A Comparison of A Vendetta by Guy de Maupassant and The Red Room by H.G. Wells I am aiming to look at the differences and similarities of two writer's methods of creating tension in their stories. The two stories I am looking at are 'A Vendetta' by Guy de Maupassant and 'The Red Room' by H. G. Wells. After I have discussed these two stories I will draw a conclusion to show what I have found. 'A Vendetta' is about a woman's struggle to avenge the death of her son. The writer of this story uses lots of sounds in his efforts to create tension, such as 'howling', 'moan' and 'cried'. These words create tension because they make people think of pain or fear and makes them worry about what will happen next. Guy de Maupassant changes his sentence structure throughout the story. Longer sentences, such as 'whenever the dog saw the dummy, she immediately quivered all over, and looked towards her mistress, who cried in a shrill voice: 'At him!' create tension because the reader is kept in suspense as they don't find out what is happening until the end of the sentence. The shorter sentences in the story, such as 'That night she slept soundly' create tension as they make you read faster and therefore make you feel panicked. Also tension is created because although you are reading faster you are not finding out much information from each sentence. In 'A Vendetta' tension is created through the behaviour of the main character. The story says that 'she went to confession and received the sacr... ... middle of paper ... ... are thought to be haunted or at least scary. This crates tension because as the reader thinks they know what will happen next, they feel more involved which makes them feel more tense and uncomfortable. From studying both stories I think Guy de Maupassant and H. G. Wells have very similar techniques for creating tension but they both use the techniques to fit their story. For example, in 'A Vendetta' colours that are associated with evil were used but in 'The Red Room' colours associated with death and disease. So although they used the technique they managed to interpret it into their own style. Although they have very similar techniques, over all I think Guy de Maupassant relies more on suspense and behaviour when creating tension, whereas H. G. Wells uses more stereotypes and imagery than Guy de Maupassant.
1. Both Arthur Miller, the author of The Crucible, and James McTeigue, the director of V for Vendetta, both convey the idea that 'governments should be afraid of their people'. Both texts express how the governments could control their people; however that control can lead to anarchy. Miller explains how the people ‘were not quite the dedicated folk that arrived on the Mayflower, [as] a vast differentiation had taken place, and in their own time a revolution unseated the royal government… at this moment of power'. Expressing how the people were controlling the government and how they were consumed by the power that they held. McTeigue expresses how the government would initially manipulate the people with how they controlled them, by treating them as lower class and enforcing laws. However, V’s rebellion, starting with blowing up the Old Bailey, caused the government to slowly begin losing control over its people as V conveyed his message and the power slowly shifted as the people
In comparison The Red Room was written only thirty years later in 1894 by HG Wells although it feels more timeless. At that time technology had improved intensely, nevertheless Wells still imitated the old fashion gothic literature style writing, which is ironic, due to the time. Both stories have managed to engage its audience by creating suspense and tension. Besides that both stories have been written in first person, this in sequence makes it sinister, in a way because we get to know the narrator’s impressions and feelings. The authors of both stories have selected discomforting places in which to set their story, they are made more eerie because that in the 19th century time many people believed in ghosts and the supernatural.
“I hunt more dangerous game….” Similarities and differences can appear anywhere, especially in the short story and the movie called The Most Dangerous Game. They have similar, yet different expositions, characters, and plots with conflicts. Many people say that books or short stories are better than movies because of the similarities and differences that are found. Books or short stories are usually more descriptive, informative, and do not stray too far from the central idea or main theme, while movies only fall into one or two of these categories. Movies hardly ever fall into all three categories, however if they do the movies become better. This is not the case with The Most Dangerous Game. One place where movies and short stories have major similarities and differences is at the beginning of the story or the exposition.
“No one man can terrorize a whole nation unless we are all his accomplices.” In the case of The Crucible by Arthur Miller, Edward Murrow is uncannily accurate. The Crucible, set in Salem, Massachusetts during the Salem Witch Trials, proves that when one antagonist has accomplices, they can destroy the lives of many. In this story, Abigail destroys the lives of everyone in Salem. That being said, in times of stress or panic, people's’ true traits and personalities can be discovered, as shown in the cases of John Proctor and his damning indiscretion, Rev. Hale’s panicked realization, and Mary Warren’s naive and fearful indecision; all of which develop throughout the play in response to different stimuli.
