The novels Winnie the Pooh By A.A Milne and Peter Pan by, J.M Barrie share many similar qualities. Not only both of their respected main characters travel to faraway lands, and but seems to have a foothold in both realities and in the fantasy realm. Thus, this essay will seek to not compare the stories themselves, but the structure of both. Each novel has a unique framework and with careful observation, one can notice that both novels share the share the same framework. Both Winnie the Pooh and Peter Pan and not from a first-person perspective but from an all present narrator. The narrator in both novel not serves as a guide for the reader to follow but helps to map out their destination. The narrator is not just one person, but many. In Winnie …show more content…
the Pooh, Christopher Robin helps to narrate along with the narrator himself. “Once upon a time, a very long time ago now, about last Friday, Winnie-the-Pooh lived in a forest all by himself under the name of Sanders. ("What does 'under the name' mean?" asked Christopher Robin. "It means he had the name over the door in gold letters and lived under it." This concept can be seen in Peter Pan though because there is more than one the narrator. There is the main one, but also the Darling serves as the narrator there the ones who create the stories of Neverland. Therefore, the concept of framing in both Winnie the Pooh and Peter Pan can be seen: The Narration and Creation. Therefore, the concept of dual narration can be in Winne the Pooh. Both the Narrator and Christopher Robin serves as the narrator. They are both creating stories in which Pooh and his friends go on. When the narrator can’t finish the story, it is up to Christopher Robin to finish it. This concept can be seen at the end of Chapter 6 ...in which Eeyore has a birthday and gets two presents. "And didn't I give him anything?" asked Christopher Robin sadly. "Of course, you did," I said. "You gave him don't you remember -- a little -- a little " "I gave him a box of paints to paint things with." "That was it." "Why didn't I give it to him in the morning?" "You were so busy getting his party ready for him. He had a cake with icing on the top, and three candles, and his name in pink sugar? and " "Yes, I remember," said Christopher Robin? Here Christopher Robin is serving as both as an observer and the narrator. He picks where the narrator has let off and continued with the story. The narrator couldn’t think of the present, so Christopher Robin narrates one. This is what makes Winnie-The Pooh a thought-provoking novel because the narrate which is Christopher Robin serves as both protagonist and narrator. He both outside of the story and inside the story. Paul Wakes Argus this concept in his “Waiting in the Hundred Acre Wood: Childhood, Narrative and Time in A. A. Milne’s Works for Children” Paul Wakes investigates during the article how the passage of time is portrayed throughout the writing of A.A Milne. Paul Wakes also argues that Christopher Robin his both an observer and Narrator. “This positioning of the reader without the texts is paralleled by the over-arching story of Christopher Robin within the texts as it becomes increasingly apparent that his role is not that of the protagonist in but as an observer and interpreter of stories. This movement from character to narrate is demonstrated within the text of “Pooh and Piglet. Hunt” in which it emerges that Christopher Robin has been watching the “hunt” as it has unfolded from the vantage point of the branches of an oak tree.” (Wakes, 37,38) The framework of Winnie the Pooh isn’t defined by the one narrator, but by the duel because they both to frame stories into almost betimes story. Where anything can happen during the story. This is what makes Wake's argument interesting because he firmly establishes that there is almost two Christopher Robins. The one in the story is a character and one narrator is the one in the real world. Though the real world and narrator Christopher Robin brings in items from reality into the fantasy there still a great difference between the two. Wakes continue in his article the differences between Christopher Robin as an observer and a creator. “While in Winnie-the-Pooh the meta-level of the storytelling act recurs in a number of the stories, offering a clear connection between Christopher Robin as both recipient of and character in the stories, “(‘Was that me?’ said Christopher Robin in an awed voice, hardly daring to believe it . . .)” (Wakes, 38) Therefore, the framework of Winnie the Pooh is very simple it all just a simple bedtime told between two people. Each person adds their own interjections to the stories as they are being told. Consequently, Peter Pan by, J.M Barrie carries with an interesting Framework because the narration of Peter Pan is more concerned with the creation of the novel. Like Winnie-The -Pooh there is more than one narrator. There is the main omnipresent Narrator, there is the Darling Children, and the reader themselves. It is up to the reader to not just frame the story, but also create it. Therefore, this also where the Darling children as narrator come into play because without them creating the stories there would be no stories. “Of course the Neverlands vary a good deal.
John's, for instance, had a lagoon with flamingoes flying over it at which John was shooting, while Michael, who was very small, had a flamingo with lagoons flying over it. John lived in a boat turned upside down on the sands, Michael in a wigwam, Wendy in a house of leaves deftly sewn together. John had no friends, Michael had friends at night, Wendy had a pet wolf forsaken by its parents, but on the whole, the Neverlands have a family resemblance, and if they stood still in a row you could say of them that they have each other's nose, and so forth. On these magic shores, children at play are for ever beaching their coracles [simple boat]. We too have been there; we can still hear the sound of the surf, though we shall land no more.” (Barrie, Chapter …show more content…
One) This is fundamental when understanding the framework of the Peter Pan.
