Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical issues in the workplace
Social inequality in the workplace
Ethical issues in the workplace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical issues in the workplace
As I watched the video of the Frontline special "A Class Divided" explaining the experiment done to a classroom of third graders to mirror segregation and discrimination in society; I could relate the discriminatory treatment given to the "brown-eyed" vs. "blue-eyed" children in many ways with the types of stereotypes that have been built in Workplaces; the categorization of jobs as White-Collar and Blue-Collar, Corporate office and Branch offices. Stereotyping coworkers for their job position and education level within an organization divides employees and encourages distrust within the levels of management. The sense of superiority which is conceded for employees that work in the different parts of an organization gives rise to differentiated
Dr. Kenneth B. Clark’s legacy has lived on and will continue to inspire because, even today, in the 21st century, there are many ideas and problems that Clark addresses in the realm of prejudice and racism that are still relevant in social identity, education and the work place in America. Clark was a social psychologist who was a firm believer in equality, though he knew that racial division would be a difficult task to overcome, he still thought it was a concept that was necessary for America to progress. One of the many researchers that have continued Clark’s work is Thomas F. Pettigrew. Pettigrew (2004) suggests that America is not where it needs to in reference to equal opportunity. Pettigrew does acknowledge that there has been many steps forward since the Brown case and Clark’ s doll studies, but believes there has also, been many steps taken backwards in regards to the progress of racial equality and opportunity (Pettigrew, 2004). According to Pettigrew (2004) racial prejudices have come to be much less blatant but still have the same effect on the people exposed to the phenomena. Though racial prejudices are still prevalent, the source of the tension is much more difficulty to identify. As did Clark suggest, Pettigrew (2004) also believes that for change to consistently and proficiently occur, it must h...
The day after Martin Luther King Jr. was murdered (in April 1968,) Jane Elliott’s third grade students were confused and upset. Growing up in a small, all-white town, they were not exposed to racism, and did not understand the meaning of it. Therefore, Jane Elliot decided to show her class what discrimination feels like. She informed the class that they were going to change the way things were done. The students were then divided by eye colour-blue eyes and brown eyes. The blue-eyed children were praised, and told that they were smarter, nicer, and better than the brown-eyed children in every way. Throughout the day, they were given special privileges that the brown-eyed children did not receive. Those privileges included extra recess time, access to the jungle gym, a second helping of food at lunch, sitting at the front of the classroom, and being allowed to participate in class discussions. In contrast, the brown-eyed children were forced to wear brown collars around their necks. They sat at the back of the classroom, and their behaviour and classroom performance was constantly criticized by the teacher. The students from the superior group (even those who were usually sweet and tolerant) became mean, and began to discriminate against the inferior group. The students from the inferior group would struggle with class assignments, and perform poorly on tests. On the second day of the experiment, the roles were reversed, making the brown-eyed children superior to the blue-eyed children. The results were similar, but the brown-eyed students didn’t treat their blue-eyed classmates quite as bad as they had treated them. When the exercise ended, the students hugged and cried with each other. Jane Elliott once said: "After you do this exercise, when the debriefing starts, when the pain is over and they're all back together, you find out how society could be if we really believed all this stuff that we
Forman, T. A. (2003). The social psychological costs of racial segmentation in the workplace:a study of african americans' well-being. Journal of health and social behavior, 44(3), 332-352.
On the first day I was in middle school, the teacher let every student introduce him/herself. I was so excited to let others know me. When it was my turn, I went up and started introducing myself and sharing my stories. Students were interested in and concentrate on what I was saying. However, when I talked about my hobbies, a lot of students were laughing and seem thought I was unreasonable. I said my hobbies were shooting game and making building models. At that time I feel disappoint and sad because I didn’t know what’s wrong with my hobbies and why students laughed at
Institutions in the businesses sector are swarming in racial discrimination, much of which is covert and difficult to detect and prove. Racial discrimination excludes, marginalizes and exploits those citizens who are discriminated against, ceasing any opportunity for economic progress and development. Under certain regulations some businesses are required to diversify their workplace by hiring certain amounts of people of color, but in reality these small quotas do not do much for the overall condition of the people who are being discriminated against. Businesses that fail to take action on racial discrimination tend to have lower levels of productivity. This stems from employees not being interested in working hard, or because people with exceptional talents and skills choose to shy away from certain places of employment due to the fear of racial discrimination. Employees who feel wronged also tend to switch jobs, forcing the organization to spend more time and resources on hiring and training new employees, besides coping with the low productivity of a new employee. (Nayab)The effects of racial discrimination in the American work force could be identified with funded research on the topic. With ample data employers will be able to better understand the negative affects that racial discrimination have
an experience I had earlier this year in a diversity seminar that was held on my job. We had a
A Class Divided The film A Class Divided was designed to show students why it is important not to judge people by how they look, but rather who they are inside. This is a very important lesson to learn: people spend too much time looking at people not for who they are but for what ETHNITICY they are. One variable that I liked about the film is that it showed the children how it felt to be on both sides of the spectrum. The HYPOTHESIS of the workshop was that if you out a child and let them experience what it is like to be in the group that is not wanted because of how they look and then make the other group the better people group that the child will have a better understanding of not to judge a person because of how they look but instead who they are as people. I liked the workshop because it made everyone that participated in it, even the adults that took it later on, realize that you can REHABILITAE ones way of thinking.
