Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sacrificial role of nora in a doll's house
Sacrificial role of nora in a doll's house
Sacrificial role played by nora in set text A DOLLS HOUSE
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sacrificial role of nora in a doll's house
What would you risk for the ones that you love? The Dolls House revolves deeply around that question. The story contains drama, suspense, and a serious problem. Nora sacrifices everything she stands for to save her loving husband from dying from an illness would you do the same? One major theme that stood out to me the most was that everyone has consequences for their actions whether good or bad. Three cases of this theme are Nora taking out the loan to save Torvald's life. Secondly, Krogstad forging a signature to get money for his dying sickly wife. Lastly, Mrs. Linde married her first husband just because of his wealth, and not out of love. Nora faced negative consequences even though her purpose behind it was a good one. Nora believed that it was her duty to save Torvald's life when he was deathly illness upon him. Nora claims that “I am the sole reason why Torvald is alive on this day” another quote Nora made was “I was most responsible for his survival”. Nora believes that forging her father's signature and receiving money was alright, because it was for the good purpose of secretly saving her husband's life. Nora later in the play suffered the consequences of her actions when Krogstad threatened to take her secret public, and …show more content…
thus that would not only derail the little reputation she had, but also Torvalds. Also the divorce of Nora and Torvald was because of what Nora did behind Torvalds back. Another example of this theme is similar to what Nora did.
Krogstad, like Nora, also forged a signature to receive money and save someone that he loved, in this case it was Krogstad's wife that was deathly sick and needed immediate help. Again although Krogstad performed an illegal action for a good purpose he still had to face the consequences of his actions. From his forgery Krogstad lost his job, and his honor in the process of his downfall. Even after he received the money Krogstad's wife still passed away. Krogstad practically lost everything he cared most for just from forging one name. Krogstad believes he made a huge mistake with this by saying “Many a man can save himself if he admits he's done wrong and takes his
punishment.” The last example of facing consequences is Mrs. Linde. Mrs. Linde, wanted her life to be simple. She wanted to marry a rich, successful man and live a pampered life for the rest of her days. This is exactly what Mrs. Linde did, she married out of money, not out of love. Mrs. Linde faced these consequences when her husband died and then became a widow. After her husband died she was left with nothing including money. Mrs. linde said “He was very well off, I'd say. But the business was shaky, Nora. When he died, it all fell apart, and nothing was left.” If Mrs. Linde would rather have married for love rather than money she still could have been happily married and would not be in the situation that she is in now. I would do anything for a loved one that needed dire help, even something illegal, if it meant that it would save their lives. I understand why some of what these characters did what they did. With both Nora, and Krogstad committing forgery to save loved ones is completely acceptable in my eyes. Even though these actions were not intended to harm anyone they both faced negative consequences and resulted in bringing even more more problems than what they began with.
In the Doll’s House, Nora dutifully lies to save Torvald from dying of illness. The readers are told that Nora’s husband, Torvald, fell sick. Nora lied to him about why she needed to borrow money. Though she told him she want to travel to shop (Ibsen 11), the doctors told her in order to save the ill-fallen Torvald, he needed to go to the South (Ibsen 10). Since she cannot borrow the money, Nora forges her father’s signature to save her husband’s life. It might seem as if Nora’s lying is wrong, but in reality, it was justified because Torvald would not have gone to Italy if he had known he was sick. He thought of her as a child, not capable of making adult decisions (Ibsen 69). Would not it make sense for Nora borrow money to help Torvald, even if it meant forging a signature and keeping it a secret? Krogstad also would not have lent Nora the money if he had known she was the actual borrower, not her father. Nora lies for reasons pertaining to life and death. She is not being deceptive to keep herself out of trouble. For these reasons, her deceit is defendable.
Nora had no power over her life; it is obvious that her father had total control and then he handed that control over Nora to Torvald when they got married. Torvald’s behavior towards Nora and her own actions make this play outdated. Nora would have had a lot more options and rights if she were born in today’s world.
Nora hides the fact that she has done something illegal from Torvald. She is given the opportunity to tell Torvald and maybe get his support or advise on the situation, and she lies to him to hide the truth. She claims that the reason that she does not want Torvald to fire Krogstad is that "this fellow writes in the most scurrilous newspapers...he can do [Torvald] an unspeakable amount of harm"(Ibsen 519). Nora hides the truth and replaces it with lies. Torvald does not know that if he fires Krogstad that the consequences will affect his whole family. Nora could have told him, but instead she decided to hide the truth from her husband.
When confronted by Krogstad, who tells her it is against the law to sign someone else's signature, she responds, "This I refuse to believe. " A daughter hasn't a right to protect her dying father from anxiety and care? A wife hasn't a right to save her husband's life. I don't know much about laws, but I'm sure that somewhere in the books these things are allowed. " Nora simply does not understand the ways of the world, and the final realization that she is in real danger of risking hers and her husband's reputation, and worse, makes her snap out of the childish dream she had been living. & nbsp; Kristine, Nora's childhood friend, is the wisdom and support Nora needs to grow up.
Although Krostad’s blackmail does not change Nora’s whimsical nature, it opens her eyes to her underappreciated potential. “I have been performing tricks for you, Torvald,” (Find a different quote perhaps?) she exclaims in her confrontation with Torvald. She realizes that she has been putting on a facade for him throughout their marriage. Acting like someone she is not in order to fill the role that her father, Torvald, and society expected her to have.