The main omnipresent Narrator assets that reader has already narrated this story because the reader has already been to Neverland they have just forget it. Like when Christopher Robin forget what he got Eeyore for his birthday, and by the help of the narrator he remembers. This concept is in line with Peter Pan because the readers have forgotten Neverland and the narrator is making the readers remember. Once the reader remembers then the reader like the darling Children starts o narrator their own story. Neverland disappears when the readers remember the real world. According to John Griffith, in his article “Making Wishes Innocent: Peter Pan”. The concept of Neverland essential to understanding the framework of Peter Pan. “Barrie's fantasy world, "the Neverland," is first presented as part of "the map of a person's mind,"2 created from the welter of conscious and unconscious material stored there. It is an ambiguous place: one part of the psyche desires and therefore creates it; another part denies and retreats from it, insisting it is only make-believe when it threatens to become too real.” (Griffith, 28) The framework of Peter pan is found within the framework of Neverland. Neverland is like childhood the further we get from it the less we remember
it. Therefore, there are three types of narrators in Peter Pan. Each has their own reason to build the framework in the Peter Pan. The main omnipresent Narrator serves as a guide for Neverland. The Darling Children are there to serves as the main characters and to make sure the Davies children are never forgotten. The reader starts to remember because of the guide and starts to narrator themes. The Framework of Peter Pan is found in Neverland because is a symbol of innocence and Make-Believe. John Griffith further argues, What Barrie's Neverland demonstrates, then, is one of the primary values of make-believe. Make-believe is the power of the mind to create its own psychologically insulated place— "for the Neverland is always more or less an island" (p. 19)— in which one can act out, symbolically and therefore recklessly, the desires which the real world denies him. There is no penalty to pay because make-believe actions don't count.” (Griffith, 34) Therefore, the framework of Peter Pan is in both narrator and in the creation because both help to explain the need to create a place like Neverland. It through the creation in which the framework of Peter Pan is built. In conclusion, the concept of the framework can be seen both the novels Winnie the Pooh By A.A Milne and Peter Pan by, J.M Barrie both share many similar qualities. Both novels have many narrators which work as sort of framework but do not establishes the main frame of the novels. Therefore, the concept of framing in both Winnie the Pooh and Peter Pan is vastly different because with Winnie-The-Pooh framework is build around narration of a bedtime story. With Peter Pan, the framework is built around creations and return of make-believe. Both novels share the qualities of make-believe, both have different definitions of the framework.
In our contemporary civilization, it is evident that different people have somewhat different personalities and that novels behold essential and key roles in our daily lives; they shape and influence our world in numerous ways via the themes and messages expressed by the authors. It is so, due to the different likes of our population, that we find numerous types and genres of books on our bookshelves, each possessing its own audience of readers and fans. In this compare and contrast essay, we will be analysing and comparing two novels, The Chrysalids and Animal Farm, and demonstrating how both books target the general audience and not one specific age group or audience of readers. We will be shedding light at the themes and messages conveyed to us in both books, the point of view and the style of writing of the authors as well as the plot and the format used by the authors, in order to demonstrate how both books are targeting the general audience.
Since the emergence of literature, thousands upon thousands of characters have graced our imaginations. From trouble maker Bart Simpson of the celebrated cartoon television series The Simpsons to Mr. Darcy of Jane Austen’s renowned novel Pride and Prejudice, the world has witnessed a plethora of characters in literature. Khaled Hosseini, author of The Kite Runner, and Billy Collins, distinguished American poet, as well as countless other authors, share the utilization of characters in their literary works. The manner in which these authors use the literary element of characters varies immensely.
Jon Scieszka has an original style that is all his own. Many of his books such as The True Story of the 3 Little Pigs, The Stinky Cheese Man and Other Fairly Stupid Tales, and The Frog Prince Continued have led several people to believe that he has created a new genre of children's literature: using unique perspectives to retell classic fairy tales. But what motivated Scieszka to become an author? And how does he come up with his innovative ideas? I will answer these questions by discussing Scieszka's many inspirations including his teaching career, students, and his family.
At first glance the characters Connie from “Where are you going? Where have you been?” and Little Red Riding Hood from the classic fairy tale “Little Red Riding Hood” may seem to have nothing in common. However, from the start one can compare how much they actually have in common. Though these two characters are very different they are the same in many ways. Their story, from beginning to end, is similar. It is easy to see how alike and different they are with the description of Connie and Little Red Riding Hood’s lives, the relationship with their wolves, and their tragic endings.
Wendy Darling’s development of maturity is expressed through the realizations of the consequences of her decisions and actions, and the interpretation of that development from text to movie, and text to drama. The development of maturity’s interpretation is transferred differently in adaptations of Peter and Wendy; including the Disney animated movie Peter Pan and the Broadway production of Peter Pan.