Research has shown that stereotypes and prejudice in the workplace are contributing factors of why disparities in income and treatment exist in the workplace, leading to overall gender inequality in this area. This paper will evaluate this phenomenon from the psychological perspective and will view the topic in regards to the theories of prejudice, discrimination, ingroup/outgroup bias, group interaction, theory of the self, and social identity theory, among others. These theories will be discussed because they are relevant in explaining the roots of inequality and the socialization that causes men to be in a certain role and women in another. Additionally, the consequences of disparities in the workplace will be presented in order to understand what may result from experienced inequality. This issue is significant because it is important to recognize issues such as these in order to enhance equality in the workplace and make further progress to enhance the inclusion of women in society on the whole. Furthermore, it is relevant to know how this inequality affects the sense of self of the parties involved so that strategies can be given to both men and women to make this inequality less prevalent in the future.
Gender stereotypes and cultural norms have lead to discriminatory occupational segregation based on gender. Women are expected to work in certain occupations that are “gender appropriate”- limi...
Discrimination is known to exist in all workplaces, sometimes it is too subtle to notice, and other times it is exceedingly obvious. It is known that everyone subconsciously discriminates, dependant on their own beliefs and environments that surround them. However, discrimination can be either positive or negative in their results, and sometimes discrimination is a necessary part of life.
In an ideal world, every person is treated equally when it comes to getting a job, advancing in his or her career and being treated fairly in the workplace. Unfortunately, discrimination still exists in hiring, firing and promotions; and the diversity of the workforce regrettably can cause hostility in the workplace when individuals do not appreciate and respect the differences among themselves and their co-workers.
The impact of diversity in the workplace is contingent upon several factors. Across companies diversified workforces are becoming increasingly common. To successfully manage a diverse workforce, organizations are ensuring that employees understand how their values and stereotypes influence their behavior toward others of different gender, ethnic, racial, or religious backgrounds; are gaining an appreciation of cultural differences among themselves; and behaviors that isolate or intimidate minorities are being improved (Noe et al., 2010, pg. 302).
Occupational sex segregation is the concept of men and women being separated into vastly different workforces. For example men are generally managers and CEOs, while women are generally typists or secretaries. Although this segregation is changing, it is doing so at a minimal rate. As Jacob says in his article, “For every news anchorwoman, there are literally thousands of women who work in traditional female settings such as at a receptionist’s desk, in an elementary school classroom, or at the take-out window of a fastfood restaurant.” This statement places this problem of sex segregation into a very understandable and relatable form. The workplace will never be as safe and great for women as long as there is so much stigma against women in higher paying jobs. This occupational sex segregation causes many over qualified women to have to settle for jobs that they do not want. Until employers have the ability to take away latent bias whether that be from blind interviews or some other method, the workplace will not be improved to the level of equity with
There are many different types of students. All students have their own way of studying and learning material. A student’s attitude is the most determining factor in how well a student performs academically. Some students are eager to learn and try their best; however, some students could care less about learning. Each year students decide whether they will succeed or fail in school. All students fall into one category or another. Students can be classified into three categories: Overachievers, Average Joes, and Do Not Give a Rips.
Everyone has some prejudices or biases that guide how they treat others throughout the day. Sometimes, those prejudices are so intense that others are harmed or treated badly in the workplace where everyone should be treated with respect. Common prejudices are based on race, ethnicity, and cultural backgrounds. This paper will look at when a party is treated differently because of ethnicity even if they are of the same race as the person prejudicial to them.