After reading The Book of the Unknown Americans, I realized how difficult immigrating to the United States can be. I am an immigrant also, so just reading the story makes me relate to many problems immigrants experience relocating to a different country. Immigrants often face many issues and difficulties, but for some it is all worth it, but for others there comes a point in time where they have to go back to their hometown. Alma and Arturo Rivera came to the United States to better their life, but also so that Maribel could attend a special education school. While Arturo had a job things had gone well for the family, but once Arturo lost the job and passed away the two of them had to go back because they felt that that was the best option for them. Reading this book made me realize how strong an individual has to be to leave their own country and relocate somewhere else not knowing if this will better your life or cause one to suffer.
People dying for no reason resonates in a lot of ways. Even in real life if people die
...mes the main idea of the book. Vengeance is ultimately obtained for the people of England and they now presumably have all of the freedom that they have dreamt of throughout V for Vendetta. V for Vendetta provides its audience with a new perspective of how a government full of corruption will affect a country and its people. This whole idea of pointing out the issues in V for Vendetta accurately portrays the entire book. All of the issues in the novel are essentially what form the story behind V for Vendetta. These issues ultimately design the vast majority of the plot of the novel and these problems are greatly relatable to many issues the world has today. V for Vendetta portrays privacy issues of a country’s people that are contrastable to many current issues, while the novel also portrays a government filled with anarchy comparable to what is commonly seen today.
Tension and Suspense in The Red Room by H.G. Wells In H.G Wells’ The Red Room tension and suspense are created through the characters, the plot and the setting. The setting is typical of Gothic and Victorian ghost stories. In these times there was no electricity so use of candles for light created an eerie atmosphere. They had no modern technology like televisions for entertainment so they used books and story telling.
Allegories are stories that have more than one meaning. For example, The Lorax was about a boy who saves the world from destroying itself due to greed; the allegory for The Lorax is that in today's society people are greedy and don’t care about the environment. The Crucible by Arthur Miller is an allegory for the Red Scare in the McCarthy Era because they were both made of fake claims, fear, and false confessions.
Arthur Miller wrote this essay to tell us how life was back in puritans time, he wasn’t from puritan time time period nor he was a puritan. Arthur Miller lived during the red scare where he was accused and he wrote this story as to compare characters from The Crucible mainly Abigail with McCarthy. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller shows us that Abigail is a metaphor for Joseph McCarthy as they both used the so called “witch hunts” to falsely accuse other of communism or witchcraft in order to gain more power or attention.
In the trials, mostly women were tried, tested, and, most of the time, imprisoned if anyone even suspected them of witchcraft. Women were mostly suspected of witchcraft because of their ability to seduce or lure men naturally.
McCarthyism is the practice of making accusations of disloyalty or treason without proper regard for evidence. The term has its origins in the period in the United States known as the Second Red Scare, which refers to the fear of communism that permeated American politics, culture, and society from the late 1940s through the 1950s. Similarities between The Crucible and A Decade of Fear pertain to the bombshell dropped by the accusers and their fame that grew from their accusations. In both The Crucible and A Decade of Fear the accuser both dropped a bombshell with the accusations they made towards people. According to Sam Roberts, author of “A Decade of Fear,” “McCarthy dropped a bombshell.” McCarthy had accused The State Department of being
Vendetta by Guy de Maupassant I think that Guy de Maupassant is "one of the greatest masters of the short story in world literature." He was born in 1850 and died in 1893. The. He has written more than two hundred stories in thirteen years. I will be writing about the structure, narrative, voice, the scene and the story.
We all have a place that we like to go to relax. For some, it is a quiet place and a good book to read. Others may enjoy spending quality time with friends and family. Guy de Maupassant enjoyed being near water. Maupassant “was a passionate lover of the sea and of rivers” (“Guy de Maupassant”). In his short story “Two Friends”, distant friends run into each other and decide to relive a peaceful activity they once shared: fishing. Maupassant’s love of the water influenced the content of this story. If the reader looks carefully, they can see several parts of the story that may have been influenced by the author’s life and views. Maupassant’s short story “Two Friends” is an allegory about his view of the ideal Frenchman because Maupassant portrayed the main characters as patriotic, brave, and opposed to war.
allows the reader to feel as if he/she were there. It is about a young