In the movie Peter Pan, Peter sprinkles fairy dust and flies away to Neverland. Neverland is an imaginary place very faraway.place. It’s where Peter Pan, Tinkerbell, the Lost Boys and other mythical creatures live. It’s considered a safe place for them. This flight represents escape and freedom by the Peter Pan, the children and all his friends being free from the real world. Being able to still hold onto their precious childhood. In a song by Ruth B. called Lost boy, she sings the line “He sprinkled me in pixie dust and told me to believe, Believe in him and believe in me. Together we will fly away in a cloud of green, To your beautiful destiny”. Peter Pan and his friends flies away to neverland to escape reality
Film analysis with a critical eye can give the viewer how animation giant Disney uses literary element to relay key messages to the audience. Walt Disney’s “The Princess and the Frog” is a perfect example how different literary theories like ‘the Marxist theory’ and ‘Archetypal theory’ can be embedded in the simplest of the fairy tales. The different literary elements in the movie, shows a person how characters like ‘the banker’ and the setting of the houses helps to portray the socio-economic differences in New Orleans at that time. Applying ‘the Marxist theory’ and ‘the Archetypal theory’ to the plot, characters and the setting, shows how movies can be a medium to confront social issues and to prove that all fairy tales are of the same base.
If children or adults think of the great classical fairy tales today, be it Snow White, Sleeping Beauty, or Cinderella, they will think Walt Disney. Their first and perhaps lasting impression of these tales and others will have emanated from Disney film, book, or artefacts (Zipes 72)
In this essay, I examine what Zipes means by institutionalised, define what makes a fairy tale and evaluate how different versions of Little Red Riding Hood reflect the social ideology of the period.
Produced in 2009, The Frog Princess is a Disney animation inspired by the Grimm Brothers’ fairytale, The Frog Prince. Both The Frog Princess and The Frog Prince deal with a multiplicity of issues, all of which contribute to supporting positive messages and morals (Ceaser, 2009). However, though The Frog Princess is based on a classic fairytale, it is far from being the same. The writers at Disney have taken a classic fairytale and created a “Monster” (Prince, 2001). This essay will examine the evolution of the original Grimm Brothers’ fairytale, the messages both main characters represent, and how the adaptation to fit a modern child readership diminishes a classic fairytale. Through discussing these arguments, this paper will prove that Disney’s adaptation into The Princess and The Frog is counter-productive in representing the original story’s messages, morals, and values.
“[Mrs. Darling] had believed in him at the time, but now that she was married and full of sense she quite doubted whether there was any such person” (Barrie 14). It seems that Mrs. Darling has once believed in Peter but she grew up and the thought of Neverland became nothing more than a story to her. The concept of Neverland relies on there not being any grown ...
In both Hans Christian Andersons “The Little Mermaid,” and Disney’s version of the story, the main character— a young and beautiful mermaid— waits anxiously for her fifteenth birthday to venture from her father’s underwater castle to the world above the water. As the story carries on the mermaids priorities change; her modest and selfless nature is revealed towards the end in Andersen’s version. However, Disney’s version encompasses a rather shallow ending and plot throughout. The theme found in comparing the two versions reveal that Andersen’s substance trumps Disney’s entertainment factor in fairy tales.
Of course the Neverlands vary a good deal. John’s for instance, had a lagoon with flamingoes flying over it at which John was shooting, which Michael, who was very small, had a flamingo with lagoons flying over it. John lived in a boat turned upside down on the sands, Michael in a wigwam, Wendy in a house of leaves deftly sewn together. […] On these magical shores children at play are for ever beaching their coracles. We too have been there; we can still hear the sound of the surf, though we shall land no more. (Barrie)
Most works of literature derive the basis of their meaning from a moment of time of the respective author that directly relates to situations that influence him as a person. Because Hans Christian Andersen encountered first-hand the struggles of an impoverished lifestyle in infancy, he expresses the problems associated with life in his short fairytale The Stead Fast Tin Soldier. In order to elicit a posterity that would not otherwise understand the perseverance and struggles that accompany success, he uses the fairytale as a mechanism for persuasion. When composing a piece of literature for the purpose of elucidating an emotion, making analysis, or, as in the case of The Steadfast Tin Soldier, to persuade, an author uses many tools of his arsenal, known in its generic collective as rhetoric. In order to achieve what he desires in this piece of work, a story that encourages personal individuality, drive, and the pursuit of self-actualization, Andersen uses many measures of rhetoric such as juxtaposition, symbolism, irony, motifs, and emotional manipulation.
Narratology divides a ‘narrative into story and narration’. (Cohan et al., 1988, p. 53) The three main figures that contribute a considerable amount of research to this theory are Gerard Genette, Aristotle and Vladimir Propp. This essay will focus on how Emily Bronte’s novel Wuthering Heights can be fully appreciated and understood when the theory is applied to the text. Firstly, I will focus on the components of narration Genette identifies that enhance a reader’s experience of the text. Secondly, I will discuss the three key elements in a plot that Aristotle recognises and apply these to Heathcliff’s character. In the final section I will apply part of the seven ‘spheres of action’, Propp categorises, to Heathcliff’s character. However, not all of Narratology can be applied to a text. This raises the question; does this hinder a readers understanding and/or appreciation of the text? This paper will also address this issue.