This analysis will compare and contrast the types of intelligence which the protagonists of ‘Rain Man’ and ‘A Beautiful Mind’ display. ‘Rain Man’ (1998) directed by Barry Levinson is about a selfish man, Charlie, who finds out he has an autistic older brother, Raymond. Charlie then kidnaps a willing Raymond from Walbrook Institute and slowly a relationship of love and understanding forms. ‘A Beautiful Mind’ (2001) directed by Ron Howard features mathematical genius, John Nash, who, after making a revolutionarily discovery in university, does secret cryptography work for the government. His life soon changes for the worse, with a diagnoses of schizophrenia.
Two different theories will be applied to compare and contrast the intellect shown by the protagonists of films. Spearman’s theory of general and specific abilities will be applied first. This theory states that people have two types of abilities, general and specific. General abilities underlie all intelligent behaviour and reflect on a persons inherited mental abilities. General ability is tested through a range of tests, such as verbal reasoning, arithmetic and general knowledge. If a relationship is found between various performances this indicates the presence and strength of general mental ability.
The second theory applied will be
…show more content…
Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences. This theory states that “people have multiple, distinct, intelligences rather than a general ability to perform all tasks.” The multiple intelligences which Gardner was referring to are linguistic, logical, spatial, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, intrapersonal and interpersonal. Two key points of this theory are that individuals possess all these intelligences, however each person is made of a unique combination. Raymond, the protagonist of ‘Rain Man’ is autistic and displays high levels of intelligence in different areas, yet simultaneously seems incapable of normal cognitive functioning. This can be explained by his general ability being extremely low, but having unusually high specific abilities. Evidence of this is when Raymond shows his inability to reason when he states that both a candy bar and a car cost the same price. “Ray do you know how much a candy bar costs? About a hundred dollars. How much does one of those new compact cars cost? About a hundred dollars.” While general knowledge would state that no candy bar and car cost the same amount of money, Raymond is unable to understand this concept. This relationship shows Raymond’s inability to verbally reason why the car and candy bar cost the same amount, as well as the fact that his general knowledge is extremely low. According to Spearman’s theory, this means Raymond’s general ability is poor, based off this relationship. Raymond has extremely high abilities in the specific ability of numeracy. He displays numerical abilities beyond the average human intelligence in various scenes. The first scene where his numerical intelligence is displayed is when he and Charlie are in a café and a box of toothpicks falls on the ground. Within seconds Raymond correctly counted the number of spilt toothpicks. “82, 82, 82 … 246 total.” Raymond displays his numerical intelligence again when Charlie takes him to the doctor who asks him various math questions. Raymond correctly responds to all the questions, within seconds. “Ray do you know how much the square root of 2130 is? 46.15192304.” These scenes and various others clearly demonstrate the height of Raymond’s numerical intelligence. Memory is another specific ability which Raymond possesses beyond normal intelligence. Raymond displays his ability for remembering things, when he reveals in the café that he memorised the phone book up to the letter g by simply reading it. ”You memorised to G? Yeah, G.” Various other scenes prove Raymond’s fantastic memory, such as when he memorised the songs on the café jukebox. Raymond also recites facts he has memorised about baseball when he is feeling distressed to calm himself. John Nash, the protagonist of ‘A Beautiful Mind’ presents strongly in the logical intelligence which Gardner proposed. John is a mathematical genius who sees patterns in everyday occurrences. For example he maps out competitive behaviour in people and tries to find an algorithmic pattern in the way pidgins move. “I’m hoping to find an algorithm to define their movement.” John’s intelligence extends beyond mathematics and into logic as is shown when he breaks Russian code at the Pentagon just by spending a couple of minutes looking at it. Similarly he finds patterns, shapes and animals in the stars upon request for his fiancé Alicia. These displays of intellect show that John’s unique mix of intelligences, as described by Gardner, is extremely strong in logical intelligence. John also presents quite strong in intrapersonal intelligence.