Nora puts her family before herself and commits a crime to save her husband’s life. She is met with potential scandal regarding a forgery on a contract. A contract that she had no choice but to forge because it was certainly a matter of life or death. Without her husband to support her and her then newborn son, what position would she have been in? What happens to her if Torvald dies? At this point, Nora had to commit this crime in order to save her husband’s life and her own
Henrik Ibsen’s “A Doll’s House” is a controversial play focusing on the marriage of Nora and Torvald Helmer. The play is filled with symbols that represent abstract ideas and concepts. These symbols effectively illustrate the inner conflicts that are going on between the characters. Henrik Ibsen’s use of symbolism such as the Christmas tree, the locked mailbox, the Tarantella, Dr. Rank’s calling cards, and the letters allows him to give a powerful portrayal to symbolize aspects of characters and their relationship to each other.
Torvald explained to Nora that keeping Krogstad on at the bank would appear to others that he is easily swayed by his wife. Torvald has also complained about Krogstad’s use of his first name at the bank. Of course, Torvald’s true feelings about his appearance come out explicitly during his fit of rage in the end. Torvald is excessively consumed with how others view him and has no moral objections to having his wife perform sultry dances in front of other men.
The enforcement of specific gender roles by societal standards in 19th century married life proved to be suffocating. Women were objects to perform those duties for which their gender was thought to have been created: to remain complacent, readily accept any chore and complete it “gracefully” (Ibsen 213). Contrarily, men were the absolute monarchs over their respective homes and all that dwelled within. In Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House, Nora is subjected to moral degradation through her familial role, the consistent patronization of her husband and her own assumed subordinance. Ibsen belittles the role of the housewife through means of stage direction, diminutive pet names and through Nora’s interaction with her morally ultimate husband, Torvald. Nora parades the façade of being naïve and frivolous, deteriorating her character from being a seemingly ignorant child-wife to a desperate woman in order to preserve her illusion of the security of home and ironically her own sanity. A Doll’s House ‘s depiction of the entrapment of the average 19th century housewife and the societal pressures placed upon her displays a woman’s gradual descent into madness. Ibsen illustrates this descent through Torvald’s progressive infantilization of Nora and the pressure on Nora to adhere to societal norms. Nora is a woman pressured by 19th century societal standards and their oppressive nature result in the gradual degradation of her character that destroys all semblances of family and identity.Nora’s role in her family is initially portrayed as being background, often “laughing quietly and happily to herself” (Ibsen 148) because of her isolation in not only space, but also person. Ibsen’s character rarely ventures from the main set of the drawi...
Torvald is extremely cautious about how he is perceived by other people. He would do anything to keep his honourable image, even if it involves him doing something dishonourable. Another way the relationship between Nora and Torvald will end is from Nora’s desire for her own identity. Even though it might seem that without Krogstad’s extortion plan, Nora would have never developed her need for an identity, but she has shown signs of a new identity well before Krogstad tried to extort Nora from his job.
have to act well so as to show audience with out seeming as if they
Krogstad creates an elaborate plan to blackmail Nora and tell her husband about her forgery if she does not persuade Torvald to keep him employed. This would lead to many legal consequences for Nora and would disrupt the family and Torvald 's business as he would take full blame for her illegal actions. Nora 's secret begins to eat at her as she contemplates what she is going to do to solve the problem. To the audience, Nora 's impression has been completely altered. The secret that Nora possesses, reveals to the audience that her character is much more than just a trophy-wife and an object. In the meantime, Nora begins to look for different ways in order to pay back all of her debts. Nora explains that she, "was lucky enough to get a lot of copying to do... [like] working and earning money" (Ibsen Act 2). Nora begins to deter from that of a traditional wife, and takes on the role of the man and begins working to pay back all of the debt. The audience begins to recognize that Nora is evolving into a determined and brave wife who is willing to protect her secret to support her
In "A Doll's House", Ibsen portrays the bleak picture of a role held by women of all economic classes that is sacrificial. The female characters in the play back-up Nora's assertion that even though men are unable to sacrifice their integrity, "hundreds of thousands of woman have." Mrs. Linde found it necessary to abandon Krogstad, her true but poor love, and marry a richer man in order to support her mother and two brothers. The nanny has to abandon her children to support herself by working for Nora. Though Nora is economically advantaged, in comparison to the other female characters, she leads a hard life because society dictates that Torvald be the marriages dominant member. Torvald condescends Nora and inadvertently forces Nora to hide the loan from him. Nora knows that Torvald could never accept the idea that his wife, or any other woman, could aid in saving his life.
A Doll House was one of Henrik Ibsen's most controversial plays. He wrote this realistic play in 1879. Ibsen's writing style of realism was clearly shown in this play. This play was controversial at the time it was written, shocking conservative readers. But, at the same time, the play served as a rallying point for supporters of a drama with different ideas.
As the play goes on, Nora seems to transform from her delicate little character into something much more. At the end of act one, Krogstad goes to Nora for the recollection of the money she had borrowed from him. "You don?t mean that you will tell my husband that I owe you money?" (21). Since Nora was wrong in doing so socially, she could not tell Torvald or anyone else about her problem. Not only would that affect their social standard but also Torvald's ego, which inevitably would happen anyway. After Krogstad threatens to expose Nora for forging her father's signature, she realizes that no matter what she does Torvald was going to know the truth. The flaw with...