A Doll House By Henrik Ibsen Essay

1121 Words3 Pages

Delayed in a Fantasy In 1879 dramatist Henrik Ibsen released his social drama playwright based on critiquing the bourgeois marriages entitled, A Doll’s House (Davis, Harrison, and Johnson 1058, 1061). A Doll’s House addresses social issues and shows the progression of feminism in marriages still. The playwright still remains in today’s society and has since contributed and reproduced on television and in films. The play has been reproduced many times since the 1920’s, was last updated in 1973, and Director Charles Huddleston plans to release his version of A Doll’s House later this year starring Michele Martin and Matthew Wolf (A Doll’s House). On January 17, 1904 dramatist and fictional author Anton Chekhov produced his masterpiece playwright …show more content…

There is a crown. No, keep the change (Doll Act 1).
In this act the readers are introduced to Nora’s carefree and irrational attitude towards life. In act one scene one of The Cherry Orchard the readers are also introduced to the main character and protagonist Madame Lyuba Ranevsky. Mrs. Ranevsky flashes back to her past by saying, “The Nursery! My dear, my beautiful room!” (Orchard Act 1). During this introduction the readers notice the keenness of Ranevsky’s flashbacks of her previous life. The two protagonist have similar characteristics throughout both playwrights varying from their obvious common gender. Mrs. Ranevsky just like Mrs. Helmer experiences a clouded reality by specific illusions and both are the victims of an abusive relationship. Although their illusions may differ in situations both ladies are victimized by their lovers on a basis of physical and emotional abuse. Mrs. Ranevsky finds her way back to Russia due to her lover’s abuse and his infidelities. Mrs. Helmer endures emotional and financial abuse from her husband, Mr. Helmer during her tainted reality who treats her as a child and trophy wife instead as an equal. The ladies irrational and carefree attitudes also leads to their fiscal debts and brings them back to a realistic life. Mrs. Helmer finds herself in debt due to her ongoing spending and has to get a forged loan from Krogstad, who is the known antagonist of the play. Mrs. Ranevsky also spends reckless and continuously wonders how …show more content…

Mrs. Ranevsky is known for her continuous fleeing from despair throughout the play. She leaves her homeland after her son drowns, leaves Paris after her lover mistreats her, and eventually leaves Russia once she loses all of her bestowed wealth. This shows that Mrs. Ranevsky does not deal with reality as well as her fellow protagonist, Mrs. Helmer. The illusion that Mrs. Ranevsky is living in is based on her perception that she is still as wealthy and powerful compared to Mrs. Helmer illusion of being in a perfect marriage. Once Mrs. Ranevsky faces reality by losing her family heirloom, the cherry orchard, she once again escapes reality by returning to her abusive love. In the beginning during Mrs. Helmer’s irrational stage of life she forges her husband’s handwriting to get a loan. Her foolish and deceitful acts displays that she is not the perfect doll that her husband and society has made of her. Differing from Mrs. Ranevsky, once Mrs. Helmer’s husband finds out about her fraudulent act she is brought to reality for once in the play. Her husband’s reaction to her acts leads her to realize that she has loved a man that really had no love for her but only saw her as a materialistic trophy. She is no longer the little girl that her husband has made of her, she has now entered womanhood, and stands up for

Open Document