Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical analysis of great expectations
Critical analysis of great expectations
Summary and analysis of the great expectations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A Comparison of Two Film Openings to Great Expectations
The story "Great Expectations" is based in Victorian times and was
written by Charles Dickens in the 1860s. This novel which Charles
Dickens wrote has been produced as a film one version by David Lean
and another by B.B.C. The B.B.C version is the modern version and the
version produced by David Lean is the traditional version. I will be
comparing these two versions of the openings to "Great Expectations".
These two openings use varying techniques to very different effects.
Both films set out to introduce isolation and vulnerability.
In the David Lean version, straight away we, the audience have the
impressions that the film is old fashioned and will use much more
traditional techniques to create images of isolation and fear in the
audiences mind. We expect the film to be black and white, to have no
special effects, to have a slow pace which would make the scene longer
than the B.B.C version, a lot of old fashioned classical music used as
background sound, the use of Standard English and more archaic
language and we expected the characters to act just like they do in
the book. We also expected the storyline to be exactly the same as the
book so it looks faithful and true.
David Leans version was made in 1946 so it is shot in black and white.
The BBC Version was made in 1997 and was in colour. Lean's version is
very similar to the novel more than the B.B.C version. Lean's was the
most effective at using most of the dialogue than the B.B.C version.
The B.B.C version used a small amount of the dialogue.
At the beginning of Lean's film there is the use of an opening
establi...
... middle of paper ...
... constant and it is first slow and up beat then its jolly music. The
music and sound effects from both films create an eerier kind of mood
and atmosphere but Lean's is more successful.
In my opinion, as a whole, David Lean's version is more effective with
the audience subjected to terror and fear. Even though the BBC version
is more up to date and in colour, I do like the black and white
version better as it is much darker, and the convict seems to appear
out of nowhere just like the original text, whereas in the BBC
version, we gradually see the convict, so we are not as surprised. The
scenery is more effective too because the setting is actually in a
graveyard and Pip is caught by the convict in the graveyard. This
happened in the novel but in the BBC version, this did not happen as
much as in David Lean's version.
In both the film and the book Bernice Bobs Her Hair, there are some main ideas that mirror and deflect on another. In the book, everything has to be detailed and described down to every last detail, while in the movie, the director had to make sure that the items in the house, barbershop, and in any setting was just as it was in that time period. Many things that were explained in the story go by so quickly in the movie and you have to take notice of every little detail that went into the making of the film. The only things that were changed in the film were slight, if not, unnoticed to you that were mentioned in the book. As well as how they leave you hanging at the end of the story.
Have you ever wondered about a “perfect” world? What if the world wasn’t so “perfect” after all? Jonas lives in a “perfect” world but wants to get out. Truman lives in a “perfect” worls also, and wants to escape too. Both doesn’t understand what is going on because there worlds control everything, but then the crushing truth comes out. You’ll now find out the simularites of the giver and the truman show.
Analysis of the Ways the Director Builds Suspense in the Opening to the Film Jaws
I'd be working in a place like this if I could afford a real snake?"
The book that I read and the movie that I watched is Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. The book was written by the British author, J.K Rowling, and the movie was directed by the English director and producer, Mike Newell. The main characters are Harry Potter (portrayed by Daniel Radcliffe), Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint), and Hermione Granger (Emma Watson). The book was first released in the United States of America and the United Kingdom on July 8, 2000 . The movie had its premiere in London on November 6, 2005. It is classified as a mystery/fantasy genre for both the movie and the book. The story starts with Harry returning to Hogwarts for his fourth year, where the Triwizard tournament between the three well-known schools of magic, Hogwarts, Beauxbatons, and Durmstrang, is about to begin, wherein 1 champion aged 17 and above,
Cuaron because he had to bring the film up to date by making the film
How can a hero survive in a world gone mad? Both Casablanca, the classic 1940s film, and 1984, a piece of classic literature by George Orwell, revolve around a world in chaos, where it is impossible to trust anyone, and a war wages on within and without. In 1984, the protagonist, Winston, hides from a totalitarian, thought controlling government, that is out to stomp out all aggression against the Party. In Casablanca, the lead character, Rick, dealt with a world rocked by the impacts of World War II, where everyone was a spy, and even the spies were spied on. Both wish for hope and courage in their mutually exclusive worlds, yet only Rick finds hope in his. Winston dies with utter hopelessness, where no one will ever know of his life or deeds, yet he dies a hero. Rick is a cynic, tossed into a chaotic yet romantic world, and comes forth victorious.
From a structural perspective, movies and novels appear as polar opposites. A film uses actors, scripts, and a set in order to create a visual that can grab and keep the attention of their viewers. However, an author strives to incorporate deeper meaning into their books. Despite these differences in media, 1984 and The Hunger Games present unique, yet similar ideas.
A human blossoms to succeed in life, they blossom to come to one point where we may look upon life and remember all the times we owned, one blossoms to be someone, great, and one strives to accomplish this with their ability. In further Frankenstein want to succeed. To look upon one’s life without any regrets is a hard assignment to accomplish. The characters mentioned are all different but yet the same in purpose: trying to succeed. The main character of Frankenstein and Death of a Salesman seize similar qualities; wanting to succeed in life, have the same relationship with another key figure in the plot line, and possessing the qualities of a tragic hero.
The Wonderful Wizard of Oz is a children’s novel that was published in 1900 and written by L. Frank Baum and because of its great success, it lead to the creation of the Oz series of thirteen additional books. Over the years, thousands of adaptations have been made of Baum’s novel. The most successful adaptation is The Wizard of Oz (1939) directed by Victor Fleming and produced by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM). The film and the novel are both very similar, however there are many differences pertaining to the characters, plot and the series of events throughout the film.
While the film was just absolutely chilling, the one scene that sticks out the most is the infamous shower scene. While I had never watched this film, I came in with the basic knowledge that the shower scene was just brutal to watch; the music scoring and actions of this scene have been parodied in countless movies and shows. One thing I noticed was the very obvious fact that the movie was shot in black and white. This film was produced at a time where color film was widely available and it seemed at first, somewhat pointless to shoot something in black and white when better options were present and also easily accessed; this meant that shooting in color would not greatly increase production values. However, this is far from the actual truth as the black and white adds an element of darkness to the actual picture and creates a depth that would not have existed otherwise...
After reading the book and watching the movie 1984 there were similarities and differences between the two. The novel is about manipulating people in believing in something that isn’t really there and about erasing history. Both the book and film focused on: authority, government, and war. The book and film follow the theme of conformity to control society.
Ethan cai Dr.Friedman Us history Oct 06 Wizard of Oz:difference between the book and movie The Wizard of Oz was a story happened in the girl Dorothy’s dream. The girl Dorothy lived with her Uncle Henry and Aunt Em in a farm in Kansas. One day, after a strong cyclone, Dorothy found that she was at a very special place where she had never been before. The crazy cyclone brought Dorothy and her little dog Toto to a place named Munchkins.
“Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore.” In case you haven’t seen the film already, the plot to The Wizard of Oz (Oz) is profoundly complex and requires critical inquiry to unravel its intricacies. Dorothy, a forlorn Kansas farmgirl, daydreams of a fanciful fantasia where her dog, Toto, doesn’t have to suffer the nuisance of a nasty spinster witch of a neighbor. So, she plans to run away – far, far away. I know, a little weighty, but stick with me.
Great Expectations and Oliver Twist are representative of the works produced by Charles Dickens over his lifetime. These novels exhibit many similarities - perhaps because they both reflect painful experiences that occurred in Dickens' past.