Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Henry VIII's life and impact
Leadership and Henry V
Henry VIII's life and impact
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Henry VIII's life and impact
When deciding the qualities that make kings great, one thinks of a king who cares about his people. A king that is charming but humble; strong and determined; powerful and wise. Those characteristics are those of one English king, Henry V. He was king of England from 1413 to 1422, and he died at the age of thirty-five because of Dysentery. Nonetheless, Henry V was the greatest king of the European monarchies because he was fair and successful. Even though being known as a religious persecutor, Henry V was the best king in all of European history because he was a soldier king, he was very successful during his rule, and he had a strong leadership. One of the various things that made King Henry V a great king was that he was a soldier king and was not afraid to fight for his kingdom. One example of this was the Battle of Agincourt. This war started on October 25, 1415 and lasted one day. To rescue England’s reputation along with his own lost during the Hundred Year War, Henry rides off alongside twelve thousand English soldiers to France. Things start to go wrong after arriving at France for this beloved king. First, half of the King’s men die of dysentery before they arrive anywhere close to Agincourt and so the wise king decided that he and his men had to retreat. Sadly, the brave English were ambushed by French forces and the English were greatly outnumbered, but the soldier king, Henry V, was intelligent. As French forces attacked, the English bombarded them with arrows. By the end of the day, six thousand French deaths greatly outnumbered the four hundred deaths that of the English (“Henry V,” History.com). “After the English soldiers took too many French captives, Henry broke the law and ordered their execution to all without... ... middle of paper ... ... or worse is up for debate. Now, Henry V had completely changed England’s and Europe’s history. If this man wasn’t important, why did William Shakespeare write several plays based around his life? Why would we still remember him today if he wasn’t influential? King Henry V sets the ideal of what people think of when thinking of kings in the modern day society. That is the reason why Henry V was important and meaningful and worth learning about. Works Cited "King Henry V." 2014. Britannica Staff. Mar 24 2014. Web "Battle of Agincourt." 2014. The History Channel Website. Mar 23 2014, 5:59. Web "Henry V." 2009. History.com Staff. Mar 23 2014. Web. "Henry VI." 2014. Britannica Staff. Mar 24 2014. Web. "Henry V. King of England." 2014. Luminarium: Encyclopedia Project. Mar 23 2014. Web. "King Henry V (1413-1422)." 2014. Royals Family History Staff. Mar 24 2014. Web
Henry is the mirror of all Christian kings. He is a great king. He is
Henry was a very well driven person. He used very persuasive techniques in his writings and speeches. He was a leader, he lead the state of Virginia through the first part of the war. He was a very outspoken man and he always put others before him.
Henry VI had a lot of weaknesses with foreign policy, his inability to make decisions, patronage, Richard duke of York, finance and evil council. With foreign policy he showed weakness in defending his country, after his father Henry VII had conquered land in France, he lost it. He lost Normandy and Gascony in 1451 due to defeat in France. This affected morale and the incomes of nobles because they had lost, reducing their reputation, especially as they had lost some of their own land, and the incomes went down because money was spent on war, so less money was available to give as income. This could have been a reason for the outbreak of conflict because the people would not have been happy with their situation. Henry's next weakness was his inability to make decisions.
...tect his right to the throne. Ultimately, he stabilized the nation by settling the civil wars, the Wars of Roses, by marrying the apposing York family, to unite the two feuding families, the Yorks and the Lancasters. All together, King Henry VII is a new monarch for displaying all of the required traits.
Shakespeare has twisted our thinking so it seems Henry is truly the ideal Christian King. For example Henry’s Christian virtues are strongly highlighted in his own thoughts spoken out loud before the battle of Agincourt. Also he is more concerned about his country and what must be completed as a king. This is also a tremendous characteristic of a leader and this would add warmth of the character of Henry and his image of being the ideal king.
Of all the absolute rulers in European history, Louis XIV of France was the most powerful, and the best example because of his successes, being able to continue his complete control even after failures, his ability to be able to use France’s money in any way he wanted, such as the Place of Versailles, taking away the nobles power, and his ability to delegate impotant jobs to smart yet loyal people.
Henry IV and eventually the throne of England. It is also the attributes that allow him to
honorble ruler. Henry IV was king of France between 1589 and 1610. He was supported
With all these kingly qualities, it showed what a great King he became and how much he was honored and respected. Through this Beowulf become his own person and his people admired that. With all these traits Beowulf use them in a good way, unlike others who would abusive their powers. These are all of Beowulf's qualities that make him a good and successful King throughout his
... all of these are examples of when Henry V cried out to God, the most powerful example takes place when the war is finally over. In front of all of his remaining soldiers, he attributes the entire victory of the war to God, telling God to "take it.. for it is none but thine" (4.8.113-114).
There is quite a lot of turn around and Henry never uses negative comments. Henry has close relationship with his men, by using a variety of strong terms. Henry's lecture has reference to the superior being to give more assurance. Furthermore King Henry gives divine inspiration to many leaders now days.
Henry V is not a simple one as it has many aspects. By looking into
In Henry V, the actions of King Henry portray him as an appalling leader. Among Henry's many negative traits, he allows himself to be influenced by people who have anterior motives. This is problematic because the decisions might not be the best decisions for the country, or neighboring countries. The bishops convinced Henry to take over France because they would be able to save land for the Church. Henry doesn't have the ability to accept responsibility for his actions, placing the blame on others. Before Henry begins to take over a French village, he tells the governor to surrender or risk having English troops terrorize civilians. This way, if the governor declines, it would be the governor's fault for the atrocities that would occur. Henry has gotten his troops to go along with the take over by manipulating them. He tells the soldiers that what they're doing is noble, and that they should be proud. In fact, they're attacking another country in order to conquer it. Henry's character comes off as coldhearted and careless. Henry shows ruthlessness towards civilians, threatening them with atrocities. He's careless with his soldiers, thoughtlessly allowing their executions, or playing hurtful games with them.
Henry V, written by William Shakespeare, is by far one of his more historically accurate plays. This play is the life of young King Henry V, who ascended to the throne after his father, Henry IV's death. These times were much different for England, as Henry V was a noble lord whom everyone loved, whereas angry factions haunted his father's reign. Shakespeare portrays a fairly accurate account of the historical Henry V, but certain parts are either inflated"deflated, or conflated to dramatize Henry V as a character suitable for a Renaissance audience.
To turn Henry V into a play glorifying war or a play condemning war would be to presume Shakespeare's intentions too much. He does both of these and more in his recount of the historical battle of Agincourt. Although Shakespeare devotes the play to the events leading to war, he simultaneously gives us insight into the political and private life of a king. It is this unity of two distinct areas that has turned the play into a critical no man's land, "acrimoniously contested and periodically disfigured by opposing barrages of intellectual artillery" (Taylor 1). One may believe that Henry is the epitome of kingly glory, a disgrace of royalty, or think that Shakespeare himself disliked Henry and attempted to express his moral distaste subtly to his audience. No matter in which camp one rests, Henry V holds relevance for the modern stage. Despite containing contradictions, Henry is also a symbol as he is one person. This unity of person brings about the victory in the battle of Agincourt.