Intrapersonal intelligence is being aware of occurrences within your own mind and body. John exhibits this awareness when he begins to overcome his schizophrenia, by realizing the appreciations aren’t real. “Marcy can’t be real, she never gets old.” John continues to demonstrate strong intrapersonal intelligence when he regains a normal life, despite his schizophrenia. “I still see things that are not here, I just choose not to acknowledge them.” These demonstrations of control over his mind and actions display John’s intrapersonal intelligence as he is fully aware of what is happening within his
mind. To balance for being unusually strong in various intelligences John is quite weak in other intelligences, such as interpersonal and linguistic. He is highly anti-social throughout the film, only bonding with a couple other key characters. “I don’t like people much, and they don’t much like me.” John has difficulty making small talk, and often directly expresses what he’s thinking. As a result he isn’t very popular with other people and was once described as, “two helpings of brain but only half a helping of heart.” A prime example of this statement is when John tries to compensate for his low interpersonal intelligence by defining love with logic. John’s intelligences from ‘A Beautiful Mind’ are celebrated more than Raymond’s from ‘Rain Man’. Both characters are similar due to them having mental illnesses and numerical intelligence. However, John manages to overcome his schizophrenia to regain a normal life and use his intelligence to contribute to society. This is demonstrated when John is awarded the Nobel Prize, yet Raymond has to return to Walbrook Institution. However, John is no more accepted in society than Raymond, as both are outcasts in the eyes of society. Raymond was put into the institute because he couldn’t function properly. When he leaves with Charlie he faces discrimination from the public, due to his low general intelligence. “This guy’s an f-cking fruitcake.” John’s logical intelligence allows him to see patterns which others miss, making him an object of mockery at university. “Nash is going to stun us all with his genius.” It is only when John begins working at the Pentagon and starts to use his intelligence for what people perceive as valuable work, that they begin to respect him. Throughout this analysis it is proven that while Raymond and John are quite different, they are also quite similar in many ways. While they both display high intelligence in the area of numeracy, the way in which they exhibit and practice this intelligence is extremely different.
Relationships can be a positive aspect in a person 's life. There are many significant attributes about relationships in the movie Rain Man by Ronald Bass that are comparable to the story Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck. Both of these stories are good examples of how relationships teach people how to be supportive and accepting. These stories also teach us about how spending time with a person brings you closer together and how over time the characters in the two stories learn the true value of friendship. It is apparent through both of these stories that a considerable part of most relationships are made up of support for one another.
General intelligence tends to relate to various degrees with each other (Cohen 2012). An example of this is that if an individual is good in math, they may also be good in spelling. In this weeks reading we reviewed several different models of measurement of intelligence. In regard to these theories and general intelligence (g), the theories are various but have commonality and overlap. The Spearman's two-factor theory is if a test has high correlation with other test than the measurement of g is highly saturated (Cohen, 2012). The greater the importance of g on a test, the better the test is believed to predict intelligence
The awareness of mental illnesses has slowly become greater over the years. We’re starting to hear more about them in the news. In schools, students are learning about and with people with mental disabilities. In our society, practically everyone has an idea of what some of the common disorders are (OCD, ADHD, etc). Therefore, it comes with no surprise that we see these mental disorders depicted in movies as well. The movie I decided to watch for this assignment was Rain Man starring Dustin Hoffman, Tom Cruise, and Valeria Golino. In this movie, the high-functioning autistic savant characteristics were depicted by Dustin Hoffman, whose character in the movie was Raymond Babbitt.
Intelligence tests have been developed by scientists as a tool to categorize army recruits or analyze school children. But still discussing what intelligence is, academics have a difficult time defining what intelligence tests should measure. According to the American researcher Thorndike, intelligence is only that what intelligence tests claim it is (Comer, Gould, & Furnham, 2013). Thus, depending on what is being researched in the test and depending on the scientist’s definition of intelligence the meaning of the word intelligence may vary a lot. This essay will discuss what intelligence is in order to be able to understand the intelligence theories and aims of intelligence tests.
Human intelligence is an eel-like subject: slippery, difficult to grasp, and almost impossible to get straight [3]. Many scientist and psychologist have made numerous attempts to come up with an explanation for the development of human intelligence. For many years, there has been much controversy over what intelligence is and whether it is hereditary or nurtured by the environment. Webster's dictionary defines intelligence as "the ability to acquire and apply knowledge; which includes a sensing an environment and reaching conclusions about the state of that environment [7]. In this paper I am going to examine the factors, which make up ones intelligence. I will be investigating whether or not intelligence is fostered by genetic heritance or nurtured by ones environment.
