" The whites create a stereotype about Boone stating that since he is black he is like all the other rowdy blacks. This stereotype is false since Coach Boone is urbane and reserved, not wanting to cause a riot on his first day in town. Additionally when the town assumes that all African-Americans are "the help" shows that the whites see themselves as superior than blacks. During the 1930s in Maycomb, Mrs. Dubose says to Scout, "Your father is no better than the niggers and trash he works for" (102). Mr. Dubose, being prejudiced saying whites or above blacks, also shows how the town in both stories is prejudiced towards the minority of blacks. So because the blacks are not seen as equal, the development of the story is played out to show how the African-Americans respond to the whites racial discrimination. When the football team is returnin...
It also deals with the emotions that this black boy faces because he has been treated unfairly by the white people. Major Characters: Jefferson, black boy who is accused of a crime and sentenced to death; Grant Wiggons, teacher sent to help Jefferson. After he went and obtained a college degree, Grant Wiggins went back to live with his grandmother. Being that he is a very educated person, Grant was elected by his grandmother to try and get Jefferson to realize that he was a man and not an animal like the white people had led him to believe. Throughout the entire novel, Grant is battling this idea in his head because he doesn’t feel that even he knows what it is to be a man.
The book follows Dana who is thrown back in time to live in a plantation during the height of slavery. The story in part explores slavery through the eye of an observer. Dana and even Kevin may have been living in the past, but they were not active members. Initially, they were just strangers who seemed to have just landed in to an ongoing play. As Dana puts it, they "were observers watching a show. We were watching history happen around us. And we were actors." (Page 98). The author creates a scenario where a woman from modern times finds herself thrust into slavery by account of her being in a period where blacks could never be anything else but slaves. The author draws a picture of two parallel times. From this parallel setting based on what Dana goes through as a slave and her experiences in the present times, readers can be able to make comparison between the two times. The reader can be able to trace how far perceptions towards women, blacks and family relations have come. The book therefore shows that even as time goes by, mankind still faces the same challenges, but takes on a reflection based on the prevailing period.
Jordan has a lot of published work which allows him to make assumptions where Conner is not clear or there are no other sources to state what was going on at the time. Some of his past work includes “White over Black: American Attitudes toward the Negro, 1550-1812” a best seller of its time. “White over Black” mainly focuses on general trends seen throughout the time before the Civil War in America and how the black man was treated throughout that time period. While using his wealth of knowledge and sources Jordan is able to piece together the puzzle of Conner’s document and retell a rough estimate of what occurred more than a century and a half ago. Jordan makes the read easy, as he paints perfect images of what might have occurred throughout this time in Adams County and makes the vocabulary very understandable for an average
Mapes, the white sheriff who traditionally dealt with the black people by the use of intimidation and force, finds himself in a frustrating situation of having to deal with a group of black men, each carrying a shotgun and claiming that he shot Beau Boutan. In addition, Candy Marshall, the young white woman whose family owns the plantation, claims that she did it. As each person tells the story, he takes the blame and, with it the glory.
After years of tragedy at the hands of the whites because of racism, the old men gather at the plantation. Each man arrives, gun in hand, admitting to the killing of Beau to tell their own story of how tragedy affected their existence, realizing one day I’m going to die and I’ve never stood my ground for myself or my lineage. Deciding to settle the score and reclaim their humanity by not "[crawling] under the bed like [they] used to" (Gaines 28). For example, Tucker reveals how they beat his brother because he wins against them in a contest between mules and a tractor. Tucker states, “How can flesh and blood and nigger win against white man and machine? So they beat him. They took stalks of cane and they beat him and beat him. I was there, and I didn’t move” (Gaines
The death of a black man, the attack of two children, and a man locked up for so long he cannot remember what life was like before all seem unrelated, however they are not. They are all examples of a common theme throughout the book To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, victims of what a main character implores his kids not to do. In To Kill a Mockingbird, two plotlines coincide; two children, Scout and Jem Finch are growing up with a fascination of their recluse neighbor, Arthur “Boo” Radley, and a black man named Tom Robinson is put on trial for the rape of a white woman. The book takes place in a small southern community during the Great Depression, and the scene heavily affects the events throughout the book. For example, in a modern, urban environment a man would not buy his children air rifles and allow them to shoot as they please. However, since it was a common thing at the time, this is precisely what Atticus does for his children. Before they are allowed to go out, Atticus does tell them one thing: that they must never shoot a mockingbird because it is a sin. When the kids question this, it is elaborated that mockingbirds are innocent, and never put anything but good into the world, so it is a sin to kill them. This theme continues to pop up in different ways throughout the book, and it is exemplified by major characters and events throughout the plotline.
...made farming more profitable and easier to run as a business. “The tractor was modern compared to the horse. The farmer did not have to pay as many hired men. There was more leisure time. But the tractor changed the social structure of rural life. The key position that farming held in American life vanished” (Carlson).
Yet, the plot is thickened by the frequent flashbacks to the early 1850’s to Sweet Home Plantation in Kentucky. The setting shapes the book, being that it is set in 1873 about seven years after the end of the civil war, racial tension were still high in the states. The Fugitive Salve Act of 1850 had been passed decades before but still had precedence over many states. “It required that all escaped slaves were, upon capture, to be returned to their masters and that officials and citizens of free states had to cooperate in this law.” (Fugitive Slave Act of 1850." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia) This law was essentially the driving force behind the entire plot.
... the novel. Flashbacks are used to create a feeling of remembrance or revelation to past events that were not introduced to the audience. The introduction of the supernatural character of Beloved was not explained in the plot prior to her introduction. However, through flashbacks Sethe is enabled to narrate the ordeal between her and her daughter. By use of flashbacks, the audience is able to be informed on past events that help create the plot of the literature piece.
Specifically, the way in which Paul D and Sethe animate the nearly twenty-year-old memories of Sweet Home Planation in an attempt to correct their current status. This article focuses principally on what Sivaraj defines as “two temporal planes” of memories; one of the past in Kentucky and the other of which is unceasingly being created within present day Cincinnati. Sivaraj focuses her interpretation upon the methods in which the characters appropriate the act of re-remembering since “each and every flashback from different perspective adds some more information to the previous once” (Sivaraj). Also, revealing how the narrative drives the reader to unquestioningly absorb the fragmented memories constructed by Sethe, which expels the multifaceted layers of Beloved’s narrative. Much like my own interpretation, Sivaraj also dedicates most of her consideration upon not only remembering the past but how one can stitch together the fragments of the communal memory in an attempt to alter their destiny. Furthermore, exploring the ways in which slavery of the Sweet Home Plantation penetrates the memory of Sethe and Paul D, ever manipulating their present-day image. Moreover, the author of this article brings attention the narrative’s voice that guides the augmented fragments of the characters
The idea of “beating back the past” creates an important and symbolic theme within the book. This notion can be seen through many of the characters; however, Morrison highlights this idea by slowly revealing parts of Paul D’s life that depict a crucial part of the story. Paul D beats back the past and buries it “where it belonged in that tobacco tin in his chest where a red heart used to be” (Morrison 86). The black tobacco is the abstract form of the past that seeks to come out, and the red heart within his chest becomes tainted as each day passes and the past locks itself further into his body. One of the reasons the past is treated as such as cancer is because it brings back the memories of the monotonous life slaves had on the plantations;