A poem called "There Will Come Soft Rains" by Sara Teasdale is very similar to a
short story of the same name by Ray Bradbury. They both talk about the same topic except
one takes place in the future while another during 1920. There shared topic is how most
non-human creatures wouldn't know or care if humans were gone. Brabury was inspired by
Sara's idea of this and made his, but in the future. These are their similarities and
Differences.
In Sara's poem the idea of humans being wiped out was almost reality for her. This time
was right after WW1 and about to be The Great Depression. She was saying how if humans
keep fighting each other and wipe each other out, no animal or anything in nature would
care or even notice if we were gone. In Ray's story a automated house was still doing
…show more content…
its routine even though all people in that area were killed by a nuculear bomb.
Eventually,
because of lack of people to protect the house it failed and burned down. They both show
how machines and nature wouldn't be moved or even notice if all humans were wiped out.
These poems are different in how Sara's was in her time, 1920 while Ray's took place in 2026.
Elements in Ray's story wouldn't be the same as some in Sara's. Like how machines could keep
their same activities while animals like pets would have to depend on something else. Also,
in Ray's story animals noticed that people were missing, and when the dog died the machine
took it as garbage and threw it away. While in Sara's she said animals would be un-moved.
The concept in these articles are very possible for us in the future. Technology is
evolving at a huge rate where we can say something to an object an it will do it for us.
Also, nuclear bombs in our time are much more powerful in Sara's time period where she
Was scared for her life because of them. So, a event similar to the events these authors
Lived through might happen to use and we should make decision fast before we wipe ourselves
off the
globe. This is how Sara Teasdale's "There Will Come Soft Rains" is similar to and different form Ray Bradburry's story of the same name. Also how these stories relate to use and our future. These stories can be foreshadowing an event just like described in the passages. These stories are very important to me because of the phrase "History Repeats Itself".
Here are the flashbacks and foreshadowing. One of the similarities is they both had to do with animals and their parents telling them something. The other is that they have flashbacks of animals. Those are the similarities with flashbacks and foreshadowing.
Both stories, Response to Executive Order 9066 and "Mericans", establish a common American Identity theme. The main idea of these two stories is how people may or may not relate to their cultures. Both are narrated by teenage girls, and both establish a common theme that your appearance does not define you.
The basic premise of the two plots is the same. Both stories deal with the capture of a young person who is to be groomed to live in a private, controlled environment to make them happy, but where they are never able to leave.
between the two authors, they share similarities towards the message they try to send out.
... almost nothing alike from a superficial aspect. The stories have different historical contexts and they simply don’t have much in common to the average audience. It is easy to contrast the stories, but deep within certain elements, the stories can be linked in several ways.
The underlying themes of the stories are l valid contrasts between the works. In some portions the themes are of the same facets, such as how in both books two men have a direct conflict between
time of their works, they both had many similarities in the theme of their stories and their goals of writing the stories.
The short story there will come soft rains by Ray Bradbury, has a poem in the story called There will come soft rains by Sara Teasdale. The story is based around the meaning of the poem making the story closely relate to the poem and the two are very similar in nature. The poem is about how nature will go on without humanity if humanity is wiped out. The short story is about a futuristic house that is continuing it’s normal routine even though the humans are gone. In the sense that things will go on without humanity, the two stories are very similar.
Both stories show the characters inequality with their lives as women bound to a society that discriminates women. The two stories were composed in different time frames of the women’s rights movement; it reveals to the readers, that society was not quite there in the fair treatment towards the mothers, daughters, and wives of United States in either era. Inequality is the antagonist that both authors created for the characters. Those experiences might have helped that change in mankind to carve a path for true equality among men and women.
The biggest difference between the two texts is that one is about gangs and racism while the other is about the way a boy’s perception of his father changes as he grows up. However, both texts cleverly use techniques to convey messages that are relevant to our society.
In the beginning of both of the pieces of literature, the main character(s) have not had the experience that will shape their values yet. Rather, as time moves forward in the stories, the
Things that are similar about the two novels and how both of their dreams were crushed are both are groups of people who have these dreams and each finds or meets something that can help their dreams come true, the pearl and Candy. Furthermore, the realization of their dreams coming to an end is, in both books, caused by the death of someone who is a part of the dream, Coyotito and Lennie.
Aside from the conditions, which lead to the creation of these works, they share a number of other common threads. Symbolism aside these works are very similar on the surface. Both are a collection of seemingly disjointed images, which when put together by the reader or observer serve up a strong social message. That messages being that the wars and conflicts of the times have twisted the world. This is reinforced by the contorted and misshapen images in both works.
Both stories show feminism of the woman trying to become free of the male dominance. Unfortunately, the woman are not successful at becoming free. In the end, the two women’s lives are drastically
This mentally evaluating process is actually the theme of the poem and we would also see this happening again in the next few lines.