Spearman believed that two factors affect performance on mental ability tests. One was the general factor or general intelligence this factor focused on the mutual relation of all mental tests. Scores on all of these tests were generally related. The second factor was the specific factor "The specific factor related to whatever unique abilities a particular ...
This psychology in a film project analyzes abnormal behavior and the psychological concepts that explain what they are and where they come from. In seeking to understand the components of a personality, theorists established many perspectives on what contributes the most to abnormal human behavior. Specifically, two such concepts, explored in this study are the cognitive affective processing system (CAPS) and attribution theory. As well, this report considers evolutionary and biological approaches to personality. Consequently, research has discovered that they both have commonality in the way they are viewed, where personality comes from: "suggest that important components of personality are inherited (R. S. Feldman, 2013, p. 448).” Additionally, this project provides analysis of other psychological aspects, including; social cognitive approaches to personality, issues with self-esteem and temperament.
This psychology in film project analyzes abnormal behavior and the psychological concepts that explain what they are and where they come from. In seeking to understand the components of a personality, theorists established many perspectives on what contributes the most to abnormal human behavior. Specifically, two such concepts, explored in this study are the cognitive affective processing system (CAPS) and attribution theory. As well, this report considers evolutionary and biological approaches to personality. Consequently, research has discovered that they both have commonality in the way they view where personality comes from: "suggest that important components of personality are inherited (R. S. Feldman, 2013, p. 448).” Additionally, this project provides analysis of other psychological aspects, including; social cognitive approaches to personality, issues with self-esteem and temperament.
The commonality between the films Good Will Hunting and A Beautiful Mind lies in the heart and the capacity of the human spirit to triumph even during the most dire circumstances. There seems to be much more dissimilarity between the two movies then there are similarities. Essentially we are looking at two very different individuals and the people and situations that surround them. To achieve a true understanding of these characters the observer has to ask several questions. The questions asked vary from personal thoughts and behaviors to social and adaptive ones. How does the social climate during the era in which they live contribute to the problems caused by their individual situations? How does their genius play into each of the disabilities they have? How do they interact with the people around them, both those they know on a personal level and those they may meet only in passing also, how do they interact with the genius in others?
In the following essay, we discuss different theoretical perspectives from Nomothetic and Idiographic approach. How they apply to both Personality (pattern of behavior and thinking) and Intelligence (thinking and behavior). Arguments for both sides are base on what psychologists generally use them as, because some might disagrees with the usage of the word nomothetic and idiographic, orientated by Kantian and Wilhelm Windelband.
Verbal Intelligence; Non-verbal Intelligence; Concrete Reasoning; and Abstract Reasoning are several of the mental abilities that have been identified by psychologists (Santrock, 2013). Spearman’s thoughts were that intelligence is general cognitive ability that can be numerically expressed and measured.
In 1983, Howard Gardner developed a number of criteria for determining different intelligences. Gardner recognized numerous “frames of mind”, or unique ideas about viewing the world. Each frame of mind is a special and independent intelligence. He referred to these criteria as the theory of multiple intelligences. Three separate intelligences are linguistic, bodily-kinesthetic, and logical/mathematical. Today, there are many of real-world examples that exemplify the preceding intelligences, including Stephen King, Usain Bolt, and Manahel Thabet. Although Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences has been tremendously influential in educational practices, there are many critics who argue against his research.
Sternberg (2002) focused on characterizing ‘successful intelligence’, and later came up with his theory of successful intelligence. He described it as a person’s capability to succeed within one’s own cultural standards. He also determined that intelligence requires one to consider their abilities,
A Beautiful Mind tells the life story of John Nash, a Nobel Prize winner who struggled through most of his adult life with schizophrenia. Directed by Ron Howard, this becomes a tale not only of one man's battle to overcome his own disability, but of the overreaching power of love - a theme that has been shown by many films that I enjoy.
The theory of multiple intelligences was developed in 1983 by Dr. Howard Gardner, professor of education at Harvard University. It suggests that the traditional notion of intelligence, based on I.Q. testing, is far too limited. Instead, Dr. Gardner proposes eight different intelligences to account for a broader range of human potential in children and adults. These intelligences are: